{ "name": "Banco de evidencias de aprendizaje / Learning Evidence Hub", "description": "80 técnicas para comprobar el aprendizaje cuando la IA puede intervenir. Inventario estático, sin datos personales.", "author": "Vicent Gadea", "url": "https://evidencias-ia-evaluacion.com/", "version": "v0.11", "generated": "2026-08-26", "licence": "CC BY-NC-SA 4.0", "count": 80, "records": [ { "id": "process-log", "slug": "diario-de-proceso", "url": "https://evidencias-ia-evaluacion.com/evidencia/diario-de-proceso", "name_es": "Diario de proceso", "name_en": "Process log", "short_description_es": "Bitácora breve donde el estudiante registra decisiones, dudas y avances de la tarea.", "short_description_en": "A short log where the student records decisions, doubts and progress on the task.", "family": "proceso-evolucion", "family_secondary": "metacognitiva", "primary_claim": "muestra-avance", "secondary_claims": "decide-criterio|usa-ia-critica", "evidence_kind": "", "evidence_modes": "proceso|metacognicion", "stages": "primaria|secundaria|bachillerato|fp|universidad|adultos", "areas": "", "moments": "durante|despues", "purposes": "formativo|calificable", "modalities": "escrita|digital", "seia_levels": "1|2|3", "time_min": 4, "time_max": 10, "teacher_load": "media", "participation": "individual", "scalability": "cualquiera", "collections": "rapidas|grupos-numerosos", "ai_relation": "", "review_status": "borrador-editorial", "version": "v0.9", "last_reviewed": "2026-07", "content": { "es": { "name": "Diario de proceso", "shortDescription": "Bitácora breve donde el estudiante registra decisiones, dudas y avances de la tarea.", "whenToUse": "", "minimalVersion": "Tres entradas breves: qué he decidido, por qué, qué me ha costado.", "instructions": [ "Define de 2 a 4 momentos en los que se escribirá una entrada.", "Proporciona 3 preguntas guía estables.", "Limita cada entrada a un máximo de 100 palabras.", "Revísalo junto al producto final, no de forma aislada." ], "observe": [ "Las decisiones descritas se corresponden con cambios visibles en el trabajo.", "La dificultad declarada es específica, no genérica.", "Existe evolución entre entradas." ], "limits": [ "Por sí sola no acredita comprensión ni ejecución competente." ], "aiAdaptation": "", "example": "Un estudiante registra tres entradas durante una tarea de escritura y explica por qué reescribió la introducción." }, "en": { "name": "Process log", "shortDescription": "A short log where the student records decisions, doubts and progress on the task.", "whenToUse": "", "minimalVersion": "Three brief entries: what I decided, why, what I struggled with.", "instructions": [ "Set 2-4 moments when an entry will be written.", "Provide 3 stable guiding questions.", "Cap each entry at 100 words.", "Review it alongside the final product, not in isolation." ], "observe": [ "The described decisions match visible changes in the work.", "The stated difficulty is specific, not generic.", "There is evolution between entries." ], "limits": [ "On its own it does not certify understanding or competent execution." ], "aiAdaptation": "", "example": "A student records three entries during a writing task and explains why they rewrote the introduction." } } }, { "id": "version-history", "slug": "historial-de-versiones", "url": "https://evidencias-ia-evaluacion.com/evidencia/historial-de-versiones", "name_es": "Historial de versiones", "name_en": "Version history", "short_description_es": "Conservar y contrastar sucesivas versiones del mismo producto para observar decisiones y avance.", "short_description_en": "Keep and contrast successive versions of the same product to observe decisions and progress.", "family": "proceso-evolucion", "family_secondary": "", "primary_claim": "muestra-avance", "secondary_claims": "decide-criterio", "evidence_kind": "", "evidence_modes": "proceso|producto", "stages": "primaria|secundaria|bachillerato|fp|universidad|adultos", "areas": "", "moments": "durante|despues", "purposes": "formativo|calificable", "modalities": "escrita|digital|visual", "seia_levels": "1|2|3", "time_min": 3, "time_max": 8, "teacher_load": "baja", "participation": "individual", "scalability": "cualquiera", "collections": "rapidas|baja-revision|grupos-numerosos", "ai_relation": "", "review_status": "borrador-editorial", "version": "v0.9", "last_reviewed": "2026-07", "content": { "es": { "name": "Historial de versiones", "shortDescription": "Conservar y contrastar sucesivas versiones del mismo producto para observar decisiones y avance.", "whenToUse": "", "minimalVersion": "Dos versiones intermedias marcadas + versión final.", "instructions": [ "Fija dos hitos intermedios de guardado obligatorio.", "Pide una nota breve de cambios por versión.", "Revisa las diferencias, no solo la última versión." ], "observe": [ "Las diferencias entre versiones son sustantivas, no cosméticas.", "Las notas de cambio corresponden con las modificaciones reales." ], "limits": [ "Puede simularse guardando versiones falsas si no se combina con otra evidencia." ], "aiAdaptation": "", "example": "Un trabajo escrito conserva V1, V2 y final, con notas de cambio y una comparación breve." }, "en": { "name": "Version history", "shortDescription": "Keep and contrast successive versions of the same product to observe decisions and progress.", "whenToUse": "", "minimalVersion": "Two marked intermediate versions + final version.", "instructions": [ "Set two mandatory intermediate save points.", "Ask for a short change note per version.", "Review the differences, not just the last version." ], "observe": [ "Differences between versions are substantive, not cosmetic.", "Change notes match actual modifications." ], "limits": [ "Can be simulated with fake saves if not combined with other evidence." ], "aiAdaptation": "", "example": "A written assignment keeps V1, V2 and final with change notes and a short comparison." } } }, { "id": "draft-vs-final", "slug": "contraste-borrador-final", "url": "https://evidencias-ia-evaluacion.com/evidencia/contraste-borrador-final", "name_es": "Contraste borrador-final", "name_en": "Draft-vs-final contrast", "short_description_es": "Compara un borrador temprano con la versión final para hacer visible la decisión de mejora.", "short_description_en": "Compare an early draft with the final version to make improvement decisions visible.", "family": "proceso-evolucion", "family_secondary": "", "primary_claim": "muestra-avance", "secondary_claims": "decide-criterio", "evidence_kind": "", "evidence_modes": "proceso|producto", "stages": "primaria|secundaria|bachillerato|fp|universidad|adultos", "areas": "", "moments": "despues", "purposes": "formativo|calificable", "modalities": "escrita|digital", "seia_levels": "1|2|3", "time_min": 5, "time_max": 10, "teacher_load": "baja", "participation": "individual", "scalability": "cualquiera", "collections": "rapidas|baja-revision|grupos-numerosos", "ai_relation": "", "review_status": "borrador-editorial", "version": "v0.9", "last_reviewed": "2026-07", "content": { "es": { "name": "Contraste borrador-final", "shortDescription": "Compara un borrador temprano con la versión final para hacer visible la decisión de mejora.", "whenToUse": "", "minimalVersion": "Entrega borrador + final + una diferencia clave explicada.", "instructions": [ "Solicita el borrador antes de una fecha intermedia.", "Pide 3 diferencias explicadas al entregar." ], "observe": [ "Las diferencias declaradas son visibles.", "Cada cambio se apoya en un criterio, no en una opinión vaga." ], "limits": [ "Muestra revisión, no necesariamente comprensión conceptual." ], "aiAdaptation": "", "example": "Un informe corto adjunta un borrador y explica por qué se han sintetizado dos secciones." }, "en": { "name": "Draft-vs-final contrast", "shortDescription": "Compare an early draft with the final version to make improvement decisions visible.", "whenToUse": "", "minimalVersion": "Submit draft + final + one key explained difference.", "instructions": [ "Request the draft before an intermediate deadline.", "Ask for 3 explained differences at submission." ], "observe": [ "Stated differences are visible.", "Each change relies on a criterion, not a vague opinion." ], "limits": [ "Shows revision, not necessarily conceptual understanding." ], "aiAdaptation": "", "example": "A short report attaches a draft and explains why two sections were merged." } } }, { "id": "decision-justification", "slug": "justificacion-de-decisiones", "url": "https://evidencias-ia-evaluacion.com/evidencia/justificacion-de-decisiones", "name_es": "Justificación de decisiones", "name_en": "Decision justification", "short_description_es": "El estudiante justifica por escrito o de palabra las decisiones clave tomadas en la tarea.", "short_description_en": "The student justifies key decisions of the task in writing or orally.", "family": "proceso-evolucion", "family_secondary": "escrita-grafica", "primary_claim": "decide-criterio", "secondary_claims": "comprende|usa-ia-critica", "evidence_kind": "", "evidence_modes": "proceso|verificacion-ia", "stages": "primaria|secundaria|bachillerato|fp|universidad|adultos", "areas": "", "moments": "durante|despues", "purposes": "formativo|calificable|alta-relevancia", "modalities": "escrita|oral", "seia_levels": "1|2|3", "time_min": 4, "time_max": 8, "teacher_load": "media", "participation": "individual", "scalability": "cualquiera", "collections": "rapidas|grupos-numerosos", "ai_relation": "", "review_status": "borrador-editorial", "version": "v0.9", "last_reviewed": "2026-07", "content": { "es": { "name": "Justificación de decisiones", "shortDescription": "El estudiante justifica por escrito o de palabra las decisiones clave tomadas en la tarea.", "whenToUse": "", "minimalVersion": "3 decisiones, 3 razones, 3 alternativas descartadas.", "instructions": [ "Define cuáles son las 2-3 decisiones clave de la tarea.", "Pide razón + alternativa descartada para cada una." ], "observe": [ "Las razones se apoyan en criterios de la tarea, no en preferencia general.", "Las alternativas descartadas son plausibles." ], "limits": [ "Puede quedarse en retórica si no se contrasta con el producto real." ], "aiAdaptation": "", "example": "En un proyecto, la estudiante justifica por qué eligió una estructura por capas frente a una monolítica." }, "en": { "name": "Decision justification", "shortDescription": "The student justifies key decisions of the task in writing or orally.", "whenToUse": "", "minimalVersion": "3 decisions, 3 reasons, 3 discarded alternatives.", "instructions": [ "Define the 2-3 key decisions of the task.", "Ask for reason + discarded alternative for each." ], "observe": [ "Reasons rely on task criteria, not general preference.", "Discarded alternatives are plausible." ], "limits": [ "Can remain rhetorical if not contrasted with the real product." ], "aiAdaptation": "", "example": "In a project, the student justifies choosing a layered structure over a monolithic one." } } }, { "id": "option-comparison", "slug": "comparacion-de-opciones", "url": "https://evidencias-ia-evaluacion.com/evidencia/comparacion-de-opciones", "name_es": "Comparación de opciones", "name_en": "Option comparison", "short_description_es": "Pedir la evaluación explícita de al menos dos alternativas antes de decidir.", "short_description_en": "Ask for an explicit evaluation of at least two alternatives before deciding.", "family": "escrita-grafica", "family_secondary": "proceso-evolucion", "primary_claim": "decide-criterio", "secondary_claims": "comprende", "evidence_kind": "", "evidence_modes": "proceso", "stages": "secundaria|bachillerato|fp|universidad|adultos", "areas": "", "moments": "durante", "purposes": "formativo|calificable", "modalities": "escrita|visual", "seia_levels": "1|2|3", "time_min": 5, "time_max": 10, "teacher_load": "baja", "participation": "individual", "scalability": "cualquiera", "collections": "rapidas|baja-revision|grupos-numerosos", "ai_relation": "", "review_status": "borrador-editorial", "version": "v0.9", "last_reviewed": "2026-07", "content": { "es": { "name": "Comparación de opciones", "shortDescription": "Pedir la evaluación explícita de al menos dos alternativas antes de decidir.", "whenToUse": "", "minimalVersion": "Tabla mínima: 2 opciones, 2 criterios, 1 decisión.", "instructions": [ "Da los criterios o pide que se declaren.", "Prohíbe empatar: se debe decidir y justificar." ], "observe": [ "Los criterios son operativos, no vagos.", "La opción elegida es coherente con la puntuación." ], "limits": [ "No garantiza que la ejecución posterior mantenga la decisión." ], "aiAdaptation": "", "example": "Un análisis compara dos fuentes con dos criterios y decide cuál usar." }, "en": { "name": "Option comparison", "shortDescription": "Ask for an explicit evaluation of at least two alternatives before deciding.", "whenToUse": "", "minimalVersion": "Minimal table: 2 options, 2 criteria, 1 decision.", "instructions": [ "Provide the criteria or ask the student to declare them.", "No ties: a decision must be made and justified." ], "observe": [ "Criteria are operational, not vague.", "The chosen option is consistent with the scoring." ], "limits": [ "Does not guarantee later execution follows the decision." ], "aiAdaptation": "", "example": "An analysis compares two sources against two criteria and decides which to use." } } }, { "id": "exit-ticket", "slug": "ticket-de-salida", "url": "https://evidencias-ia-evaluacion.com/evidencia/ticket-de-salida", "name_es": "Ticket de salida", "name_en": "Exit ticket", "short_description_es": "Respuesta breve al final de la clase sobre lo aprendido y lo que sigue costando.", "short_description_en": "A brief response at the end of class about what was learned and what still feels hard.", "family": "metacognitiva", "family_secondary": "escrita-grafica", "primary_claim": "muestra-avance", "secondary_claims": "comprende", "evidence_kind": "", "evidence_modes": "metacognicion", "stages": "primaria|secundaria|bachillerato|fp|universidad|adultos", "areas": "", "moments": "despues", "purposes": "formativo", "modalities": "escrita|digital", "seia_levels": "0|1|2|3", "time_min": 2, "time_max": 5, "teacher_load": "baja", "participation": "individual", "scalability": "cualquiera", "collections": "rapidas|baja-revision|grupos-numerosos", "ai_relation": "", "review_status": "borrador-editorial", "version": "v0.9", "last_reviewed": "2026-07", "content": { "es": { "name": "Ticket de salida", "shortDescription": "Respuesta breve al final de la clase sobre lo aprendido y lo que sigue costando.", "whenToUse": "", "minimalVersion": "Una idea aprendida + una duda persistente.", "instructions": [ "Repite la misma estructura cada sesión.", "Devuelve una síntesis al grupo en la siguiente clase." ], "observe": [ "Las respuestas son específicas del contenido tratado.", "Aparecen patrones de duda que orientan la siguiente sesión." ], "limits": [ "No sostiene decisiones calificables por sí sola." ], "aiAdaptation": "", "example": "Al final de la clase, cada estudiante entrega un post-it con una idea y una duda." }, "en": { "name": "Exit ticket", "shortDescription": "A brief response at the end of class about what was learned and what still feels hard.", "whenToUse": "", "minimalVersion": "One thing I learned + one persistent doubt.", "instructions": [ "Keep the same structure every session.", "Return a synthesis to the group in the next class." ], "observe": [ "Answers are specific to today's content.", "Doubt patterns emerge to guide the next session." ], "limits": [ "Does not sustain graded decisions on its own." ], "aiAdaptation": "", "example": "At the end of class, each student hands in a post-it with one idea and one doubt." } } }, { "id": "meta-journal", "slug": "diario-metacognitivo", "url": "https://evidencias-ia-evaluacion.com/evidencia/diario-metacognitivo", "name_es": "Diario metacognitivo breve", "name_en": "Brief metacognitive journal", "short_description_es": "Entradas cortas donde el estudiante analiza cómo aprende, no solo qué produce.", "short_description_en": "Short entries where the student analyses how they learn, not only what they produce.", "family": "metacognitiva", "family_secondary": "proceso-evolucion", "primary_claim": "muestra-avance", "secondary_claims": "decide-criterio", "evidence_kind": "", "evidence_modes": "metacognicion", "stages": "secundaria|bachillerato|fp|universidad|adultos", "areas": "", "moments": "durante|despues", "purposes": "formativo|calificable", "modalities": "escrita", "seia_levels": "1|2|3", "time_min": 5, "time_max": 10, "teacher_load": "media", "participation": "individual", "scalability": "cualquiera", "collections": "rapidas|grupos-numerosos", "ai_relation": "", "review_status": "borrador-editorial", "version": "v0.9", "last_reviewed": "2026-07", "content": { "es": { "name": "Diario metacognitivo breve", "shortDescription": "Entradas cortas donde el estudiante analiza cómo aprende, no solo qué produce.", "whenToUse": "", "minimalVersion": "Dos entradas de 5 líneas por unidad.", "instructions": [ "Ancla las preguntas a la tarea, no a emociones generales.", "Evita respuestas plantilla dando ejemplos distintos cada vez." ], "observe": [ "La dificultad y la estrategia son específicas.", "Hay conexión entre entradas." ], "limits": [ "Puede volverse repetitivo si las preguntas no rotan." ], "aiAdaptation": "", "example": "El estudiante identifica que su estrategia de estudio no funciona en textos largos y prueba otra." }, "en": { "name": "Brief metacognitive journal", "shortDescription": "Short entries where the student analyses how they learn, not only what they produce.", "whenToUse": "", "minimalVersion": "Two 5-line entries per unit.", "instructions": [ "Anchor questions to the task, not to general feelings.", "Prevent boilerplate answers by rotating examples." ], "observe": [ "Difficulty and strategy are specific.", "There is connection between entries." ], "limits": [ "Can become repetitive if questions do not rotate." ], "aiAdaptation": "", "example": "The student notices their study strategy fails on long texts and tries another." } } }, { "id": "rubric-self", "slug": "autoevaluacion-con-rubrica", "url": "https://evidencias-ia-evaluacion.com/evidencia/autoevaluacion-con-rubrica", "name_es": "Autoevaluación con rúbrica", "name_en": "Rubric-based self-assessment", "short_description_es": "El estudiante se sitúa en una rúbrica compartida antes de entregar.", "short_description_en": "The student places themselves in a shared rubric before submitting.", "family": "metacognitiva", "family_secondary": "", "primary_claim": "decide-criterio", "secondary_claims": "muestra-avance", "evidence_kind": "", "evidence_modes": "metacognicion", "stages": "primaria|secundaria|bachillerato|fp|universidad|adultos", "areas": "", "moments": "antes|despues", "purposes": "formativo|calificable", "modalities": "escrita|digital", "seia_levels": "0|1|2|3", "time_min": 4, "time_max": 10, "teacher_load": "baja", "participation": "individual", "scalability": "cualquiera", "collections": "rapidas|baja-revision|grupos-numerosos", "ai_relation": "", "review_status": "borrador-editorial", "version": "v0.9", "last_reviewed": "2026-07", "content": { "es": { "name": "Autoevaluación con rúbrica", "shortDescription": "El estudiante se sitúa en una rúbrica compartida antes de entregar.", "whenToUse": "", "minimalVersion": "Rúbrica de 3 criterios y una nota justificativa por criterio.", "instructions": [ "Redacta la rúbrica en lenguaje observable.", "Pide una razón por cada casilla marcada." ], "observe": [ "Coincide razonablemente con la valoración docente.", "La justificación cita elementos concretos." ], "limits": [ "Sensible a la calidad de la rúbrica." ], "aiAdaptation": "", "example": "El estudiante marca su nivel y cita párrafos del texto para justificar." }, "en": { "name": "Rubric-based self-assessment", "shortDescription": "The student places themselves in a shared rubric before submitting.", "whenToUse": "", "minimalVersion": "3-criterion rubric and a justifying note per criterion.", "instructions": [ "Write the rubric in observable language.", "Ask for a reason per marked cell." ], "observe": [ "Reasonably matches the teacher's assessment.", "Justification cites concrete elements." ], "limits": [ "Sensitive to rubric quality." ], "aiAdaptation": "", "example": "The student marks their level and quotes passages to justify." } } }, { "id": "peer-feedback", "slug": "coevaluacion-pautada", "url": "https://evidencias-ia-evaluacion.com/evidencia/coevaluacion-pautada", "name_es": "Coevaluación pautada", "name_en": "Guided peer feedback", "short_description_es": "Pares se aportan feedback estructurado con criterios comunes.", "short_description_en": "Peers exchange structured feedback based on shared criteria.", "family": "cooperativa", "family_secondary": "metacognitiva", "primary_claim": "decide-criterio", "secondary_claims": "comprende|muestra-avance", "evidence_kind": "", "evidence_modes": "metacognicion", "stages": "primaria|secundaria|bachillerato|fp|universidad|adultos", "areas": "", "moments": "durante|despues", "purposes": "formativo", "modalities": "escrita|oral", "seia_levels": "0|1|2|3", "time_min": 8, "time_max": 15, "teacher_load": "media", "participation": "pareja", "scalability": "hasta-30", "collections": "", "ai_relation": "", "review_status": "borrador-editorial", "version": "v0.9", "last_reviewed": "2026-07", "content": { "es": { "name": "Coevaluación pautada", "shortDescription": "Pares se aportan feedback estructurado con criterios comunes.", "whenToUse": "", "minimalVersion": "Dos fortalezas + una sugerencia concreta por par.", "instructions": [ "Modela primero el tono y la forma del feedback.", "Prohíbe generalidades: exige ejemplos." ], "observe": [ "El feedback es específico y respetuoso.", "Los pares aplican al menos una sugerencia recibida." ], "limits": [ "Requiere confianza y práctica previa." ], "aiAdaptation": "", "example": "En una clase de escritura, cada estudiante recibe feedback de dos compañeros y revisa." }, "en": { "name": "Guided peer feedback", "shortDescription": "Peers exchange structured feedback based on shared criteria.", "whenToUse": "", "minimalVersion": "Two strengths + one concrete suggestion per peer.", "instructions": [ "Model the tone and form of feedback first.", "No generalities: require examples." ], "observe": [ "Feedback is specific and respectful.", "Peers act on at least one received suggestion." ], "limits": [ "Requires trust and prior practice." ], "aiAdaptation": "", "example": "In a writing class, each student gets feedback from two peers and revises." } } }, { "id": "oral-defence", "slug": "defensa-oral-breve", "url": "https://evidencias-ia-evaluacion.com/evidencia/defensa-oral-breve", "name_es": "Defensa oral breve", "name_en": "Brief oral defence", "short_description_es": "Micro-defensa de 2 a 5 minutos donde el estudiante explica y responde preguntas sobre su trabajo.", "short_description_en": "A 2-5 minute micro-defence where the student explains and answers questions about their work.", "family": "oral-dialogica", "family_secondary": "practica-desempeno", "primary_claim": "puede-hacerlo", "secondary_claims": "comprende|decide-criterio|usa-ia-critica", "evidence_kind": "", "evidence_modes": "oral|desempeno-controlado", "stages": "primaria|secundaria|bachillerato|fp|universidad|adultos", "areas": "", "moments": "despues", "purposes": "formativo|calificable|certificacion|alta-relevancia", "modalities": "oral", "seia_levels": "0|1|2|3", "time_min": 2, "time_max": 5, "teacher_load": "alta", "participation": "individual", "scalability": "grupo-reducido", "collections": "rapidas", "ai_relation": "", "review_status": "borrador-editorial", "version": "v0.9", "last_reviewed": "2026-07", "content": { "es": { "name": "Defensa oral breve", "shortDescription": "Micro-defensa de 2 a 5 minutos donde el estudiante explica y responde preguntas sobre su trabajo.", "whenToUse": "", "minimalVersion": "Explica tu decisión clave y responde 2 preguntas.", "instructions": [ "Prepara 3 preguntas por trabajo, no genéricas.", "Toma nota con criterios cortos.", "Puede hacerse en pares con turno." ], "observe": [ "Responde sin recitar de memoria.", "Sostiene o corrige su decisión con criterio." ], "limits": [ "Coste alto en grupos grandes sin rotación." ], "aiAdaptation": "", "example": "Tras entregar el trabajo, cada estudiante lo explica 2 minutos en una micro-tutoría." }, "en": { "name": "Brief oral defence", "shortDescription": "A 2-5 minute micro-defence where the student explains and answers questions about their work.", "whenToUse": "", "minimalVersion": "Explain your key decision and answer 2 questions.", "instructions": [ "Prepare 3 questions per work, not generic.", "Take notes using short criteria.", "Can be done in peer pairs with turns." ], "observe": [ "Answers without reciting from memory.", "Holds or corrects the decision with criteria." ], "limits": [ "High cost in large groups without rotation." ], "aiAdaptation": "", "example": "After submitting, each student explains their work for 2 minutes in a micro-tutorial." } } }, { "id": "socratic-round", "slug": "ronda-socratica", "url": "https://evidencias-ia-evaluacion.com/evidencia/ronda-socratica", "name_es": "Ronda socrática", "name_en": "Socratic round", "short_description_es": "Pequeño grupo responde preguntas encadenadas sobre una idea o texto.", "short_description_en": "A small group answers chained questions about an idea or text.", "family": "oral-dialogica", "family_secondary": "", "primary_claim": "comprende", "secondary_claims": "decide-criterio", "evidence_kind": "", "evidence_modes": "oral", "stages": "secundaria|bachillerato|universidad|adultos", "areas": "", "moments": "durante|despues", "purposes": "formativo", "modalities": "oral", "seia_levels": "0|1|2|3", "time_min": 10, "time_max": 20, "teacher_load": "media", "participation": "grupo-clase", "scalability": "hasta-30", "collections": "", "ai_relation": "", "review_status": "borrador-editorial", "version": "v0.9", "last_reviewed": "2026-07", "content": { "es": { "name": "Ronda socrática", "shortDescription": "Pequeño grupo responde preguntas encadenadas sobre una idea o texto.", "whenToUse": "", "minimalVersion": "Ronda de 10 minutos con 3 preguntas encadenadas.", "instructions": [ "Prepara preguntas de nivel creciente.", "Evita responder por los estudiantes." ], "observe": [ "Las respuestas ganan matiz al avanzar.", "Se detectan lagunas y las reconoce." ], "limits": [ "Difícil de escalar sin rotación." ], "aiAdaptation": "", "example": "Debate breve sobre la validez de una fuente con tres preguntas en cadena." }, "en": { "name": "Socratic round", "shortDescription": "A small group answers chained questions about an idea or text.", "whenToUse": "", "minimalVersion": "10-minute round with 3 chained questions.", "instructions": [ "Prepare increasingly complex questions.", "Do not answer for students." ], "observe": [ "Answers gain nuance as they progress.", "Gaps are identified and acknowledged." ], "limits": [ "Hard to scale without rotation." ], "aiAdaptation": "", "example": "Short debate on source validity with three chained questions." } } }, { "id": "two-minute-explain", "slug": "explica-en-dos-minutos", "url": "https://evidencias-ia-evaluacion.com/evidencia/explica-en-dos-minutos", "name_es": "Explica en dos minutos", "name_en": "Two-minute explanation", "short_description_es": "El estudiante explica una idea o solución en dos minutos, sin apoyo escrito.", "short_description_en": "The student explains an idea or solution in two minutes without written support.", "family": "oral-dialogica", "family_secondary": "", "primary_claim": "comprende", "secondary_claims": "puede-hacerlo", "evidence_kind": "", "evidence_modes": "oral", "stages": "primaria|secundaria|bachillerato|fp|universidad|adultos", "areas": "", "moments": "durante|despues", "purposes": "formativo|calificable", "modalities": "oral", "seia_levels": "0|1|2|3", "time_min": 2, "time_max": 4, "teacher_load": "alta", "participation": "individual", "scalability": "grupo-reducido", "collections": "rapidas", "ai_relation": "", "review_status": "borrador-editorial", "version": "v0.9", "last_reviewed": "2026-07", "content": { "es": { "name": "Explica en dos minutos", "shortDescription": "El estudiante explica una idea o solución en dos minutos, sin apoyo escrito.", "whenToUse": "", "minimalVersion": "Un tema, dos minutos, sin notas.", "instructions": [ "Pide una audiencia imaginaria concreta.", "Rota temas para evitar preparación literal." ], "observe": [ "Usa ejemplos propios.", "Corrige errores en marcha si aparecen." ], "limits": [ "Momento único, alta variabilidad." ], "aiAdaptation": "", "example": "Explicar el ciclo del agua a alguien que llega tarde a clase." }, "en": { "name": "Two-minute explanation", "shortDescription": "The student explains an idea or solution in two minutes without written support.", "whenToUse": "", "minimalVersion": "One topic, two minutes, no notes.", "instructions": [ "Ask for a specific imagined audience.", "Rotate topics to avoid literal preparation." ], "observe": [ "Uses own examples.", "Corrects errors on the fly if they appear." ], "limits": [ "One-shot moment, high variability." ], "aiAdaptation": "", "example": "Explain the water cycle to someone who arrived late." } } }, { "id": "new-context-task", "slug": "tarea-en-contexto-nuevo", "url": "https://evidencias-ia-evaluacion.com/evidencia/tarea-en-contexto-nuevo", "name_es": "Tarea en contexto nuevo", "name_en": "Task in a new context", "short_description_es": "Aplicar lo aprendido a una situación distinta a la trabajada en clase.", "short_description_en": "Apply learning to a situation different from the one worked in class.", "family": "practica-desempeno", "family_secondary": "escrita-grafica", "primary_claim": "transfiere", "secondary_claims": "puede-hacerlo|comprende", "evidence_kind": "", "evidence_modes": "transferencia|desempeno-controlado", "stages": "primaria|secundaria|bachillerato|fp|universidad|adultos", "areas": "", "moments": "durante|despues", "purposes": "formativo|calificable|alta-relevancia", "modalities": "escrita|practica", "seia_levels": "0|1|2|3", "time_min": 10, "time_max": 20, "teacher_load": "media", "participation": "individual", "scalability": "cualquiera", "collections": "transferencia|grupos-numerosos", "ai_relation": "", "review_status": "borrador-editorial", "version": "v0.9", "last_reviewed": "2026-07", "content": { "es": { "name": "Tarea en contexto nuevo", "shortDescription": "Aplicar lo aprendido a una situación distinta a la trabajada en clase.", "whenToUse": "", "minimalVersion": "Un problema distinto, mismas herramientas.", "instructions": [ "Cambia contexto pero mantiene la demanda cognitiva.", "Evita disfrazar el mismo enunciado." ], "observe": [ "Adapta la estrategia, no la copia.", "Reconoce lo que no aplica." ], "limits": [ "Muy sensible al diseño del enunciado nuevo." ], "aiAdaptation": "", "example": "Después de trabajar un problema de proporciones en cocina, resolver uno en logística." }, "en": { "name": "Task in a new context", "shortDescription": "Apply learning to a situation different from the one worked in class.", "whenToUse": "", "minimalVersion": "A different problem, the same tools.", "instructions": [ "Change context but keep the cognitive demand.", "Avoid disguising the same statement." ], "observe": [ "Adapts the strategy, does not copy it.", "Recognises what does not apply." ], "limits": [ "Very sensitive to the new prompt design." ], "aiAdaptation": "", "example": "After a ratios problem in cooking, solve one in logistics." } } }, { "id": "counterexample", "slug": "contraejemplo", "url": "https://evidencias-ia-evaluacion.com/evidencia/contraejemplo", "name_es": "Contraejemplo", "name_en": "Counterexample", "short_description_es": "Pedir un contraejemplo obliga a probar los límites de una idea o regla.", "short_description_en": "Asking for a counterexample forces testing the limits of an idea or rule.", "family": "escrita-grafica", "family_secondary": "oral-dialogica", "primary_claim": "comprende", "secondary_claims": "transfiere", "evidence_kind": "", "evidence_modes": "transferencia", "stages": "secundaria|bachillerato|universidad|adultos", "areas": "", "moments": "durante|despues", "purposes": "formativo", "modalities": "escrita|oral", "seia_levels": "0|1|2|3", "time_min": 3, "time_max": 8, "teacher_load": "baja", "participation": "individual", "scalability": "cualquiera", "collections": "transferencia|rapidas|baja-revision|grupos-numerosos", "ai_relation": "", "review_status": "borrador-editorial", "version": "v0.9", "last_reviewed": "2026-07", "content": { "es": { "name": "Contraejemplo", "shortDescription": "Pedir un contraejemplo obliga a probar los límites de una idea o regla.", "whenToUse": "", "minimalVersion": "Pide un contraejemplo con explicación en tres líneas.", "instructions": [ "Formula reglas o afirmaciones desafiables.", "Valora contraejemplos plausibles aunque no perfectos." ], "observe": [ "El contraejemplo es específico y verificable.", "Se identifica la condición que rompe la regla." ], "limits": [ "Puede confundirse con ejemplos negativos triviales." ], "aiAdaptation": "", "example": "Pedir un caso donde una regla estadística deje de aplicarse." }, "en": { "name": "Counterexample", "shortDescription": "Asking for a counterexample forces testing the limits of an idea or rule.", "whenToUse": "", "minimalVersion": "Ask for a counterexample with a three-line explanation.", "instructions": [ "State challengeable rules or claims.", "Value plausible counterexamples even if not perfect." ], "observe": [ "The counterexample is specific and verifiable.", "The breaking condition is identified." ], "limits": [ "Can be confused with trivial negative examples." ], "aiAdaptation": "", "example": "Ask for a case where a statistical rule stops applying." } } }, { "id": "reverse-problem", "slug": "problema-inverso", "url": "https://evidencias-ia-evaluacion.com/evidencia/problema-inverso", "name_es": "Problema inverso", "name_en": "Reverse problem", "short_description_es": "Dar la solución y pedir el enunciado plausible, o dar el resultado y pedir el proceso.", "short_description_en": "Give the solution and ask for a plausible statement, or give the result and ask for the process.", "family": "escrita-grafica", "family_secondary": "", "primary_claim": "comprende", "secondary_claims": "transfiere", "evidence_kind": "", "evidence_modes": "transferencia", "stages": "primaria|secundaria|bachillerato|universidad|adultos", "areas": "", "moments": "durante|despues", "purposes": "formativo", "modalities": "escrita", "seia_levels": "0|1|2|3", "time_min": 5, "time_max": 12, "teacher_load": "baja", "participation": "individual", "scalability": "cualquiera", "collections": "baja-revision|grupos-numerosos", "ai_relation": "", "review_status": "borrador-editorial", "version": "v0.9", "last_reviewed": "2026-07", "content": { "es": { "name": "Problema inverso", "shortDescription": "Dar la solución y pedir el enunciado plausible, o dar el resultado y pedir el proceso.", "whenToUse": "", "minimalVersion": "Presenta un resultado y pide construir el enunciado.", "instructions": [ "Elige resultados con más de una vía razonable.", "Valora la coherencia interna del enunciado propuesto." ], "observe": [ "El enunciado propuesto es consistente con el resultado.", "La lógica está explícita." ], "limits": [ "Difícil de calificar cuantitativamente." ], "aiAdaptation": "", "example": "Dar una gráfica y pedir el fenómeno que la produciría." }, "en": { "name": "Reverse problem", "shortDescription": "Give the solution and ask for a plausible statement, or give the result and ask for the process.", "whenToUse": "", "minimalVersion": "Show a result and ask to build the statement.", "instructions": [ "Choose results with more than one reasonable path.", "Value the internal coherence of the proposed statement." ], "observe": [ "The proposed statement is consistent with the result.", "The logic is explicit." ], "limits": [ "Hard to grade quantitatively." ], "aiAdaptation": "", "example": "Give a chart and ask for the phenomenon that would produce it." } } }, { "id": "observation-rubric", "slug": "observacion-con-rubrica", "url": "https://evidencias-ia-evaluacion.com/evidencia/observacion-con-rubrica", "name_es": "Observación con rúbrica", "name_en": "Rubric-based observation", "short_description_es": "Observar desempeños en directo con criterios definidos previamente.", "short_description_en": "Observe live performances against pre-defined criteria.", "family": "practica-desempeno", "family_secondary": "", "primary_claim": "puede-hacerlo", "secondary_claims": "muestra-avance", "evidence_kind": "", "evidence_modes": "desempeno-controlado|proceso", "stages": "infantil|primaria|secundaria|bachillerato|fp|universidad|adultos", "areas": "", "moments": "durante", "purposes": "formativo|calificable|certificacion", "modalities": "practica|oral", "seia_levels": "0|1|2|3", "time_min": 5, "time_max": 15, "teacher_load": "alta", "participation": "individual", "scalability": "mas-30-equipos", "collections": "grupos-numerosos", "ai_relation": "", "review_status": "borrador-editorial", "version": "v0.9", "last_reviewed": "2026-07", "content": { "es": { "name": "Observación con rúbrica", "shortDescription": "Observar desempeños en directo con criterios definidos previamente.", "whenToUse": "", "minimalVersion": "Rúbrica de 3-4 indicadores y toma de notas breve.", "instructions": [ "Redacta indicadores conductuales.", "Prevé rotación de observaciones si el grupo es grande." ], "observe": [ "Comportamientos observables, no inferencias.", "Al menos 2 observaciones por estudiante." ], "limits": [ "Muy dependiente de tiempo docente." ], "aiAdaptation": "", "example": "Observar cómo una alumna resuelve una tarea manipulativa." }, "en": { "name": "Rubric-based observation", "shortDescription": "Observe live performances against pre-defined criteria.", "whenToUse": "", "minimalVersion": "3-4 indicator rubric and brief note-taking.", "instructions": [ "Write behavioural indicators.", "Plan observation rotation for large groups." ], "observe": [ "Observable behaviours, not inferences.", "At least 2 observations per student." ], "limits": [ "Very dependent on teacher time." ], "aiAdaptation": "", "example": "Observe how a student solves a hands-on task." } } }, { "id": "anecdotal-record", "slug": "registro-anecdotico", "url": "https://evidencias-ia-evaluacion.com/evidencia/registro-anecdotico", "name_es": "Registro anecdótico", "name_en": "Anecdotal record", "short_description_es": "Nota breve del docente sobre un episodio significativo de aprendizaje.", "short_description_en": "Brief teacher note about a meaningful learning episode.", "family": "proceso-evolucion", "family_secondary": "practica-desempeno", "primary_claim": "muestra-avance", "secondary_claims": "puede-hacerlo", "evidence_kind": "", "evidence_modes": "proceso", "stages": "infantil|primaria|secundaria|fp|adultos", "areas": "", "moments": "durante", "purposes": "formativo", "modalities": "escrita", "seia_levels": "0|1|2|3", "time_min": 1, "time_max": 3, "teacher_load": "media", "participation": "individual", "scalability": "mas-30-equipos", "collections": "rapidas|grupos-numerosos", "ai_relation": "", "review_status": "borrador-editorial", "version": "v0.9", "last_reviewed": "2026-07", "content": { "es": { "name": "Registro anecdótico", "shortDescription": "Nota breve del docente sobre un episodio significativo de aprendizaje.", "whenToUse": "", "minimalVersion": "Una nota por sesión: qué ha pasado, qué evidencia deja.", "instructions": [ "Describe hechos, no interpretaciones amplias.", "Fecha, contexto, breve descripción." ], "observe": [ "Las notas describen hechos.", "Emergen patrones al acumular varias." ], "limits": [ "Riesgo de sesgo del docente." ], "aiAdaptation": "", "example": "Una nota registra que una alumna aplicó una estrategia trabajada 3 semanas antes." }, "en": { "name": "Anecdotal record", "shortDescription": "Brief teacher note about a meaningful learning episode.", "whenToUse": "", "minimalVersion": "One note per session: what happened, what evidence it leaves.", "instructions": [ "Describe facts, not broad interpretations.", "Date, context, brief description." ], "observe": [ "Notes describe facts.", "Patterns emerge over multiple notes." ], "limits": [ "Teacher bias risk." ], "aiAdaptation": "", "example": "A note records that a student applied a strategy worked on 3 weeks earlier." } } }, { "id": "group-role-observation", "slug": "observacion-de-rol-en-grupo", "url": "https://evidencias-ia-evaluacion.com/evidencia/observacion-de-rol-en-grupo", "name_es": "Observación de rol en grupo", "name_en": "Group role observation", "short_description_es": "Asignar roles observables en trabajo cooperativo y valorar su desempeño.", "short_description_en": "Assign observable roles in cooperative work and assess their performance.", "family": "cooperativa", "family_secondary": "practica-desempeno", "primary_claim": "puede-hacerlo", "secondary_claims": "muestra-avance", "evidence_kind": "", "evidence_modes": "desempeno-controlado|proceso", "stages": "primaria|secundaria|bachillerato|fp|universidad|adultos", "areas": "", "moments": "durante", "purposes": "formativo|calificable", "modalities": "practica|oral", "seia_levels": "0|1|2|3", "time_min": 10, "time_max": 20, "teacher_load": "media", "participation": "equipo", "scalability": "hasta-30", "collections": "", "ai_relation": "", "review_status": "borrador-editorial", "version": "v0.9", "last_reviewed": "2026-07", "content": { "es": { "name": "Observación de rol en grupo", "shortDescription": "Asignar roles observables en trabajo cooperativo y valorar su desempeño.", "whenToUse": "", "minimalVersion": "Un rol por estudiante y una tarjeta de indicadores por rol.", "instructions": [ "Define roles concretos y sus indicadores.", "Combina observación docente con auto-registro." ], "observe": [ "Rol ejecutado, no solo declarado.", "La contribución individual es identificable." ], "limits": [ "Sensible a dinámicas del grupo." ], "aiAdaptation": "", "example": "En un trabajo en grupo, cada estudiante asume un rol y se valora su ejecución." }, "en": { "name": "Group role observation", "shortDescription": "Assign observable roles in cooperative work and assess their performance.", "whenToUse": "", "minimalVersion": "One role per student and one indicator card per role.", "instructions": [ "Define concrete roles and their indicators.", "Combine teacher observation with self-report." ], "observe": [ "Role performed, not just declared.", "Individual contribution is identifiable." ], "limits": [ "Sensitive to group dynamics." ], "aiAdaptation": "", "example": "In group work, each student takes a role and their execution is assessed." } } }, { "id": "product-contrast", "slug": "microprueba-de-contraste", "url": "https://evidencias-ia-evaluacion.com/evidencia/microprueba-de-contraste", "name_es": "Micro-prueba de contraste", "name_en": "Micro contrast check", "short_description_es": "Una prueba muy breve tras la entrega del producto para contrastar autoría o comprensión.", "short_description_en": "A very brief check after the product is submitted to contrast authorship or understanding.", "family": "escrita-grafica", "family_secondary": "oral-dialogica", "primary_claim": "comprende", "secondary_claims": "puede-hacerlo|decide-criterio", "evidence_kind": "", "evidence_modes": "desempeno-controlado", "stages": "primaria|secundaria|bachillerato|fp|universidad|adultos", "areas": "", "moments": "despues", "purposes": "calificable|certificacion|alta-relevancia", "modalities": "escrita|oral", "seia_levels": "1|2|3", "time_min": 5, "time_max": 10, "teacher_load": "media", "participation": "individual", "scalability": "cualquiera", "collections": "rapidas|grupos-numerosos", "ai_relation": "", "review_status": "borrador-editorial", "version": "v0.9", "last_reviewed": "2026-07", "content": { "es": { "name": "Micro-prueba de contraste", "shortDescription": "Una prueba muy breve tras la entrega del producto para contrastar autoría o comprensión.", "whenToUse": "", "minimalVersion": "3 preguntas ligadas al producto entregado.", "instructions": [ "Prepara preguntas específicas del trabajo, no genéricas.", "Hazla poco después de la entrega." ], "observe": [ "El estudiante puede sostener elementos concretos del trabajo.", "Reconoce lo que no domina en lugar de simular." ], "limits": [ "Es una prueba de autoría, no una evaluación integral." ], "aiAdaptation": "", "example": "Tras entregar un informe, contestar tres preguntas breves en clase." }, "en": { "name": "Micro contrast check", "shortDescription": "A very brief check after the product is submitted to contrast authorship or understanding.", "whenToUse": "", "minimalVersion": "3 questions tied to the submitted product.", "instructions": [ "Prepare questions specific to the work, not generic.", "Run it soon after submission." ], "observe": [ "The student can uphold concrete elements of the work.", "Acknowledges what they don't master instead of simulating." ], "limits": [ "It's an authorship check, not full assessment." ], "aiAdaptation": "", "example": "After submitting a report, answer three brief questions in class." } } }, { "id": "blind-swap", "slug": "intercambio-ciego", "url": "https://evidencias-ia-evaluacion.com/evidencia/intercambio-ciego", "name_es": "Intercambio ciego con pares", "name_en": "Blind peer swap", "short_description_es": "Los trabajos se intercambian sin identificar autoría y se comentan con criterios.", "short_description_en": "Works are swapped without identifying authorship and are commented against criteria.", "family": "cooperativa", "family_secondary": "metacognitiva", "primary_claim": "decide-criterio", "secondary_claims": "comprende", "evidence_kind": "", "evidence_modes": "metacognicion", "stages": "secundaria|bachillerato|fp|universidad|adultos", "areas": "", "moments": "despues", "purposes": "formativo", "modalities": "escrita", "seia_levels": "0|1|2|3", "time_min": 10, "time_max": 15, "teacher_load": "media", "participation": "pareja", "scalability": "hasta-30", "collections": "", "ai_relation": "", "review_status": "borrador-editorial", "version": "v0.9", "last_reviewed": "2026-07", "content": { "es": { "name": "Intercambio ciego con pares", "shortDescription": "Los trabajos se intercambian sin identificar autoría y se comentan con criterios.", "whenToUse": "", "minimalVersion": "Cada estudiante comenta un trabajo anónimo con la rúbrica.", "instructions": [ "Anonimiza los trabajos antes.", "Prohíbe reconocer autoría." ], "observe": [ "Comentarios centrados en criterios.", "No hay identificación cruzada." ], "limits": [ "Requiere gestión cuidadosa del anonimato." ], "aiAdaptation": "", "example": "Intercambio ciego de ensayos con doble revisor." }, "en": { "name": "Blind peer swap", "shortDescription": "Works are swapped without identifying authorship and are commented against criteria.", "whenToUse": "", "minimalVersion": "Each student comments on an anonymous work with the rubric.", "instructions": [ "Anonymise works beforehand.", "Forbid guessing authorship." ], "observe": [ "Comments focused on criteria.", "No cross-identification." ], "limits": [ "Careful anonymity management required." ], "aiAdaptation": "", "example": "Blind essay swap with two reviewers." } } }, { "id": "teacher-followup", "slug": "microtutoria-de-contraste", "url": "https://evidencias-ia-evaluacion.com/evidencia/microtutoria-de-contraste", "name_es": "Micro-tutoría de contraste", "name_en": "Micro-tutorial contrast", "short_description_es": "Entrevista breve del docente con el estudiante para contrastar el trabajo entregado.", "short_description_en": "A brief teacher-student interview to contrast the submitted work.", "family": "oral-dialogica", "family_secondary": "", "primary_claim": "comprende", "secondary_claims": "decide-criterio|usa-ia-critica", "evidence_kind": "", "evidence_modes": "oral|desempeno-controlado", "stages": "primaria|secundaria|bachillerato|fp|universidad|adultos", "areas": "", "moments": "despues", "purposes": "calificable|certificacion|alta-relevancia", "modalities": "oral", "seia_levels": "1|2|3", "time_min": 3, "time_max": 8, "teacher_load": "alta", "participation": "individual", "scalability": "grupo-reducido", "collections": "rapidas", "ai_relation": "", "review_status": "borrador-editorial", "version": "v0.9", "last_reviewed": "2026-07", "content": { "es": { "name": "Micro-tutoría de contraste", "shortDescription": "Entrevista breve del docente con el estudiante para contrastar el trabajo entregado.", "whenToUse": "", "minimalVersion": "Tres preguntas ligadas al producto entregado.", "instructions": [ "Cita elementos concretos del trabajo.", "Registra respuestas con notas cortas." ], "observe": [ "Sostiene el trabajo con criterios.", "Reconoce las partes que dominó menos." ], "limits": [ "No es escalable sin planificación." ], "aiAdaptation": "", "example": "Micro-tutoría al recoger un trabajo de alta relevancia." }, "en": { "name": "Micro-tutorial contrast", "shortDescription": "A brief teacher-student interview to contrast the submitted work.", "whenToUse": "", "minimalVersion": "Three questions tied to the submitted product.", "instructions": [ "Cite concrete elements of the work.", "Log responses with short notes." ], "observe": [ "Upholds the work with criteria.", "Recognises weaker parts." ], "limits": [ "Not scalable without planning." ], "aiAdaptation": "", "example": "Micro-tutorial when collecting a high-stakes work." } } }, { "id": "ai-critique", "slug": "critica-de-una-salida-de-ia", "url": "https://evidencias-ia-evaluacion.com/evidencia/critica-de-una-salida-de-ia", "name_es": "Crítica de una salida de IA", "name_en": "Critique of an AI output", "short_description_es": "El estudiante señala errores, sesgos y decisiones cuestionables de una respuesta generada por IA.", "short_description_en": "The student flags errors, biases and questionable decisions in an AI-generated response.", "family": "escrita-grafica", "family_secondary": "metacognitiva", "primary_claim": "usa-ia-critica", "secondary_claims": "comprende|decide-criterio", "evidence_kind": "", "evidence_modes": "verificacion-ia", "stages": "secundaria|bachillerato|fp|universidad|adultos", "areas": "", "moments": "durante|despues", "purposes": "formativo|calificable", "modalities": "escrita", "seia_levels": "1|2|3", "time_min": 5, "time_max": 15, "teacher_load": "baja", "participation": "individual", "scalability": "cualquiera", "collections": "ia-critica|baja-revision|grupos-numerosos", "ai_relation": "con-ia", "review_status": "borrador-editorial", "version": "v0.9", "last_reviewed": "2026-07", "content": { "es": { "name": "Crítica de una salida de IA", "shortDescription": "El estudiante señala errores, sesgos y decisiones cuestionables de una respuesta generada por IA.", "whenToUse": "", "minimalVersion": "Señala 3 problemas concretos en una salida de IA dada.", "instructions": [ "Da tú la salida de IA para partir de una misma base.", "Exige señalar la línea o el fragmento problemático." ], "observe": [ "Los problemas señalados son reales y localizados.", "La corrección se apoya en criterios o fuentes." ], "limits": [ "Sensible al nivel de dominio del contenido." ], "aiAdaptation": "", "example": "Se entrega una respuesta plausible pero con dos errores factuales y se pide localizarlos." }, "en": { "name": "Critique of an AI output", "shortDescription": "The student flags errors, biases and questionable decisions in an AI-generated response.", "whenToUse": "", "minimalVersion": "Flag 3 concrete problems in a given AI output.", "instructions": [ "Provide the AI output so everyone starts from the same base.", "Require pointing to the exact line or fragment." ], "observe": [ "Flagged problems are real and localised.", "The correction rests on criteria or sources." ], "limits": [ "Sensitive to content mastery level." ], "aiAdaptation": "", "example": "A plausible but flawed AI answer is provided with two factual errors to locate." } } }, { "id": "ai-fact-check", "slug": "verificacion-de-hechos-ia", "url": "https://evidencias-ia-evaluacion.com/evidencia/verificacion-de-hechos-ia", "name_es": "Verificación de hechos generados por IA", "name_en": "AI fact-check", "short_description_es": "Comprobar afirmaciones concretas de una salida de IA contra fuentes fiables.", "short_description_en": "Verify specific claims in an AI output against reliable sources.", "family": "escrita-grafica", "family_secondary": "proceso-evolucion", "primary_claim": "usa-ia-critica", "secondary_claims": "comprende", "evidence_kind": "", "evidence_modes": "verificacion-ia", "stages": "secundaria|bachillerato|fp|universidad|adultos", "areas": "", "moments": "durante|despues", "purposes": "formativo|calificable", "modalities": "digital|escrita", "seia_levels": "1|2|3", "time_min": 10, "time_max": 20, "teacher_load": "media", "participation": "individual", "scalability": "cualquiera", "collections": "ia-critica|grupos-numerosos", "ai_relation": "", "review_status": "borrador-editorial", "version": "v0.9", "last_reviewed": "2026-07", "content": { "es": { "name": "Verificación de hechos generados por IA", "shortDescription": "Comprobar afirmaciones concretas de una salida de IA contra fuentes fiables.", "whenToUse": "", "minimalVersion": "Verifica 3 afirmaciones con fuente y veredicto.", "instructions": [ "Define qué fuentes son admisibles.", "Pide veredicto: sostenida, matizada, refutada." ], "observe": [ "Las fuentes son citables.", "El veredicto se sostiene con lo verificado." ], "limits": [ "Puede colapsar si el acceso a fuentes es desigual." ], "aiAdaptation": "", "example": "Verificar tres afirmaciones históricas de un texto generado por IA." }, "en": { "name": "AI fact-check", "shortDescription": "Verify specific claims in an AI output against reliable sources.", "whenToUse": "", "minimalVersion": "Verify 3 claims with source and verdict.", "instructions": [ "Define acceptable sources.", "Ask for a verdict: supported, qualified, refuted." ], "observe": [ "Sources are citable.", "The verdict follows from what was verified." ], "limits": [ "Can collapse if source access is unequal." ], "aiAdaptation": "", "example": "Verify three historical claims in an AI-generated text." } } }, { "id": "ai-audit", "slug": "auditoria-de-uso-de-ia", "url": "https://evidencias-ia-evaluacion.com/evidencia/auditoria-de-uso-de-ia", "name_es": "Auditoría del uso de IA", "name_en": "AI use audit", "short_description_es": "Documentar de forma proporcional qué se ha usado de IA, cómo se ha verificado y qué se ha decidido.", "short_description_en": "Document proportionally what was used from AI, how it was verified and what was decided.", "family": "proceso-evolucion", "family_secondary": "metacognitiva", "primary_claim": "usa-ia-critica", "secondary_claims": "decide-criterio", "evidence_kind": "", "evidence_modes": "verificacion-ia|proceso", "stages": "secundaria|bachillerato|fp|universidad|adultos", "areas": "", "moments": "despues", "purposes": "calificable|certificacion", "modalities": "escrita", "seia_levels": "2|3", "time_min": 5, "time_max": 10, "teacher_load": "baja", "participation": "individual", "scalability": "cualquiera", "collections": "ia-critica|rapidas|baja-revision|grupos-numerosos", "ai_relation": "", "review_status": "borrador-editorial", "version": "v0.9", "last_reviewed": "2026-07", "content": { "es": { "name": "Auditoría del uso de IA", "shortDescription": "Documentar de forma proporcional qué se ha usado de IA, cómo se ha verificado y qué se ha decidido.", "whenToUse": "", "minimalVersion": "Formulario breve: qué usé, qué verifiqué, qué rechacé.", "instructions": [ "Evita pedir historiales completos por defecto.", "Foco en decisiones, no en volumen." ], "observe": [ "Coherencia entre lo declarado y el producto final.", "Verificación con fuentes o criterios." ], "limits": [ "Puede volverse burocrático si se sobredimensiona." ], "aiAdaptation": "", "example": "Ficha adjunta a un informe universitario con SEIA 2." }, "en": { "name": "AI use audit", "shortDescription": "Document proportionally what was used from AI, how it was verified and what was decided.", "whenToUse": "", "minimalVersion": "Brief form: what I used, what I verified, what I rejected.", "instructions": [ "Do not request full histories by default.", "Focus on decisions, not volume." ], "observe": [ "Coherence between the declaration and the final product.", "Verification via sources or criteria." ], "limits": [ "Can become bureaucratic if overdone." ], "aiAdaptation": "", "example": "Form attached to a SEIA-2 university report." } } }, { "id": "reject-and-improve", "slug": "rechaza-y-mejora", "url": "https://evidencias-ia-evaluacion.com/evidencia/rechaza-y-mejora", "name_es": "Rechaza y mejora", "name_en": "Reject and improve", "short_description_es": "El estudiante debe rechazar total o parcialmente una salida de IA y ofrecer una mejora sostenida.", "short_description_en": "The student must reject in whole or in part an AI output and provide a sustained improvement.", "family": "escrita-grafica", "family_secondary": "proceso-evolucion", "primary_claim": "usa-ia-critica", "secondary_claims": "decide-criterio|comprende", "evidence_kind": "", "evidence_modes": "verificacion-ia", "stages": "secundaria|bachillerato|fp|universidad|adultos", "areas": "", "moments": "durante|despues", "purposes": "formativo|calificable", "modalities": "escrita", "seia_levels": "1|2|3", "time_min": 10, "time_max": 20, "teacher_load": "media", "participation": "individual", "scalability": "cualquiera", "collections": "ia-critica|grupos-numerosos", "ai_relation": "", "review_status": "borrador-editorial", "version": "v0.9", "last_reviewed": "2026-07", "content": { "es": { "name": "Rechaza y mejora", "shortDescription": "El estudiante debe rechazar total o parcialmente una salida de IA y ofrecer una mejora sostenida.", "whenToUse": "", "minimalVersion": "Rechaza una parte y sustitúyela con justificación breve.", "instructions": [ "Prohíbe la mejora meramente estilística.", "Pide criterio explícito para rechazar." ], "observe": [ "El rechazo se justifica con criterio.", "La mejora es sostenida y verificable." ], "limits": [ "Requiere dominio previo del tema." ], "aiAdaptation": "", "example": "Un párrafo con dato erróneo se rechaza y se reescribe con la cifra correcta y su fuente." }, "en": { "name": "Reject and improve", "shortDescription": "The student must reject in whole or in part an AI output and provide a sustained improvement.", "whenToUse": "", "minimalVersion": "Reject a part and replace it with a brief justification.", "instructions": [ "Forbid purely stylistic improvement.", "Ask for an explicit criterion to reject." ], "observe": [ "Rejection is justified by criteria.", "The improvement is sustained and verifiable." ], "limits": [ "Requires prior mastery of the topic." ], "aiAdaptation": "", "example": "A paragraph with a wrong figure is rejected and rewritten with the correct number and source." } } }, { "id": "sequenced-evidence", "slug": "secuencia-de-evidencias", "url": "https://evidencias-ia-evaluacion.com/evidencia/secuencia-de-evidencias", "name_es": "Secuencia de evidencias", "name_en": "Evidence sequence", "short_description_es": "Encadenar tres evidencias breves de naturaleza distinta para sostener una decisión más relevante.", "short_description_en": "Chain three brief pieces of evidence of different kinds to support a more relevant decision.", "family": "proceso-evolucion", "family_secondary": "oral-dialogica", "primary_claim": "puede-hacerlo", "secondary_claims": "comprende|decide-criterio|muestra-avance", "evidence_kind": "", "evidence_modes": "proceso|desempeno-controlado|oral", "stages": "secundaria|bachillerato|fp|universidad|adultos", "areas": "", "moments": "antes|durante|despues", "purposes": "calificable|certificacion|alta-relevancia", "modalities": "escrita|oral", "seia_levels": "1|2|3", "time_min": 15, "time_max": 30, "teacher_load": "media", "participation": "individual", "scalability": "hasta-30", "collections": "", "ai_relation": "", "review_status": "borrador-editorial", "version": "v0.9", "last_reviewed": "2026-07", "content": { "es": { "name": "Secuencia de evidencias", "shortDescription": "Encadenar tres evidencias breves de naturaleza distinta para sostener una decisión más relevante.", "whenToUse": "", "minimalVersion": "Producto + rastro de proceso + micro-defensa oral.", "instructions": [ "Selecciona tres evidencias suficientemente independientes.", "Alinea todas con el mismo criterio de aprendizaje." ], "observe": [ "Las tres evidencias apuntan a la misma afirmación.", "Ninguna repite el mismo tipo." ], "limits": [ "Requiere planificación previa; no improvisable." ], "aiAdaptation": "", "example": "Trabajo final + bitácora + micro-defensa en FP." }, "en": { "name": "Evidence sequence", "shortDescription": "Chain three brief pieces of evidence of different kinds to support a more relevant decision.", "whenToUse": "", "minimalVersion": "Product + process trace + brief oral defence.", "instructions": [ "Pick three sufficiently independent pieces of evidence.", "Align them all with the same learning criterion." ], "observe": [ "The three pieces of evidence point to the same claim.", "No two repeat the same type." ], "limits": [ "Requires prior planning; not improvised." ], "aiAdaptation": "", "example": "Final work + logbook + micro-defence in vocational education." } } }, { "id": "process-photos", "slug": "fotos-de-proceso", "url": "https://evidencias-ia-evaluacion.com/evidencia/fotos-de-proceso", "name_es": "Fotos de proceso", "name_en": "Process photos", "short_description_es": "Hitos fotográficos que documentan cómo se ha desarrollado un trabajo manual, plástico o técnico.", "short_description_en": "Photo milestones documenting how a manual, artistic or technical piece unfolded.", "family": "proceso-evolucion", "family_secondary": "", "primary_claim": "muestra-avance", "secondary_claims": "puede-hacerlo", "evidence_kind": "", "evidence_modes": "proceso", "stages": "infantil|primaria|secundaria|fp", "areas": "artes|tecnologia|fp|efisica", "moments": "durante", "purposes": "formativo|calificable", "modalities": "visual", "seia_levels": "0|1|2|3", "time_min": 1, "time_max": 3, "teacher_load": "baja", "participation": "individual", "scalability": "cualquiera", "collections": "rapidas|baja-revision|grupos-numerosos", "ai_relation": "", "review_status": "borrador-editorial", "version": "v0.9", "last_reviewed": "2026-07", "content": { "es": { "name": "Fotos de proceso", "shortDescription": "Hitos fotográficos que documentan cómo se ha desarrollado un trabajo manual, plástico o técnico.", "whenToUse": "", "minimalVersion": "Tres fotos con leyenda breve.", "instructions": [ "Define los hitos que se fotografiarán.", "Evita almacenar imágenes reconocibles innecesarias." ], "observe": [ "Se aprecia progreso entre fotos.", "Las leyendas explican cambios reales." ], "limits": [ "No prueba ejecución sin combinar con otro registro." ], "aiAdaptation": "", "example": "Un proyecto de tecnología documenta 3 hitos de montaje." }, "en": { "name": "Process photos", "shortDescription": "Photo milestones documenting how a manual, artistic or technical piece unfolded.", "whenToUse": "", "minimalVersion": "Three photos with brief captions.", "instructions": [ "Define the milestones to be photographed.", "Avoid storing unnecessary identifiable images." ], "observe": [ "Progress is visible across photos.", "Captions explain real changes." ], "limits": [ "Does not prove execution without another record." ], "aiAdaptation": "", "example": "A technology project documents 3 assembly milestones." } } }, { "id": "decision-trace", "slug": "rastro-de-decisiones", "url": "https://evidencias-ia-evaluacion.com/evidencia/rastro-de-decisiones", "name_es": "Rastro de decisiones", "name_en": "Decision trace", "short_description_es": "Registro puntual de los momentos en los que el estudiante ha tomado decisiones clave.", "short_description_en": "A punctual record of the moments when the student took key decisions.", "family": "proceso-evolucion", "family_secondary": "escrita-grafica", "primary_claim": "decide-criterio", "secondary_claims": "muestra-avance", "evidence_kind": "", "evidence_modes": "proceso", "stages": "secundaria|bachillerato|fp|universidad|adultos", "areas": "", "moments": "durante", "purposes": "formativo|calificable", "modalities": "escrita", "seia_levels": "1|2|3", "time_min": 3, "time_max": 8, "teacher_load": "baja", "participation": "individual", "scalability": "cualquiera", "collections": "rapidas|baja-revision|grupos-numerosos", "ai_relation": "", "review_status": "borrador-editorial", "version": "v0.9", "last_reviewed": "2026-07", "content": { "es": { "name": "Rastro de decisiones", "shortDescription": "Registro puntual de los momentos en los que el estudiante ha tomado decisiones clave.", "whenToUse": "", "minimalVersion": "Tres marcas de decisión con hora y razón.", "instructions": [ "Define qué cuenta como decisión.", "Limita a 3-5 marcas para evitar burocracia." ], "observe": [ "Las decisiones coinciden con cambios visibles." ], "limits": [ "Puede volverse formal si no se contrasta." ], "aiAdaptation": "", "example": "En un ensayo, marcar tres puntos donde se decidió reorganizar el argumento." }, "en": { "name": "Decision trace", "shortDescription": "A punctual record of the moments when the student took key decisions.", "whenToUse": "", "minimalVersion": "Three decision marks with time and reason.", "instructions": [ "Define what counts as a decision.", "Cap at 3-5 marks to avoid bureaucracy." ], "observe": [ "Decisions match visible changes." ], "limits": [ "Can become formal if not contrasted." ], "aiAdaptation": "", "example": "In an essay, mark three points where the argument was reorganised." } } }, { "id": "role-play-check", "slug": "simulacion-de-rol", "url": "https://evidencias-ia-evaluacion.com/evidencia/simulacion-de-rol", "name_es": "Simulación de rol", "name_en": "Role simulation", "short_description_es": "Ejecutar un rol profesional o comunicativo específico ante un caso realista.", "short_description_en": "Perform a specific professional or communicative role in a realistic case.", "family": "practica-desempeno", "family_secondary": "oral-dialogica", "primary_claim": "puede-hacerlo", "secondary_claims": "transfiere|decide-criterio", "evidence_kind": "", "evidence_modes": "desempeno-controlado|oral", "stages": "secundaria|bachillerato|fp|universidad|adultos", "areas": "", "moments": "durante", "purposes": "formativo|calificable|certificacion", "modalities": "oral|practica", "seia_levels": "0|1|2|3", "time_min": 10, "time_max": 20, "teacher_load": "alta", "participation": "equipo", "scalability": "grupo-reducido", "collections": "", "ai_relation": "", "review_status": "borrador-editorial", "version": "v0.9", "last_reviewed": "2026-07", "content": { "es": { "name": "Simulación de rol", "shortDescription": "Ejecutar un rol profesional o comunicativo específico ante un caso realista.", "whenToUse": "", "minimalVersion": "Un caso, un rol, una interacción con criterios.", "instructions": [ "Describe el escenario con precisión.", "Prepara indicadores conductuales." ], "observe": [ "Mantiene el rol.", "Toma decisiones coherentes con el rol." ], "limits": [ "Alta demanda docente." ], "aiAdaptation": "", "example": "En FP sanitaria, un rol de atención a un paciente simulado." }, "en": { "name": "Role simulation", "shortDescription": "Perform a specific professional or communicative role in a realistic case.", "whenToUse": "", "minimalVersion": "One case, one role, one interaction against criteria.", "instructions": [ "Describe the scenario precisely.", "Prepare behavioural indicators." ], "observe": [ "Stays in role.", "Makes decisions consistent with the role." ], "limits": [ "High teacher demand." ], "aiAdaptation": "", "example": "In healthcare vocational training, a simulated patient care role." } } }, { "id": "concept-map", "slug": "mapa-conceptual", "url": "https://evidencias-ia-evaluacion.com/evidencia/mapa-conceptual", "name_es": "Mapa conceptual anotado", "name_en": "Annotated concept map", "short_description_es": "Representación visual con relaciones etiquetadas entre conceptos, acompañada de una explicación.", "short_description_en": "Visual representation with labelled relations between concepts, plus a written explanation.", "family": "escrita-grafica", "family_secondary": "", "primary_claim": "comprende", "secondary_claims": "decide-criterio", "evidence_kind": "", "evidence_modes": "producto|metacognicion", "stages": "primaria|secundaria|bachillerato|universidad|adultos", "areas": "", "moments": "durante|despues", "purposes": "formativo|calificable", "modalities": "visual|escrita", "seia_levels": "0|1|2|3", "time_min": 10, "time_max": 20, "teacher_load": "media", "participation": "individual", "scalability": "cualquiera", "collections": "grupos-numerosos", "ai_relation": "", "review_status": "borrador-editorial", "version": "v0.9", "last_reviewed": "2026-07", "content": { "es": { "name": "Mapa conceptual anotado", "shortDescription": "Representación visual con relaciones etiquetadas entre conceptos, acompañada de una explicación.", "whenToUse": "", "minimalVersion": "6-10 conceptos con relaciones etiquetadas.", "instructions": [ "Exige verbos en las flechas, no líneas neutras.", "Pide justificación breve de dos relaciones clave." ], "observe": [ "Las relaciones son sustantivas, no ornamentales.", "Los conceptos principales están conectados." ], "limits": [ "Puede parecer completo sin comprensión profunda." ], "aiAdaptation": "", "example": "Mapa de un tema con 3 relaciones justificadas." }, "en": { "name": "Annotated concept map", "shortDescription": "Visual representation with labelled relations between concepts, plus a written explanation.", "whenToUse": "", "minimalVersion": "6-10 concepts with labelled relations.", "instructions": [ "Require verbs on arrows, not neutral lines.", "Ask for brief justification of two key links." ], "observe": [ "Relations are substantive, not ornamental.", "Main concepts are connected." ], "limits": [ "Can look complete without deep understanding." ], "aiAdaptation": "", "example": "A topic map with 3 justified relations." } } }, { "id": "explica-30s", "slug": "explica-lo-aprendido-en-30-segundos", "url": "https://evidencias-ia-evaluacion.com/evidencia/explica-lo-aprendido-en-30-segundos", "name_es": "Explica lo aprendido en 30 segundos", "name_en": "Explain what you've learnt in 30 seconds", "short_description_es": "El estudiante identifica y comunica la idea principal en medio minuto.", "short_description_en": "The student identifies and communicates the main idea in half a minute.", "family": "oral-dialogica", "family_secondary": "metacognitiva", "primary_claim": "comprende", "secondary_claims": "decide-criterio", "evidence_kind": "desempeno", "evidence_modes": "oral|metacognicion", "stages": "primaria|secundaria|bachillerato|fp|universidad|adultos", "areas": "", "moments": "durante|despues", "purposes": "formativo|calificable", "modalities": "oral", "seia_levels": "0|1|2|3", "time_min": 1, "time_max": 3, "teacher_load": "baja", "participation": "individual", "scalability": "cualquiera", "collections": "rapidas|baja-revision|grupos-numerosos", "ai_relation": "compatible", "review_status": "borrador-editorial", "version": "v0.10", "last_reviewed": "2026-07", "content": { "es": { "name": "Explica lo aprendido en 30 segundos", "shortDescription": "El estudiante identifica y comunica la idea principal en medio minuto.", "whenToUse": "Al cerrar una sesión o subtema, para comprobar rápidamente qué ha comprendido cada estudiante.", "minimalVersion": "El estudiante identifica y comunica la idea principal en medio minuto.", "instructions": [ "Anuncia el disparo: 30 segundos exactos.", "Pide una idea principal, no un resumen exhaustivo.", "Escucha 3-5 respuestas y contrasta." ], "observe": [ "Prioriza lo esencial frente a lo anecdótico.", "Usa lenguaje propio, no fórmulas memorizadas." ], "limits": [], "aiAdaptation": "Si han trabajado con IA, pide que la explicación oral no cite frases textuales de la IA: obliga a reformular con criterio propio.", "example": "Tras una clase sobre fotosíntesis, cada estudiante resume en 30 segundos por qué las plantas necesitan luz." }, "en": { "name": "Explain what you've learnt in 30 seconds", "shortDescription": "The student identifies and communicates the main idea in half a minute.", "whenToUse": "At the end of a session or subtopic, to quickly check what each student has understood.", "minimalVersion": "The student identifies and communicates the main idea in half a minute.", "instructions": [ "Announce the cue: exactly 30 seconds.", "Ask for the main idea, not an exhaustive summary.", "Listen to 3-5 responses and contrast them." ], "observe": [ "Prioritises the essential over the anecdotal.", "Uses their own words, not memorised formulas." ], "limits": [], "aiAdaptation": "If they worked with AI, ask them not to quote the AI verbatim in the oral answer: force own-word reformulation.", "example": "After a class on photosynthesis, each student summarises in 30 seconds why plants need light." } } }, { "id": "debate-evidencias", "slug": "debate-con-evidencias", "url": "https://evidencias-ia-evaluacion.com/evidencia/debate-con-evidencias", "name_es": "Debate con evidencias", "name_en": "Evidence-based debate", "short_description_es": "Los participantes defienden una posición utilizando datos, conceptos y fuentes verificables.", "short_description_en": "Participants defend a position using data, concepts and verifiable sources.", "family": "oral-dialogica", "family_secondary": "cooperativa", "primary_claim": "decide-criterio", "secondary_claims": "comprende|usa-ia-critica", "evidence_kind": "desempeno", "evidence_modes": "oral|desempeno-controlado", "stages": "primaria|secundaria|bachillerato|fp|universidad|adultos", "areas": "", "moments": "durante|despues", "purposes": "formativo|calificable", "modalities": "oral", "seia_levels": "1|2|3", "time_min": 20, "time_max": 45, "teacher_load": "media", "participation": "grupo-clase", "scalability": "hasta-30", "collections": "", "ai_relation": "compatible", "review_status": "borrador-editorial", "version": "v0.10", "last_reviewed": "2026-07", "content": { "es": { "name": "Debate con evidencias", "shortDescription": "Los participantes defienden una posición utilizando datos, conceptos y fuentes verificables.", "whenToUse": "Cuando el tema admita más de una posición razonable y quieras evaluar criterio, no opinión.", "minimalVersion": "Los participantes defienden una posición utilizando datos, conceptos y fuentes verificables.", "instructions": [ "Reparte posiciones no elegidas: asigna, no dejes elegir.", "Exige al menos dos evidencias por argumento (datos, cita, ejemplo).", "Deja un turno final donde cada equipo reconoce algo válido del contrario." ], "observe": [ "Distingue evidencia de opinión.", "Cita fuentes reconocibles, no genéricas.", "Responde a la refutación sin repetirse." ], "limits": [], "aiAdaptation": "Permite usar IA para preparar argumentos, pero prohíbe llevar guion escrito por IA al debate. Exige citar fuentes primarias, no sólo la IA.", "example": "Debate sobre uso de móviles en secundaria con datos de estudios recientes asignados." }, "en": { "name": "Evidence-based debate", "shortDescription": "Participants defend a position using data, concepts and verifiable sources.", "whenToUse": "When the topic allows more than one reasonable position and you want to assess criteria, not opinion.", "minimalVersion": "Participants defend a position using data, concepts and verifiable sources.", "instructions": [ "Assign positions rather than let students choose.", "Require at least two pieces of evidence per argument (data, citation, example).", "Leave a final turn where each team acknowledges something valid from the opponent." ], "observe": [ "Distinguishes evidence from opinion.", "Cites recognisable, not generic, sources.", "Responds to rebuttal without repeating themselves." ], "limits": [], "aiAdaptation": "Allow AI to prepare arguments, but ban AI-written scripts during the debate. Require primary sources, not the AI itself.", "example": "Debate on mobile-phone use in secondary school with data from assigned recent studies." } } }, { "id": "piensa-conversa-comparte", "slug": "piensa-conversa-comparte", "url": "https://evidencias-ia-evaluacion.com/evidencia/piensa-conversa-comparte", "name_es": "Piensa, conversa y comparte", "name_en": "Think, pair, share", "short_description_es": "Respuesta individual, contraste en pareja y versión revisada compartida con la clase.", "short_description_en": "Individual answer, pair contrast and a revised version shared with the class.", "family": "cooperativa", "family_secondary": "oral-dialogica", "primary_claim": "comprende", "secondary_claims": "decide-criterio", "evidence_kind": "proceso", "evidence_modes": "oral|proceso", "stages": "primaria|secundaria|bachillerato|fp|universidad|adultos", "areas": "", "moments": "durante", "purposes": "formativo|calificable", "modalities": "oral|escrita", "seia_levels": "0|1|2", "time_min": 5, "time_max": 12, "teacher_load": "baja", "participation": "pareja", "scalability": "cualquiera", "collections": "baja-revision|grupos-numerosos", "ai_relation": "compatible", "review_status": "borrador-editorial", "version": "v0.10", "last_reviewed": "2026-07", "content": { "es": { "name": "Piensa, conversa y comparte", "shortDescription": "Respuesta individual, contraste en pareja y versión revisada compartida con la clase.", "whenToUse": "Para desbloquear participación y comprobar comprensión rápida.", "minimalVersion": "Respuesta individual, contraste en pareja y versión revisada compartida con la clase.", "instructions": [ "1 min individual escribiendo respuesta.", "3 min por parejas: contrastan y revisan.", "2-3 parejas comparten la versión revisada, no la inicial." ], "observe": [ "Si la versión revisada mejora sobre la individual.", "Quién habla y quién no en las parejas." ], "limits": [], "aiAdaptation": "Puedes pedir que comparen su respuesta individual con una salida de IA antes del contraste en pareja.", "example": "Antes de resolver un problema, cada pareja plantea la estrategia y la comparte." }, "en": { "name": "Think, pair, share", "shortDescription": "Individual answer, pair contrast and a revised version shared with the class.", "whenToUse": "To unlock participation and quickly check understanding.", "minimalVersion": "Individual answer, pair contrast and a revised version shared with the class.", "instructions": [ "1 min individual writing.", "3 min in pairs: contrast and revise.", "2-3 pairs share the revised, not the initial, version." ], "observe": [ "Whether the revised version improves on the individual one.", "Who speaks and who doesn't in each pair." ], "limits": [], "aiAdaptation": "You can ask them to compare their individual answer with an AI output before pairing up.", "example": "Before solving a problem, each pair proposes a strategy and shares it." } } }, { "id": "ensenanza-pares", "slug": "ensenanza-entre-pares", "url": "https://evidencias-ia-evaluacion.com/evidencia/ensenanza-entre-pares", "name_es": "Enseñanza entre pares", "name_en": "Peer teaching", "short_description_es": "Un estudiante explica un procedimiento o concepto a otro y responde a sus preguntas.", "short_description_en": "A student explains a procedure or concept to another and answers their questions.", "family": "cooperativa", "family_secondary": "oral-dialogica", "primary_claim": "comprende", "secondary_claims": "puede-hacerlo", "evidence_kind": "desempeno", "evidence_modes": "oral|desempeno-controlado", "stages": "primaria|secundaria|bachillerato|fp|universidad|adultos", "areas": "", "moments": "durante", "purposes": "formativo|calificable", "modalities": "oral", "seia_levels": "0|1|2", "time_min": 8, "time_max": 15, "teacher_load": "baja", "participation": "pareja", "scalability": "hasta-30", "collections": "baja-revision", "ai_relation": "compatible", "review_status": "borrador-editorial", "version": "v0.10", "last_reviewed": "2026-07", "content": { "es": { "name": "Enseñanza entre pares", "shortDescription": "Un estudiante explica un procedimiento o concepto a otro y responde a sus preguntas.", "whenToUse": "Cuando quieras comprobar comprensión profunda: explicar exige más que reconocer.", "minimalVersion": "Un estudiante explica un procedimiento o concepto a otro y responde a sus preguntas.", "instructions": [ "Empareja niveles heterogéneos.", "Da al que enseña 2 minutos para preparar la explicación.", "Al final, quien escuchó formula 1 pregunta que quien enseñó debe responder." ], "observe": [ "Usa ejemplos propios.", "Detecta y corrige la duda del compañero." ], "limits": [], "aiAdaptation": "Prohíbe leer la explicación desde una salida de IA: exige explicación en vivo con hoja en blanco.", "example": "En matemáticas, quien resolvió correctamente explica el procedimiento paso a paso a un compañero." }, "en": { "name": "Peer teaching", "shortDescription": "A student explains a procedure or concept to another and answers their questions.", "whenToUse": "When you want to check deep understanding: explaining requires more than recognising.", "minimalVersion": "A student explains a procedure or concept to another and answers their questions.", "instructions": [ "Pair heterogeneous levels.", "Give the teacher 2 min to prepare.", "At the end, the listener asks 1 question that the teacher must answer." ], "observe": [ "Uses their own examples.", "Detects and addresses the peer's doubt." ], "limits": [], "aiAdaptation": "Ban reading the explanation from AI output: require live explanation with a blank sheet.", "example": "In maths, the student who solved correctly explains the procedure step by step to a peer." } } }, { "id": "entrevista-companeros", "slug": "entrevista-entre-companeros", "url": "https://evidencias-ia-evaluacion.com/evidencia/entrevista-entre-companeros", "name_es": "Entrevista entre compañeros", "name_en": "Peer interview", "short_description_es": "Las parejas se formulan preguntas preparadas para comprobar comprensión y decisiones.", "short_description_en": "Pairs ask each other prepared questions to check understanding and decisions.", "family": "cooperativa", "family_secondary": "oral-dialogica", "primary_claim": "comprende", "secondary_claims": "decide-criterio", "evidence_kind": "desempeno", "evidence_modes": "oral", "stages": "primaria|secundaria|bachillerato|fp|universidad|adultos", "areas": "", "moments": "durante", "purposes": "formativo|calificable", "modalities": "oral", "seia_levels": "0|1|2|3", "time_min": 10, "time_max": 20, "teacher_load": "baja", "participation": "pareja", "scalability": "hasta-30", "collections": "baja-revision", "ai_relation": "compatible", "review_status": "borrador-editorial", "version": "v0.10", "last_reviewed": "2026-07", "content": { "es": { "name": "Entrevista entre compañeros", "shortDescription": "Las parejas se formulan preguntas preparadas para comprobar comprensión y decisiones.", "whenToUse": "Tras una tarea con decisiones no triviales, para hacerlas explícitas.", "minimalVersion": "Las parejas se formulan preguntas preparadas para comprobar comprensión y decisiones.", "instructions": [ "Facilita un guion con 4 preguntas obligatorias y 2 libres.", "Cada pareja se entrevista mutuamente 5 minutos por turno.", "Anotan 1 idea que hayan aprendido del compañero." ], "observe": [ "Respuestas concretas, no genéricas." ], "limits": [], "aiAdaptation": "Incluye una pregunta obligatoria: '¿Qué te aportó la IA y qué descartaste?'", "example": "Tras un trabajo de investigación, se entrevistan sobre las fuentes descartadas y por qué." }, "en": { "name": "Peer interview", "shortDescription": "Pairs ask each other prepared questions to check understanding and decisions.", "whenToUse": "After a task with non-trivial decisions, to make them explicit.", "minimalVersion": "Pairs ask each other prepared questions to check understanding and decisions.", "instructions": [ "Provide a script with 4 mandatory and 2 free questions.", "Each pair interviews each other for 5 minutes per turn.", "They note 1 idea learnt from the peer." ], "observe": [ "Concrete, not generic, answers." ], "limits": [], "aiAdaptation": "Include one mandatory question: 'What did AI give you and what did you discard?'", "example": "After research, they interview each other about discarded sources and why." } } }, { "id": "rueda-preguntas", "slug": "rueda-de-preguntas", "url": "https://evidencias-ia-evaluacion.com/evidencia/rueda-de-preguntas", "name_es": "Rueda de preguntas", "name_en": "Question round", "short_description_es": "Cada estudiante responde una pregunta y formula la siguiente a otro compañero.", "short_description_en": "Each student answers a question and passes a new one to a peer.", "family": "oral-dialogica", "family_secondary": "cooperativa", "primary_claim": "comprende", "secondary_claims": "", "evidence_kind": "desempeno", "evidence_modes": "oral", "stages": "primaria|secundaria|bachillerato|fp|universidad|adultos", "areas": "", "moments": "durante", "purposes": "formativo|calificable", "modalities": "oral", "seia_levels": "0|1|2", "time_min": 8, "time_max": 15, "teacher_load": "baja", "participation": "grupo-clase", "scalability": "hasta-30", "collections": "baja-revision", "ai_relation": "compatible", "review_status": "borrador-editorial", "version": "v0.10", "last_reviewed": "2026-07", "content": { "es": { "name": "Rueda de preguntas", "shortDescription": "Cada estudiante responde una pregunta y formula la siguiente a otro compañero.", "whenToUse": "En clases pequeñas o en pequeño grupo, para cerrar una unidad.", "minimalVersion": "Cada estudiante responde una pregunta y formula la siguiente a otro compañero.", "instructions": [ "Da el arranque: una pregunta docente.", "Cada estudiante responde y formula otra dirigida a un compañero.", "Nadie puede repetir pregunta." ], "observe": [ "Calidad de las preguntas formuladas por los estudiantes." ], "limits": [], "aiAdaptation": "Pide una pregunta que no se pueda responder con IA sin pensar.", "example": "Cierre de tema histórico donde cada pregunta enlaza con la anterior." }, "en": { "name": "Question round", "shortDescription": "Each student answers a question and passes a new one to a peer.", "whenToUse": "In small classes or small groups, to close a unit.", "minimalVersion": "Each student answers a question and passes a new one to a peer.", "instructions": [ "Start with a teacher question.", "Each student answers and asks another peer.", "No repeated questions." ], "observe": [ "Quality of student-generated questions." ], "limits": [], "aiAdaptation": "Request a question that cannot be answered with AI without thinking.", "example": "Closing a history unit where each question links to the previous one." } } }, { "id": "debate-pecera", "slug": "debate-en-pecera", "url": "https://evidencias-ia-evaluacion.com/evidencia/debate-en-pecera", "name_es": "Debate en pecera", "name_en": "Fishbowl debate", "short_description_es": "Un pequeño grupo debate y el resto observa con criterios, después aporta.", "short_description_en": "A small group debates while the rest observes with criteria and then contributes.", "family": "oral-dialogica", "family_secondary": "cooperativa", "primary_claim": "decide-criterio", "secondary_claims": "comprende", "evidence_kind": "desempeno", "evidence_modes": "oral", "stages": "primaria|secundaria|bachillerato|fp|universidad|adultos", "areas": "", "moments": "durante", "purposes": "formativo|calificable", "modalities": "oral", "seia_levels": "1|2|3", "time_min": 20, "time_max": 40, "teacher_load": "media", "participation": "grupo-clase", "scalability": "mas-30-equipos", "collections": "grupos-numerosos", "ai_relation": "compatible", "review_status": "borrador-editorial", "version": "v0.10", "last_reviewed": "2026-07", "content": { "es": { "name": "Debate en pecera", "shortDescription": "Un pequeño grupo debate y el resto observa con criterios, después aporta.", "whenToUse": "Grupos grandes donde no todos pueden debatir a la vez.", "minimalVersion": "Un pequeño grupo debate y el resto observa con criterios, después aporta.", "instructions": [ "Selecciona 4-6 debatientes; el resto observa con rúbrica.", "Rota entradas: observadores pueden tocar el hombro y sustituir.", "Cierra con contribución conjunta." ], "observe": [ "Escuchan antes de responder.", "Usan evidencias, no impresiones." ], "limits": [], "aiAdaptation": "Permite un turno donde los observadores comprueben datos citados con una fuente distinta a la IA.", "example": "Debate en pecera sobre dilemas éticos del uso de IA en el aula." }, "en": { "name": "Fishbowl debate", "shortDescription": "A small group debates while the rest observes with criteria and then contributes.", "whenToUse": "Large groups where not everyone can debate at once.", "minimalVersion": "A small group debates while the rest observes with criteria and then contributes.", "instructions": [ "Pick 4-6 debaters; the rest observes with a rubric.", "Rotate: observers can tap in and swap.", "Close with joint contribution." ], "observe": [ "Listen before responding.", "Use evidence, not impressions." ], "limits": [], "aiAdaptation": "Allow a turn where observers verify quoted data with a source other than AI.", "example": "Fishbowl on ethical dilemmas of AI in the classroom." } } }, { "id": "rueda-prensa", "slug": "rueda-de-prensa", "url": "https://evidencias-ia-evaluacion.com/evidencia/rueda-de-prensa", "name_es": "Rueda de prensa", "name_en": "Press conference", "short_description_es": "Un estudiante o equipo presenta una propuesta y responde preguntas de la clase.", "short_description_en": "A student or team presents a proposal and answers questions from the class.", "family": "oral-dialogica", "family_secondary": "practica-desempeno", "primary_claim": "decide-criterio", "secondary_claims": "puede-hacerlo|comprende", "evidence_kind": "desempeno", "evidence_modes": "oral|desempeno-controlado", "stages": "primaria|secundaria|bachillerato|fp|universidad|adultos", "areas": "", "moments": "durante", "purposes": "formativo|calificable", "modalities": "oral", "seia_levels": "1|2|3", "time_min": 12, "time_max": 25, "teacher_load": "media", "participation": "equipo", "scalability": "hasta-30", "collections": "", "ai_relation": "compatible", "review_status": "borrador-editorial", "version": "v0.10", "last_reviewed": "2026-07", "content": { "es": { "name": "Rueda de prensa", "shortDescription": "Un estudiante o equipo presenta una propuesta y responde preguntas de la clase.", "whenToUse": "Cierre de proyecto o defensa de una decisión de diseño.", "minimalVersion": "Un estudiante o equipo presenta una propuesta y responde preguntas de la clase.", "instructions": [ "Prepara la presentación en 5 minutos máx.", "Prepara al público con 3 tipos de pregunta obligatorios: 'por qué', 'y si', 'cómo'.", "Documenta 2 preguntas y sus respuestas." ], "observe": [ "Mantiene la coherencia bajo presión de preguntas." ], "limits": [], "aiAdaptation": "El público puede pedir cómo llegaron a una cifra o cita: exige trazabilidad.", "example": "Un equipo defiende su solución a un problema de ingeniería." }, "en": { "name": "Press conference", "shortDescription": "A student or team presents a proposal and answers questions from the class.", "whenToUse": "Project close or defence of a design decision.", "minimalVersion": "A student or team presents a proposal and answers questions from the class.", "instructions": [ "Cap presentation at 5 minutes.", "Prime the audience with 3 mandatory question types: 'why', 'what if', 'how'.", "Log 2 questions and their answers." ], "observe": [ "Keeps coherence under questioning." ], "limits": [], "aiAdaptation": "The audience can request how a figure or quote was reached: enforce traceability.", "example": "A team defends their solution to an engineering problem." } } }, { "id": "galeria-comentada", "slug": "galeria-comentada", "url": "https://evidencias-ia-evaluacion.com/evidencia/galeria-comentada", "name_es": "Galería comentada", "name_en": "Curated gallery walk", "short_description_es": "Los trabajos se exponen y sus autores explican decisiones a grupos que rotan.", "short_description_en": "Works are exhibited and authors explain decisions to rotating groups.", "family": "oral-dialogica", "family_secondary": "cooperativa", "primary_claim": "decide-criterio", "secondary_claims": "muestra-avance|comprende", "evidence_kind": "desempeno", "evidence_modes": "oral|producto", "stages": "primaria|secundaria|bachillerato|fp|universidad|adultos", "areas": "", "moments": "durante", "purposes": "formativo|calificable", "modalities": "oral|visual", "seia_levels": "1|2|3", "time_min": 20, "time_max": 40, "teacher_load": "media", "participation": "equipo", "scalability": "mas-30-equipos", "collections": "grupos-numerosos", "ai_relation": "compatible", "review_status": "borrador-editorial", "version": "v0.10", "last_reviewed": "2026-07", "content": { "es": { "name": "Galería comentada", "shortDescription": "Los trabajos se exponen y sus autores explican decisiones a grupos que rotan.", "whenToUse": "Cuando el producto merece defensa y quieres oír a todos, no solo a los 'buenos'.", "minimalVersion": "Los trabajos se exponen y sus autores explican decisiones a grupos que rotan.", "instructions": [ "Cuelga los trabajos en la pared o en mesas.", "El autor está junto a su trabajo 3-4 min por rotación.", "Los visitantes dejan una pregunta o mejora." ], "observe": [ "El autor explica decisiones, no solo el resultado." ], "limits": [], "aiAdaptation": "El cartel debe indicar qué aportó la IA y qué se descartó.", "example": "Feria de proyectos con carteles y explicación oral por rotaciones." }, "en": { "name": "Curated gallery walk", "shortDescription": "Works are exhibited and authors explain decisions to rotating groups.", "whenToUse": "When the product deserves defence and you want to hear everyone.", "minimalVersion": "Works are exhibited and authors explain decisions to rotating groups.", "instructions": [ "Post works on walls or tables.", "The author stands by their work 3-4 min per rotation.", "Visitors leave a question or improvement." ], "observe": [ "Author explains decisions, not just the result." ], "limits": [], "aiAdaptation": "The poster must indicate what AI contributed and what was discarded.", "example": "Project fair with posters and oral rotation." } } }, { "id": "predice-observa-explica", "slug": "predice-observa-explica", "url": "https://evidencias-ia-evaluacion.com/evidencia/predice-observa-explica", "name_es": "Predice, observa y explica", "name_en": "Predict, observe, explain", "short_description_es": "El estudiante anticipa un resultado, observa lo sucedido y explica las diferencias.", "short_description_en": "The student predicts a result, observes what happens and explains the differences.", "family": "practica-desempeno", "family_secondary": "oral-dialogica", "primary_claim": "comprende", "secondary_claims": "decide-criterio", "evidence_kind": "proceso", "evidence_modes": "oral|proceso", "stages": "infantil|primaria|secundaria|bachillerato", "areas": "", "moments": "durante", "purposes": "formativo|calificable", "modalities": "oral|escrita|practica", "seia_levels": "0|1|2", "time_min": 10, "time_max": 20, "teacher_load": "media", "participation": "equipo", "scalability": "hasta-30", "collections": "", "ai_relation": "compatible", "review_status": "borrador-editorial", "version": "v0.10", "last_reviewed": "2026-07", "content": { "es": { "name": "Predice, observa y explica", "shortDescription": "El estudiante anticipa un resultado, observa lo sucedido y explica las diferencias.", "whenToUse": "Cuando hay una demostración observable: experimento, simulación, cálculo con resultado inesperado.", "minimalVersion": "El estudiante anticipa un resultado, observa lo sucedido y explica las diferencias.", "instructions": [ "Antes: cada estudiante anota su predicción con motivo.", "Durante: observa y anota.", "Después: explica la diferencia con la predicción." ], "observe": [ "Reconoce el error de la predicción sin justificarlo con vaguedades." ], "limits": [], "aiAdaptation": "La IA no debe intervenir entre predicción y observación.", "example": "Experimento de flotación: predice qué objetos flotarán y por qué." }, "en": { "name": "Predict, observe, explain", "shortDescription": "The student predicts a result, observes what happens and explains the differences.", "whenToUse": "When there is an observable demo: experiment, simulation, calculation with a surprising result.", "minimalVersion": "The student predicts a result, observes what happens and explains the differences.", "instructions": [ "Before: each student writes their prediction with a reason.", "During: observe and note.", "After: explain the gap with the prediction." ], "observe": [ "Acknowledges the wrong prediction without vague justification." ], "limits": [], "aiAdaptation": "AI must not intervene between prediction and observation.", "example": "Buoyancy experiment: predict which objects float and why." } } }, { "id": "rompecabezas-expertos", "slug": "rompecabezas-de-expertos", "url": "https://evidencias-ia-evaluacion.com/evidencia/rompecabezas-de-expertos", "name_es": "Rompecabezas de expertos", "name_en": "Jigsaw", "short_description_es": "Cada miembro aprende una parte, la enseña al equipo y contribuye a una respuesta común.", "short_description_en": "Each member learns a part, teaches it to the team and contributes to a shared answer.", "family": "cooperativa", "family_secondary": "oral-dialogica", "primary_claim": "comprende", "secondary_claims": "puede-hacerlo", "evidence_kind": "desempeno", "evidence_modes": "oral|proceso", "stages": "primaria|secundaria|bachillerato|fp|universidad|adultos", "areas": "", "moments": "durante", "purposes": "formativo|calificable", "modalities": "oral|escrita", "seia_levels": "0|1|2", "time_min": 30, "time_max": 60, "teacher_load": "media", "participation": "equipo", "scalability": "mas-30-equipos", "collections": "individual-tras-grupo|grupos-numerosos", "ai_relation": "compatible", "review_status": "borrador-editorial", "version": "v0.10", "last_reviewed": "2026-07", "content": { "es": { "name": "Rompecabezas de expertos", "shortDescription": "Cada miembro aprende una parte, la enseña al equipo y contribuye a una respuesta común.", "whenToUse": "Contenido que se puede fraccionar en 4-5 piezas complementarias.", "minimalVersion": "Cada miembro aprende una parte, la enseña al equipo y contribuye a una respuesta común.", "instructions": [ "Grupos base de 4-5. Cada miembro va al grupo de expertos de su pieza.", "Los expertos preparan la explicación 15-20 min.", "Regresan al grupo base y enseñan; el grupo produce la respuesta común." ], "observe": [ "Cada miembro puede responder por cualquier pieza al final." ], "limits": [], "aiAdaptation": "Los expertos pueden usar IA para preparar, pero deben enseñar sin leer.", "example": "Cuatro artículos de una ley, un experto por artículo." }, "en": { "name": "Jigsaw", "shortDescription": "Each member learns a part, teaches it to the team and contributes to a shared answer.", "whenToUse": "Content that can be split into 4-5 complementary pieces.", "minimalVersion": "Each member learns a part, teaches it to the team and contributes to a shared answer.", "instructions": [ "Base groups of 4-5. Each member joins the experts' group for their piece.", "Experts prepare their explanation for 15-20 min.", "They return to the base group and teach; the group produces the common answer." ], "observe": [ "Each member can answer for any piece by the end." ], "limits": [], "aiAdaptation": "Experts may use AI to prepare but must teach without reading.", "example": "Four articles of a law, one expert per article." } } }, { "id": "resolucion-roles", "slug": "resolucion-cooperativa-con-roles", "url": "https://evidencias-ia-evaluacion.com/evidencia/resolucion-cooperativa-con-roles", "name_es": "Resolución cooperativa con roles", "name_en": "Cooperative solving with roles", "short_description_es": "El grupo resuelve una tarea con responsabilidades observables y rotatorias.", "short_description_en": "The group solves a task with observable, rotating responsibilities.", "family": "cooperativa", "family_secondary": "practica-desempeno", "primary_claim": "puede-hacerlo", "secondary_claims": "decide-criterio", "evidence_kind": "desempeno", "evidence_modes": "proceso|desempeno-controlado", "stages": "primaria|secundaria|bachillerato|fp|universidad|adultos", "areas": "", "moments": "durante", "purposes": "formativo|calificable", "modalities": "cualquiera", "seia_levels": "0|1|2|3", "time_min": 20, "time_max": 45, "teacher_load": "media", "participation": "equipo", "scalability": "mas-30-equipos", "collections": "grupos-numerosos", "ai_relation": "compatible", "review_status": "borrador-editorial", "version": "v0.10", "last_reviewed": "2026-07", "content": { "es": { "name": "Resolución cooperativa con roles", "shortDescription": "El grupo resuelve una tarea con responsabilidades observables y rotatorias.", "whenToUse": "Tareas complejas donde el trabajo en grupo suele opacar la contribución individual.", "minimalVersion": "El grupo resuelve una tarea con responsabilidades observables y rotatorias.", "instructions": [ "Define 4 roles observables: portavoz, revisor, coordinador, secretario.", "Cada rol tiene indicadores claros.", "Rota roles a media tarea." ], "observe": [ "El rol se ejerce, no se declara." ], "limits": [], "aiAdaptation": "Añade el rol de 'verificador de IA': contrasta lo que aporte la IA con otra fuente.", "example": "Resolución cooperativa de un caso jurídico con 4 roles." }, "en": { "name": "Cooperative solving with roles", "shortDescription": "The group solves a task with observable, rotating responsibilities.", "whenToUse": "Complex tasks where group work often hides individual contribution.", "minimalVersion": "The group solves a task with observable, rotating responsibilities.", "instructions": [ "Define 4 observable roles: spokesperson, checker, coordinator, secretary.", "Each role has clear indicators.", "Rotate roles halfway through." ], "observe": [ "The role is exercised, not merely declared." ], "limits": [], "aiAdaptation": "Add an 'AI verifier' role: cross-checks AI outputs with another source.", "example": "Cooperative resolution of a legal case with 4 roles." } } }, { "id": "consenso-razonado", "slug": "consenso-razonado", "url": "https://evidencias-ia-evaluacion.com/evidencia/consenso-razonado", "name_es": "Consenso razonado", "name_en": "Reasoned consensus", "short_description_es": "El equipo llega a una decisión común dejando constancia de argumentos descartados y aceptados.", "short_description_en": "The team reaches a shared decision, logging accepted and rejected arguments.", "family": "cooperativa", "family_secondary": "oral-dialogica", "primary_claim": "decide-criterio", "secondary_claims": "", "evidence_kind": "proceso", "evidence_modes": "proceso", "stages": "primaria|secundaria|bachillerato|fp|universidad|adultos", "areas": "", "moments": "durante", "purposes": "formativo|calificable", "modalities": "oral|escrita", "seia_levels": "0|1|2|3", "time_min": 15, "time_max": 30, "teacher_load": "media", "participation": "equipo", "scalability": "hasta-30", "collections": "", "ai_relation": "compatible", "review_status": "borrador-editorial", "version": "v0.10", "last_reviewed": "2026-07", "content": { "es": { "name": "Consenso razonado", "shortDescription": "El equipo llega a una decisión común dejando constancia de argumentos descartados y aceptados.", "whenToUse": "Cuando la decisión importa más que el resultado técnico correcto.", "minimalVersion": "El equipo llega a una decisión común dejando constancia de argumentos descartados y aceptados.", "instructions": [ "Fase individual: cada miembro propone y justifica.", "Fase grupal: se listan pros y contras.", "Se firma la decisión con los argumentos aceptados y descartados." ], "observe": [ "Los descartes se justifican, no se ignoran." ], "limits": [], "aiAdaptation": "Incluye una fila donde se registre qué aportó la IA y cómo se validó.", "example": "Consenso sobre el criterio para seleccionar fuentes en un trabajo." }, "en": { "name": "Reasoned consensus", "shortDescription": "The team reaches a shared decision, logging accepted and rejected arguments.", "whenToUse": "When the decision matters more than a technically correct answer.", "minimalVersion": "The team reaches a shared decision, logging accepted and rejected arguments.", "instructions": [ "Individual phase: each member proposes and justifies.", "Group phase: list pros and cons.", "Sign the decision with accepted and rejected arguments." ], "observe": [ "Rejections are justified, not ignored." ], "limits": [], "aiAdaptation": "Add a row logging what AI contributed and how it was validated.", "example": "Consensus on criteria to pick sources for a paper." } } }, { "id": "portavoz-aleatorio", "slug": "portavoz-aleatorio", "url": "https://evidencias-ia-evaluacion.com/evidencia/portavoz-aleatorio", "name_es": "Portavoz aleatorio", "name_en": "Random spokesperson", "short_description_es": "Después del trabajo, el docente elige quién explicará la respuesta del equipo.", "short_description_en": "After the work, the teacher picks who will explain the team's answer.", "family": "cooperativa", "family_secondary": "oral-dialogica", "primary_claim": "comprende", "secondary_claims": "decide-criterio", "evidence_kind": "desempeno", "evidence_modes": "oral", "stages": "primaria|secundaria|bachillerato|fp|universidad|adultos", "areas": "", "moments": "durante", "purposes": "formativo|calificable", "modalities": "oral", "seia_levels": "0|1|2|3", "time_min": 3, "time_max": 8, "teacher_load": "baja", "participation": "equipo", "scalability": "mas-30-equipos", "collections": "individual-tras-grupo|rapidas|baja-revision|grupos-numerosos", "ai_relation": "compatible", "review_status": "borrador-editorial", "version": "v0.10", "last_reviewed": "2026-07", "content": { "es": { "name": "Portavoz aleatorio", "shortDescription": "Después del trabajo, el docente elige quién explicará la respuesta del equipo.", "whenToUse": "Para asegurar que todos se preparen igual, no solo el líder habitual.", "minimalVersion": "Después del trabajo, el docente elige quién explicará la respuesta del equipo.", "instructions": [ "Anuncia al inicio que el portavoz se elegirá al azar.", "Al terminar, elige mediante palitos o app.", "Si falla, permite al equipo un turno adicional breve." ], "observe": [ "Explica la respuesta del equipo, no la suya propia." ], "limits": [], "aiAdaptation": "El portavoz debe explicar sin apoyarse en la salida de IA.", "example": "Tras resolver un problema, elegimos quién sale a la pizarra." }, "en": { "name": "Random spokesperson", "shortDescription": "After the work, the teacher picks who will explain the team's answer.", "whenToUse": "To ensure everyone prepares, not just the usual leader.", "minimalVersion": "After the work, the teacher picks who will explain the team's answer.", "instructions": [ "Announce at the start that the spokesperson will be random.", "At the end, pick with sticks or an app.", "If they fail, allow the team a short extra turn." ], "observe": [ "Explains the team's answer, not their own." ], "limits": [], "aiAdaptation": "The spokesperson must explain without leaning on AI output.", "example": "After solving a problem, we pick who goes to the board." } } }, { "id": "respuesta-individual-post-grupo", "slug": "respuesta-individual-post-grupo", "url": "https://evidencias-ia-evaluacion.com/evidencia/respuesta-individual-post-grupo", "name_es": "Respuesta individual después del grupo", "name_en": "Individual answer after the group", "short_description_es": "Tras una tarea cooperativa, cada estudiante responde individualmente una pregunta de contraste.", "short_description_en": "After a cooperative task, each student individually answers a contrast question.", "family": "cooperativa", "family_secondary": "escrita-grafica", "primary_claim": "comprende", "secondary_claims": "", "evidence_kind": "producto", "evidence_modes": "proceso|producto", "stages": "primaria|secundaria|bachillerato|fp|universidad|adultos", "areas": "", "moments": "durante", "purposes": "formativo|calificable", "modalities": "escrita|oral", "seia_levels": "0|1|2|3", "time_min": 5, "time_max": 10, "teacher_load": "media", "participation": "individual", "scalability": "cualquiera", "collections": "individual-tras-grupo|rapidas|grupos-numerosos", "ai_relation": "compatible", "review_status": "borrador-editorial", "version": "v0.10", "last_reviewed": "2026-07", "content": { "es": { "name": "Respuesta individual después del grupo", "shortDescription": "Tras una tarea cooperativa, cada estudiante responde individualmente una pregunta de contraste.", "whenToUse": "Para asegurar aprendizaje individual tras el trabajo cooperativo.", "minimalVersion": "Tras una tarea cooperativa, cada estudiante responde individualmente una pregunta de contraste.", "instructions": [ "Diseña una pregunta que no se resuelva copiando la respuesta del grupo.", "Aplícala inmediatamente al terminar.", "Compara respuestas dentro del grupo." ], "observe": [ "Coherencia entre respuesta individual y aportación al grupo." ], "limits": [], "aiAdaptation": "Sin acceso a IA en esta fase individual.", "example": "Tras resolver un caso, se pide cambiar una variable y decidir de nuevo." }, "en": { "name": "Individual answer after the group", "shortDescription": "After a cooperative task, each student individually answers a contrast question.", "whenToUse": "To ensure individual learning after group work.", "minimalVersion": "After a cooperative task, each student individually answers a contrast question.", "instructions": [ "Design a question that cannot be answered by copying the group's answer.", "Apply immediately at the end.", "Compare within the group." ], "observe": [ "Consistency between individual answer and group contribution." ], "limits": [], "aiAdaptation": "No AI access during this individual phase.", "example": "After a case, change a variable and decide again." } } }, { "id": "controversia-academica", "slug": "controversia-academica", "url": "https://evidencias-ia-evaluacion.com/evidencia/controversia-academica", "name_es": "Controversia académica estructurada", "name_en": "Structured academic controversy", "short_description_es": "Los equipos estudian posiciones opuestas, intercambian argumentos y redactan una conclusión revisada.", "short_description_en": "Teams study opposing positions, swap arguments and draft a revised conclusion.", "family": "cooperativa", "family_secondary": "oral-dialogica", "primary_claim": "decide-criterio", "secondary_claims": "comprende|usa-ia-critica", "evidence_kind": "desempeno", "evidence_modes": "proceso|oral", "stages": "secundaria|bachillerato|fp|universidad|adultos", "areas": "", "moments": "durante", "purposes": "formativo|calificable", "modalities": "oral|escrita", "seia_levels": "1|2|3", "time_min": 40, "time_max": 90, "teacher_load": "alta", "participation": "equipo", "scalability": "hasta-30", "collections": "", "ai_relation": "compatible", "review_status": "borrador-editorial", "version": "v0.10", "last_reviewed": "2026-07", "content": { "es": { "name": "Controversia académica estructurada", "shortDescription": "Los equipos estudian posiciones opuestas, intercambian argumentos y redactan una conclusión revisada.", "whenToUse": "Temas polémicos que exigen mirar más allá de la propia opinión.", "minimalVersion": "Los equipos estudian posiciones opuestas, intercambian argumentos y redactan una conclusión revisada.", "instructions": [ "Cada equipo prepara su posición.", "Intercambia argumentos con el equipo contrario.", "Cambia de posición y defiende la contraria.", "Redacta una conclusión conjunta razonada." ], "observe": [ "Capacidad de defender la posición contraria con solidez." ], "limits": [], "aiAdaptation": "Permite IA en preparación, pero exige citar fuentes primarias en la conclusión.", "example": "Controversia sobre política energética con posiciones asignadas." }, "en": { "name": "Structured academic controversy", "shortDescription": "Teams study opposing positions, swap arguments and draft a revised conclusion.", "whenToUse": "Contested topics that demand looking beyond one's opinion.", "minimalVersion": "Teams study opposing positions, swap arguments and draft a revised conclusion.", "instructions": [ "Each team prepares its position.", "Swap arguments with the opposite team.", "Switch positions and defend the other side.", "Draft a joint reasoned conclusion." ], "observe": [ "Ability to defend the opposite side robustly." ], "limits": [], "aiAdaptation": "Allow AI in preparation but require primary sources in the conclusion.", "example": "Controversy on energy policy with assigned positions." } } }, { "id": "revision-cruzada-equipos", "slug": "revision-cruzada-entre-equipos", "url": "https://evidencias-ia-evaluacion.com/evidencia/revision-cruzada-entre-equipos", "name_es": "Revisión cruzada entre equipos", "name_en": "Cross-team review", "short_description_es": "Cada equipo analiza el trabajo de otro con criterios y propone una mejora concreta.", "short_description_en": "Each team analyses another's work with criteria and proposes a concrete improvement.", "family": "cooperativa", "family_secondary": "proceso-evolucion", "primary_claim": "decide-criterio", "secondary_claims": "comprende", "evidence_kind": "proceso", "evidence_modes": "proceso|producto", "stages": "primaria|secundaria|bachillerato|fp|universidad|adultos", "areas": "", "moments": "durante", "purposes": "formativo|calificable", "modalities": "escrita", "seia_levels": "0|1|2|3", "time_min": 15, "time_max": 30, "teacher_load": "media", "participation": "equipo", "scalability": "mas-30-equipos", "collections": "grupos-numerosos", "ai_relation": "compatible", "review_status": "borrador-editorial", "version": "v0.10", "last_reviewed": "2026-07", "content": { "es": { "name": "Revisión cruzada entre equipos", "shortDescription": "Cada equipo analiza el trabajo de otro con criterios y propone una mejora concreta.", "whenToUse": "Antes de la entrega final, para mejorar y evaluar criterio.", "minimalVersion": "Cada equipo analiza el trabajo de otro con criterios y propone una mejora concreta.", "instructions": [ "Define rúbrica compartida con 3-5 criterios.", "Intercambia trabajos anonimizados.", "Cada equipo entrega 1 mejora concreta." ], "observe": [ "La mejora es accionable, no cosmética." ], "limits": [], "aiAdaptation": "La rúbrica humana prevalece sobre cualquier análisis automatizado.", "example": "Revisión cruzada de borradores de informe con rúbrica." }, "en": { "name": "Cross-team review", "shortDescription": "Each team analyses another's work with criteria and proposes a concrete improvement.", "whenToUse": "Before final delivery, to improve and assess criteria.", "minimalVersion": "Each team analyses another's work with criteria and proposes a concrete improvement.", "instructions": [ "Define a shared rubric with 3-5 criteria.", "Swap anonymised works.", "Each team delivers 1 concrete improvement." ], "observe": [ "The improvement is actionable, not cosmetic." ], "limits": [], "aiAdaptation": "The human rubric outweighs any automated analysis.", "example": "Cross review of report drafts with a rubric." } } }, { "id": "mural-conexiones", "slug": "mural-de-conexiones", "url": "https://evidencias-ia-evaluacion.com/evidencia/mural-de-conexiones", "name_es": "Mural de conexiones", "name_en": "Connections mural", "short_description_es": "El grupo construye una representación común donde cada integrante justifica una relación.", "short_description_en": "The group builds a shared representation and each member justifies one link.", "family": "cooperativa", "family_secondary": "escrita-grafica", "primary_claim": "comprende", "secondary_claims": "", "evidence_kind": "producto", "evidence_modes": "proceso|producto", "stages": "primaria|secundaria|bachillerato|fp|universidad|adultos", "areas": "", "moments": "durante", "purposes": "formativo|calificable", "modalities": "visual|oral", "seia_levels": "0|1|2|3", "time_min": 20, "time_max": 40, "teacher_load": "media", "participation": "equipo", "scalability": "hasta-30", "collections": "", "ai_relation": "compatible", "review_status": "borrador-editorial", "version": "v0.10", "last_reviewed": "2026-07", "content": { "es": { "name": "Mural de conexiones", "shortDescription": "El grupo construye una representación común donde cada integrante justifica una relación.", "whenToUse": "Al cerrar un tema con muchas piezas relacionadas.", "minimalVersion": "El grupo construye una representación común donde cada integrante justifica una relación.", "instructions": [ "Pared grande, post-its o tarjetas.", "Cada miembro añade 2 nodos y 1 relación.", "Justifica su relación en voz alta ante el grupo." ], "observe": [ "Las relaciones son sustantivas, no ornamentales." ], "limits": [], "aiAdaptation": "Prohíbe mural generado por IA: se construye colectivamente.", "example": "Mural sobre revolución industrial con causas, consecuencias y actores." }, "en": { "name": "Connections mural", "shortDescription": "The group builds a shared representation and each member justifies one link.", "whenToUse": "When closing a topic with many related pieces.", "minimalVersion": "The group builds a shared representation and each member justifies one link.", "instructions": [ "Big wall, sticky notes or cards.", "Each member adds 2 nodes and 1 link.", "Justifies their link aloud to the group." ], "observe": [ "Links are substantive, not decorative." ], "limits": [], "aiAdaptation": "Ban AI-generated murals: build it collectively.", "example": "Mural on the industrial revolution with causes, consequences and actors." } } }, { "id": "acta-decisiones", "slug": "acta-de-decisiones-del-equipo", "url": "https://evidencias-ia-evaluacion.com/evidencia/acta-de-decisiones-del-equipo", "name_es": "Acta de decisiones del equipo", "name_en": "Team decision log", "short_description_es": "Registro breve de decisiones, desacuerdos, cambios y responsables durante el trabajo.", "short_description_en": "Brief log of decisions, disagreements, changes and owners during the work.", "family": "proceso-evolucion", "family_secondary": "cooperativa", "primary_claim": "muestra-avance", "secondary_claims": "decide-criterio", "evidence_kind": "proceso", "evidence_modes": "proceso", "stages": "primaria|secundaria|bachillerato|fp|universidad|adultos", "areas": "", "moments": "durante", "purposes": "formativo|calificable", "modalities": "escrita", "seia_levels": "0|1|2|3", "time_min": 5, "time_max": 10, "teacher_load": "baja", "participation": "equipo", "scalability": "cualquiera", "collections": "rapidas|baja-revision|grupos-numerosos", "ai_relation": "compatible", "review_status": "borrador-editorial", "version": "v0.10", "last_reviewed": "2026-07", "content": { "es": { "name": "Acta de decisiones del equipo", "shortDescription": "Registro breve de decisiones, desacuerdos, cambios y responsables durante el trabajo.", "whenToUse": "Proyectos largos donde la trazabilidad de decisiones importa.", "minimalVersion": "Registro breve de decisiones, desacuerdos, cambios y responsables durante el trabajo.", "instructions": [ "Plantilla fija: fecha · decisión · argumentos · descartes · responsable.", "Se rellena en cada sesión, no al final.", "La entrega final incluye las actas." ], "observe": [ "Coherencia entre actas y producto final." ], "limits": [], "aiAdaptation": "El acta debe indicar dónde intervino la IA y qué decisiones humanas se tomaron sobre ello.", "example": "Proyecto de investigación con acta semanal." }, "en": { "name": "Team decision log", "shortDescription": "Brief log of decisions, disagreements, changes and owners during the work.", "whenToUse": "Long projects where decision traceability matters.", "minimalVersion": "Brief log of decisions, disagreements, changes and owners during the work.", "instructions": [ "Fixed template: date · decision · arguments · discards · owner.", "Filled each session, not at the end.", "Final delivery includes the log." ], "observe": [ "Consistency between the log and the final product." ], "limits": [], "aiAdaptation": "The log must record where AI intervened and what human decisions followed.", "example": "Research project with a weekly log." } } }, { "id": "autoeval-contribucion", "slug": "autoevaluacion-contribucion-grupo", "url": "https://evidencias-ia-evaluacion.com/evidencia/autoevaluacion-contribucion-grupo", "name_es": "Autoevaluación de la contribución al grupo", "name_en": "Self-evaluation of group contribution", "short_description_es": "Cada integrante valora su aportación con indicadores observables y aporta un ejemplo.", "short_description_en": "Each member rates their contribution with observable indicators and gives an example.", "family": "metacognitiva", "family_secondary": "cooperativa", "primary_claim": "muestra-avance", "secondary_claims": "decide-criterio", "evidence_kind": "proceso", "evidence_modes": "metacognicion", "stages": "primaria|secundaria|bachillerato|fp|universidad|adultos", "areas": "", "moments": "durante", "purposes": "formativo|calificable", "modalities": "escrita", "seia_levels": "0|1|2|3", "time_min": 5, "time_max": 10, "teacher_load": "baja", "participation": "individual", "scalability": "cualquiera", "collections": "individual-tras-grupo|rapidas|baja-revision|grupos-numerosos", "ai_relation": "compatible", "review_status": "borrador-editorial", "version": "v0.10", "last_reviewed": "2026-07", "content": { "es": { "name": "Autoevaluación de la contribución al grupo", "shortDescription": "Cada integrante valora su aportación con indicadores observables y aporta un ejemplo.", "whenToUse": "Al final de un trabajo cooperativo con calificación grupal.", "minimalVersion": "Cada integrante valora su aportación con indicadores observables y aporta un ejemplo.", "instructions": [ "Facilita rúbrica con 4-6 indicadores observables.", "Exige un ejemplo concreto por indicador.", "Contrasta con la coevaluación del equipo." ], "observe": [ "Los ejemplos son verificables por el grupo." ], "limits": [], "aiAdaptation": "Incluye indicador 'uso responsable de IA' con ejemplo obligatorio.", "example": "Al terminar un proyecto, cada miembro rellena una hoja de autoevaluación con ejemplos." }, "en": { "name": "Self-evaluation of group contribution", "shortDescription": "Each member rates their contribution with observable indicators and gives an example.", "whenToUse": "At the end of cooperative work with a group mark.", "minimalVersion": "Each member rates their contribution with observable indicators and gives an example.", "instructions": [ "Provide a rubric with 4-6 observable indicators.", "Require a concrete example per indicator.", "Contrast with peer evaluation." ], "observe": [ "Examples are verifiable by the group." ], "limits": [], "aiAdaptation": "Include a 'responsible AI use' indicator with a mandatory example.", "example": "At project end, each member fills a self-evaluation sheet with examples." } } }, { "id": "papel-un-minuto", "slug": "papel-de-un-minuto", "url": "https://evidencias-ia-evaluacion.com/evidencia/papel-de-un-minuto", "name_es": "Papel de un minuto", "name_en": "One-minute paper", "short_description_es": "Respuesta breve sobre la idea principal aprendida y la duda que permanece.", "short_description_en": "Short response on the main idea learnt and the remaining question.", "family": "metacognitiva", "family_secondary": "escrita-grafica", "primary_claim": "comprende", "secondary_claims": "", "evidence_kind": "producto", "evidence_modes": "metacognicion|producto", "stages": "primaria|secundaria|bachillerato|fp|universidad|adultos", "areas": "", "moments": "despues", "purposes": "formativo|calificable", "modalities": "escrita", "seia_levels": "0|1|2|3", "time_min": 2, "time_max": 5, "teacher_load": "baja", "participation": "individual", "scalability": "cualquiera", "collections": "rapidas|baja-revision|grupos-numerosos", "ai_relation": "compatible", "review_status": "borrador-editorial", "version": "v0.10", "last_reviewed": "2026-07", "content": { "es": { "name": "Papel de un minuto", "shortDescription": "Respuesta breve sobre la idea principal aprendida y la duda que permanece.", "whenToUse": "Cierre de clase para captar comprensión y dudas.", "minimalVersion": "Respuesta breve sobre la idea principal aprendida y la duda que permanece.", "instructions": [ "Dos preguntas fijas: qué he aprendido y qué sigo sin entender.", "Anónimo o firmado según el clima.", "Lee 5-10 al inicio de la siguiente sesión." ], "observe": [ "Las dudas repetidas señalan lo que hay que retomar." ], "limits": [], "aiAdaptation": "Prohíbe usar IA: interesa lo que cree el estudiante, no la IA.", "example": "Últimos 2 minutos: papel de un minuto en una tarjeta." }, "en": { "name": "One-minute paper", "shortDescription": "Short response on the main idea learnt and the remaining question.", "whenToUse": "End of class to capture understanding and doubts.", "minimalVersion": "Short response on the main idea learnt and the remaining question.", "instructions": [ "Two fixed questions: what I learnt and what I don't yet get.", "Anonymous or signed depending on the climate.", "Read 5-10 at the start of the next session." ], "observe": [ "Recurring doubts signal what to revisit." ], "limits": [], "aiAdaptation": "Ban AI: what matters is the student's view.", "example": "Last 2 minutes: one-minute paper on a card." } } }, { "id": "punto-mas-confuso", "slug": "el-punto-mas-confuso", "url": "https://evidencias-ia-evaluacion.com/evidencia/el-punto-mas-confuso", "name_es": "El punto más confuso", "name_en": "The muddiest point", "short_description_es": "El estudiante identifica qué parte no comprende y dónde aparece la dificultad.", "short_description_en": "The student identifies which part they don't yet understand and where.", "family": "metacognitiva", "family_secondary": "", "primary_claim": "comprende", "secondary_claims": "", "evidence_kind": "proceso", "evidence_modes": "metacognicion", "stages": "primaria|secundaria|bachillerato|fp|universidad|adultos", "areas": "", "moments": "despues", "purposes": "formativo|calificable", "modalities": "escrita", "seia_levels": "0|1|2|3", "time_min": 2, "time_max": 5, "teacher_load": "baja", "participation": "individual", "scalability": "cualquiera", "collections": "rapidas|baja-revision|grupos-numerosos", "ai_relation": "compatible", "review_status": "borrador-editorial", "version": "v0.10", "last_reviewed": "2026-07", "content": { "es": { "name": "El punto más confuso", "shortDescription": "El estudiante identifica qué parte no comprende y dónde aparece la dificultad.", "whenToUse": "Cuando la clase toca conceptos que suelen dar problemas.", "minimalVersion": "El estudiante identifica qué parte no comprende y dónde aparece la dificultad.", "instructions": [ "Pide localización exacta: 'el paso 3', 'la fórmula X'.", "Exige una frase describiendo la dificultad, no una etiqueta." ], "observe": [ "Especificidad de la localización." ], "limits": [], "aiAdaptation": "La IA puede ayudar a formularla, pero interesa la duda propia.", "example": "Al final del tema, cada estudiante entrega su punto más confuso." }, "en": { "name": "The muddiest point", "shortDescription": "The student identifies which part they don't yet understand and where.", "whenToUse": "When the class covers concepts that often cause trouble.", "minimalVersion": "The student identifies which part they don't yet understand and where.", "instructions": [ "Ask for exact location: 'step 3', 'formula X'.", "Require a sentence describing the difficulty, not a label." ], "observe": [ "Specificity of the location." ], "limits": [], "aiAdaptation": "AI can help phrasing, but the student's own doubt is what matters.", "example": "At the end of a unit, each student submits their muddiest point." } } }, { "id": "titular-subtitulo", "slug": "titular-y-subtitulo", "url": "https://evidencias-ia-evaluacion.com/evidencia/titular-y-subtitulo", "name_es": "Titular y subtítulo", "name_en": "Headline and standfirst", "short_description_es": "Síntesis de un aprendizaje mediante un titular preciso y una frase que lo explique.", "short_description_en": "Synthesis of learning through a precise headline and one explanatory sentence.", "family": "escrita-grafica", "family_secondary": "", "primary_claim": "comprende", "secondary_claims": "", "evidence_kind": "producto", "evidence_modes": "producto", "stages": "primaria|secundaria|bachillerato|fp|universidad|adultos", "areas": "", "moments": "durante", "purposes": "formativo|calificable", "modalities": "escrita", "seia_levels": "0|1|2|3", "time_min": 3, "time_max": 8, "teacher_load": "baja", "participation": "individual", "scalability": "cualquiera", "collections": "rapidas|baja-revision|grupos-numerosos", "ai_relation": "compatible", "review_status": "borrador-editorial", "version": "v0.10", "last_reviewed": "2026-07", "content": { "es": { "name": "Titular y subtítulo", "shortDescription": "Síntesis de un aprendizaje mediante un titular preciso y una frase que lo explique.", "whenToUse": "Cierre de tema o lectura para comprobar síntesis.", "minimalVersion": "Síntesis de un aprendizaje mediante un titular preciso y una frase que lo explique.", "instructions": [ "Titular de máximo 10 palabras.", "Subtítulo de 1 frase que aporte lo esencial que el titular no dice." ], "observe": [ "Precisión del titular.", "Complementariedad entre titular y subtítulo." ], "limits": [], "aiAdaptation": "Prohíbe titular generado por IA: interesa la síntesis del estudiante.", "example": "Titular del artículo leído: '10 palabras que capten la idea nuclear'." }, "en": { "name": "Headline and standfirst", "shortDescription": "Synthesis of learning through a precise headline and one explanatory sentence.", "whenToUse": "End of unit or reading to check synthesis.", "minimalVersion": "Synthesis of learning through a precise headline and one explanatory sentence.", "instructions": [ "Headline of up to 10 words.", "Standfirst of 1 sentence adding what the headline omits." ], "observe": [ "Headline precision.", "Complementarity between headline and standfirst." ], "limits": [], "aiAdaptation": "Ban AI-generated headlines: the student's synthesis is what matters.", "example": "Headline for the article read: '10 words capturing the core idea'." } } }, { "id": "ejemplo-no-ejemplo", "slug": "ejemplo-y-no-ejemplo", "url": "https://evidencias-ia-evaluacion.com/evidencia/ejemplo-y-no-ejemplo", "name_es": "Ejemplo y no ejemplo", "name_en": "Example and non-example", "short_description_es": "El estudiante crea o clasifica casos que cumplen y no cumplen un concepto y justifica la diferencia.", "short_description_en": "The student creates or classifies cases that meet and do not meet a concept and justifies the difference.", "family": "escrita-grafica", "family_secondary": "", "primary_claim": "comprende", "secondary_claims": "", "evidence_kind": "producto", "evidence_modes": "producto", "stages": "primaria|secundaria|bachillerato|fp|universidad|adultos", "areas": "", "moments": "durante", "purposes": "formativo|calificable", "modalities": "escrita", "seia_levels": "0|1|2|3", "time_min": 5, "time_max": 12, "teacher_load": "baja", "participation": "individual", "scalability": "cualquiera", "collections": "baja-revision|grupos-numerosos", "ai_relation": "compatible", "review_status": "borrador-editorial", "version": "v0.10", "last_reviewed": "2026-07", "content": { "es": { "name": "Ejemplo y no ejemplo", "shortDescription": "El estudiante crea o clasifica casos que cumplen y no cumplen un concepto y justifica la diferencia.", "whenToUse": "Conceptos que se confunden con otros cercanos.", "minimalVersion": "El estudiante crea o clasifica casos que cumplen y no cumplen un concepto y justifica la diferencia.", "instructions": [ "Pide 1 ejemplo y 1 no ejemplo.", "Exige una razón por la que el no ejemplo se queda fuera." ], "observe": [ "El no ejemplo es realmente cercano, no absurdo." ], "limits": [], "aiAdaptation": "Pide un no ejemplo que la IA no detecte fácilmente.", "example": "Ejemplo y no ejemplo de metáfora frente a comparación." }, "en": { "name": "Example and non-example", "shortDescription": "The student creates or classifies cases that meet and do not meet a concept and justifies the difference.", "whenToUse": "Concepts often confused with similar ones.", "minimalVersion": "The student creates or classifies cases that meet and do not meet a concept and justifies the difference.", "instructions": [ "Ask for 1 example and 1 non-example.", "Require a reason why the non-example is excluded." ], "observe": [ "The non-example is genuinely close, not absurd." ], "limits": [], "aiAdaptation": "Ask for a non-example the AI wouldn't easily catch.", "example": "Example and non-example of metaphor vs simile." } } }, { "id": "analisis-error", "slug": "analisis-de-un-error", "url": "https://evidencias-ia-evaluacion.com/evidencia/analisis-de-un-error", "name_es": "Análisis de un error", "name_en": "Error analysis", "short_description_es": "Se presenta una respuesta equivocada y se pide localizar el error, explicarlo y corregirlo.", "short_description_en": "A wrong answer is presented; students must locate the error, explain it and correct it.", "family": "escrita-grafica", "family_secondary": "metacognitiva", "primary_claim": "comprende", "secondary_claims": "decide-criterio", "evidence_kind": "producto", "evidence_modes": "producto", "stages": "primaria|secundaria|bachillerato|fp|universidad|adultos", "areas": "", "moments": "durante", "purposes": "formativo|calificable", "modalities": "escrita", "seia_levels": "0|1|2|3", "time_min": 8, "time_max": 15, "teacher_load": "media", "participation": "individual", "scalability": "cualquiera", "collections": "grupos-numerosos", "ai_relation": "compatible", "review_status": "borrador-editorial", "version": "v0.10", "last_reviewed": "2026-07", "content": { "es": { "name": "Análisis de un error", "shortDescription": "Se presenta una respuesta equivocada y se pide localizar el error, explicarlo y corregirlo.", "whenToUse": "Contenidos con errores típicos frecuentes.", "minimalVersion": "Se presenta una respuesta equivocada y se pide localizar el error, explicarlo y corregirlo.", "instructions": [ "Prepara la respuesta con un error genuino, no ficticio.", "Pide localización, explicación y corrección." ], "observe": [ "Explica por qué es error, no solo lo señala." ], "limits": [], "aiAdaptation": "Usa salidas de IA con errores reales como caso de análisis.", "example": "Análisis de un texto argumentativo con una falacia introducida." }, "en": { "name": "Error analysis", "shortDescription": "A wrong answer is presented; students must locate the error, explain it and correct it.", "whenToUse": "Content with common typical errors.", "minimalVersion": "A wrong answer is presented; students must locate the error, explain it and correct it.", "instructions": [ "Prepare an answer with a real, not fictitious, error.", "Ask for location, explanation and correction." ], "observe": [ "Explains why it's an error, not just points at it." ], "limits": [], "aiAdaptation": "Use real AI outputs with errors as analysis cases.", "example": "Analysis of an argumentative text with an introduced fallacy." } } }, { "id": "completa-ejemplo-resuelto", "slug": "completa-el-ejemplo-resuelto", "url": "https://evidencias-ia-evaluacion.com/evidencia/completa-el-ejemplo-resuelto", "name_es": "Completa el ejemplo resuelto", "name_en": "Complete the worked example", "short_description_es": "El estudiante recibe un procedimiento incompleto y debe terminarlo justificando los pasos.", "short_description_en": "The student receives an incomplete procedure and must finish it, justifying each step.", "family": "escrita-grafica", "family_secondary": "practica-desempeno", "primary_claim": "puede-hacerlo", "secondary_claims": "comprende", "evidence_kind": "desempeno", "evidence_modes": "producto", "stages": "primaria|secundaria|bachillerato|fp|universidad|adultos", "areas": "", "moments": "durante", "purposes": "formativo|calificable", "modalities": "escrita", "seia_levels": "0|1|2", "time_min": 10, "time_max": 20, "teacher_load": "media", "participation": "individual", "scalability": "cualquiera", "collections": "grupos-numerosos", "ai_relation": "compatible", "review_status": "borrador-editorial", "version": "v0.10", "last_reviewed": "2026-07", "content": { "es": { "name": "Completa el ejemplo resuelto", "shortDescription": "El estudiante recibe un procedimiento incompleto y debe terminarlo justificando los pasos.", "whenToUse": "Procedimientos que requieren pasos con lógica.", "minimalVersion": "El estudiante recibe un procedimiento incompleto y debe terminarlo justificando los pasos.", "instructions": [ "Prepara procedimiento con últimos 2-3 pasos ausentes.", "Pide justificación breve por paso completado." ], "observe": [ "Coherencia entre pasos y justificación." ], "limits": [], "aiAdaptation": "Prohíbe copiar el resto desde IA: exige justificación manuscrita en clase.", "example": "Problema de matemáticas con desarrollo hasta la mitad." }, "en": { "name": "Complete the worked example", "shortDescription": "The student receives an incomplete procedure and must finish it, justifying each step.", "whenToUse": "Procedures with logical steps.", "minimalVersion": "The student receives an incomplete procedure and must finish it, justifying each step.", "instructions": [ "Prepare a procedure missing its last 2-3 steps.", "Ask for a brief justification per completed step." ], "observe": [ "Coherence between steps and justification." ], "limits": [], "aiAdaptation": "Ban copying the rest from AI: require in-class hand-written justification.", "example": "Maths problem worked out halfway." } } }, { "id": "cuadricula-recuperacion", "slug": "cuadricula-de-recuperacion", "url": "https://evidencias-ia-evaluacion.com/evidencia/cuadricula-de-recuperacion", "name_es": "Cuadrícula de recuperación", "name_en": "Retrieval grid", "short_description_es": "Tabla de preguntas breves para recuperar conocimientos sin consultar los materiales.", "short_description_en": "Grid of short questions to retrieve knowledge without checking materials.", "family": "escrita-grafica", "family_secondary": "metacognitiva", "primary_claim": "comprende", "secondary_claims": "", "evidence_kind": "producto", "evidence_modes": "producto", "stages": "primaria|secundaria|bachillerato|fp|universidad|adultos", "areas": "", "moments": "durante", "purposes": "formativo|calificable", "modalities": "escrita", "seia_levels": "0|1", "time_min": 8, "time_max": 15, "teacher_load": "baja", "participation": "individual", "scalability": "cualquiera", "collections": "baja-revision|grupos-numerosos", "ai_relation": "compatible", "review_status": "borrador-editorial", "version": "v0.10", "last_reviewed": "2026-07", "content": { "es": { "name": "Cuadrícula de recuperación", "shortDescription": "Tabla de preguntas breves para recuperar conocimientos sin consultar los materiales.", "whenToUse": "Retención a medio plazo, contenido acumulativo.", "minimalVersion": "Tabla de preguntas breves para recuperar conocimientos sin consultar los materiales.", "instructions": [ "Grid con 9-12 casillas de preguntas variadas.", "Sin apuntes durante la primera pasada.", "Corrige en pareja con apuntes." ], "observe": [ "Retención sin apoyo." ], "limits": [], "aiAdaptation": "Modo sin IA. La IA puede generar la propia cuadrícula.", "example": "Grid semanal de recuperación con contenidos de las 3 últimas semanas." }, "en": { "name": "Retrieval grid", "shortDescription": "Grid of short questions to retrieve knowledge without checking materials.", "whenToUse": "Mid-term retention, cumulative content.", "minimalVersion": "Grid of short questions to retrieve knowledge without checking materials.", "instructions": [ "Grid with 9-12 varied questions.", "No notes on the first pass.", "Correct in pairs with notes." ], "observe": [ "Retention without support." ], "limits": [], "aiAdaptation": "No-AI mode. AI can generate the grid itself.", "example": "Weekly retrieval grid with the last 3 weeks' content." } } }, { "id": "dibuja-de-memoria", "slug": "dibuja-de-memoria", "url": "https://evidencias-ia-evaluacion.com/evidencia/dibuja-de-memoria", "name_es": "Dibuja de memoria", "name_en": "Draw from memory", "short_description_es": "Representación visual de un sistema, proceso o concepto antes de consultar fuentes.", "short_description_en": "Visual representation of a system, process or concept before consulting sources.", "family": "escrita-grafica", "family_secondary": "", "primary_claim": "comprende", "secondary_claims": "", "evidence_kind": "producto", "evidence_modes": "producto", "stages": "primaria|secundaria|bachillerato|fp|universidad|adultos", "areas": "", "moments": "durante", "purposes": "formativo|calificable", "modalities": "visual", "seia_levels": "0|1", "time_min": 5, "time_max": 10, "teacher_load": "baja", "participation": "individual", "scalability": "cualquiera", "collections": "rapidas|baja-revision|grupos-numerosos", "ai_relation": "compatible", "review_status": "borrador-editorial", "version": "v0.10", "last_reviewed": "2026-07", "content": { "es": { "name": "Dibuja de memoria", "shortDescription": "Representación visual de un sistema, proceso o concepto antes de consultar fuentes.", "whenToUse": "Contenido con estructura espacial o sistémica.", "minimalVersion": "Representación visual de un sistema, proceso o concepto antes de consultar fuentes.", "instructions": [ "Dibuja sin consultar durante 5 min.", "Compara con la fuente y marca lo que faltó." ], "observe": [ "Estructura global, no detalle." ], "limits": [], "aiAdaptation": "La IA no interviene en la primera pasada.", "example": "Dibuja el sistema circulatorio de memoria." }, "en": { "name": "Draw from memory", "shortDescription": "Visual representation of a system, process or concept before consulting sources.", "whenToUse": "Content with spatial or systemic structure.", "minimalVersion": "Visual representation of a system, process or concept before consulting sources.", "instructions": [ "Draw without checking for 5 min.", "Compare with the source and mark what was missing." ], "observe": [ "Overall structure, not detail." ], "limits": [], "aiAdaptation": "AI does not intervene in the first pass.", "example": "Draw the circulatory system from memory." } } }, { "id": "afirmacion-evidencia-razonamiento", "slug": "afirmacion-evidencia-razonamiento", "url": "https://evidencias-ia-evaluacion.com/evidencia/afirmacion-evidencia-razonamiento", "name_es": "Afirmación, evidencia y razonamiento", "name_en": "Claim, evidence, reasoning", "short_description_es": "El estudiante formula una afirmación, aporta evidencias y explica por qué la sostienen.", "short_description_en": "The student states a claim, provides evidence and explains why it supports the claim.", "family": "escrita-grafica", "family_secondary": "", "primary_claim": "decide-criterio", "secondary_claims": "comprende", "evidence_kind": "producto", "evidence_modes": "producto", "stages": "primaria|secundaria|bachillerato|fp|universidad|adultos", "areas": "", "moments": "durante", "purposes": "formativo|calificable", "modalities": "escrita", "seia_levels": "0|1|2|3", "time_min": 10, "time_max": 25, "teacher_load": "media", "participation": "individual", "scalability": "cualquiera", "collections": "grupos-numerosos", "ai_relation": "compatible", "review_status": "borrador-editorial", "version": "v0.10", "last_reviewed": "2026-07", "content": { "es": { "name": "Afirmación, evidencia y razonamiento", "shortDescription": "El estudiante formula una afirmación, aporta evidencias y explica por qué la sostienen.", "whenToUse": "Argumentación en cualquier área.", "minimalVersion": "El estudiante formula una afirmación, aporta evidencias y explica por qué la sostienen.", "instructions": [ "Estructura fija: afirmación · evidencia · razonamiento.", "Cada evidencia se atribuye a una fuente." ], "observe": [ "La evidencia sostiene realmente la afirmación." ], "limits": [], "aiAdaptation": "La IA no aporta razonamiento: pide que sea del estudiante.", "example": "En ciencias: afirmación, datos del experimento, razón teórica." }, "en": { "name": "Claim, evidence, reasoning", "shortDescription": "The student states a claim, provides evidence and explains why it supports the claim.", "whenToUse": "Argumentation in any subject.", "minimalVersion": "The student states a claim, provides evidence and explains why it supports the claim.", "instructions": [ "Fixed structure: claim · evidence · reasoning.", "Each evidence is attributed to a source." ], "observe": [ "Evidence genuinely supports the claim." ], "limits": [], "aiAdaptation": "AI must not provide the reasoning: require it from the student.", "example": "In science: claim, experimental data, theoretical reasoning." } } }, { "id": "matriz-comparacion", "slug": "matriz-de-comparacion", "url": "https://evidencias-ia-evaluacion.com/evidencia/matriz-de-comparacion", "name_es": "Matriz de comparación", "name_en": "Comparison matrix", "short_description_es": "Comparación de casos, textos, métodos o soluciones mediante criterios definidos.", "short_description_en": "Comparison of cases, texts, methods or solutions using defined criteria.", "family": "escrita-grafica", "family_secondary": "", "primary_claim": "decide-criterio", "secondary_claims": "comprende", "evidence_kind": "producto", "evidence_modes": "producto", "stages": "primaria|secundaria|bachillerato|fp|universidad|adultos", "areas": "", "moments": "durante", "purposes": "formativo|calificable", "modalities": "escrita|visual", "seia_levels": "0|1|2|3", "time_min": 15, "time_max": 30, "teacher_load": "media", "participation": "individual", "scalability": "cualquiera", "collections": "grupos-numerosos", "ai_relation": "compatible", "review_status": "borrador-editorial", "version": "v0.10", "last_reviewed": "2026-07", "content": { "es": { "name": "Matriz de comparación", "shortDescription": "Comparación de casos, textos, métodos o soluciones mediante criterios definidos.", "whenToUse": "Cuando hay varias opciones y hay que elegir.", "minimalVersion": "Comparación de casos, textos, métodos o soluciones mediante criterios definidos.", "instructions": [ "Filas: criterios. Columnas: opciones.", "Al final, decisión razonada." ], "observe": [ "La decisión final es consistente con la matriz." ], "limits": [], "aiAdaptation": "La IA puede llenar celdas, pero el estudiante decide y firma.", "example": "Comparar 3 métodos científicos para resolver un problema." }, "en": { "name": "Comparison matrix", "shortDescription": "Comparison of cases, texts, methods or solutions using defined criteria.", "whenToUse": "When there are several options and a choice must be made.", "minimalVersion": "Comparison of cases, texts, methods or solutions using defined criteria.", "instructions": [ "Rows: criteria. Columns: options.", "At the end, reasoned decision." ], "observe": [ "The final decision matches the matrix." ], "limits": [], "aiAdaptation": "AI can fill cells; the student decides and signs.", "example": "Compare 3 scientific methods for a problem." } } }, { "id": "formula-buena-pregunta", "slug": "formula-una-buena-pregunta", "url": "https://evidencias-ia-evaluacion.com/evidencia/formula-una-buena-pregunta", "name_es": "Formula una buena pregunta", "name_en": "Craft a good question", "short_description_es": "El estudiante crea una pregunta que permita comprobar comprensión y redacta una respuesta razonada.", "short_description_en": "The student creates a question that checks understanding and writes a reasoned answer.", "family": "escrita-grafica", "family_secondary": "metacognitiva", "primary_claim": "comprende", "secondary_claims": "", "evidence_kind": "producto", "evidence_modes": "producto|metacognicion", "stages": "primaria|secundaria|bachillerato|fp|universidad|adultos", "areas": "", "moments": "durante", "purposes": "formativo|calificable", "modalities": "escrita", "seia_levels": "0|1|2|3", "time_min": 10, "time_max": 20, "teacher_load": "media", "participation": "individual", "scalability": "cualquiera", "collections": "grupos-numerosos", "ai_relation": "compatible", "review_status": "borrador-editorial", "version": "v0.10", "last_reviewed": "2026-07", "content": { "es": { "name": "Formula una buena pregunta", "shortDescription": "El estudiante crea una pregunta que permita comprobar comprensión y redacta una respuesta razonada.", "whenToUse": "Cierre de tema; permite ver el techo cognitivo del estudiante.", "minimalVersion": "El estudiante crea una pregunta que permita comprobar comprensión y redacta una respuesta razonada.", "instructions": [ "Prohíbe preguntas cerradas de definición.", "Exige que la respuesta prevista requiera al menos 2 pasos." ], "observe": [ "La pregunta pide algo más que reconocer." ], "limits": [], "aiAdaptation": "Puedes contrastar la pregunta con una generada por IA y comparar profundidad.", "example": "Pregunta de examen que el propio estudiante propone." }, "en": { "name": "Craft a good question", "shortDescription": "The student creates a question that checks understanding and writes a reasoned answer.", "whenToUse": "End of unit; reveals the student's cognitive ceiling.", "minimalVersion": "The student creates a question that checks understanding and writes a reasoned answer.", "instructions": [ "Ban closed definition questions.", "Require the expected answer to need at least 2 steps." ], "observe": [ "The question asks for more than recognition." ], "limits": [], "aiAdaptation": "Compare the question with an AI-generated one and contrast depth.", "example": "Exam question the student proposes themselves." } } }, { "id": "clasificacion-razonada", "slug": "clasificacion-razonada", "url": "https://evidencias-ia-evaluacion.com/evidencia/clasificacion-razonada", "name_es": "Clasificación razonada", "name_en": "Reasoned classification", "short_description_es": "Organiza elementos en categorías y explica los criterios utilizados.", "short_description_en": "Sorts items into categories and explains the criteria.", "family": "escrita-grafica", "family_secondary": "", "primary_claim": "comprende", "secondary_claims": "decide-criterio", "evidence_kind": "producto", "evidence_modes": "producto", "stages": "primaria|secundaria|bachillerato|fp|universidad|adultos", "areas": "", "moments": "durante", "purposes": "formativo|calificable", "modalities": "escrita|visual", "seia_levels": "0|1|2|3", "time_min": 10, "time_max": 20, "teacher_load": "baja", "participation": "individual", "scalability": "cualquiera", "collections": "baja-revision|grupos-numerosos", "ai_relation": "compatible", "review_status": "borrador-editorial", "version": "v0.10", "last_reviewed": "2026-07", "content": { "es": { "name": "Clasificación razonada", "shortDescription": "Organiza elementos en categorías y explica los criterios utilizados.", "whenToUse": "Contenido con taxonomías o categorías.", "minimalVersion": "Organiza elementos en categorías y explica los criterios utilizados.", "instructions": [ "Da un conjunto de 8-15 elementos.", "Pide criterios explícitos, no solo cajas." ], "observe": [ "El criterio es explícito y aplicado sin excepciones." ], "limits": [], "aiAdaptation": "Pide una clasificación diferente a la de una IA con justificación.", "example": "Clasificar seres vivos según nutrición y reproducción." }, "en": { "name": "Reasoned classification", "shortDescription": "Sorts items into categories and explains the criteria.", "whenToUse": "Content with taxonomies or categories.", "minimalVersion": "Sorts items into categories and explains the criteria.", "instructions": [ "Give a set of 8-15 items.", "Ask for explicit criteria, not just boxes." ], "observe": [ "The criterion is explicit and applied without exceptions." ], "limits": [], "aiAdaptation": "Ask for a classification different from an AI's, with justification.", "example": "Classify organisms by nutrition and reproduction." } } }, { "id": "demuestra-explica", "slug": "demuestra-y-explica", "url": "https://evidencias-ia-evaluacion.com/evidencia/demuestra-y-explica", "name_es": "Demuestra y explica", "name_en": "Demonstrate and explain", "short_description_es": "El estudiante ejecuta un procedimiento mientras explica las decisiones relevantes.", "short_description_en": "The student performs a procedure while explaining relevant decisions.", "family": "practica-desempeno", "family_secondary": "oral-dialogica", "primary_claim": "puede-hacerlo", "secondary_claims": "comprende", "evidence_kind": "desempeno", "evidence_modes": "oral|desempeno-controlado", "stages": "primaria|secundaria|bachillerato|fp|universidad|adultos", "areas": "", "moments": "durante", "purposes": "formativo|calificable", "modalities": "oral|practica", "seia_levels": "0|1|2", "time_min": 5, "time_max": 15, "teacher_load": "media", "participation": "individual", "scalability": "grupo-reducido", "collections": "", "ai_relation": "compatible", "review_status": "borrador-editorial", "version": "v0.10", "last_reviewed": "2026-07", "content": { "es": { "name": "Demuestra y explica", "shortDescription": "El estudiante ejecuta un procedimiento mientras explica las decisiones relevantes.", "whenToUse": "Procedimientos donde el paso a paso importa.", "minimalVersion": "El estudiante ejecuta un procedimiento mientras explica las decisiones relevantes.", "instructions": [ "El estudiante hace y verbaliza al mismo tiempo.", "Docente pregunta sobre decisiones clave." ], "observe": [ "La ejecución y la explicación coinciden." ], "limits": [], "aiAdaptation": "La ejecución debe ser en vivo, no leída desde IA.", "example": "Un estudiante prepara una disolución y explica cada paso." }, "en": { "name": "Demonstrate and explain", "shortDescription": "The student performs a procedure while explaining relevant decisions.", "whenToUse": "Procedures where step-by-step matters.", "minimalVersion": "The student performs a procedure while explaining relevant decisions.", "instructions": [ "The student does and verbalises at once.", "Teacher asks about key decisions." ], "observe": [ "Execution and explanation match." ], "limits": [], "aiAdaptation": "Execution must be live, not read from AI.", "example": "A student prepares a solution and explains each step." } } }, { "id": "piensa-en-voz-alta", "slug": "piensa-en-voz-alta", "url": "https://evidencias-ia-evaluacion.com/evidencia/piensa-en-voz-alta", "name_es": "Piensa en voz alta", "name_en": "Think aloud", "short_description_es": "Verbaliza qué observa, qué decide y por qué mientras resuelve una tarea.", "short_description_en": "Verbalises what they observe, decide and why while solving a task.", "family": "oral-dialogica", "family_secondary": "proceso-evolucion", "primary_claim": "decide-criterio", "secondary_claims": "comprende", "evidence_kind": "proceso", "evidence_modes": "oral|proceso", "stages": "primaria|secundaria|bachillerato|fp|universidad|adultos", "areas": "", "moments": "durante", "purposes": "formativo|calificable", "modalities": "oral", "seia_levels": "0|1|2", "time_min": 5, "time_max": 15, "teacher_load": "media", "participation": "individual", "scalability": "grupo-reducido", "collections": "", "ai_relation": "compatible", "review_status": "borrador-editorial", "version": "v0.10", "last_reviewed": "2026-07", "content": { "es": { "name": "Piensa en voz alta", "shortDescription": "Verbaliza qué observa, qué decide y por qué mientras resuelve una tarea.", "whenToUse": "Tareas con decisiones invisibles en el producto final.", "minimalVersion": "Verbaliza qué observa, qué decide y por qué mientras resuelve una tarea.", "instructions": [ "Modela una vez tú mismo.", "El estudiante resuelve verbalizando cada paso." ], "observe": [ "Verbaliza dudas, no solo aciertos." ], "limits": [], "aiAdaptation": "Sin IA durante la verbalización.", "example": "Resolución de un problema matemático pensando en voz alta." }, "en": { "name": "Think aloud", "shortDescription": "Verbalises what they observe, decide and why while solving a task.", "whenToUse": "Tasks with decisions invisible in the final product.", "minimalVersion": "Verbalises what they observe, decide and why while solving a task.", "instructions": [ "Model it once yourself.", "The student solves while verbalising each step." ], "observe": [ "Verbalises doubts, not just correct steps." ], "limits": [], "aiAdaptation": "No AI during verbalisation.", "example": "Maths problem solved thinking aloud." } } }, { "id": "cuaderno-laboratorio", "slug": "cuaderno-de-laboratorio", "url": "https://evidencias-ia-evaluacion.com/evidencia/cuaderno-de-laboratorio", "name_es": "Cuaderno de laboratorio", "name_en": "Lab notebook", "short_description_es": "Registra hipótesis, procedimiento, incidencias, datos y cambios durante una práctica.", "short_description_en": "Records hypotheses, procedure, incidents, data and changes during a practical session.", "family": "proceso-evolucion", "family_secondary": "practica-desempeno", "primary_claim": "muestra-avance", "secondary_claims": "decide-criterio|puede-hacerlo", "evidence_kind": "proceso", "evidence_modes": "proceso", "stages": "secundaria|bachillerato|fp|universidad", "areas": "ciencias|tecnologia|fp", "moments": "durante", "purposes": "formativo|calificable", "modalities": "escrita", "seia_levels": "0|1|2|3", "time_min": 15, "time_max": 45, "teacher_load": "media", "participation": "individual", "scalability": "cualquiera", "collections": "grupos-numerosos", "ai_relation": "compatible", "review_status": "borrador-editorial", "version": "v0.10", "last_reviewed": "2026-07", "content": { "es": { "name": "Cuaderno de laboratorio", "shortDescription": "Registra hipótesis, procedimiento, incidencias, datos y cambios durante una práctica.", "whenToUse": "Prácticas experimentales o técnicas.", "minimalVersion": "Registra hipótesis, procedimiento, incidencias, datos y cambios durante una práctica.", "instructions": [ "Estructura fija con secciones obligatorias.", "Registra incidencias, no solo éxitos." ], "observe": [ "Trazabilidad entre datos y conclusiones." ], "limits": [], "aiAdaptation": "La IA no genera el cuaderno; sí puede revisar formato.", "example": "Cuaderno de una práctica química con desviaciones registradas." }, "en": { "name": "Lab notebook", "shortDescription": "Records hypotheses, procedure, incidents, data and changes during a practical session.", "whenToUse": "Experimental or technical practicals.", "minimalVersion": "Records hypotheses, procedure, incidents, data and changes during a practical session.", "instructions": [ "Fixed structure with mandatory sections.", "Log incidents, not just successes." ], "observe": [ "Traceability between data and conclusions." ], "limits": [], "aiAdaptation": "AI cannot generate the notebook; it can review the format.", "example": "Chemistry practical notebook with recorded deviations." } } }, { "id": "prueba-revision-prototipo", "slug": "prueba-y-revision-de-prototipo", "url": "https://evidencias-ia-evaluacion.com/evidencia/prueba-y-revision-de-prototipo", "name_es": "Prueba y revisión de prototipo", "name_en": "Prototype test and revision", "short_description_es": "El estudiante somete su creación a una prueba, recoge fallos y justifica los cambios.", "short_description_en": "The student tests their creation, gathers failures and justifies changes.", "family": "practica-desempeno", "family_secondary": "proceso-evolucion", "primary_claim": "puede-hacerlo", "secondary_claims": "muestra-avance|decide-criterio", "evidence_kind": "desempeno", "evidence_modes": "proceso|desempeno-controlado", "stages": "primaria|secundaria|bachillerato|fp|universidad", "areas": "tecnologia|artes|fp|ciencias", "moments": "durante", "purposes": "formativo|calificable", "modalities": "practica", "seia_levels": "0|1|2|3", "time_min": 20, "time_max": 60, "teacher_load": "media", "participation": "equipo", "scalability": "hasta-30", "collections": "", "ai_relation": "compatible", "review_status": "borrador-editorial", "version": "v0.10", "last_reviewed": "2026-07", "content": { "es": { "name": "Prueba y revisión de prototipo", "shortDescription": "El estudiante somete su creación a una prueba, recoge fallos y justifica los cambios.", "whenToUse": "Proyectos con producto físico o digital.", "minimalVersion": "El estudiante somete su creación a una prueba, recoge fallos y justifica los cambios.", "instructions": [ "Define escenario de prueba.", "Recoge fallos.", "Prioriza y aplica 2 mejoras justificadas." ], "observe": [ "Los cambios responden a fallos, no a preferencia estética." ], "limits": [], "aiAdaptation": "La IA puede sugerir cambios; el estudiante decide y justifica.", "example": "Prototipo de aplicación con revisión tras usuarios reales." }, "en": { "name": "Prototype test and revision", "shortDescription": "The student tests their creation, gathers failures and justifies changes.", "whenToUse": "Projects with a physical or digital product.", "minimalVersion": "The student tests their creation, gathers failures and justifies changes.", "instructions": [ "Define test scenario.", "Gather failures.", "Prioritise and apply 2 justified improvements." ], "observe": [ "Changes respond to failures, not aesthetic preference." ], "limits": [], "aiAdaptation": "AI can suggest changes; the student decides and justifies.", "example": "App prototype revised after real users." } } }, { "id": "estaciones-practicas", "slug": "estaciones-practicas", "url": "https://evidencias-ia-evaluacion.com/evidencia/estaciones-practicas", "name_es": "Estaciones prácticas", "name_en": "Practical stations", "short_description_es": "El alumnado pasa por varias tareas breves que permiten observar habilidades diferentes.", "short_description_en": "Students rotate through short tasks that surface different skills.", "family": "practica-desempeno", "family_secondary": "", "primary_claim": "puede-hacerlo", "secondary_claims": "", "evidence_kind": "desempeno", "evidence_modes": "desempeno-controlado", "stages": "primaria|secundaria|bachillerato|fp|universidad|adultos", "areas": "", "moments": "durante", "purposes": "formativo|calificable", "modalities": "practica", "seia_levels": "0|1|2", "time_min": 20, "time_max": 50, "teacher_load": "alta", "participation": "equipo", "scalability": "mas-30-equipos", "collections": "grupos-numerosos", "ai_relation": "compatible", "review_status": "borrador-editorial", "version": "v0.10", "last_reviewed": "2026-07", "content": { "es": { "name": "Estaciones prácticas", "shortDescription": "El alumnado pasa por varias tareas breves que permiten observar habilidades diferentes.", "whenToUse": "Evaluación de competencia con múltiples subhabilidades.", "minimalVersion": "El alumnado pasa por varias tareas breves que permiten observar habilidades diferentes.", "instructions": [ "Prepara 4-6 estaciones autónomas.", "5-8 min por estación.", "Rúbrica compartida." ], "observe": [ "Autonomía por estación." ], "limits": [], "aiAdaptation": "Algunas estaciones con IA, otras sin, para triangular.", "example": "Evaluación de competencias digitales en 5 estaciones." }, "en": { "name": "Practical stations", "shortDescription": "Students rotate through short tasks that surface different skills.", "whenToUse": "Competency assessment with multiple subskills.", "minimalVersion": "Students rotate through short tasks that surface different skills.", "instructions": [ "Prepare 4-6 self-contained stations.", "5-8 min per station.", "Shared rubric." ], "observe": [ "Autonomy per station." ], "limits": [], "aiAdaptation": "Some stations with AI, some without, to triangulate.", "example": "Digital-competence assessment in 5 stations." } } }, { "id": "caso-profesional", "slug": "resolucion-de-caso-profesional", "url": "https://evidencias-ia-evaluacion.com/evidencia/resolucion-de-caso-profesional", "name_es": "Resolución de un caso profesional", "name_en": "Solve a professional case", "short_description_es": "Actuación ante una situación propia de una profesión, con decisiones y criterios realistas.", "short_description_en": "Response to a real professional situation with realistic decisions and criteria.", "family": "practica-desempeno", "family_secondary": "escrita-grafica", "primary_claim": "puede-hacerlo", "secondary_claims": "transfiere|decide-criterio", "evidence_kind": "desempeno", "evidence_modes": "desempeno-controlado|transferencia", "stages": "fp|bachillerato|universidad", "areas": "fp|sociales|ciencias|tecnologia", "moments": "durante", "purposes": "formativo|calificable", "modalities": "cualquiera", "seia_levels": "1|2|3", "time_min": 30, "time_max": 90, "teacher_load": "alta", "participation": "equipo", "scalability": "hasta-30", "collections": "transferencia", "ai_relation": "compatible", "review_status": "borrador-editorial", "version": "v0.10", "last_reviewed": "2026-07", "content": { "es": { "name": "Resolución de un caso profesional", "shortDescription": "Actuación ante una situación propia de una profesión, con decisiones y criterios realistas.", "whenToUse": "Formación profesional y prácticas.", "minimalVersion": "Actuación ante una situación propia de una profesión, con decisiones y criterios realistas.", "instructions": [ "Describe situación realista y contexto.", "Exige documento profesional coherente." ], "observe": [ "Coherencia con estándares del sector." ], "limits": [], "aiAdaptation": "Permite IA como en la profesión: exige transparencia en el uso.", "example": "Elaborar un informe técnico ante una incidencia industrial." }, "en": { "name": "Solve a professional case", "shortDescription": "Response to a real professional situation with realistic decisions and criteria.", "whenToUse": "Vocational training and internships.", "minimalVersion": "Response to a real professional situation with realistic decisions and criteria.", "instructions": [ "Describe realistic situation and context.", "Require a coherent professional output." ], "observe": [ "Consistency with industry standards." ], "limits": [], "aiAdaptation": "Allow AI as the profession does: require transparency.", "example": "Produce a technical report on an industrial incident." } } }, { "id": "lectura-datos", "slug": "lectura-e-interpretacion-de-datos", "url": "https://evidencias-ia-evaluacion.com/evidencia/lectura-e-interpretacion-de-datos", "name_es": "Lectura e interpretación de datos", "name_en": "Data reading and interpretation", "short_description_es": "El estudiante extrae conclusiones de una tabla, gráfica o conjunto de datos y señala sus límites.", "short_description_en": "The student draws conclusions from a table, graph or dataset and flags its limits.", "family": "escrita-grafica", "family_secondary": "", "primary_claim": "decide-criterio", "secondary_claims": "comprende", "evidence_kind": "producto", "evidence_modes": "producto", "stages": "primaria|secundaria|bachillerato|fp|universidad|adultos", "areas": "", "moments": "durante", "purposes": "formativo|calificable", "modalities": "escrita|visual", "seia_levels": "0|1|2|3", "time_min": 10, "time_max": 25, "teacher_load": "media", "participation": "individual", "scalability": "cualquiera", "collections": "grupos-numerosos", "ai_relation": "compatible", "review_status": "borrador-editorial", "version": "v0.10", "last_reviewed": "2026-07", "content": { "es": { "name": "Lectura e interpretación de datos", "shortDescription": "El estudiante extrae conclusiones de una tabla, gráfica o conjunto de datos y señala sus límites.", "whenToUse": "Ciencias, sociales, salud, economía.", "minimalVersion": "El estudiante extrae conclusiones de una tabla, gráfica o conjunto de datos y señala sus límites.", "instructions": [ "Entrega dato o gráfica.", "Pide 3 conclusiones y 2 límites." ], "observe": [ "Distingue lo que dice el dato de lo que no dice." ], "limits": [], "aiAdaptation": "Comprueba con IA cuando la IA da conclusiones falsas por generalización.", "example": "Interpretar una gráfica de encuesta y señalar 2 sesgos posibles." }, "en": { "name": "Data reading and interpretation", "shortDescription": "The student draws conclusions from a table, graph or dataset and flags its limits.", "whenToUse": "Science, humanities, health, economics.", "minimalVersion": "The student draws conclusions from a table, graph or dataset and flags its limits.", "instructions": [ "Provide data or chart.", "Ask for 3 conclusions and 2 limits." ], "observe": [ "Distinguishes what data says from what it doesn't." ], "limits": [], "aiAdaptation": "Verify with AI outputs that generalise wrongly.", "example": "Interpret a survey chart and flag 2 possible biases." } } }, { "id": "analisis-fuente-primaria", "slug": "analisis-de-fuente-primaria", "url": "https://evidencias-ia-evaluacion.com/evidencia/analisis-de-fuente-primaria", "name_es": "Análisis de una fuente primaria", "name_en": "Primary-source analysis", "short_description_es": "Examina autoría, contexto, intención, contenido y fiabilidad de una fuente original.", "short_description_en": "Examines authorship, context, intent, content and reliability of an original source.", "family": "escrita-grafica", "family_secondary": "", "primary_claim": "decide-criterio", "secondary_claims": "usa-ia-critica|comprende", "evidence_kind": "producto", "evidence_modes": "producto", "stages": "primaria|secundaria|bachillerato|fp|universidad|adultos", "areas": "sociales|lenguas|artes", "moments": "durante", "purposes": "formativo|calificable", "modalities": "escrita", "seia_levels": "0|1|2|3", "time_min": 15, "time_max": 30, "teacher_load": "media", "participation": "individual", "scalability": "cualquiera", "collections": "grupos-numerosos", "ai_relation": "compatible", "review_status": "borrador-editorial", "version": "v0.10", "last_reviewed": "2026-07", "content": { "es": { "name": "Análisis de una fuente primaria", "shortDescription": "Examina autoría, contexto, intención, contenido y fiabilidad de una fuente original.", "whenToUse": "Historia, filosofía, literatura, comunicación.", "minimalVersion": "Examina autoría, contexto, intención, contenido y fiabilidad de una fuente original.", "instructions": [ "Rúbrica: autoría · contexto · intención · contenido · fiabilidad.", "Comparación con una fuente secundaria." ], "observe": [ "Distingue evidencia primaria de interpretación." ], "limits": [], "aiAdaptation": "Contrasta la interpretación de la IA con la del estudiante.", "example": "Análisis de un cartel histórico contrastado con un libro de texto." }, "en": { "name": "Primary-source analysis", "shortDescription": "Examines authorship, context, intent, content and reliability of an original source.", "whenToUse": "History, philosophy, literature, media.", "minimalVersion": "Examines authorship, context, intent, content and reliability of an original source.", "instructions": [ "Rubric: authorship · context · intent · content · reliability.", "Contrast with a secondary source." ], "observe": [ "Distinguishes primary evidence from interpretation." ], "limits": [], "aiAdaptation": "Contrast AI's interpretation with the student's.", "example": "Analysis of a historical poster contrasted with a textbook." } } }, { "id": "muestra-artistica", "slug": "muestra-artistica-comentada", "url": "https://evidencias-ia-evaluacion.com/evidencia/muestra-artistica-comentada", "name_es": "Muestra artística comentada", "name_en": "Commented artistic showing", "short_description_es": "Presenta una creación y explica elecciones de composición, técnica, referentes y revisión.", "short_description_en": "Presents a creation and explains choices of composition, technique, references and revision.", "family": "oral-dialogica", "family_secondary": "practica-desempeno", "primary_claim": "decide-criterio", "secondary_claims": "puede-hacerlo|muestra-avance", "evidence_kind": "desempeno", "evidence_modes": "oral|producto", "stages": "primaria|secundaria|bachillerato|fp|universidad|adultos", "areas": "artes", "moments": "durante", "purposes": "formativo|calificable", "modalities": "oral|visual", "seia_levels": "0|1|2|3", "time_min": 8, "time_max": 20, "teacher_load": "media", "participation": "individual", "scalability": "hasta-30", "collections": "", "ai_relation": "compatible", "review_status": "borrador-editorial", "version": "v0.10", "last_reviewed": "2026-07", "content": { "es": { "name": "Muestra artística comentada", "shortDescription": "Presenta una creación y explica elecciones de composición, técnica, referentes y revisión.", "whenToUse": "Educación artística y proyectos de diseño.", "minimalVersion": "Presenta una creación y explica elecciones de composición, técnica, referentes y revisión.", "instructions": [ "Cada estudiante presenta 5-8 min.", "Rúbrica con 4 focos: composición, técnica, referente, revisión." ], "observe": [ "Explica elecciones, no solo describe la obra." ], "limits": [], "aiAdaptation": "Si usó IA generativa, exige comparar con esbozo humano previo.", "example": "Presentación de una serie fotográfica." }, "en": { "name": "Commented artistic showing", "shortDescription": "Presents a creation and explains choices of composition, technique, references and revision.", "whenToUse": "Arts education and design projects.", "minimalVersion": "Presents a creation and explains choices of composition, technique, references and revision.", "instructions": [ "Each student presents 5-8 min.", "Rubric with 4 foci: composition, technique, reference, revision." ], "observe": [ "Explains choices, not just describes the work." ], "limits": [], "aiAdaptation": "If generative AI was used, require comparison with a prior human sketch.", "example": "Photo series presentation." } } }, { "id": "ejecucion-motriz", "slug": "ejecucion-motriz-explicada", "url": "https://evidencias-ia-evaluacion.com/evidencia/ejecucion-motriz-explicada", "name_es": "Ejecución motriz explicada", "name_en": "Explained motor performance", "short_description_es": "Realiza una acción corporal o deportiva y reconoce elementos técnicos, tácticos o de seguridad.", "short_description_en": "Performs a bodily or sporting action and recognises technical, tactical or safety elements.", "family": "practica-desempeno", "family_secondary": "oral-dialogica", "primary_claim": "puede-hacerlo", "secondary_claims": "comprende", "evidence_kind": "desempeno", "evidence_modes": "oral|desempeno-controlado", "stages": "primaria|secundaria|bachillerato|fp|universidad|adultos", "areas": "efisica", "moments": "durante", "purposes": "formativo|calificable", "modalities": "oral|practica", "seia_levels": "0|1|2", "time_min": 8, "time_max": 20, "teacher_load": "media", "participation": "individual", "scalability": "mas-30-equipos", "collections": "grupos-numerosos", "ai_relation": "compatible", "review_status": "borrador-editorial", "version": "v0.10", "last_reviewed": "2026-07", "content": { "es": { "name": "Ejecución motriz explicada", "shortDescription": "Realiza una acción corporal o deportiva y reconoce elementos técnicos, tácticos o de seguridad.", "whenToUse": "Educación física, danza, artes escénicas.", "minimalVersion": "Realiza una acción corporal o deportiva y reconoce elementos técnicos, tácticos o de seguridad.", "instructions": [ "Ejecuta y verbaliza los focos técnicos.", "Detecta un error propio y propone corrección." ], "observe": [ "Distingue error técnico de error táctico." ], "limits": [], "aiAdaptation": "Análisis por vídeo con IA no reemplaza el ojo docente.", "example": "Ejecución de un pase con verbalización de puntos técnicos." }, "en": { "name": "Explained motor performance", "shortDescription": "Performs a bodily or sporting action and recognises technical, tactical or safety elements.", "whenToUse": "PE, dance, performing arts.", "minimalVersion": "Performs a bodily or sporting action and recognises technical, tactical or safety elements.", "instructions": [ "Perform and verbalise technical foci.", "Detect one own error and propose a fix." ], "observe": [ "Distinguishes technical from tactical errors." ], "limits": [], "aiAdaptation": "AI video analysis does not replace the teacher's eye.", "example": "Passing performance with verbalised technical points." } } }, { "id": "secuencia-manipulativos", "slug": "secuencia-con-materiales-manipulativos", "url": "https://evidencias-ia-evaluacion.com/evidencia/secuencia-con-materiales-manipulativos", "name_es": "Secuencia con materiales manipulativos", "name_en": "Sequence with hands-on materials", "short_description_es": "El niño construye, ordena o representa una idea con objetos y explica lo que ha hecho.", "short_description_en": "The child builds, orders or represents an idea with objects and explains what they did.", "family": "practica-desempeno", "family_secondary": "oral-dialogica", "primary_claim": "comprende", "secondary_claims": "puede-hacerlo", "evidence_kind": "desempeno", "evidence_modes": "oral|desempeno-controlado", "stages": "infantil|primaria", "areas": "", "moments": "durante", "purposes": "formativo|calificable", "modalities": "practica|oral", "seia_levels": "0|1", "time_min": 5, "time_max": 15, "teacher_load": "baja", "participation": "individual", "scalability": "grupo-reducido", "collections": "baja-revision", "ai_relation": "sin-ia", "review_status": "borrador-editorial", "version": "v0.10", "last_reviewed": "2026-07", "content": { "es": { "name": "Secuencia con materiales manipulativos", "shortDescription": "El niño construye, ordena o representa una idea con objetos y explica lo que ha hecho.", "whenToUse": "Cuando los niños aún no leen o escriben con soltura.", "minimalVersion": "El niño construye, ordena o representa una idea con objetos y explica lo que ha hecho.", "instructions": [ "Ofrece objetos manipulables.", "Pide construir y contar lo hecho." ], "observe": [ "Coherencia entre lo que hace y lo que dice." ], "limits": [], "aiAdaptation": "No procede en esta etapa; centrarse en el niño.", "example": "Ordenar palitos por tamaño y explicar el criterio." }, "en": { "name": "Sequence with hands-on materials", "shortDescription": "The child builds, orders or represents an idea with objects and explains what they did.", "whenToUse": "When children do not yet read or write fluently.", "minimalVersion": "The child builds, orders or represents an idea with objects and explains what they did.", "instructions": [ "Offer manipulable objects.", "Ask to build and tell." ], "observe": [ "Consistency between doing and saying." ], "limits": [], "aiAdaptation": "Not applicable at this stage; focus on the child.", "example": "Order sticks by size and explain the criterion." } } }, { "id": "dibujo-explicacion-oral", "slug": "dibujo-con-explicacion-oral", "url": "https://evidencias-ia-evaluacion.com/evidencia/dibujo-con-explicacion-oral", "name_es": "Dibujo con explicación oral", "name_en": "Drawing with oral explanation", "short_description_es": "El dibujo se acompaña de una conversación breve para interpretar lo que el niño comprende.", "short_description_en": "The drawing goes with a brief conversation to interpret what the child understands.", "family": "oral-dialogica", "family_secondary": "escrita-grafica", "primary_claim": "comprende", "secondary_claims": "", "evidence_kind": "producto", "evidence_modes": "oral|producto", "stages": "infantil|primaria", "areas": "", "moments": "durante", "purposes": "formativo|calificable", "modalities": "visual|oral", "seia_levels": "0|1", "time_min": 5, "time_max": 15, "teacher_load": "baja", "participation": "individual", "scalability": "grupo-reducido", "collections": "baja-revision", "ai_relation": "sin-ia", "review_status": "borrador-editorial", "version": "v0.10", "last_reviewed": "2026-07", "content": { "es": { "name": "Dibujo con explicación oral", "shortDescription": "El dibujo se acompaña de una conversación breve para interpretar lo que el niño comprende.", "whenToUse": "Etapa infantil y primeros cursos.", "minimalVersion": "El dibujo se acompaña de una conversación breve para interpretar lo que el niño comprende.", "instructions": [ "Pide dibujar una idea.", "Conversa con preguntas abiertas: 'cuéntame'." ], "observe": [ "Se interpreta lo que dice el niño, no solo el dibujo." ], "limits": [], "aiAdaptation": "No procede.", "example": "Dibuja una planta y explica cómo crece." }, "en": { "name": "Drawing with oral explanation", "shortDescription": "The drawing goes with a brief conversation to interpret what the child understands.", "whenToUse": "Early years and first primary grades.", "minimalVersion": "The drawing goes with a brief conversation to interpret what the child understands.", "instructions": [ "Ask to draw an idea.", "Chat with open prompts: 'tell me'." ], "observe": [ "Interpret what the child says, not just the drawing." ], "limits": [], "aiAdaptation": "Not applicable.", "example": "Draw a plant and explain how it grows." } } }, { "id": "observacion-juego-simbolico", "slug": "observacion-del-juego-simbolico", "url": "https://evidencias-ia-evaluacion.com/evidencia/observacion-del-juego-simbolico", "name_es": "Observación del juego simbólico", "name_en": "Symbolic-play observation", "short_description_es": "El docente registra cómo el alumnado utiliza lenguaje, roles, reglas y conocimientos durante el juego.", "short_description_en": "The teacher records how children use language, roles, rules and knowledge during play.", "family": "practica-desempeno", "family_secondary": "proceso-evolucion", "primary_claim": "muestra-avance", "secondary_claims": "comprende|puede-hacerlo", "evidence_kind": "proceso", "evidence_modes": "proceso", "stages": "infantil", "areas": "", "moments": "durante", "purposes": "formativo|calificable", "modalities": "oral|practica", "seia_levels": "0", "time_min": 10, "time_max": 30, "teacher_load": "media", "participation": "individual", "scalability": "grupo-reducido", "collections": "", "ai_relation": "sin-ia", "review_status": "borrador-editorial", "version": "v0.10", "last_reviewed": "2026-07", "content": { "es": { "name": "Observación del juego simbólico", "shortDescription": "El docente registra cómo el alumnado utiliza lenguaje, roles, reglas y conocimientos durante el juego.", "whenToUse": "Rincones y momentos de juego libre estructurado.", "minimalVersion": "El docente registra cómo el alumnado utiliza lenguaje, roles, reglas y conocimientos durante el juego.", "instructions": [ "Ficha de observación con 4-6 indicadores.", "Registra ejemplos concretos." ], "observe": [ "Uso funcional del lenguaje aprendido." ], "limits": [], "aiAdaptation": "No procede.", "example": "Observación de un rincón de tienda: uso de números y roles." }, "en": { "name": "Symbolic-play observation", "shortDescription": "The teacher records how children use language, roles, rules and knowledge during play.", "whenToUse": "Free structured-play corners.", "minimalVersion": "The teacher records how children use language, roles, rules and knowledge during play.", "instructions": [ "Observation sheet with 4-6 indicators.", "Log concrete examples." ], "observe": [ "Functional use of learnt language." ], "limits": [], "aiAdaptation": "Not applicable.", "example": "Observation of a shop corner: use of numbers and roles." } } }, { "id": "caso-variable-cambiada", "slug": "caso-con-una-variable-cambiada", "url": "https://evidencias-ia-evaluacion.com/evidencia/caso-con-una-variable-cambiada", "name_es": "Caso con una variable cambiada", "name_en": "Case with one variable changed", "short_description_es": "Se modifica una condición del problema original para comprobar si el estudiante adapta lo aprendido.", "short_description_en": "One condition of the original problem is changed to check if the student adapts what they learnt.", "family": "escrita-grafica", "family_secondary": "practica-desempeno", "primary_claim": "transfiere", "secondary_claims": "comprende|decide-criterio", "evidence_kind": "producto", "evidence_modes": "transferencia", "stages": "primaria|secundaria|bachillerato|fp|universidad|adultos", "areas": "", "moments": "durante", "purposes": "formativo|calificable", "modalities": "escrita|oral", "seia_levels": "0|1|2|3", "time_min": 10, "time_max": 25, "teacher_load": "media", "participation": "individual", "scalability": "cualquiera", "collections": "transferencia|grupos-numerosos", "ai_relation": "compatible", "review_status": "borrador-editorial", "version": "v0.10", "last_reviewed": "2026-07", "content": { "es": { "name": "Caso con una variable cambiada", "shortDescription": "Se modifica una condición del problema original para comprobar si el estudiante adapta lo aprendido.", "whenToUse": "Tras resolver un caso o problema conocido.", "minimalVersion": "Se modifica una condición del problema original para comprobar si el estudiante adapta lo aprendido.", "instructions": [ "Cambia una sola variable de un caso previo.", "Pide nueva decisión con justificación." ], "observe": [ "Reconoce qué cambia y qué se mantiene." ], "limits": [], "aiAdaptation": "Sin IA en la fase individual, para no volver a delegar.", "example": "Mismo problema con presupuesto reducido a la mitad." }, "en": { "name": "Case with one variable changed", "shortDescription": "One condition of the original problem is changed to check if the student adapts what they learnt.", "whenToUse": "After solving a known case or problem.", "minimalVersion": "One condition of the original problem is changed to check if the student adapts what they learnt.", "instructions": [ "Change a single variable in a prior case.", "Ask for a new decision with justification." ], "observe": [ "Recognises what changes and what remains." ], "limits": [], "aiAdaptation": "No AI during the individual phase, to avoid re-delegation.", "example": "Same problem with budget halved." } } }, { "id": "explicaselo-a-alguien-que-empieza", "slug": "explicaselo-a-alguien-que-empieza", "url": "https://evidencias-ia-evaluacion.com/evidencia/explicaselo-a-alguien-que-empieza", "name_es": "Explícaselo a alguien que empieza", "name_en": "Explain it to a beginner", "short_description_es": "Preparar una explicación para una persona sin conocimientos previos y responder sus dudas.", "short_description_en": "Prepare an explanation for a beginner and respond to their doubts.", "family": "oral-dialogica", "family_secondary": "escrita-grafica", "primary_claim": "comprende", "secondary_claims": "transfiere|decide-criterio", "evidence_kind": "desempeno", "evidence_modes": "oral|producto", "stages": "primaria|secundaria|bachillerato|fp|universidad|adultos", "areas": "", "moments": "durante", "purposes": "formativo|calificable", "modalities": "oral|escrita", "seia_levels": "0|1|2|3", "time_min": 10, "time_max": 20, "teacher_load": "media", "participation": "individual", "scalability": "cualquiera", "collections": "grupos-numerosos", "ai_relation": "compatible", "review_status": "borrador-editorial", "version": "v0.10", "last_reviewed": "2026-07", "content": { "es": { "name": "Explícaselo a alguien que empieza", "shortDescription": "Preparar una explicación para una persona sin conocimientos previos y responder sus dudas.", "whenToUse": "Consolidar comprensión de un contenido nuevo.", "minimalVersion": "Preparar una explicación para una persona sin conocimientos previos y responder sus dudas.", "instructions": [ "Elige audiencia real o simulada.", "Prepara explicación de 3 min sin jerga." ], "observe": [ "Usa analogías útiles, no forzadas." ], "limits": [], "aiAdaptation": "Contrasta la explicación humana con la de una IA y analiza claridad.", "example": "Explica qué es una hipoteca a un adolescente." }, "en": { "name": "Explain it to a beginner", "shortDescription": "Prepare an explanation for a beginner and respond to their doubts.", "whenToUse": "Consolidate understanding of new content.", "minimalVersion": "Prepare an explanation for a beginner and respond to their doubts.", "instructions": [ "Choose real or simulated audience.", "Prepare a 3-min jargon-free explanation." ], "observe": [ "Uses useful, not forced, analogies." ], "limits": [], "aiAdaptation": "Contrast the human explanation with an AI's and analyse clarity.", "example": "Explain a mortgage to a teenager." } } }, { "id": "encargo-realista", "slug": "encargo-realista", "url": "https://evidencias-ia-evaluacion.com/evidencia/encargo-realista", "name_es": "Encargo realista", "name_en": "Realistic commission", "short_description_es": "Responder a una petición con destinatario, condiciones y propósito definidos.", "short_description_en": "Respond to a request with a defined audience, constraints and purpose.", "family": "practica-desempeno", "family_secondary": "proceso-evolucion", "primary_claim": "transfiere", "secondary_claims": "puede-hacerlo|decide-criterio", "evidence_kind": "producto", "evidence_modes": "producto|transferencia", "stages": "primaria|secundaria|bachillerato|fp|universidad|adultos", "areas": "", "moments": "durante", "purposes": "formativo|calificable", "modalities": "escrita|digital|visual", "seia_levels": "1|2|3", "time_min": 30, "time_max": 120, "teacher_load": "alta", "participation": "equipo", "scalability": "hasta-30", "collections": "transferencia", "ai_relation": "compatible", "review_status": "borrador-editorial", "version": "v0.10", "last_reviewed": "2026-07", "content": { "es": { "name": "Encargo realista", "shortDescription": "Responder a una petición con destinatario, condiciones y propósito definidos.", "whenToUse": "Aprendizaje aplicado a situaciones reales.", "minimalVersion": "Responder a una petición con destinatario, condiciones y propósito definidos.", "instructions": [ "Define destinatario, propósito, restricciones.", "Producto con formato profesional." ], "observe": [ "Adecuación a destinatario real." ], "limits": [], "aiAdaptation": "Permite IA; exige declaración de uso y firma humana del contenido.", "example": "Redactar un correo formal para una asociación local." }, "en": { "name": "Realistic commission", "shortDescription": "Respond to a request with a defined audience, constraints and purpose.", "whenToUse": "Learning applied to real situations.", "minimalVersion": "Respond to a request with a defined audience, constraints and purpose.", "instructions": [ "Define audience, purpose, constraints.", "Professional-format product." ], "observe": [ "Fit to real audience." ], "limits": [], "aiAdaptation": "Allow AI; require use declaration and human sign-off.", "example": "Draft a formal email to a local association." } } }, { "id": "decision-bajo-restricciones", "slug": "decision-bajo-restricciones", "url": "https://evidencias-ia-evaluacion.com/evidencia/decision-bajo-restricciones", "name_es": "Decisión bajo restricciones", "name_en": "Decision under constraints", "short_description_es": "Elegir una solución con límites de tiempo, coste, recursos, seguridad o impacto.", "short_description_en": "Choose a solution within constraints of time, cost, resources, safety or impact.", "family": "escrita-grafica", "family_secondary": "oral-dialogica", "primary_claim": "decide-criterio", "secondary_claims": "transfiere", "evidence_kind": "producto", "evidence_modes": "producto", "stages": "primaria|secundaria|bachillerato|fp|universidad|adultos", "areas": "", "moments": "durante", "purposes": "formativo|calificable", "modalities": "escrita|oral", "seia_levels": "0|1|2|3", "time_min": 15, "time_max": 40, "teacher_load": "media", "participation": "individual", "scalability": "cualquiera", "collections": "transferencia|grupos-numerosos", "ai_relation": "compatible", "review_status": "borrador-editorial", "version": "v0.10", "last_reviewed": "2026-07", "content": { "es": { "name": "Decisión bajo restricciones", "shortDescription": "Elegir una solución con límites de tiempo, coste, recursos, seguridad o impacto.", "whenToUse": "Cuando hay que elegir con restricciones reales.", "minimalVersion": "Elegir una solución con límites de tiempo, coste, recursos, seguridad o impacto.", "instructions": [ "Explicita 3 restricciones no negociables.", "Compara al menos 2 alternativas.", "Justifica la elección final." ], "observe": [ "Las restricciones se respetan y se explicitan." ], "limits": [], "aiAdaptation": "La IA puede simular alternativas; el estudiante decide y firma.", "example": "Elegir la mejor solución técnica con presupuesto limitado." }, "en": { "name": "Decision under constraints", "shortDescription": "Choose a solution within constraints of time, cost, resources, safety or impact.", "whenToUse": "When choosing under real constraints.", "minimalVersion": "Choose a solution within constraints of time, cost, resources, safety or impact.", "instructions": [ "Set 3 non-negotiable constraints.", "Compare at least 2 alternatives.", "Justify the final choice." ], "observe": [ "Constraints are respected and made explicit." ], "limits": [], "aiAdaptation": "AI can simulate alternatives; the student decides and signs.", "example": "Pick the best technical solution within budget." } } }, { "id": "solucion-propia-vs-ia", "slug": "solucion-propia-frente-a-solucion-de-ia", "url": "https://evidencias-ia-evaluacion.com/evidencia/solucion-propia-frente-a-solucion-de-ia", "name_es": "Solución propia frente a solución de IA", "name_en": "Own solution vs AI solution", "short_description_es": "El estudiante compara su primera respuesta con una salida generada, identifica diferencias y construye una versión final justificada.", "short_description_en": "The student compares their first answer with an AI output, identifies differences and builds a justified final version.", "family": "escrita-grafica", "family_secondary": "proceso-evolucion", "primary_claim": "usa-ia-critica", "secondary_claims": "decide-criterio|comprende", "evidence_kind": "producto", "evidence_modes": "verificacion-ia|producto", "stages": "primaria|secundaria|bachillerato|fp|universidad|adultos", "areas": "", "moments": "durante|despues", "purposes": "formativo|calificable", "modalities": "escrita|digital", "seia_levels": "2|3", "time_min": 15, "time_max": 30, "teacher_load": "media", "participation": "individual", "scalability": "cualquiera", "collections": "ia-critica|grupos-numerosos", "ai_relation": "con-ia", "review_status": "borrador-editorial", "version": "v0.10", "last_reviewed": "2026-07", "content": { "es": { "name": "Solución propia frente a solución de IA", "shortDescription": "El estudiante compara su primera respuesta con una salida generada, identifica diferencias y construye una versión final justificada.", "whenToUse": "Tras generar una primera respuesta propia sin IA.", "minimalVersion": "El estudiante compara su primera respuesta con una salida generada, identifica diferencias y construye una versión final justificada.", "instructions": [ "Fase 1: respuesta individual sin IA.", "Fase 2: obtener una salida de IA con prompt fijo.", "Fase 3: identificar 3 diferencias.", "Fase 4: versión final justificada indicando qué se aceptó y qué se rechazó." ], "observe": [ "Reconoce sesgos, imprecisiones o simplificaciones de la IA." ], "limits": [], "aiAdaptation": "El objetivo mismo requiere IA. Fija el prompt para que sea comparable entre estudiantes.", "example": "Ensayo breve corregido tras comparar con salida de IA." }, "en": { "name": "Own solution vs AI solution", "shortDescription": "The student compares their first answer with an AI output, identifies differences and builds a justified final version.", "whenToUse": "After producing a first AI-free answer.", "minimalVersion": "The student compares their first answer with an AI output, identifies differences and builds a justified final version.", "instructions": [ "Phase 1: individual AI-free answer.", "Phase 2: obtain an AI output with a fixed prompt.", "Phase 3: identify 3 differences.", "Phase 4: justified final version, noting what was kept and rejected." ], "observe": [ "Recognises AI biases, inaccuracies or oversimplifications." ], "limits": [], "aiAdaptation": "The task requires AI. Fix the prompt so it is comparable across students.", "example": "Short essay revised after comparing with AI output." } } } ] }