{
  "name": "Banco de evidencias de aprendizaje / Learning Evidence Hub",
  "description": "81 técnicas para comprobar el aprendizaje cuando la IA puede intervenir. Inventario estático, sin datos personales.",
  "author": "Vicent Gadea",
  "url": "https://evidencias-ia-evaluacion.com/",
  "version": "v0.13",
  "generated": "2026-09-06",
  "licence": "CC BY-NC-SA 4.0",
  "count": 81,
  "records": [
    {
      "id": "process-log",
      "slug": "diario-de-proceso",
      "url": "https://evidencias-ia-evaluacion.com/evidencia/diario-de-proceso",
      "name_es": "Diario de proceso",
      "name_en": "Process log",
      "short_description_es": "Bitácora breve donde el estudiante registra decisiones, dudas y avances de la tarea.",
      "short_description_en": "A short log where the student records decisions, doubts and progress on the task.",
      "family": "proceso-evolucion",
      "family_secondary": "metacognitiva",
      "primary_claim": "muestra-avance",
      "secondary_claims": "decide-criterio|usa-ia-critica",
      "evidence_kind": "proceso",
      "evidence_modes": "proceso|metacognicion",
      "stages": "primaria|secundaria|bachillerato|fp|universidad|adultos",
      "areas": "",
      "moments": "durante|despues",
      "purposes": "formativo|calificable",
      "modalities": "escrita|digital",
      "seia_levels": "1|2|3",
      "time_min": 4,
      "time_max": 10,
      "teacher_load": "media",
      "participation": "individual",
      "scalability": "cualquiera",
      "collections": "rapidas|grupos-numerosos",
      "ai_relation": "",
      "review_status": "borrador-editorial",
      "version": "v0.13",
      "last_reviewed": "2026-09-06",
      "time_scope": "",
      "learning_windows": "evolucion-borradores|investigacion-decisiones",
      "complementary_layers": "",
      "evidence_origins": "natural|reflexiva",
      "window_selection": "docente|cocreada",
      "evidence_produced_es": "Un conjunto de entradas breves y fechadas con la decisión tomada, su motivo y la dificultad declarada en ese momento.",
      "evidence_produced_en": "A set of short, dated entries with the decision taken, its reason and the difficulty declared at that moment.",
      "bounded_inference_es": "Que el estudiante puede describir decisiones propias del trabajo y situarlas en el tiempo, y que esas decisiones se corresponden con cambios localizables en el producto.",
      "bounded_inference_en": "That the student can describe decisions of their own within the work and place them in time, and that those decisions match locatable changes in the product.",
      "inference_conditions_es": "Las entradas se escriben durante la tarea, no reconstruidas al entregar. | El diario se lee junto al producto para comprobar la correspondencia.",
      "inference_conditions_en": "Entries are written during the task, not reconstructed at submission. | The log is read alongside the product to check correspondence.",
      "cannot_infer_es": "No acredita la autoría material de lo entregado. | No informa de la calidad técnica del resultado ni de la comprensión conceptual.",
      "cannot_infer_en": "It does not certify material authorship of the submission. | It says nothing about the technical quality of the result or conceptual understanding.",
      "when_not_to_use_es": "Cuando la tarea es tan breve que no hay decisiones reales que registrar, o cuando escribir el diario cuesta más que hacer la tarea.",
      "when_not_to_use_en": "When the task is so short that there are no real decisions to record, or when writing the log costs more than doing the task.",
      "content": {
        "es": {
          "name": "Diario de proceso",
          "shortDescription": "Bitácora breve donde el estudiante registra decisiones, dudas y avances de la tarea.",
          "whenToUse": "Cuando el producto final no basta y necesitas ver cómo se ha llegado hasta él.",
          "minimalVersion": "Tres entradas breves: qué he decidido, por qué, qué me ha costado.",
          "instructions": [
            "Define de 2 a 4 momentos en los que se escribirá una entrada.",
            "Proporciona 3 preguntas guía estables.",
            "Limita cada entrada a un máximo de 100 palabras.",
            "Revísalo junto al producto final, no de forma aislada."
          ],
          "observe": [
            "Las decisiones descritas se corresponden con cambios visibles en el trabajo.",
            "La dificultad declarada es específica, no genérica.",
            "Existe evolución entre entradas."
          ],
          "limits": [
            "Por sí sola no acredita comprensión ni ejecución competente."
          ],
          "aiAdaptation": "",
          "example": "Un estudiante registra tres entradas durante una tarea de escritura y explica por qué reescribió la introducción.",
          "evidenceProduced": "Un conjunto de entradas breves y fechadas con la decisión tomada, su motivo y la dificultad declarada en ese momento.",
          "boundedInference": "Que el estudiante puede describir decisiones propias del trabajo y situarlas en el tiempo, y que esas decisiones se corresponden con cambios localizables en el producto.",
          "cannotInfer": [
            "No acredita la autoría material de lo entregado.",
            "No informa de la calidad técnica del resultado ni de la comprensión conceptual."
          ],
          "inferenceConditions": [
            "Las entradas se escriben durante la tarea, no reconstruidas al entregar.",
            "El diario se lee junto al producto para comprobar la correspondencia."
          ],
          "whenNotToUse": "Cuando la tarea es tan breve que no hay decisiones reales que registrar, o cuando escribir el diario cuesta más que hacer la tarea.",
          "copyablePrompt": "Escribe una entrada de máximo 100 palabras respondiendo a: (1) qué decisión he tomado hoy, (2) por qué la he tomado, (3) qué me sigue costando.",
          "coverageNote": "",
          "windowConditions": [
            "Solo si hay al menos dos entradas separadas en el tiempo y se contrastan con cambios visibles en el trabajo."
          ],
          "windowRationale": "El diario registra decisiones fechadas del propio proceso; sin contraste temporal es solo una declaración."
        },
        "en": {
          "name": "Process log",
          "shortDescription": "A short log where the student records decisions, doubts and progress on the task.",
          "whenToUse": "When the final product is not enough and you need to see how it was reached.",
          "minimalVersion": "Three brief entries: what I decided, why, what I struggled with.",
          "instructions": [
            "Set 2-4 moments when an entry will be written.",
            "Provide 3 stable guiding questions.",
            "Cap each entry at 100 words.",
            "Review it alongside the final product, not in isolation."
          ],
          "observe": [
            "The described decisions match visible changes in the work.",
            "The stated difficulty is specific, not generic.",
            "There is evolution between entries."
          ],
          "limits": [
            "On its own it does not certify understanding or competent execution."
          ],
          "aiAdaptation": "",
          "example": "A student records three entries during a writing task and explains why they rewrote the introduction.",
          "evidenceProduced": "A set of short, dated entries with the decision taken, its reason and the difficulty declared at that moment.",
          "boundedInference": "That the student can describe decisions of their own within the work and place them in time, and that those decisions match locatable changes in the product.",
          "cannotInfer": [
            "It does not certify material authorship of the submission.",
            "It says nothing about the technical quality of the result or conceptual understanding."
          ],
          "inferenceConditions": [
            "Entries are written during the task, not reconstructed at submission.",
            "The log is read alongside the product to check correspondence."
          ],
          "whenNotToUse": "When the task is so short that there are no real decisions to record, or when writing the log costs more than doing the task.",
          "copyablePrompt": "Write an entry of up to 100 words answering: (1) what decision I made today, (2) why, (3) what I still find hard.",
          "coverageNote": "",
          "windowConditions": [
            "Only if there are at least two entries at different times, contrasted with visible changes in the work."
          ],
          "windowRationale": "The log records dated decisions from the process itself; without a time contrast it is only a statement."
        }
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "version-history",
      "slug": "historial-de-versiones",
      "url": "https://evidencias-ia-evaluacion.com/evidencia/historial-de-versiones",
      "name_es": "Historial de versiones",
      "name_en": "Version history",
      "short_description_es": "Conservar y contrastar sucesivas versiones del mismo producto para observar decisiones y avance.",
      "short_description_en": "Keep and contrast successive versions of the same product to observe decisions and progress.",
      "family": "proceso-evolucion",
      "family_secondary": "",
      "primary_claim": "muestra-avance",
      "secondary_claims": "decide-criterio",
      "evidence_kind": "proceso",
      "evidence_modes": "proceso|producto",
      "stages": "primaria|secundaria|bachillerato|fp|universidad|adultos",
      "areas": "",
      "moments": "durante|despues",
      "purposes": "formativo|calificable",
      "modalities": "escrita|digital|visual",
      "seia_levels": "1|2|3",
      "time_min": 3,
      "time_max": 8,
      "teacher_load": "baja",
      "participation": "individual",
      "scalability": "cualquiera",
      "collections": "rapidas|baja-revision|grupos-numerosos",
      "ai_relation": "",
      "review_status": "borrador-editorial",
      "version": "v0.13",
      "last_reviewed": "2026-09-06",
      "time_scope": "",
      "learning_windows": "evolucion-borradores",
      "complementary_layers": "",
      "evidence_origins": "natural",
      "window_selection": "docente|estudiante",
      "evidence_produced_es": "Dos o más ficheros o estados guardados del mismo producto, con fecha y con una nota de cambio por versión.",
      "evidence_produced_en": "Two or more saved files or states of the same product, dated, with a change note per version.",
      "bounded_inference_es": "Que el producto se ha construido por pasos y que existen diferencias sustantivas entre estados, atribuibles a decisiones descritas.",
      "bounded_inference_en": "That the product was built in stages and that there are substantive differences between states, attributable to described decisions.",
      "inference_conditions_es": "Los puntos de guardado se fijan antes de empezar, no a posteriori. | Se comparan las diferencias, no solo la última versión.",
      "inference_conditions_en": "Save points are set before starting, not afterwards. | Differences are compared, not just the final version.",
      "cannot_infer_es": "No demuestra que las versiones intermedias las haya escrito la misma persona. | Un número alto de versiones no indica mayor aprendizaje.",
      "cannot_infer_en": "It does not prove the intermediate versions were written by the same person. | A high number of versions does not indicate more learning.",
      "when_not_to_use_es": "Cuando el formato de trabajo no admite versiones o cuando el guardado se convierte en un control de vigilancia continua.",
      "when_not_to_use_en": "When the working format does not allow versions, or when saving turns into continuous surveillance.",
      "content": {
        "es": {
          "name": "Historial de versiones",
          "shortDescription": "Conservar y contrastar sucesivas versiones del mismo producto para observar decisiones y avance.",
          "whenToUse": "Cuando el trabajo se hace en documentos digitales y quieres ver el rastro de cambios; por sí solo no explica quién hizo cada cambio ni por qué.",
          "minimalVersion": "Dos versiones intermedias marcadas + versión final.",
          "instructions": [
            "Fija dos hitos intermedios de guardado obligatorio.",
            "Pide una nota breve de cambios por versión.",
            "Revisa las diferencias, no solo la última versión."
          ],
          "observe": [
            "Las diferencias entre versiones son sustantivas, no cosméticas.",
            "Las notas de cambio corresponden con las modificaciones reales."
          ],
          "limits": [
            "Puede simularse guardando versiones falsas si no se combina con otra evidencia."
          ],
          "aiAdaptation": "",
          "example": "Un trabajo escrito conserva V1, V2 y final, con notas de cambio y una comparación breve.",
          "evidenceProduced": "Dos o más ficheros o estados guardados del mismo producto, con fecha y con una nota de cambio por versión.",
          "boundedInference": "Que el producto se ha construido por pasos y que existen diferencias sustantivas entre estados, atribuibles a decisiones descritas.",
          "cannotInfer": [
            "No demuestra que las versiones intermedias las haya escrito la misma persona.",
            "Un número alto de versiones no indica mayor aprendizaje."
          ],
          "inferenceConditions": [
            "Los puntos de guardado se fijan antes de empezar, no a posteriori.",
            "Se comparan las diferencias, no solo la última versión."
          ],
          "whenNotToUse": "Cuando el formato de trabajo no admite versiones o cuando el guardado se convierte en un control de vigilancia continua.",
          "copyablePrompt": "Guarda esta versión con la fecha y añade 2 líneas: qué has cambiado y por qué.",
          "coverageNote": "",
          "windowConditions": [
            "Requiere versiones intermedias conservadas y diferencias sustantivas, no solo cambios de formato."
          ],
          "windowRationale": "Las versiones sucesivas son el rastro más directo de cómo cambia el trabajo."
        },
        "en": {
          "name": "Version history",
          "shortDescription": "Keep and contrast successive versions of the same product to observe decisions and progress.",
          "whenToUse": "When the work is done in digital documents and you want to see the trail of changes; on its own it explains neither who made each change nor why.",
          "minimalVersion": "Two marked intermediate versions + final version.",
          "instructions": [
            "Set two mandatory intermediate save points.",
            "Ask for a short change note per version.",
            "Review the differences, not just the last version."
          ],
          "observe": [
            "Differences between versions are substantive, not cosmetic.",
            "Change notes match actual modifications."
          ],
          "limits": [
            "Can be simulated with fake saves if not combined with other evidence."
          ],
          "aiAdaptation": "",
          "example": "A written assignment keeps V1, V2 and final with change notes and a short comparison.",
          "evidenceProduced": "Two or more saved files or states of the same product, dated, with a change note per version.",
          "boundedInference": "That the product was built in stages and that there are substantive differences between states, attributable to described decisions.",
          "cannotInfer": [
            "It does not prove the intermediate versions were written by the same person.",
            "A high number of versions does not indicate more learning."
          ],
          "inferenceConditions": [
            "Save points are set before starting, not afterwards.",
            "Differences are compared, not just the final version."
          ],
          "whenNotToUse": "When the working format does not allow versions, or when saving turns into continuous surveillance.",
          "copyablePrompt": "Save this version with today's date and add 2 lines: what you changed and why.",
          "coverageNote": "",
          "windowConditions": [
            "Requires intermediate versions kept and substantive differences, not just formatting changes."
          ],
          "windowRationale": "Successive versions are the most direct trace of how the work changes."
        }
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "draft-vs-final",
      "slug": "contraste-borrador-final",
      "url": "https://evidencias-ia-evaluacion.com/evidencia/contraste-borrador-final",
      "name_es": "Contraste borrador-final",
      "name_en": "Draft-vs-final contrast",
      "short_description_es": "Compara un borrador temprano con la versión final para hacer visible la decisión de mejora.",
      "short_description_en": "Compare an early draft with the final version to make improvement decisions visible.",
      "family": "proceso-evolucion",
      "family_secondary": "",
      "primary_claim": "muestra-avance",
      "secondary_claims": "decide-criterio",
      "evidence_kind": "proceso",
      "evidence_modes": "proceso|producto",
      "stages": "primaria|secundaria|bachillerato|fp|universidad|adultos",
      "areas": "",
      "moments": "despues",
      "purposes": "formativo|calificable",
      "modalities": "escrita|digital",
      "seia_levels": "1|2|3",
      "time_min": 5,
      "time_max": 10,
      "teacher_load": "baja",
      "participation": "individual",
      "scalability": "cualquiera",
      "collections": "rapidas|baja-revision|grupos-numerosos",
      "ai_relation": "",
      "review_status": "borrador-editorial",
      "version": "v0.13",
      "last_reviewed": "2026-09-06",
      "time_scope": "",
      "learning_windows": "evolucion-borradores",
      "complementary_layers": "",
      "evidence_origins": "natural",
      "window_selection": "docente|estudiante",
      "evidence_produced_es": "Un borrador temprano, la versión final y una explicación breve de qué se mejoró y por qué.",
      "evidence_produced_en": "An early draft, the final version and a short explanation of what was improved and why.",
      "bounded_inference_es": "Que el estudiante identifica la diferencia entre ambos estados y sabe nombrar el criterio de mejora aplicado.",
      "bounded_inference_en": "That the student identifies the difference between both states and can name the improvement criterion applied.",
      "inference_conditions_es": "El borrador se recoge antes de cualquier revisión externa. | La explicación señala cambios concretos, localizables en el texto o el producto.",
      "inference_conditions_en": "The draft is collected before any external revision. | The explanation points to concrete changes, locatable in the text or product.",
      "cannot_infer_es": "No indica quién sugirió la mejora, solo que se reconoce y se explica. | No permite afirmar que la mejora se repetirá en otra tarea.",
      "cannot_infer_en": "It does not indicate who suggested the improvement, only that it is recognised and explained. | It does not support claiming the improvement will recur in another task.",
      "when_not_to_use_es": "Cuando no ha existido un borrador real y se pide fabricarlo después para cumplir el requisito.",
      "when_not_to_use_en": "When there was no real draft and one is fabricated afterwards to meet the requirement.",
      "content": {
        "es": {
          "name": "Contraste borrador-final",
          "shortDescription": "Compara un borrador temprano con la versión final para hacer visible la decisión de mejora.",
          "whenToUse": "Cuando quieres saber qué ha mejorado entre dos versiones y por qué.",
          "minimalVersion": "Entrega borrador + final + una diferencia clave explicada.",
          "instructions": [
            "Solicita el borrador antes de una fecha intermedia.",
            "Pide 3 diferencias explicadas al entregar."
          ],
          "observe": [
            "Las diferencias declaradas son visibles.",
            "Cada cambio se apoya en un criterio, no en una opinión vaga."
          ],
          "limits": [
            "Muestra revisión, no necesariamente comprensión conceptual."
          ],
          "aiAdaptation": "",
          "example": "Un informe corto adjunta un borrador y explica por qué se han sintetizado dos secciones.",
          "evidenceProduced": "Un borrador temprano, la versión final y una explicación breve de qué se mejoró y por qué.",
          "boundedInference": "Que el estudiante identifica la diferencia entre ambos estados y sabe nombrar el criterio de mejora aplicado.",
          "cannotInfer": [
            "No indica quién sugirió la mejora, solo que se reconoce y se explica.",
            "No permite afirmar que la mejora se repetirá en otra tarea."
          ],
          "inferenceConditions": [
            "El borrador se recoge antes de cualquier revisión externa.",
            "La explicación señala cambios concretos, localizables en el texto o el producto."
          ],
          "whenNotToUse": "Cuando no ha existido un borrador real y se pide fabricarlo después para cumplir el requisito.",
          "copyablePrompt": "Adjunta tu borrador y tu final. Señala 3 diferencias importantes y explica por qué las hiciste.",
          "coverageNote": "",
          "windowConditions": [
            "Requiere borrador previo identificable y explicación de la mejora introducida."
          ],
          "windowRationale": "El contraste entre dos estados del mismo texto muestra la decisión de mejora."
        },
        "en": {
          "name": "Draft-vs-final contrast",
          "shortDescription": "Compare an early draft with the final version to make improvement decisions visible.",
          "whenToUse": "When you want to know what improved between two versions and why.",
          "minimalVersion": "Submit draft + final + one key explained difference.",
          "instructions": [
            "Request the draft before an intermediate deadline.",
            "Ask for 3 explained differences at submission."
          ],
          "observe": [
            "Stated differences are visible.",
            "Each change relies on a criterion, not a vague opinion."
          ],
          "limits": [
            "Shows revision, not necessarily conceptual understanding."
          ],
          "aiAdaptation": "",
          "example": "A short report attaches a draft and explains why two sections were merged.",
          "evidenceProduced": "An early draft, the final version and a short explanation of what was improved and why.",
          "boundedInference": "That the student identifies the difference between both states and can name the improvement criterion applied.",
          "cannotInfer": [
            "It does not indicate who suggested the improvement, only that it is recognised and explained.",
            "It does not support claiming the improvement will recur in another task."
          ],
          "inferenceConditions": [
            "The draft is collected before any external revision.",
            "The explanation points to concrete changes, locatable in the text or product."
          ],
          "whenNotToUse": "When there was no real draft and one is fabricated afterwards to meet the requirement.",
          "copyablePrompt": "Attach your draft and your final. Mark 3 important differences and explain why you made them.",
          "coverageNote": "",
          "windowConditions": [
            "Requires an identifiable earlier draft and an explanation of the improvement made."
          ],
          "windowRationale": "Contrasting two states of the same text shows the improvement decision."
        }
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "decision-justification",
      "slug": "justificacion-de-decisiones",
      "url": "https://evidencias-ia-evaluacion.com/evidencia/justificacion-de-decisiones",
      "name_es": "Justificación de decisiones",
      "name_en": "Decision justification",
      "short_description_es": "El estudiante justifica por escrito o de palabra las decisiones clave tomadas en la tarea.",
      "short_description_en": "The student justifies key decisions of the task in writing or orally.",
      "family": "proceso-evolucion",
      "family_secondary": "escrita-grafica",
      "primary_claim": "decide-criterio",
      "secondary_claims": "comprende|usa-ia-critica",
      "evidence_kind": "producto",
      "evidence_modes": "proceso|verificacion-ia",
      "stages": "primaria|secundaria|bachillerato|fp|universidad|adultos",
      "areas": "",
      "moments": "durante|despues",
      "purposes": "formativo|calificable|alta-relevancia",
      "modalities": "escrita|oral",
      "seia_levels": "1|2|3",
      "time_min": 4,
      "time_max": 8,
      "teacher_load": "media",
      "participation": "individual",
      "scalability": "cualquiera",
      "collections": "rapidas|grupos-numerosos",
      "ai_relation": "",
      "review_status": "borrador-editorial",
      "version": "v0.13",
      "last_reviewed": "2026-09-06",
      "time_scope": "",
      "learning_windows": "investigacion-decisiones",
      "complementary_layers": "",
      "evidence_origins": "reflexiva",
      "window_selection": "docente|cocreada",
      "evidence_produced_es": "Un texto o intervención oral que enuncia las decisiones clave de la tarea y el motivo de cada una.",
      "evidence_produced_en": "A text or oral intervention stating the key decisions in the task and the reason for each.",
      "bounded_inference_es": "Que el estudiante puede explicitar criterios de elección y relacionarlos con rasgos concretos del trabajo entregado.",
      "bounded_inference_en": "That the student can make choice criteria explicit and relate them to concrete features of the submitted work.",
      "inference_conditions_es": "Las decisiones justificadas deben ser identificables en el producto. | Se pregunta por decisiones concretas, no por el proceso en abstracto.",
      "inference_conditions_en": "The justified decisions must be identifiable in the product. | Ask about specific decisions, not about the process in the abstract.",
      "cannot_infer_es": "Una justificación bien escrita no garantiza que la decisión se tomara así. | No informa de la ejecución técnica de esa decisión.",
      "cannot_infer_en": "A well-written justification does not guarantee the decision was actually taken that way. | It says nothing about the technical execution of that decision.",
      "when_not_to_use_es": "Cuando la tarea es de ejecución cerrada y no hay decisiones con alternativa razonable.",
      "when_not_to_use_en": "When the task is closed-ended and there are no decisions with a reasonable alternative.",
      "content": {
        "es": {
          "name": "Justificación de decisiones",
          "shortDescription": "El estudiante justifica por escrito o de palabra las decisiones clave tomadas en la tarea.",
          "whenToUse": "Cuando la tarea admite varias soluciones y lo relevante es el criterio de elección.",
          "minimalVersion": "3 decisiones, 3 razones, 3 alternativas descartadas.",
          "instructions": [
            "Define cuáles son las 2-3 decisiones clave de la tarea.",
            "Pide razón + alternativa descartada para cada una."
          ],
          "observe": [
            "Las razones se apoyan en criterios de la tarea, no en preferencia general.",
            "Las alternativas descartadas son plausibles."
          ],
          "limits": [
            "Puede quedarse en retórica si no se contrasta con el producto real."
          ],
          "aiAdaptation": "",
          "example": "En un proyecto, la estudiante justifica por qué eligió una estructura por capas frente a una monolítica.",
          "evidenceProduced": "Un texto o intervención oral que enuncia las decisiones clave de la tarea y el motivo de cada una.",
          "boundedInference": "Que el estudiante puede explicitar criterios de elección y relacionarlos con rasgos concretos del trabajo entregado.",
          "cannotInfer": [
            "Una justificación bien escrita no garantiza que la decisión se tomara así.",
            "No informa de la ejecución técnica de esa decisión."
          ],
          "inferenceConditions": [
            "Las decisiones justificadas deben ser identificables en el producto.",
            "Se pregunta por decisiones concretas, no por el proceso en abstracto."
          ],
          "whenNotToUse": "Cuando la tarea es de ejecución cerrada y no hay decisiones con alternativa razonable.",
          "copyablePrompt": "Enumera 3 decisiones importantes que has tomado. Para cada una, indica por qué la tomaste y qué alternativa descartaste.",
          "coverageNote": "",
          "windowConditions": [
            "Solo si las decisiones justificadas son identificables en el producto entregado."
          ],
          "windowRationale": "Hace explícito el criterio de elección, que de otro modo queda dentro de la caja negra."
        },
        "en": {
          "name": "Decision justification",
          "shortDescription": "The student justifies key decisions of the task in writing or orally.",
          "whenToUse": "When the task admits several solutions and what matters is the choice criterion.",
          "minimalVersion": "3 decisions, 3 reasons, 3 discarded alternatives.",
          "instructions": [
            "Define the 2-3 key decisions of the task.",
            "Ask for reason + discarded alternative for each."
          ],
          "observe": [
            "Reasons rely on task criteria, not general preference.",
            "Discarded alternatives are plausible."
          ],
          "limits": [
            "Can remain rhetorical if not contrasted with the real product."
          ],
          "aiAdaptation": "",
          "example": "In a project, the student justifies choosing a layered structure over a monolithic one.",
          "evidenceProduced": "A text or oral intervention stating the key decisions in the task and the reason for each.",
          "boundedInference": "That the student can make choice criteria explicit and relate them to concrete features of the submitted work.",
          "cannotInfer": [
            "A well-written justification does not guarantee the decision was actually taken that way.",
            "It says nothing about the technical execution of that decision."
          ],
          "inferenceConditions": [
            "The justified decisions must be identifiable in the product.",
            "Ask about specific decisions, not about the process in the abstract."
          ],
          "whenNotToUse": "When the task is closed-ended and there are no decisions with a reasonable alternative.",
          "copyablePrompt": "List 3 important decisions you made. For each, state why and which alternative you discarded.",
          "coverageNote": "",
          "windowConditions": [
            "Only if the justified decisions can be identified in the submitted product."
          ],
          "windowRationale": "It makes the choice criterion explicit, which otherwise stays inside the black box."
        }
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "option-comparison",
      "slug": "comparacion-de-opciones",
      "url": "https://evidencias-ia-evaluacion.com/evidencia/comparacion-de-opciones",
      "name_es": "Comparación de opciones",
      "name_en": "Option comparison",
      "short_description_es": "Pedir la evaluación explícita de al menos dos alternativas antes de decidir.",
      "short_description_en": "Ask for an explicit evaluation of at least two alternatives before deciding.",
      "family": "escrita-grafica",
      "family_secondary": "proceso-evolucion",
      "primary_claim": "decide-criterio",
      "secondary_claims": "comprende",
      "evidence_kind": "producto",
      "evidence_modes": "proceso",
      "stages": "secundaria|bachillerato|fp|universidad|adultos",
      "areas": "",
      "moments": "durante",
      "purposes": "formativo|calificable",
      "modalities": "escrita|visual",
      "seia_levels": "1|2|3",
      "time_min": 5,
      "time_max": 10,
      "teacher_load": "baja",
      "participation": "individual",
      "scalability": "cualquiera",
      "collections": "rapidas|baja-revision|grupos-numerosos",
      "ai_relation": "",
      "review_status": "borrador-editorial",
      "version": "v0.13",
      "last_reviewed": "2026-09-06",
      "time_scope": "",
      "learning_windows": "investigacion-decisiones",
      "complementary_layers": "",
      "evidence_origins": "reflexiva",
      "window_selection": "docente",
      "evidence_produced_es": "Una comparación escrita de al menos dos alternativas, con criterios explícitos y el motivo del descarte.",
      "evidence_produced_en": "A written comparison of at least two alternatives, with explicit criteria and the reason for discarding one.",
      "bounded_inference_es": "Que el estudiante distingue criterios pertinentes de los que no lo son y sostiene una elección frente a una alternativa concreta.",
      "bounded_inference_en": "That the student distinguishes relevant criteria from irrelevant ones and defends a choice against a concrete alternative.",
      "inference_conditions_es": "Las alternativas comparadas deben ser plausibles, no un hombre de paja. | Los criterios se fijan o negocian antes de comparar.",
      "inference_conditions_en": "The alternatives compared must be plausible, not straw men. | Criteria are set or negotiated before comparing.",
      "cannot_infer_es": "No demuestra que sepa ejecutar la opción elegida. | No evidencia que el criterio se aplique en decisiones futuras.",
      "cannot_infer_en": "It does not show they can execute the chosen option. | It does not evidence that the criterion is applied in future decisions.",
      "when_not_to_use_es": "Cuando solo existe una opción defendible y comparar se vuelve un ejercicio artificial.",
      "when_not_to_use_en": "When only one defensible option exists and comparing becomes artificial.",
      "content": {
        "es": {
          "name": "Comparación de opciones",
          "shortDescription": "Pedir la evaluación explícita de al menos dos alternativas antes de decidir.",
          "whenToUse": "Cuando quieres comprobar que se han considerado alternativas antes de decidir.",
          "minimalVersion": "Tabla mínima: 2 opciones, 2 criterios, 1 decisión.",
          "instructions": [
            "Da los criterios o pide que se declaren.",
            "Prohíbe empatar: se debe decidir y justificar."
          ],
          "observe": [
            "Los criterios son operativos, no vagos.",
            "La opción elegida es coherente con la puntuación."
          ],
          "limits": [
            "No garantiza que la ejecución posterior mantenga la decisión."
          ],
          "aiAdaptation": "",
          "example": "Un análisis compara dos fuentes con dos criterios y decide cuál usar.",
          "evidenceProduced": "Una comparación escrita de al menos dos alternativas, con criterios explícitos y el motivo del descarte.",
          "boundedInference": "Que el estudiante distingue criterios pertinentes de los que no lo son y sostiene una elección frente a una alternativa concreta.",
          "cannotInfer": [
            "No demuestra que sepa ejecutar la opción elegida.",
            "No evidencia que el criterio se aplique en decisiones futuras."
          ],
          "inferenceConditions": [
            "Las alternativas comparadas deben ser plausibles, no un hombre de paja.",
            "Los criterios se fijan o negocian antes de comparar."
          ],
          "whenNotToUse": "Cuando solo existe una opción defendible y comparar se vuelve un ejercicio artificial.",
          "copyablePrompt": "Escribe dos alternativas para resolver esto. Puntúalas en dos criterios. Explica cuál eliges y por qué.",
          "coverageNote": "",
          "windowConditions": [
            "Requiere al menos dos alternativas reales y el motivo del descarte."
          ],
          "windowRationale": "Lo descartado, y por qué, es parte del proceso que suele desaparecer."
        },
        "en": {
          "name": "Option comparison",
          "shortDescription": "Ask for an explicit evaluation of at least two alternatives before deciding.",
          "whenToUse": "When you want to check that alternatives were considered before deciding.",
          "minimalVersion": "Minimal table: 2 options, 2 criteria, 1 decision.",
          "instructions": [
            "Provide the criteria or ask the student to declare them.",
            "No ties: a decision must be made and justified."
          ],
          "observe": [
            "Criteria are operational, not vague.",
            "The chosen option is consistent with the scoring."
          ],
          "limits": [
            "Does not guarantee later execution follows the decision."
          ],
          "aiAdaptation": "",
          "example": "An analysis compares two sources against two criteria and decides which to use.",
          "evidenceProduced": "A written comparison of at least two alternatives, with explicit criteria and the reason for discarding one.",
          "boundedInference": "That the student distinguishes relevant criteria from irrelevant ones and defends a choice against a concrete alternative.",
          "cannotInfer": [
            "It does not show they can execute the chosen option.",
            "It does not evidence that the criterion is applied in future decisions."
          ],
          "inferenceConditions": [
            "The alternatives compared must be plausible, not straw men.",
            "Criteria are set or negotiated before comparing."
          ],
          "whenNotToUse": "When only one defensible option exists and comparing becomes artificial.",
          "copyablePrompt": "Write two alternatives to solve this. Score them on two criteria. Explain which one you pick and why.",
          "coverageNote": "",
          "windowConditions": [
            "Requires at least two genuine alternatives and the reason for discarding one."
          ],
          "windowRationale": "What was discarded, and why, is part of the process that usually disappears."
        }
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "exit-ticket",
      "slug": "ticket-de-salida",
      "url": "https://evidencias-ia-evaluacion.com/evidencia/ticket-de-salida",
      "name_es": "Ticket de salida",
      "name_en": "Exit ticket",
      "short_description_es": "Respuesta breve al final de la clase sobre lo aprendido y lo que sigue costando.",
      "short_description_en": "A brief response at the end of class about what was learned and what still feels hard.",
      "family": "metacognitiva",
      "family_secondary": "escrita-grafica",
      "primary_claim": "muestra-avance",
      "secondary_claims": "comprende",
      "evidence_kind": "producto",
      "evidence_modes": "metacognicion",
      "stages": "primaria|secundaria|bachillerato|fp|universidad|adultos",
      "areas": "",
      "moments": "despues",
      "purposes": "formativo",
      "modalities": "escrita|digital",
      "seia_levels": "0|1|2|3",
      "time_min": 2,
      "time_max": 5,
      "teacher_load": "baja",
      "participation": "individual",
      "scalability": "cualquiera",
      "collections": "rapidas|baja-revision|grupos-numerosos",
      "ai_relation": "",
      "review_status": "borrador-editorial",
      "version": "v0.13",
      "last_reviewed": "2026-09-06",
      "time_scope": "",
      "learning_windows": "error-cambio-cognitivo",
      "complementary_layers": "",
      "evidence_origins": "reflexiva",
      "window_selection": "docente",
      "evidence_produced_es": "Una respuesta escrita muy breve, recogida al final de la sesión, sobre la idea principal y la dificultad que permanece.",
      "evidence_produced_en": "A very short written response, collected at the end of the session, on the main idea and the remaining difficulty.",
      "bounded_inference_es": "Que en ese momento el estudiante puede nombrar una idea de la sesión y señalar dónde se le atasca; sirve para decidir cómo empezar la clase siguiente.",
      "bounded_inference_en": "That at that moment the student can name one idea from the session and point to where they get stuck; useful for deciding how to start the next class.",
      "inference_conditions_es": "La pregunta se formula igual para todo el grupo y se responde sin consultar materiales. | Se lee como información de grupo para la siguiente sesión, no como calificación individual.",
      "inference_conditions_en": "The prompt is the same for the whole group and is answered without consulting materials. | It is read as group information for the next session, not as an individual grade.",
      "cannot_infer_es": "No evidencia cambio de comprensión: para eso hace falta una respuesta previa comparable. | No mide dominio ni permite calificar el aprendizaje de la unidad.",
      "cannot_infer_en": "It evidences no change in understanding: that requires a comparable earlier response. | It does not measure mastery or support grading the unit.",
      "when_not_to_use_es": "Cuando se usa como control de asistencia encubierto o cuando se acumula sin devolver nada al grupo.",
      "when_not_to_use_en": "When used as a covert attendance check, or accumulated without giving anything back to the group.",
      "content": {
        "es": {
          "name": "Ticket de salida",
          "shortDescription": "Respuesta breve al final de la clase sobre lo aprendido y lo que sigue costando.",
          "whenToUse": "Al cerrar una sesión, para ajustar la siguiente con información del grupo.",
          "minimalVersion": "Una idea aprendida + una duda persistente.",
          "instructions": [
            "Repite la misma estructura cada sesión.",
            "Devuelve una síntesis al grupo en la siguiente clase."
          ],
          "observe": [
            "Las respuestas son específicas del contenido tratado.",
            "Aparecen patrones de duda que orientan la siguiente sesión."
          ],
          "limits": [
            "No sostiene decisiones calificables por sí sola."
          ],
          "aiAdaptation": "",
          "example": "Al final de la clase, cada estudiante entrega un post-it con una idea y una duda.",
          "evidenceProduced": "Una respuesta escrita muy breve, recogida al final de la sesión, sobre la idea principal y la dificultad que permanece.",
          "boundedInference": "Que en ese momento el estudiante puede nombrar una idea de la sesión y señalar dónde se le atasca; sirve para decidir cómo empezar la clase siguiente.",
          "cannotInfer": [
            "No evidencia cambio de comprensión: para eso hace falta una respuesta previa comparable.",
            "No mide dominio ni permite calificar el aprendizaje de la unidad."
          ],
          "inferenceConditions": [
            "La pregunta se formula igual para todo el grupo y se responde sin consultar materiales.",
            "Se lee como información de grupo para la siguiente sesión, no como calificación individual."
          ],
          "whenNotToUse": "Cuando se usa como control de asistencia encubierto o cuando se acumula sin devolver nada al grupo.",
          "copyablePrompt": "Escribe una idea que crees haber entendido hoy y una duda que sigue abierta.",
          "coverageNote": "",
          "windowConditions": [
            "Revisión v0.13: solo abre ventana si se compara con un ticket anterior sobre el mismo contenido y el estudiante explica qué ha cambiado."
          ],
          "windowRationale": "Una sola respuesta de salida es una foto fija; el cambio exige dos momentos."
        },
        "en": {
          "name": "Exit ticket",
          "shortDescription": "A brief response at the end of class about what was learned and what still feels hard.",
          "whenToUse": "At the end of a session, to adjust the next one with information from the group.",
          "minimalVersion": "One thing I learned + one persistent doubt.",
          "instructions": [
            "Keep the same structure every session.",
            "Return a synthesis to the group in the next class."
          ],
          "observe": [
            "Answers are specific to today's content.",
            "Doubt patterns emerge to guide the next session."
          ],
          "limits": [
            "Does not sustain graded decisions on its own."
          ],
          "aiAdaptation": "",
          "example": "At the end of class, each student hands in a post-it with one idea and one doubt.",
          "evidenceProduced": "A very short written response, collected at the end of the session, on the main idea and the remaining difficulty.",
          "boundedInference": "That at that moment the student can name one idea from the session and point to where they get stuck; useful for deciding how to start the next class.",
          "cannotInfer": [
            "It evidences no change in understanding: that requires a comparable earlier response.",
            "It does not measure mastery or support grading the unit."
          ],
          "inferenceConditions": [
            "The prompt is the same for the whole group and is answered without consulting materials.",
            "It is read as group information for the next session, not as an individual grade."
          ],
          "whenNotToUse": "When used as a covert attendance check, or accumulated without giving anything back to the group.",
          "copyablePrompt": "Write one idea you think you got today and one doubt that remains open.",
          "coverageNote": "",
          "windowConditions": [
            "v0.13 review: it only opens the window if compared with an earlier ticket on the same content and the student explains what changed."
          ],
          "windowRationale": "A single exit response is a snapshot; change requires two moments."
        }
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "meta-journal",
      "slug": "diario-metacognitivo",
      "url": "https://evidencias-ia-evaluacion.com/evidencia/diario-metacognitivo",
      "name_es": "Diario metacognitivo breve",
      "name_en": "Brief metacognitive journal",
      "short_description_es": "Entradas cortas donde el estudiante analiza cómo aprende, no solo qué produce.",
      "short_description_en": "Short entries where the student analyses how they learn, not only what they produce.",
      "family": "metacognitiva",
      "family_secondary": "proceso-evolucion",
      "primary_claim": "muestra-avance",
      "secondary_claims": "decide-criterio",
      "evidence_kind": "proceso",
      "evidence_modes": "metacognicion",
      "stages": "secundaria|bachillerato|fp|universidad|adultos",
      "areas": "",
      "moments": "durante|despues",
      "purposes": "formativo|calificable",
      "modalities": "escrita",
      "seia_levels": "1|2|3",
      "time_min": 5,
      "time_max": 10,
      "teacher_load": "media",
      "participation": "individual",
      "scalability": "cualquiera",
      "collections": "rapidas|grupos-numerosos",
      "ai_relation": "",
      "review_status": "borrador-editorial",
      "version": "v0.13",
      "last_reviewed": "2026-09-06",
      "time_scope": "",
      "learning_windows": "error-cambio-cognitivo|evolucion-borradores",
      "complementary_layers": "",
      "evidence_origins": "reflexiva",
      "window_selection": "estudiante|cocreada",
      "evidence_produced_es": "Varias entradas cortas en las que el estudiante describe cómo ha estudiado o trabajado, qué le ha funcionado y qué no.",
      "evidence_produced_en": "Several short entries where the student describes how they studied or worked, what worked and what did not.",
      "bounded_inference_es": "Que el estudiante puede describir sus propias estrategias con cierta especificidad y compararlas entre momentos distintos.",
      "bounded_inference_en": "That the student can describe their own strategies with some specificity and compare them across different moments.",
      "inference_conditions_es": "Hay al menos dos entradas comparables sobre el mismo tipo de tarea. | Las preguntas guía se mantienen estables entre entradas.",
      "inference_conditions_en": "There are at least two comparable entries on the same kind of task. | The guiding questions stay stable across entries.",
      "cannot_infer_es": "Describir una estrategia no prueba que se use ni que funcione. | No sustituye ninguna evidencia de dominio del contenido.",
      "cannot_infer_en": "Describing a strategy does not prove it is used or that it works. | It does not replace any evidence of content mastery.",
      "when_not_to_use_es": "Cuando se pide una reflexión sobre aspectos personales o emocionales que el estudiante no ha elegido compartir.",
      "when_not_to_use_en": "When it asks for reflection on personal or emotional matters the student has not chosen to share.",
      "content": {
        "es": {
          "name": "Diario metacognitivo breve",
          "shortDescription": "Entradas cortas donde el estudiante analiza cómo aprende, no solo qué produce.",
          "whenToUse": "En trabajos largos, para seguir cómo cambia la comprensión a lo largo del tiempo.",
          "minimalVersion": "Dos entradas de 5 líneas por unidad.",
          "instructions": [
            "Ancla las preguntas a la tarea, no a emociones generales.",
            "Evita respuestas plantilla dando ejemplos distintos cada vez."
          ],
          "observe": [
            "La dificultad y la estrategia son específicas.",
            "Hay conexión entre entradas."
          ],
          "limits": [
            "Puede volverse repetitivo si las preguntas no rotan."
          ],
          "aiAdaptation": "",
          "example": "El estudiante identifica que su estrategia de estudio no funciona en textos largos y prueba otra.",
          "evidenceProduced": "Varias entradas cortas en las que el estudiante describe cómo ha estudiado o trabajado, qué le ha funcionado y qué no.",
          "boundedInference": "Que el estudiante puede describir sus propias estrategias con cierta especificidad y compararlas entre momentos distintos.",
          "cannotInfer": [
            "Describir una estrategia no prueba que se use ni que funcione.",
            "No sustituye ninguna evidencia de dominio del contenido."
          ],
          "inferenceConditions": [
            "Hay al menos dos entradas comparables sobre el mismo tipo de tarea.",
            "Las preguntas guía se mantienen estables entre entradas."
          ],
          "whenNotToUse": "Cuando se pide una reflexión sobre aspectos personales o emocionales que el estudiante no ha elegido compartir.",
          "copyablePrompt": "Describe una dificultad concreta que has tenido, qué has probado y qué harás distinto la próxima vez.",
          "coverageNote": "",
          "windowConditions": [
            "Requiere varias entradas comparables en el tiempo, no una reflexión final única."
          ],
          "windowRationale": "Las entradas sucesivas permiten contrastar cómo cambia la interpretación del propio trabajo."
        },
        "en": {
          "name": "Brief metacognitive journal",
          "shortDescription": "Short entries where the student analyses how they learn, not only what they produce.",
          "whenToUse": "In long projects, to follow how understanding changes over time.",
          "minimalVersion": "Two 5-line entries per unit.",
          "instructions": [
            "Anchor questions to the task, not to general feelings.",
            "Prevent boilerplate answers by rotating examples."
          ],
          "observe": [
            "Difficulty and strategy are specific.",
            "There is connection between entries."
          ],
          "limits": [
            "Can become repetitive if questions do not rotate."
          ],
          "aiAdaptation": "",
          "example": "The student notices their study strategy fails on long texts and tries another.",
          "evidenceProduced": "Several short entries where the student describes how they studied or worked, what worked and what did not.",
          "boundedInference": "That the student can describe their own strategies with some specificity and compare them across different moments.",
          "cannotInfer": [
            "Describing a strategy does not prove it is used or that it works.",
            "It does not replace any evidence of content mastery."
          ],
          "inferenceConditions": [
            "There are at least two comparable entries on the same kind of task.",
            "The guiding questions stay stable across entries."
          ],
          "whenNotToUse": "When it asks for reflection on personal or emotional matters the student has not chosen to share.",
          "copyablePrompt": "Describe a specific difficulty you had, what you tried and what you'll do differently next time.",
          "coverageNote": "",
          "windowConditions": [
            "Requires several comparable entries over time, not a single final reflection."
          ],
          "windowRationale": "Successive entries allow contrasting how the reading of one's own work changes."
        }
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "rubric-self",
      "slug": "autoevaluacion-con-rubrica",
      "url": "https://evidencias-ia-evaluacion.com/evidencia/autoevaluacion-con-rubrica",
      "name_es": "Autoevaluación con rúbrica",
      "name_en": "Rubric-based self-assessment",
      "short_description_es": "El estudiante se sitúa en una rúbrica compartida antes de entregar.",
      "short_description_en": "The student places themselves in a shared rubric before submitting.",
      "family": "metacognitiva",
      "family_secondary": "",
      "primary_claim": "decide-criterio",
      "secondary_claims": "muestra-avance",
      "evidence_kind": "proceso",
      "evidence_modes": "metacognicion",
      "stages": "primaria|secundaria|bachillerato|fp|universidad|adultos",
      "areas": "",
      "moments": "antes|despues",
      "purposes": "formativo|calificable",
      "modalities": "escrita|digital",
      "seia_levels": "0|1|2|3",
      "time_min": 4,
      "time_max": 10,
      "teacher_load": "baja",
      "participation": "individual",
      "scalability": "cualquiera",
      "collections": "rapidas|baja-revision|grupos-numerosos",
      "ai_relation": "",
      "review_status": "borrador-editorial",
      "version": "v0.13",
      "last_reviewed": "2026-09-06",
      "time_scope": "",
      "learning_windows": "error-cambio-cognitivo",
      "complementary_layers": "",
      "evidence_origins": "reflexiva",
      "window_selection": "cocreada",
      "evidence_produced_es": "La posición que el estudiante se asigna en cada criterio de una rúbrica compartida, con la justificación de esa posición.",
      "evidence_produced_en": "The position the student assigns themselves on each rubric criterion, with the justification for that position.",
      "bounded_inference_es": "Que el estudiante interpreta los criterios de la rúbrica y los aplica a su propio trabajo con evidencia señalada.",
      "bounded_inference_en": "That the student interprets the rubric criteria and applies them to their own work with evidence pointed out.",
      "inference_conditions_es": "La rúbrica se ha trabajado antes con ejemplos, no se entrega en frío. | Cada posición se acompaña de la parte del trabajo que la sostiene.",
      "inference_conditions_en": "The rubric has been worked on beforehand with examples, not handed over cold. | Each position comes with the part of the work that supports it.",
      "cannot_infer_es": "La coincidencia con la valoración docente no mide honestidad ni aprendizaje. | Una sola autoevaluación no evidencia cambio de criterio.",
      "cannot_infer_en": "Agreement with the teacher's rating does not measure honesty or learning. | A single self-assessment evidences no change in judgement.",
      "when_not_to_use_es": "Cuando la autoevaluación influye directamente en la nota sin contraste, porque cambia lo que el estudiante declara.",
      "when_not_to_use_en": "When self-assessment feeds the grade directly without checks, because it changes what students declare.",
      "content": {
        "es": {
          "name": "Autoevaluación con rúbrica",
          "shortDescription": "El estudiante se sitúa en una rúbrica compartida antes de entregar.",
          "whenToUse": "Cuando existen criterios compartidos y quieres ver si se aplican al propio trabajo.",
          "minimalVersion": "Rúbrica de 3 criterios y una nota justificativa por criterio.",
          "instructions": [
            "Redacta la rúbrica en lenguaje observable.",
            "Pide una razón por cada casilla marcada."
          ],
          "observe": [
            "Coincide razonablemente con la valoración docente.",
            "La justificación cita elementos concretos."
          ],
          "limits": [
            "Sensible a la calidad de la rúbrica."
          ],
          "aiAdaptation": "",
          "example": "El estudiante marca su nivel y cita párrafos del texto para justificar.",
          "evidenceProduced": "La posición que el estudiante se asigna en cada criterio de una rúbrica compartida, con la justificación de esa posición.",
          "boundedInference": "Que el estudiante interpreta los criterios de la rúbrica y los aplica a su propio trabajo con evidencia señalada.",
          "cannotInfer": [
            "La coincidencia con la valoración docente no mide honestidad ni aprendizaje.",
            "Una sola autoevaluación no evidencia cambio de criterio."
          ],
          "inferenceConditions": [
            "La rúbrica se ha trabajado antes con ejemplos, no se entrega en frío.",
            "Cada posición se acompaña de la parte del trabajo que la sostiene."
          ],
          "whenNotToUse": "Cuando la autoevaluación influye directamente en la nota sin contraste, porque cambia lo que el estudiante declara.",
          "copyablePrompt": "Sitúa tu trabajo en cada criterio de la rúbrica y añade en dos líneas por qué te sitúas ahí.",
          "coverageNote": "",
          "windowConditions": [
            "Revisión v0.13: condicionada a dos autoevaluaciones sobre la misma rúbrica y una explicación de qué justifica el desplazamiento."
          ],
          "windowRationale": "Situarse una vez en una rúbrica no evidencia cambio de comprensión."
        },
        "en": {
          "name": "Rubric-based self-assessment",
          "shortDescription": "The student places themselves in a shared rubric before submitting.",
          "whenToUse": "When shared criteria exist and you want to see whether they are applied to one's own work.",
          "minimalVersion": "3-criterion rubric and a justifying note per criterion.",
          "instructions": [
            "Write the rubric in observable language.",
            "Ask for a reason per marked cell."
          ],
          "observe": [
            "Reasonably matches the teacher's assessment.",
            "Justification cites concrete elements."
          ],
          "limits": [
            "Sensitive to rubric quality."
          ],
          "aiAdaptation": "",
          "example": "The student marks their level and quotes passages to justify.",
          "evidenceProduced": "The position the student assigns themselves on each rubric criterion, with the justification for that position.",
          "boundedInference": "That the student interprets the rubric criteria and applies them to their own work with evidence pointed out.",
          "cannotInfer": [
            "Agreement with the teacher's rating does not measure honesty or learning.",
            "A single self-assessment evidences no change in judgement."
          ],
          "inferenceConditions": [
            "The rubric has been worked on beforehand with examples, not handed over cold.",
            "Each position comes with the part of the work that supports it."
          ],
          "whenNotToUse": "When self-assessment feeds the grade directly without checks, because it changes what students declare.",
          "copyablePrompt": "Place your work on each rubric criterion and add two lines explaining why.",
          "coverageNote": "",
          "windowConditions": [
            "v0.13 review: conditional on two self-assessments against the same rubric and an explanation of what justifies the shift."
          ],
          "windowRationale": "Placing oneself on a rubric once evidences no conceptual change."
        }
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "peer-feedback",
      "slug": "coevaluacion-pautada",
      "url": "https://evidencias-ia-evaluacion.com/evidencia/coevaluacion-pautada",
      "name_es": "Coevaluación pautada",
      "name_en": "Guided peer feedback",
      "short_description_es": "Pares se aportan feedback estructurado con criterios comunes.",
      "short_description_en": "Peers exchange structured feedback based on shared criteria.",
      "family": "cooperativa",
      "family_secondary": "metacognitiva",
      "primary_claim": "decide-criterio",
      "secondary_claims": "comprende|muestra-avance",
      "evidence_kind": "producto",
      "evidence_modes": "metacognicion",
      "stages": "primaria|secundaria|bachillerato|fp|universidad|adultos",
      "areas": "",
      "moments": "durante|despues",
      "purposes": "formativo",
      "modalities": "escrita|oral",
      "seia_levels": "0|1|2|3",
      "time_min": 8,
      "time_max": 15,
      "teacher_load": "media",
      "participation": "pareja",
      "scalability": "hasta-30",
      "collections": "",
      "ai_relation": "",
      "review_status": "borrador-editorial",
      "version": "v0.13",
      "last_reviewed": "2026-09-06",
      "time_scope": "",
      "learning_windows": "error-cambio-cognitivo|evolucion-borradores",
      "complementary_layers": "",
      "evidence_origins": "natural|reflexiva",
      "window_selection": "docente|cocreada",
      "evidence_produced_es": "Comentarios escritos de un par sobre el trabajo de otro, ajustados a criterios comunes, y la revisión posterior que provocan.",
      "evidence_produced_en": "Written comments from a peer on another's work, aligned to shared criteria, and the revision they trigger.",
      "bounded_inference_es": "Que quien comenta sabe usar los criterios para señalar algo concreto y mejorable en un trabajo ajeno.",
      "bounded_inference_en": "That the commenter can use the criteria to point out something concrete and improvable in someone else's work.",
      "inference_conditions_es": "Los criterios están escritos y son los mismos para todos. | Se guarda la versión previa y la posterior a la revisión.",
      "inference_conditions_en": "Criteria are written down and identical for everyone. | Both the pre-revision and post-revision versions are kept.",
      "cannot_infer_es": "El comentario informa sobre quien comenta, no sobre el aprendizaje del autor. | No sustituye la valoración docente del producto.",
      "cannot_infer_en": "The comment informs about the commenter, not about the author's learning. | It does not replace the teacher's assessment of the product.",
      "when_not_to_use_es": "Cuando el clima del grupo hace que el comentario sea social en lugar de técnico, o cuando no hay tiempo para revisar después.",
      "when_not_to_use_en": "When the group climate makes comments social rather than technical, or when there is no time to revise afterwards.",
      "content": {
        "es": {
          "name": "Coevaluación pautada",
          "shortDescription": "Pares se aportan feedback estructurado con criterios comunes.",
          "whenToUse": "Cuando quieres comprobar el dominio de los criterios aplicándolos a un trabajo ajeno.",
          "minimalVersion": "Dos fortalezas + una sugerencia concreta por par.",
          "instructions": [
            "Modela primero el tono y la forma del feedback.",
            "Prohíbe generalidades: exige ejemplos."
          ],
          "observe": [
            "El feedback es específico y respetuoso.",
            "Los pares aplican al menos una sugerencia recibida."
          ],
          "limits": [
            "Requiere confianza y práctica previa."
          ],
          "aiAdaptation": "",
          "example": "En una clase de escritura, cada estudiante recibe feedback de dos compañeros y revisa.",
          "evidenceProduced": "Comentarios escritos de un par sobre el trabajo de otro, ajustados a criterios comunes, y la revisión posterior que provocan.",
          "boundedInference": "Que quien comenta sabe usar los criterios para señalar algo concreto y mejorable en un trabajo ajeno.",
          "cannotInfer": [
            "El comentario informa sobre quien comenta, no sobre el aprendizaje del autor.",
            "No sustituye la valoración docente del producto."
          ],
          "inferenceConditions": [
            "Los criterios están escritos y son los mismos para todos.",
            "Se guarda la versión previa y la posterior a la revisión."
          ],
          "whenNotToUse": "Cuando el clima del grupo hace que el comentario sea social en lugar de técnico, o cuando no hay tiempo para revisar después.",
          "copyablePrompt": "Da dos fortalezas concretas del trabajo de tu compañera y una sugerencia con ejemplo.",
          "coverageNote": "",
          "windowConditions": [
            "Requiere que el feedback recibido se traduzca en una revisión posterior identificable.",
            "La ventana de error y cambio solo se abre si hay respuesta propia de partida, versión revisada y explicación del cambio; mejorar la versión no equivale por sí solo a un cambio de comprensión."
          ],
          "windowRationale": "Sin revisión posterior solo hay intercambio de comentarios."
        },
        "en": {
          "name": "Guided peer feedback",
          "shortDescription": "Peers exchange structured feedback based on shared criteria.",
          "whenToUse": "When you want to check command of the criteria by applying them to someone else's work.",
          "minimalVersion": "Two strengths + one concrete suggestion per peer.",
          "instructions": [
            "Model the tone and form of feedback first.",
            "No generalities: require examples."
          ],
          "observe": [
            "Feedback is specific and respectful.",
            "Peers act on at least one received suggestion."
          ],
          "limits": [
            "Requires trust and prior practice."
          ],
          "aiAdaptation": "",
          "example": "In a writing class, each student gets feedback from two peers and revises.",
          "evidenceProduced": "Written comments from a peer on another's work, aligned to shared criteria, and the revision they trigger.",
          "boundedInference": "That the commenter can use the criteria to point out something concrete and improvable in someone else's work.",
          "cannotInfer": [
            "The comment informs about the commenter, not about the author's learning.",
            "It does not replace the teacher's assessment of the product."
          ],
          "inferenceConditions": [
            "Criteria are written down and identical for everyone.",
            "Both the pre-revision and post-revision versions are kept."
          ],
          "whenNotToUse": "When the group climate makes comments social rather than technical, or when there is no time to revise afterwards.",
          "copyablePrompt": "Give two concrete strengths of your peer's work and one suggestion with an example.",
          "coverageNote": "",
          "windowConditions": [
            "Requires the feedback received to result in an identifiable later revision.",
            "The error-and-change window only opens with a baseline own answer, a revised version and an explanation of the change; an improved version alone is not a change of understanding."
          ],
          "windowRationale": "Without a later revision there is only an exchange of comments."
        }
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "oral-defence",
      "slug": "defensa-oral-breve",
      "url": "https://evidencias-ia-evaluacion.com/evidencia/defensa-oral-breve",
      "name_es": "Defensa oral breve",
      "name_en": "Brief oral defence",
      "short_description_es": "Micro-defensa de 2 a 5 minutos donde el estudiante explica y responde preguntas sobre su trabajo.",
      "short_description_en": "A 2-5 minute micro-defence where the student explains and answers questions about their work.",
      "family": "oral-dialogica",
      "family_secondary": "practica-desempeno",
      "primary_claim": "puede-hacerlo",
      "secondary_claims": "comprende|decide-criterio|usa-ia-critica",
      "evidence_kind": "desempeno",
      "evidence_modes": "oral|desempeno-controlado",
      "stages": "primaria|secundaria|bachillerato|fp|universidad|adultos",
      "areas": "",
      "moments": "despues",
      "purposes": "formativo|calificable|certificacion|alta-relevancia",
      "modalities": "oral",
      "seia_levels": "0|1|2|3",
      "time_min": 2,
      "time_max": 5,
      "teacher_load": "alta",
      "participation": "individual",
      "scalability": "grupo-reducido",
      "collections": "rapidas",
      "ai_relation": "",
      "review_status": "borrador-editorial",
      "version": "v0.13",
      "last_reviewed": "2026-09-06",
      "time_scope": "",
      "learning_windows": "investigacion-decisiones",
      "complementary_layers": "desempeno-observado",
      "evidence_origins": "actuacion-provocada",
      "window_selection": "docente",
      "evidence_produced_es": "Una intervención oral de dos a cinco minutos sobre el trabajo entregado y las respuestas a preguntas sobre decisiones concretas.",
      "evidence_produced_en": "A two-to-five-minute oral intervention on the submitted work and the answers to questions about specific decisions.",
      "bounded_inference_es": "Que la persona puede explicar y sostener las decisiones del trabajo cuando se le repregunta, en el momento de la defensa.",
      "bounded_inference_en": "That the person can explain and sustain the work's decisions when questioned, at the moment of the defence.",
      "inference_conditions_es": "Las preguntas apuntan a partes concretas del trabajo, no a generalidades. | Se ofrecen ajustes a quien tenga dificultades con la expresión oral bajo presión.",
      "inference_conditions_en": "Questions target concrete parts of the work, not generalities. | Adjustments are offered to anyone who struggles with speaking under pressure.",
      "cannot_infer_es": "Una defensa débil no prueba que el trabajo no sea propio. | La fluidez verbal no equivale a comprensión.",
      "cannot_infer_en": "A weak defence does not prove the work is not their own. | Verbal fluency is not the same as understanding.",
      "when_not_to_use_es": "Cuando el objetivo es detectar plagio o uso de IA y la defensa se convierte en interrogatorio.",
      "when_not_to_use_en": "When the aim is to detect plagiarism or AI use and the defence turns into an interrogation.",
      "content": {
        "es": {
          "name": "Defensa oral breve",
          "shortDescription": "Micro-defensa de 2 a 5 minutos donde el estudiante explica y responde preguntas sobre su trabajo.",
          "whenToUse": "Cuando la decisión es relevante y necesitas contrastar la comprensión y las decisiones sobre el trabajo entregado; no acredita por sí sola su autoría.",
          "minimalVersion": "Explica tu decisión clave y responde 2 preguntas.",
          "instructions": [
            "Prepara 3 preguntas por trabajo, no genéricas.",
            "Toma nota con criterios cortos.",
            "Puede hacerse en pares con turno."
          ],
          "observe": [
            "Responde sin recitar de memoria.",
            "Sostiene o corrige su decisión con criterio."
          ],
          "limits": [
            "Coste alto en grupos grandes sin rotación."
          ],
          "aiAdaptation": "",
          "example": "Tras entregar el trabajo, cada estudiante lo explica 2 minutos en una micro-tutoría.",
          "evidenceProduced": "Una intervención oral de dos a cinco minutos sobre el trabajo entregado y las respuestas a preguntas sobre decisiones concretas.",
          "boundedInference": "Que la persona puede explicar y sostener las decisiones del trabajo cuando se le repregunta, en el momento de la defensa.",
          "cannotInfer": [
            "Una defensa débil no prueba que el trabajo no sea propio.",
            "La fluidez verbal no equivale a comprensión."
          ],
          "inferenceConditions": [
            "Las preguntas apuntan a partes concretas del trabajo, no a generalidades.",
            "Se ofrecen ajustes a quien tenga dificultades con la expresión oral bajo presión."
          ],
          "whenNotToUse": "Cuando el objetivo es detectar plagio o uso de IA y la defensa se convierte en interrogatorio.",
          "copyablePrompt": "Explícame en dos minutos por qué has decidido X. Voy a hacerte dos preguntas sobre ello.",
          "coverageNote": "",
          "windowConditions": [
            "Las preguntas deben dirigirse a decisiones concretas del trabajo entregado."
          ],
          "windowRationale": "La defensa recupera oralmente el porqué de las decisiones que el producto no muestra."
        },
        "en": {
          "name": "Brief oral defence",
          "shortDescription": "A 2-5 minute micro-defence where the student explains and answers questions about their work.",
          "whenToUse": "When the decision matters and you need to contrast understanding of and decisions about the submitted work; on its own it does not certify authorship.",
          "minimalVersion": "Explain your key decision and answer 2 questions.",
          "instructions": [
            "Prepare 3 questions per work, not generic.",
            "Take notes using short criteria.",
            "Can be done in peer pairs with turns."
          ],
          "observe": [
            "Answers without reciting from memory.",
            "Holds or corrects the decision with criteria."
          ],
          "limits": [
            "High cost in large groups without rotation."
          ],
          "aiAdaptation": "",
          "example": "After submitting, each student explains their work for 2 minutes in a micro-tutorial.",
          "evidenceProduced": "A two-to-five-minute oral intervention on the submitted work and the answers to questions about specific decisions.",
          "boundedInference": "That the person can explain and sustain the work's decisions when questioned, at the moment of the defence.",
          "cannotInfer": [
            "A weak defence does not prove the work is not their own.",
            "Verbal fluency is not the same as understanding."
          ],
          "inferenceConditions": [
            "Questions target concrete parts of the work, not generalities.",
            "Adjustments are offered to anyone who struggles with speaking under pressure."
          ],
          "whenNotToUse": "When the aim is to detect plagiarism or AI use and the defence turns into an interrogation.",
          "copyablePrompt": "Explain in two minutes why you decided X. I will ask you two questions about it.",
          "coverageNote": "",
          "windowConditions": [
            "Questions must target specific decisions in the submitted work."
          ],
          "windowRationale": "The defence orally recovers the reasons behind decisions the product does not show."
        }
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "socratic-round",
      "slug": "ronda-socratica",
      "url": "https://evidencias-ia-evaluacion.com/evidencia/ronda-socratica",
      "name_es": "Ronda socrática",
      "name_en": "Socratic round",
      "short_description_es": "Pequeño grupo responde preguntas encadenadas sobre una idea o texto.",
      "short_description_en": "A small group answers chained questions about an idea or text.",
      "family": "oral-dialogica",
      "family_secondary": "",
      "primary_claim": "comprende",
      "secondary_claims": "decide-criterio",
      "evidence_kind": "desempeno",
      "evidence_modes": "oral",
      "stages": "secundaria|bachillerato|universidad|adultos",
      "areas": "",
      "moments": "durante|despues",
      "purposes": "formativo",
      "modalities": "oral",
      "seia_levels": "0|1|2|3",
      "time_min": 10,
      "time_max": 20,
      "teacher_load": "media",
      "participation": "grupo-clase",
      "scalability": "hasta-30",
      "collections": "",
      "ai_relation": "",
      "review_status": "borrador-editorial",
      "version": "v0.13",
      "last_reviewed": "2026-09-06",
      "time_scope": "",
      "learning_windows": "",
      "complementary_layers": "",
      "evidence_origins": "",
      "window_selection": "",
      "evidence_produced_es": "El registro de las respuestas encadenadas de un grupo pequeño a una secuencia de preguntas sobre la misma idea o texto.",
      "evidence_produced_en": "A record of a small group's chained answers to a sequence of questions on the same idea or text.",
      "bounded_inference_es": "Que las personas participantes distinguen matices de la idea discutida y ajustan su respuesta al escuchar a otras.",
      "bounded_inference_en": "That the participants distinguish nuances in the idea discussed and adjust their answer when hearing others.",
      "inference_conditions_es": "El docente registra quién dice qué; si no, la evidencia es del grupo, no individual. | Las preguntas se preparan antes y se encadenan sobre las respuestas dadas.",
      "inference_conditions_en": "The teacher records who says what; otherwise the evidence is the group's, not individual. | Questions are prepared in advance and chained onto the answers given.",
      "cannot_infer_es": "No informa sobre quien no ha intervenido. | No permite comparar niveles entre estudiantes.",
      "cannot_infer_en": "It says nothing about those who did not speak. | It does not support comparing levels between students.",
      "when_not_to_use_es": "En grupos grandes sin tiempo real de intervención, o cuando la exposición pública perjudica a parte del alumnado.",
      "when_not_to_use_en": "In large groups with no real speaking time, or when public exposure harms part of the class.",
      "content": {
        "es": {
          "name": "Ronda socrática",
          "shortDescription": "Pequeño grupo responde preguntas encadenadas sobre una idea o texto.",
          "whenToUse": "Cuando quieres ver hasta dónde llega la comprensión con preguntas encadenadas.",
          "minimalVersion": "Ronda de 10 minutos con 3 preguntas encadenadas.",
          "instructions": [
            "Prepara preguntas de nivel creciente.",
            "Evita responder por los estudiantes."
          ],
          "observe": [
            "Las respuestas ganan matiz al avanzar.",
            "Se detectan lagunas y las reconoce."
          ],
          "limits": [
            "Difícil de escalar sin rotación."
          ],
          "aiAdaptation": "",
          "example": "Debate breve sobre la validez de una fuente con tres preguntas en cadena.",
          "evidenceProduced": "El registro de las respuestas encadenadas de un grupo pequeño a una secuencia de preguntas sobre la misma idea o texto.",
          "boundedInference": "Que las personas participantes distinguen matices de la idea discutida y ajustan su respuesta al escuchar a otras.",
          "cannotInfer": [
            "No informa sobre quien no ha intervenido.",
            "No permite comparar niveles entre estudiantes."
          ],
          "inferenceConditions": [
            "El docente registra quién dice qué; si no, la evidencia es del grupo, no individual.",
            "Las preguntas se preparan antes y se encadenan sobre las respuestas dadas."
          ],
          "whenNotToUse": "En grupos grandes sin tiempo real de intervención, o cuando la exposición pública perjudica a parte del alumnado.",
          "copyablePrompt": "Voy a hacerte tres preguntas encadenadas. Cada una parte de tu respuesta anterior.",
          "coverageNote": "",
          "windowConditions": [],
          "windowRationale": ""
        },
        "en": {
          "name": "Socratic round",
          "shortDescription": "A small group answers chained questions about an idea or text.",
          "whenToUse": "When you want to see how far understanding goes through chained questions.",
          "minimalVersion": "10-minute round with 3 chained questions.",
          "instructions": [
            "Prepare increasingly complex questions.",
            "Do not answer for students."
          ],
          "observe": [
            "Answers gain nuance as they progress.",
            "Gaps are identified and acknowledged."
          ],
          "limits": [
            "Hard to scale without rotation."
          ],
          "aiAdaptation": "",
          "example": "Short debate on source validity with three chained questions.",
          "evidenceProduced": "A record of a small group's chained answers to a sequence of questions on the same idea or text.",
          "boundedInference": "That the participants distinguish nuances in the idea discussed and adjust their answer when hearing others.",
          "cannotInfer": [
            "It says nothing about those who did not speak.",
            "It does not support comparing levels between students."
          ],
          "inferenceConditions": [
            "The teacher records who says what; otherwise the evidence is the group's, not individual.",
            "Questions are prepared in advance and chained onto the answers given."
          ],
          "whenNotToUse": "In large groups with no real speaking time, or when public exposure harms part of the class.",
          "copyablePrompt": "I will ask you three chained questions. Each one starts from your previous answer.",
          "coverageNote": "",
          "windowConditions": [],
          "windowRationale": ""
        }
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "two-minute-explain",
      "slug": "explica-en-dos-minutos",
      "url": "https://evidencias-ia-evaluacion.com/evidencia/explica-en-dos-minutos",
      "name_es": "Explica en dos minutos",
      "name_en": "Two-minute explanation",
      "short_description_es": "El estudiante explica una idea o solución en dos minutos, sin apoyo escrito.",
      "short_description_en": "The student explains an idea or solution in two minutes without written support.",
      "family": "oral-dialogica",
      "family_secondary": "",
      "primary_claim": "comprende",
      "secondary_claims": "puede-hacerlo",
      "evidence_kind": "desempeno",
      "evidence_modes": "oral",
      "stages": "primaria|secundaria|bachillerato|fp|universidad|adultos",
      "areas": "",
      "moments": "durante|despues",
      "purposes": "formativo|calificable",
      "modalities": "oral",
      "seia_levels": "0|1|2|3",
      "time_min": 2,
      "time_max": 4,
      "teacher_load": "alta",
      "participation": "individual",
      "scalability": "grupo-reducido",
      "collections": "rapidas",
      "ai_relation": "",
      "review_status": "borrador-editorial",
      "version": "v0.13",
      "last_reviewed": "2026-09-06",
      "time_scope": "",
      "learning_windows": "",
      "complementary_layers": "desempeno-observado",
      "evidence_origins": "actuacion-provocada",
      "window_selection": "docente",
      "evidence_produced_es": "Una explicación oral de dos minutos sin apoyo escrito, con la respuesta a una repregunta.",
      "evidence_produced_en": "A two-minute unaided oral explanation, plus the answer to one follow-up question.",
      "bounded_inference_es": "Que la persona organiza la idea principal sin leer y responde a una repregunta inmediata sobre ella.",
      "bounded_inference_en": "That the person organises the main idea without reading and answers an immediate follow-up on it.",
      "inference_conditions_es": "La repregunta pide un porqué o un ejemplo, no una repetición. | Se admite apoyo visual mínimo si la barrera es de expresión, no de comprensión.",
      "inference_conditions_en": "The follow-up asks for a reason or an example, not a repetition. | Minimal visual support is allowed when the barrier is expression, not understanding.",
      "cannot_infer_es": "No evidencia aplicación a una situación nueva. | La soltura al hablar no acredita comprensión profunda.",
      "cannot_infer_en": "It evidences no application to a new situation. | Fluency in speaking does not certify deep understanding.",
      "when_not_to_use_es": "Cuando el contenido exige cálculo, consulta o desarrollo escrito para poder explicarse.",
      "when_not_to_use_en": "When the content needs calculation, consultation or written development to be explained at all.",
      "content": {
        "es": {
          "name": "Explica en dos minutos",
          "shortDescription": "El estudiante explica una idea o solución en dos minutos, sin apoyo escrito.",
          "whenToUse": "Cuando necesitas una comprobación oral breve y comparable entre estudiantes.",
          "minimalVersion": "Un tema, dos minutos, sin notas.",
          "instructions": [
            "Pide una audiencia imaginaria concreta.",
            "Rota temas para evitar preparación literal."
          ],
          "observe": [
            "Usa ejemplos propios.",
            "Corrige errores en marcha si aparecen."
          ],
          "limits": [
            "Momento único, alta variabilidad."
          ],
          "aiAdaptation": "",
          "example": "Explicar el ciclo del agua a alguien que llega tarde a clase.",
          "evidenceProduced": "Una explicación oral de dos minutos sin apoyo escrito, con la respuesta a una repregunta.",
          "boundedInference": "Que la persona organiza la idea principal sin leer y responde a una repregunta inmediata sobre ella.",
          "cannotInfer": [
            "No evidencia aplicación a una situación nueva.",
            "La soltura al hablar no acredita comprensión profunda."
          ],
          "inferenceConditions": [
            "La repregunta pide un porqué o un ejemplo, no una repetición.",
            "Se admite apoyo visual mínimo si la barrera es de expresión, no de comprensión."
          ],
          "whenNotToUse": "Cuando el contenido exige cálculo, consulta o desarrollo escrito para poder explicarse.",
          "copyablePrompt": "Explica en dos minutos, sin notas, este concepto como si tu audiencia no lo conociera.",
          "coverageNote": "",
          "windowConditions": [],
          "windowRationale": "Explicación breve sin apoyo: desempeño observado, no ventana de proceso."
        },
        "en": {
          "name": "Two-minute explanation",
          "shortDescription": "The student explains an idea or solution in two minutes without written support.",
          "whenToUse": "When you need a brief oral check that is comparable across students.",
          "minimalVersion": "One topic, two minutes, no notes.",
          "instructions": [
            "Ask for a specific imagined audience.",
            "Rotate topics to avoid literal preparation."
          ],
          "observe": [
            "Uses own examples.",
            "Corrects errors on the fly if they appear."
          ],
          "limits": [
            "One-shot moment, high variability."
          ],
          "aiAdaptation": "",
          "example": "Explain the water cycle to someone who arrived late.",
          "evidenceProduced": "A two-minute unaided oral explanation, plus the answer to one follow-up question.",
          "boundedInference": "That the person organises the main idea without reading and answers an immediate follow-up on it.",
          "cannotInfer": [
            "It evidences no application to a new situation.",
            "Fluency in speaking does not certify deep understanding."
          ],
          "inferenceConditions": [
            "The follow-up asks for a reason or an example, not a repetition.",
            "Minimal visual support is allowed when the barrier is expression, not understanding."
          ],
          "whenNotToUse": "When the content needs calculation, consultation or written development to be explained at all.",
          "copyablePrompt": "Explain this concept in two minutes, no notes, as if your audience didn't know it.",
          "coverageNote": "",
          "windowConditions": [],
          "windowRationale": "Short unaided explanation: observed performance, not a process window."
        }
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "new-context-task",
      "slug": "tarea-en-contexto-nuevo",
      "url": "https://evidencias-ia-evaluacion.com/evidencia/tarea-en-contexto-nuevo",
      "name_es": "Tarea en contexto nuevo",
      "name_en": "Task in a new context",
      "short_description_es": "Aplicar lo aprendido a una situación distinta a la trabajada en clase.",
      "short_description_en": "Apply learning to a situation different from the one worked in class.",
      "family": "practica-desempeno",
      "family_secondary": "escrita-grafica",
      "primary_claim": "transfiere",
      "secondary_claims": "puede-hacerlo|comprende",
      "evidence_kind": "producto",
      "evidence_modes": "transferencia|desempeno-controlado",
      "stages": "primaria|secundaria|bachillerato|fp|universidad|adultos",
      "areas": "",
      "moments": "durante|despues",
      "purposes": "formativo|calificable|alta-relevancia",
      "modalities": "escrita|practica",
      "seia_levels": "0|1|2|3",
      "time_min": 10,
      "time_max": 20,
      "teacher_load": "media",
      "participation": "individual",
      "scalability": "cualquiera",
      "collections": "transferencia|grupos-numerosos",
      "ai_relation": "",
      "review_status": "borrador-editorial",
      "version": "v0.13",
      "last_reviewed": "2026-09-06",
      "time_scope": "",
      "learning_windows": "",
      "complementary_layers": "transferencia-real",
      "evidence_origins": "actuacion-provocada",
      "window_selection": "docente",
      "evidence_produced_es": "La resolución de una tarea situada en un contexto distinto al trabajado, con el razonamiento visible.",
      "evidence_produced_en": "The resolution of a task set in a context different from the one taught, with reasoning visible.",
      "bounded_inference_es": "Que la persona reconoce qué de lo aprendido aplica en un contexto que no había visto y adapta el procedimiento.",
      "bounded_inference_en": "That the person recognises what learning applies in a context they had not seen and adapts the procedure.",
      "inference_conditions_es": "El contexto es realmente nuevo y sigue siendo pertinente al mismo contenido. | La dificultad añadida es de transferencia, no de vocabulario o de lectura. | Se especifica qué aprendizaje anterior debía aplicarse y la tarea pide explicar el razonamiento y declarar los apoyos permitidos.",
      "inference_conditions_en": "The context is genuinely new and remains relevant to the same content. | The added difficulty is transfer, not vocabulary or reading. | The prior learning to be applied is specified, and the task asks for the reasoning to be explained and the permitted support declared.",
      "cannot_infer_es": "Fallar no distingue entre falta de transferencia y falta de comprensión del enunciado. | Un único contexto nuevo no acredita transferencia general.",
      "cannot_infer_en": "Failing does not distinguish lack of transfer from misreading the prompt. | One new context does not certify general transfer.",
      "when_not_to_use_es": "Cuando el contenido aún no se domina en el contexto original.",
      "when_not_to_use_en": "When the content is not yet secure in the original context.",
      "content": {
        "es": {
          "name": "Tarea en contexto nuevo",
          "shortDescription": "Aplicar lo aprendido a una situación distinta a la trabajada en clase.",
          "whenToUse": "Cuando quieres comprobar aplicación real a una situación no trabajada en clase.",
          "minimalVersion": "Un problema distinto, mismas herramientas.",
          "instructions": [
            "Cambia contexto pero mantiene la demanda cognitiva.",
            "Evita disfrazar el mismo enunciado."
          ],
          "observe": [
            "Adapta la estrategia, no la copia.",
            "Reconoce lo que no aplica."
          ],
          "limits": [
            "Muy sensible al diseño del enunciado nuevo."
          ],
          "aiAdaptation": "",
          "example": "Después de trabajar un problema de proporciones en cocina, resolver uno en logística.",
          "evidenceProduced": "La resolución de una tarea situada en un contexto distinto al trabajado, con el razonamiento visible.",
          "boundedInference": "Que la persona reconoce qué de lo aprendido aplica en un contexto que no había visto y adapta el procedimiento.",
          "cannotInfer": [
            "Fallar no distingue entre falta de transferencia y falta de comprensión del enunciado.",
            "Un único contexto nuevo no acredita transferencia general."
          ],
          "inferenceConditions": [
            "El contexto es realmente nuevo y sigue siendo pertinente al mismo contenido.",
            "La dificultad añadida es de transferencia, no de vocabulario o de lectura.",
            "Se especifica qué aprendizaje anterior debía aplicarse y la tarea pide explicar el razonamiento y declarar los apoyos permitidos."
          ],
          "whenNotToUse": "Cuando el contenido aún no se domina en el contexto original.",
          "copyablePrompt": "Resuelve esta situación nueva usando lo trabajado. Explica qué cambia respecto al caso original.",
          "coverageNote": "",
          "windowConditions": [
            "Solo puede leerse como transferencia si se especifica qué aprendizaje anterior debía aplicarse y el contexto es nuevo y pertinente a ese aprendizaje.",
            "Los datos de proceso por sí solos no acreditan de dónde salió el razonamiento: hace falta que la tarea provoque y recoja la explicación del razonamiento y se declare qué apoyos estaban permitidos."
          ],
          "windowRationale": "Puede explorar transferencia si la aplicación en el contexto nuevo es real y pertinente; la novedad del enunciado por sí sola no lo es."
        },
        "en": {
          "name": "Task in a new context",
          "shortDescription": "Apply learning to a situation different from the one worked in class.",
          "whenToUse": "When you want to check real application to a situation not covered in class.",
          "minimalVersion": "A different problem, the same tools.",
          "instructions": [
            "Change context but keep the cognitive demand.",
            "Avoid disguising the same statement."
          ],
          "observe": [
            "Adapts the strategy, does not copy it.",
            "Recognises what does not apply."
          ],
          "limits": [
            "Very sensitive to the new prompt design."
          ],
          "aiAdaptation": "",
          "example": "After a ratios problem in cooking, solve one in logistics.",
          "evidenceProduced": "The resolution of a task set in a context different from the one taught, with reasoning visible.",
          "boundedInference": "That the person recognises what learning applies in a context they had not seen and adapts the procedure.",
          "cannotInfer": [
            "Failing does not distinguish lack of transfer from misreading the prompt.",
            "One new context does not certify general transfer."
          ],
          "inferenceConditions": [
            "The context is genuinely new and remains relevant to the same content.",
            "The added difficulty is transfer, not vocabulary or reading.",
            "The prior learning to be applied is specified, and the task asks for the reasoning to be explained and the permitted support declared."
          ],
          "whenNotToUse": "When the content is not yet secure in the original context.",
          "copyablePrompt": "Solve this new situation using what we worked on. Explain what changes vs. the original case.",
          "coverageNote": "",
          "windowConditions": [
            "It can only be read as transfer if the prior learning meant to be applied is specified and the context is new and relevant to that learning.",
            "Process data alone does not establish where the reasoning came from: the task must elicit and record an explanation of the reasoning, and the permitted support must be stated."
          ],
          "windowRationale": "It can explore transfer if the application in the new context is genuine and relevant; a novel-sounding prompt alone is not."
        }
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "counterexample",
      "slug": "contraejemplo",
      "url": "https://evidencias-ia-evaluacion.com/evidencia/contraejemplo",
      "name_es": "Contraejemplo",
      "name_en": "Counterexample",
      "short_description_es": "Pedir un contraejemplo obliga a probar los límites de una idea o regla.",
      "short_description_en": "Asking for a counterexample forces testing the limits of an idea or rule.",
      "family": "escrita-grafica",
      "family_secondary": "oral-dialogica",
      "primary_claim": "comprende",
      "secondary_claims": "transfiere",
      "evidence_kind": "producto",
      "evidence_modes": "transferencia",
      "stages": "secundaria|bachillerato|universidad|adultos",
      "areas": "",
      "moments": "durante|despues",
      "purposes": "formativo",
      "modalities": "escrita|oral",
      "seia_levels": "0|1|2|3",
      "time_min": 3,
      "time_max": 8,
      "teacher_load": "baja",
      "participation": "individual",
      "scalability": "cualquiera",
      "collections": "transferencia|rapidas|baja-revision|grupos-numerosos",
      "ai_relation": "",
      "review_status": "borrador-editorial",
      "version": "v0.13",
      "last_reviewed": "2026-09-06",
      "time_scope": "",
      "learning_windows": "",
      "complementary_layers": "",
      "evidence_origins": "actuacion-provocada",
      "window_selection": "docente",
      "evidence_produced_es": "Un caso propuesto por el estudiante que no cumple la regla o el concepto, con la explicación de por qué queda fuera.",
      "evidence_produced_en": "A case proposed by the student that does not meet the rule or concept, with an explanation of why it falls outside.",
      "bounded_inference_es": "Que la persona maneja los límites del concepto y no solo sus casos típicos.",
      "bounded_inference_en": "That the person handles the boundaries of the concept, not only its typical cases.",
      "inference_conditions_es": "El contraejemplo debe ser propio, no recuperado de los materiales de clase. | Se pide señalar qué condición concreta se incumple.",
      "inference_conditions_en": "The counterexample must be their own, not lifted from class materials. | They are asked to state which specific condition is broken.",
      "cannot_infer_es": "No evidencia transferencia a una situación práctica nueva. | No informa de la capacidad de ejecutar el procedimiento asociado.",
      "cannot_infer_en": "It evidences no transfer to a new practical situation. | It says nothing about the ability to execute the associated procedure.",
      "when_not_to_use_es": "Cuando el concepto no admite contraejemplos claros o el alumnado aún no tiene ejemplos suficientes.",
      "when_not_to_use_en": "When the concept admits no clear counterexamples, or students lack enough examples yet.",
      "content": {
        "es": {
          "name": "Contraejemplo",
          "shortDescription": "Pedir un contraejemplo obliga a probar los límites de una idea o regla.",
          "whenToUse": "Cuando conviene comprobar los límites de una regla o generalización.",
          "minimalVersion": "Pide un contraejemplo con explicación en tres líneas.",
          "instructions": [
            "Formula reglas o afirmaciones desafiables.",
            "Valora contraejemplos plausibles aunque no perfectos."
          ],
          "observe": [
            "El contraejemplo es específico y verificable.",
            "Se identifica la condición que rompe la regla."
          ],
          "limits": [
            "Puede confundirse con ejemplos negativos triviales."
          ],
          "aiAdaptation": "",
          "example": "Pedir un caso donde una regla estadística deje de aplicarse.",
          "evidenceProduced": "Un caso propuesto por el estudiante que no cumple la regla o el concepto, con la explicación de por qué queda fuera.",
          "boundedInference": "Que la persona maneja los límites del concepto y no solo sus casos típicos.",
          "cannotInfer": [
            "No evidencia transferencia a una situación práctica nueva.",
            "No informa de la capacidad de ejecutar el procedimiento asociado."
          ],
          "inferenceConditions": [
            "El contraejemplo debe ser propio, no recuperado de los materiales de clase.",
            "Se pide señalar qué condición concreta se incumple."
          ],
          "whenNotToUse": "Cuando el concepto no admite contraejemplos claros o el alumnado aún no tiene ejemplos suficientes.",
          "copyablePrompt": "Encuentra un caso donde la afirmación no funcione y explica por qué falla ahí.",
          "coverageNote": "",
          "windowConditions": [],
          "windowRationale": "Revisión v0.13: retirada la etiqueta de transferencia. Probar los límites de una regla es comprensión conceptual, no aplicación en situación nueva."
        },
        "en": {
          "name": "Counterexample",
          "shortDescription": "Asking for a counterexample forces testing the limits of an idea or rule.",
          "whenToUse": "When it is worth checking the limits of a rule or generalisation.",
          "minimalVersion": "Ask for a counterexample with a three-line explanation.",
          "instructions": [
            "State challengeable rules or claims.",
            "Value plausible counterexamples even if not perfect."
          ],
          "observe": [
            "The counterexample is specific and verifiable.",
            "The breaking condition is identified."
          ],
          "limits": [
            "Can be confused with trivial negative examples."
          ],
          "aiAdaptation": "",
          "example": "Ask for a case where a statistical rule stops applying.",
          "evidenceProduced": "A case proposed by the student that does not meet the rule or concept, with an explanation of why it falls outside.",
          "boundedInference": "That the person handles the boundaries of the concept, not only its typical cases.",
          "cannotInfer": [
            "It evidences no transfer to a new practical situation.",
            "It says nothing about the ability to execute the associated procedure."
          ],
          "inferenceConditions": [
            "The counterexample must be their own, not lifted from class materials.",
            "They are asked to state which specific condition is broken."
          ],
          "whenNotToUse": "When the concept admits no clear counterexamples, or students lack enough examples yet.",
          "copyablePrompt": "Find a case where the claim fails and explain why it fails there.",
          "coverageNote": "",
          "windowConditions": [],
          "windowRationale": "v0.13 review: transfer tag removed. Testing the limits of a rule is conceptual understanding, not application in a new situation."
        }
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "reverse-problem",
      "slug": "problema-inverso",
      "url": "https://evidencias-ia-evaluacion.com/evidencia/problema-inverso",
      "name_es": "Problema inverso",
      "name_en": "Reverse problem",
      "short_description_es": "Dar la solución y pedir el enunciado plausible, o dar el resultado y pedir el proceso.",
      "short_description_en": "Give the solution and ask for a plausible statement, or give the result and ask for the process.",
      "family": "escrita-grafica",
      "family_secondary": "",
      "primary_claim": "comprende",
      "secondary_claims": "transfiere",
      "evidence_kind": "producto",
      "evidence_modes": "transferencia",
      "stages": "primaria|secundaria|bachillerato|universidad|adultos",
      "areas": "",
      "moments": "durante|despues",
      "purposes": "formativo",
      "modalities": "escrita",
      "seia_levels": "0|1|2|3",
      "time_min": 5,
      "time_max": 12,
      "teacher_load": "baja",
      "participation": "individual",
      "scalability": "cualquiera",
      "collections": "baja-revision|grupos-numerosos",
      "ai_relation": "",
      "review_status": "borrador-editorial",
      "version": "v0.13",
      "last_reviewed": "2026-09-06",
      "time_scope": "",
      "learning_windows": "",
      "complementary_layers": "",
      "evidence_origins": "",
      "window_selection": "",
      "evidence_produced_es": "Un enunciado plausible construido por el estudiante a partir de una solución dada, o el proceso reconstruido a partir de un resultado.",
      "evidence_produced_en": "A plausible problem statement built by the student from a given solution, or the process reconstructed from a result.",
      "bounded_inference_es": "Que la persona comprende la relación entre datos, procedimiento y resultado, y no solo la ejecución hacia delante.",
      "bounded_inference_en": "That the person understands the relation between data, procedure and result, not just forward execution.",
      "inference_conditions_es": "La solución de partida admite más de un enunciado válido. | Se valora la coherencia interna, no el parecido con el enunciado original.",
      "inference_conditions_en": "The starting solution admits more than one valid statement. | Internal coherence is assessed, not similarity to the original statement.",
      "cannot_infer_es": "No acredita fluidez en la resolución directa. | No informa de la capacidad de aplicar el contenido fuera del aula.",
      "cannot_infer_en": "It does not certify fluency in direct solving. | It says nothing about applying the content outside the classroom.",
      "when_not_to_use_es": "Cuando el contenido no tiene estructura reversible o el formato desorienta más de lo que informa.",
      "when_not_to_use_en": "When the content has no reversible structure, or the format confuses more than it informs.",
      "content": {
        "es": {
          "name": "Problema inverso",
          "shortDescription": "Dar la solución y pedir el enunciado plausible, o dar el resultado y pedir el proceso.",
          "whenToUse": "Cuando quieres ver si se domina la estructura del problema, no solo su resolución.",
          "minimalVersion": "Presenta un resultado y pide construir el enunciado.",
          "instructions": [
            "Elige resultados con más de una vía razonable.",
            "Valora la coherencia interna del enunciado propuesto."
          ],
          "observe": [
            "El enunciado propuesto es consistente con el resultado.",
            "La lógica está explícita."
          ],
          "limits": [
            "Difícil de calificar cuantitativamente."
          ],
          "aiAdaptation": "",
          "example": "Dar una gráfica y pedir el fenómeno que la produciría.",
          "evidenceProduced": "Un enunciado plausible construido por el estudiante a partir de una solución dada, o el proceso reconstruido a partir de un resultado.",
          "boundedInference": "Que la persona comprende la relación entre datos, procedimiento y resultado, y no solo la ejecución hacia delante.",
          "cannotInfer": [
            "No acredita fluidez en la resolución directa.",
            "No informa de la capacidad de aplicar el contenido fuera del aula."
          ],
          "inferenceConditions": [
            "La solución de partida admite más de un enunciado válido.",
            "Se valora la coherencia interna, no el parecido con el enunciado original."
          ],
          "whenNotToUse": "Cuando el contenido no tiene estructura reversible o el formato desorienta más de lo que informa.",
          "copyablePrompt": "Aquí tienes un resultado. Escribe un enunciado que llevara a él y explica por qué.",
          "coverageNote": "",
          "windowConditions": [],
          "windowRationale": ""
        },
        "en": {
          "name": "Reverse problem",
          "shortDescription": "Give the solution and ask for a plausible statement, or give the result and ask for the process.",
          "whenToUse": "When you want to see whether the problem's structure is mastered, not just its solution.",
          "minimalVersion": "Show a result and ask to build the statement.",
          "instructions": [
            "Choose results with more than one reasonable path.",
            "Value the internal coherence of the proposed statement."
          ],
          "observe": [
            "The proposed statement is consistent with the result.",
            "The logic is explicit."
          ],
          "limits": [
            "Hard to grade quantitatively."
          ],
          "aiAdaptation": "",
          "example": "Give a chart and ask for the phenomenon that would produce it.",
          "evidenceProduced": "A plausible problem statement built by the student from a given solution, or the process reconstructed from a result.",
          "boundedInference": "That the person understands the relation between data, procedure and result, not just forward execution.",
          "cannotInfer": [
            "It does not certify fluency in direct solving.",
            "It says nothing about applying the content outside the classroom."
          ],
          "inferenceConditions": [
            "The starting solution admits more than one valid statement.",
            "Internal coherence is assessed, not similarity to the original statement."
          ],
          "whenNotToUse": "When the content has no reversible structure, or the format confuses more than it informs.",
          "copyablePrompt": "Here's a result. Write a statement that would lead to it and explain why.",
          "coverageNote": "",
          "windowConditions": [],
          "windowRationale": ""
        }
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "observation-rubric",
      "slug": "observacion-con-rubrica",
      "url": "https://evidencias-ia-evaluacion.com/evidencia/observacion-con-rubrica",
      "name_es": "Observación con rúbrica",
      "name_en": "Rubric-based observation",
      "short_description_es": "Observar desempeños en directo con criterios definidos previamente.",
      "short_description_en": "Observe live performances against pre-defined criteria.",
      "family": "practica-desempeno",
      "family_secondary": "",
      "primary_claim": "puede-hacerlo",
      "secondary_claims": "muestra-avance",
      "evidence_kind": "desempeno",
      "evidence_modes": "desempeno-controlado|proceso",
      "stages": "infantil|primaria|secundaria|bachillerato|fp|universidad|adultos",
      "areas": "",
      "moments": "durante",
      "purposes": "formativo|calificable|certificacion",
      "modalities": "practica|oral",
      "seia_levels": "0|1|2|3",
      "time_min": 5,
      "time_max": 15,
      "teacher_load": "alta",
      "participation": "individual",
      "scalability": "mas-30-equipos",
      "collections": "grupos-numerosos",
      "ai_relation": "",
      "review_status": "borrador-editorial",
      "version": "v0.13",
      "last_reviewed": "2026-09-06",
      "time_scope": "",
      "learning_windows": "",
      "complementary_layers": "desempeno-observado",
      "evidence_origins": "natural",
      "window_selection": "docente",
      "evidence_produced_es": "El registro del docente sobre criterios definidos, cumplimentado mientras el desempeño ocurre.",
      "evidence_produced_en": "The teacher's record against defined criteria, completed while the performance takes place.",
      "bounded_inference_es": "Que en esa ejecución observada la persona cumple o no cumple criterios concretos previamente publicados.",
      "bounded_inference_en": "That in that observed performance the person meets or does not meet specific, previously published criteria.",
      "inference_conditions_es": "Los criterios se comparten con el alumnado antes de observar. | Se observa a un número de personas asumible por sesión.",
      "inference_conditions_en": "Criteria are shared with students before observing. | A manageable number of people is observed per session.",
      "cannot_infer_es": "No informa del proceso previo ni de cómo se preparó. | Una observación puntual no acredita un desempeño estable.",
      "cannot_infer_en": "It says nothing about the prior process or how it was prepared. | A one-off observation does not certify stable performance.",
      "when_not_to_use_es": "Cuando la presencia del observador altera de forma decisiva la ejecución, o cuando no hay criterios previos.",
      "when_not_to_use_en": "When the observer's presence decisively alters performance, or when there are no prior criteria.",
      "content": {
        "es": {
          "name": "Observación con rúbrica",
          "shortDescription": "Observar desempeños en directo con criterios definidos previamente.",
          "whenToUse": "Cuando el aprendizaje se ve mejor en acción que en un producto entregado.",
          "minimalVersion": "Rúbrica de 3-4 indicadores y toma de notas breve.",
          "instructions": [
            "Redacta indicadores conductuales.",
            "Prevé rotación de observaciones si el grupo es grande."
          ],
          "observe": [
            "Comportamientos observables, no inferencias.",
            "Al menos 2 observaciones por estudiante."
          ],
          "limits": [
            "Muy dependiente de tiempo docente."
          ],
          "aiAdaptation": "",
          "example": "Observar cómo una alumna resuelve una tarea manipulativa.",
          "evidenceProduced": "El registro del docente sobre criterios definidos, cumplimentado mientras el desempeño ocurre.",
          "boundedInference": "Que en esa ejecución observada la persona cumple o no cumple criterios concretos previamente publicados.",
          "cannotInfer": [
            "No informa del proceso previo ni de cómo se preparó.",
            "Una observación puntual no acredita un desempeño estable."
          ],
          "inferenceConditions": [
            "Los criterios se comparten con el alumnado antes de observar.",
            "Se observa a un número de personas asumible por sesión."
          ],
          "whenNotToUse": "Cuando la presencia del observador altera de forma decisiva la ejecución, o cuando no hay criterios previos.",
          "copyablePrompt": "Observa esta rúbrica y realiza la actividad mientras el docente marca los indicadores.",
          "coverageNote": "",
          "windowConditions": [],
          "windowRationale": "Observación en directo con criterios: desempeño observado, sin acceso al proceso previo."
        },
        "en": {
          "name": "Rubric-based observation",
          "shortDescription": "Observe live performances against pre-defined criteria.",
          "whenToUse": "When the learning is better seen in action than in a submitted product.",
          "minimalVersion": "3-4 indicator rubric and brief note-taking.",
          "instructions": [
            "Write behavioural indicators.",
            "Plan observation rotation for large groups."
          ],
          "observe": [
            "Observable behaviours, not inferences.",
            "At least 2 observations per student."
          ],
          "limits": [
            "Very dependent on teacher time."
          ],
          "aiAdaptation": "",
          "example": "Observe how a student solves a hands-on task.",
          "evidenceProduced": "The teacher's record against defined criteria, completed while the performance takes place.",
          "boundedInference": "That in that observed performance the person meets or does not meet specific, previously published criteria.",
          "cannotInfer": [
            "It says nothing about the prior process or how it was prepared.",
            "A one-off observation does not certify stable performance."
          ],
          "inferenceConditions": [
            "Criteria are shared with students before observing.",
            "A manageable number of people is observed per session."
          ],
          "whenNotToUse": "When the observer's presence decisively alters performance, or when there are no prior criteria.",
          "copyablePrompt": "Review this rubric and perform the activity while the teacher marks indicators.",
          "coverageNote": "",
          "windowConditions": [],
          "windowRationale": "Live observation with criteria: observed performance, with no access to the prior process."
        }
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "anecdotal-record",
      "slug": "registro-anecdotico",
      "url": "https://evidencias-ia-evaluacion.com/evidencia/registro-anecdotico",
      "name_es": "Registro anecdótico",
      "name_en": "Anecdotal record",
      "short_description_es": "Nota breve del docente sobre un episodio significativo de aprendizaje.",
      "short_description_en": "Brief teacher note about a meaningful learning episode.",
      "family": "proceso-evolucion",
      "family_secondary": "practica-desempeno",
      "primary_claim": "muestra-avance",
      "secondary_claims": "puede-hacerlo",
      "evidence_kind": "desempeno",
      "evidence_modes": "proceso",
      "stages": "infantil|primaria|secundaria|fp|adultos",
      "areas": "",
      "moments": "durante",
      "purposes": "formativo",
      "modalities": "escrita",
      "seia_levels": "0|1|2|3",
      "time_min": 1,
      "time_max": 3,
      "teacher_load": "media",
      "participation": "individual",
      "scalability": "mas-30-equipos",
      "collections": "rapidas|grupos-numerosos",
      "ai_relation": "",
      "review_status": "borrador-editorial",
      "version": "v0.13",
      "last_reviewed": "2026-09-06",
      "time_scope": "",
      "learning_windows": "",
      "complementary_layers": "desempeno-observado",
      "evidence_origins": "natural",
      "window_selection": "docente",
      "evidence_produced_es": "Una nota breve y fechada del docente que describe un episodio observado, sin interpretación añadida.",
      "evidence_produced_en": "A short, dated teacher note describing an observed episode, with no added interpretation.",
      "bounded_inference_es": "Que ese episodio concreto ocurrió y fue relevante a juicio del docente; acumulado, sugiere una tendencia por comprobar.",
      "bounded_inference_en": "That this specific episode occurred and was relevant in the teacher's judgement; accumulated, it suggests a trend to be checked.",
      "inference_conditions_es": "Se describe conducta observable y se separa del juicio valorativo. | Se registra con la misma sistemática para todo el alumnado, no solo para quien destaca.",
      "inference_conditions_en": "Observable behaviour is described and kept separate from evaluative judgement. | It is recorded with the same systematic approach for all students, not just those who stand out.",
      "cannot_infer_es": "No es evidencia de aprendizaje por sí sola; es una observación aislada. | No permite comparar entre estudiantes.",
      "cannot_infer_en": "It is not evidence of learning on its own; it is an isolated observation. | It does not support comparison between students.",
      "when_not_to_use_es": "Cuando el registro deriva en un historial personal que el estudiante no conoce ni puede rebatir.",
      "when_not_to_use_en": "When the record drifts into a personal history the student neither knows nor can contest.",
      "content": {
        "es": {
          "name": "Registro anecdótico",
          "shortDescription": "Nota breve del docente sobre un episodio significativo de aprendizaje.",
          "whenToUse": "Cuando necesitas acumular indicios en el tiempo sin interrumpir la actividad.",
          "minimalVersion": "Una nota por sesión: qué ha pasado, qué evidencia deja.",
          "instructions": [
            "Describe hechos, no interpretaciones amplias.",
            "Fecha, contexto, breve descripción."
          ],
          "observe": [
            "Las notas describen hechos.",
            "Emergen patrones al acumular varias."
          ],
          "limits": [
            "Riesgo de sesgo del docente."
          ],
          "aiAdaptation": "",
          "example": "Una nota registra que una alumna aplicó una estrategia trabajada 3 semanas antes.",
          "evidenceProduced": "Una nota breve y fechada del docente que describe un episodio observado, sin interpretación añadida.",
          "boundedInference": "Que ese episodio concreto ocurrió y fue relevante a juicio del docente; acumulado, sugiere una tendencia por comprobar.",
          "cannotInfer": [
            "No es evidencia de aprendizaje por sí sola; es una observación aislada.",
            "No permite comparar entre estudiantes."
          ],
          "inferenceConditions": [
            "Se describe conducta observable y se separa del juicio valorativo.",
            "Se registra con la misma sistemática para todo el alumnado, no solo para quien destaca."
          ],
          "whenNotToUse": "Cuando el registro deriva en un historial personal que el estudiante no conoce ni puede rebatir.",
          "copyablePrompt": "Anota fecha, contexto y qué has observado hoy que resulta significativo del aprendizaje de X.",
          "coverageNote": "",
          "windowConditions": [],
          "windowRationale": "Nota del docente sobre un episodio observado: no abre ninguna ventana de proceso del estudiante."
        },
        "en": {
          "name": "Anecdotal record",
          "shortDescription": "Brief teacher note about a meaningful learning episode.",
          "whenToUse": "When you need to accumulate indications over time without interrupting the activity.",
          "minimalVersion": "One note per session: what happened, what evidence it leaves.",
          "instructions": [
            "Describe facts, not broad interpretations.",
            "Date, context, brief description."
          ],
          "observe": [
            "Notes describe facts.",
            "Patterns emerge over multiple notes."
          ],
          "limits": [
            "Teacher bias risk."
          ],
          "aiAdaptation": "",
          "example": "A note records that a student applied a strategy worked on 3 weeks earlier.",
          "evidenceProduced": "A short, dated teacher note describing an observed episode, with no added interpretation.",
          "boundedInference": "That this specific episode occurred and was relevant in the teacher's judgement; accumulated, it suggests a trend to be checked.",
          "cannotInfer": [
            "It is not evidence of learning on its own; it is an isolated observation.",
            "It does not support comparison between students."
          ],
          "inferenceConditions": [
            "Observable behaviour is described and kept separate from evaluative judgement.",
            "It is recorded with the same systematic approach for all students, not just those who stand out."
          ],
          "whenNotToUse": "When the record drifts into a personal history the student neither knows nor can contest.",
          "copyablePrompt": "Note date, context and what you observed today that is meaningful for X's learning.",
          "coverageNote": "",
          "windowConditions": [],
          "windowRationale": "A teacher note about an observed episode: it opens no window on the student's process."
        }
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "group-role-observation",
      "slug": "observacion-de-rol-en-grupo",
      "url": "https://evidencias-ia-evaluacion.com/evidencia/observacion-de-rol-en-grupo",
      "name_es": "Observación de rol en grupo",
      "name_en": "Group role observation",
      "short_description_es": "Asignar roles observables en trabajo cooperativo y valorar su desempeño.",
      "short_description_en": "Assign observable roles in cooperative work and assess their performance.",
      "family": "cooperativa",
      "family_secondary": "practica-desempeno",
      "primary_claim": "puede-hacerlo",
      "secondary_claims": "muestra-avance",
      "evidence_kind": "desempeno",
      "evidence_modes": "desempeno-controlado|proceso",
      "stages": "primaria|secundaria|bachillerato|fp|universidad|adultos",
      "areas": "",
      "moments": "durante",
      "purposes": "formativo|calificable",
      "modalities": "practica|oral",
      "seia_levels": "0|1|2|3",
      "time_min": 10,
      "time_max": 20,
      "teacher_load": "media",
      "participation": "equipo",
      "scalability": "hasta-30",
      "collections": "",
      "ai_relation": "",
      "review_status": "borrador-editorial",
      "version": "v0.13",
      "last_reviewed": "2026-09-06",
      "time_scope": "",
      "learning_windows": "",
      "complementary_layers": "",
      "evidence_origins": "",
      "window_selection": "",
      "evidence_produced_es": "El registro de conductas observables asociadas a un rol asignado durante el trabajo cooperativo.",
      "evidence_produced_en": "A record of observable behaviours tied to an assigned role during cooperative work.",
      "bounded_inference_es": "Que la persona ejerció, o no, las funciones del rol durante esa sesión concreta.",
      "bounded_inference_en": "That the person did, or did not, carry out the role's functions during that specific session.",
      "inference_conditions_es": "El rol y sus conductas esperadas se explican antes de empezar. | Los roles rotan entre sesiones para no fijar etiquetas.",
      "inference_conditions_en": "The role and its expected behaviours are explained before starting. | Roles rotate across sessions so labels do not stick.",
      "cannot_infer_es": "No evidencia comprensión del contenido trabajado por el equipo. | No mide el aprendizaje individual del resto del grupo.",
      "cannot_infer_en": "It evidences no understanding of the content the team worked on. | It does not measure the individual learning of the rest of the group.",
      "when_not_to_use_es": "Cuando los roles se usan para calificar actitud en lugar de organizar el trabajo.",
      "when_not_to_use_en": "When roles are used to grade attitude rather than to organise the work.",
      "content": {
        "es": {
          "name": "Observación de rol en grupo",
          "shortDescription": "Asignar roles observables en trabajo cooperativo y valorar su desempeño.",
          "whenToUse": "Cuando el trabajo es cooperativo y quieres evidencia individual dentro del equipo.",
          "minimalVersion": "Un rol por estudiante y una tarjeta de indicadores por rol.",
          "instructions": [
            "Define roles concretos y sus indicadores.",
            "Combina observación docente con auto-registro."
          ],
          "observe": [
            "Rol ejecutado, no solo declarado.",
            "La contribución individual es identificable."
          ],
          "limits": [
            "Sensible a dinámicas del grupo."
          ],
          "aiAdaptation": "",
          "example": "En un trabajo en grupo, cada estudiante asume un rol y se valora su ejecución.",
          "evidenceProduced": "El registro de conductas observables asociadas a un rol asignado durante el trabajo cooperativo.",
          "boundedInference": "Que la persona ejerció, o no, las funciones del rol durante esa sesión concreta.",
          "cannotInfer": [
            "No evidencia comprensión del contenido trabajado por el equipo.",
            "No mide el aprendizaje individual del resto del grupo."
          ],
          "inferenceConditions": [
            "El rol y sus conductas esperadas se explican antes de empezar.",
            "Los roles rotan entre sesiones para no fijar etiquetas."
          ],
          "whenNotToUse": "Cuando los roles se usan para calificar actitud en lugar de organizar el trabajo.",
          "copyablePrompt": "Hoy tu rol es X. Al final de la actividad, describe qué has hecho como X y en qué evidencia se ve.",
          "coverageNote": "",
          "windowConditions": [],
          "windowRationale": ""
        },
        "en": {
          "name": "Group role observation",
          "shortDescription": "Assign observable roles in cooperative work and assess their performance.",
          "whenToUse": "When the work is cooperative and you want individual evidence within the team.",
          "minimalVersion": "One role per student and one indicator card per role.",
          "instructions": [
            "Define concrete roles and their indicators.",
            "Combine teacher observation with self-report."
          ],
          "observe": [
            "Role performed, not just declared.",
            "Individual contribution is identifiable."
          ],
          "limits": [
            "Sensitive to group dynamics."
          ],
          "aiAdaptation": "",
          "example": "In group work, each student takes a role and their execution is assessed.",
          "evidenceProduced": "A record of observable behaviours tied to an assigned role during cooperative work.",
          "boundedInference": "That the person did, or did not, carry out the role's functions during that specific session.",
          "cannotInfer": [
            "It evidences no understanding of the content the team worked on.",
            "It does not measure the individual learning of the rest of the group."
          ],
          "inferenceConditions": [
            "The role and its expected behaviours are explained before starting.",
            "Roles rotate across sessions so labels do not stick."
          ],
          "whenNotToUse": "When roles are used to grade attitude rather than to organise the work.",
          "copyablePrompt": "Your role today is X. At the end, describe what you did as X and where the evidence shows it.",
          "coverageNote": "",
          "windowConditions": [],
          "windowRationale": ""
        }
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "product-contrast",
      "slug": "microprueba-de-contraste",
      "url": "https://evidencias-ia-evaluacion.com/evidencia/microprueba-de-contraste",
      "name_es": "Micro-prueba de contraste",
      "name_en": "Micro contrast check",
      "short_description_es": "Una prueba muy breve tras la entrega del producto para contrastar la comprensión de lo entregado; no acredita autoría.",
      "short_description_en": "A very brief check after submission to contrast understanding of the submitted work; it does not certify authorship.",
      "family": "escrita-grafica",
      "family_secondary": "oral-dialogica",
      "primary_claim": "comprende",
      "secondary_claims": "puede-hacerlo|decide-criterio",
      "evidence_kind": "producto",
      "evidence_modes": "desempeno-controlado",
      "stages": "primaria|secundaria|bachillerato|fp|universidad|adultos",
      "areas": "",
      "moments": "despues",
      "purposes": "calificable|certificacion|alta-relevancia",
      "modalities": "escrita|oral",
      "seia_levels": "1|2|3",
      "time_min": 5,
      "time_max": 10,
      "teacher_load": "media",
      "participation": "individual",
      "scalability": "cualquiera",
      "collections": "rapidas|grupos-numerosos",
      "ai_relation": "",
      "review_status": "borrador-editorial",
      "version": "v0.13",
      "last_reviewed": "2026-09-06",
      "time_scope": "",
      "learning_windows": "",
      "complementary_layers": "desempeno-observado",
      "evidence_origins": "actuacion-provocada",
      "window_selection": "docente",
      "evidence_produced_es": "Las respuestas a dos o tres preguntas breves sobre partes concretas del producto ya entregado, resueltas en clase.",
      "evidence_produced_en": "Answers to two or three short questions about specific parts of the already submitted product, done in class.",
      "bounded_inference_es": "Que la persona reconoce y explica decisiones de su propio producto en condiciones controladas.",
      "bounded_inference_en": "That the person recognises and explains decisions in their own product under controlled conditions.",
      "inference_conditions_es": "Las preguntas se refieren a decisiones y elementos concretos del producto y piden justificarlos con criterios disciplinares; conocerlos o explicarlos no acredita por sí solo la autoría. | Se aplica a todo el grupo con el mismo formato, no de forma selectiva.",
      "inference_conditions_en": "Questions refer to specific decisions and elements of the product and ask for them to be justified against disciplinary criteria; knowing or explaining them does not by itself establish authorship. | It is applied to the whole group in the same format, not selectively.",
      "cannot_infer_es": "No acredita ni descarta el uso de IA; una respuesta floja tiene muchas causas. | No establece la autoría del trabajo entregado ni sirve como prueba disciplinaria de autoría.",
      "cannot_infer_en": "It neither certifies nor rules out AI use; a weak answer has many causes. | It does not establish authorship of the submitted work, nor does it serve as disciplinary proof of authorship.",
      "when_not_to_use_es": "Cuando se plantea como trampa o como sospecha dirigida a personas concretas.",
      "when_not_to_use_en": "When framed as a trap or as suspicion aimed at particular people.",
      "content": {
        "es": {
          "name": "Micro-prueba de contraste",
          "shortDescription": "Una prueba muy breve tras la entrega del producto para contrastar la comprensión de lo entregado; no acredita autoría.",
          "whenToUse": "Cuando el producto entregado no encaja con lo observado en clase.",
          "minimalVersion": "3 preguntas ligadas al producto entregado.",
          "instructions": [
            "Prepara preguntas específicas del trabajo, no genéricas.",
            "Hazla poco después de la entrega."
          ],
          "observe": [
            "El estudiante puede sostener elementos concretos del trabajo.",
            "Reconoce lo que no domina en lugar de simular."
          ],
          "limits": [
            "Muestra si el estudiante sostiene lo entregado; no prueba quién lo escribió ni sustituye una evaluación completa."
          ],
          "aiAdaptation": "",
          "example": "Tras entregar un informe, contestar tres preguntas breves en clase.",
          "evidenceProduced": "Las respuestas a dos o tres preguntas breves sobre partes concretas del producto ya entregado, resueltas en clase.",
          "boundedInference": "Que la persona reconoce y explica decisiones de su propio producto en condiciones controladas.",
          "cannotInfer": [
            "No acredita ni descarta el uso de IA; una respuesta floja tiene muchas causas.",
            "No establece la autoría del trabajo entregado ni sirve como prueba disciplinaria de autoría."
          ],
          "inferenceConditions": [
            "Las preguntas se refieren a decisiones y elementos concretos del producto y piden justificarlos con criterios disciplinares; conocerlos o explicarlos no acredita por sí solo la autoría.",
            "Se aplica a todo el grupo con el mismo formato, no de forma selectiva."
          ],
          "whenNotToUse": "Cuando se plantea como trampa o como sospecha dirigida a personas concretas.",
          "copyablePrompt": "Responde en 5 minutos estas 3 preguntas sobre el trabajo que has entregado.",
          "coverageNote": "",
          "windowConditions": [
            "Contrasta la comprensión del producto entregado; no acredita ni la autoría ni un uso concreto de IA.",
            "Adaptación opcional: solo abre la ventana de uso de IA si la tarea pide explícitamente explicar decisiones de uso de IA pertinentes y aportar su evidencia (registro de la interacción o de la salida usada)."
          ],
          "windowRationale": "Revisión v0.13: retirada la ventana de uso de IA por defecto. Informa de la relación entre la persona y el producto, no del historial de la herramienta."
        },
        "en": {
          "name": "Micro contrast check",
          "shortDescription": "A very brief check after submission to contrast understanding of the submitted work; it does not certify authorship.",
          "whenToUse": "When the submitted product does not match what was observed in class.",
          "minimalVersion": "3 questions tied to the submitted product.",
          "instructions": [
            "Prepare questions specific to the work, not generic.",
            "Run it soon after submission."
          ],
          "observe": [
            "The student can uphold concrete elements of the work.",
            "Acknowledges what they don't master instead of simulating."
          ],
          "limits": [
            "It shows whether the student can uphold what they submitted; it does not prove who wrote it, nor replace a full assessment."
          ],
          "aiAdaptation": "",
          "example": "After submitting a report, answer three brief questions in class.",
          "evidenceProduced": "Answers to two or three short questions about specific parts of the already submitted product, done in class.",
          "boundedInference": "That the person recognises and explains decisions in their own product under controlled conditions.",
          "cannotInfer": [
            "It neither certifies nor rules out AI use; a weak answer has many causes.",
            "It does not establish authorship of the submitted work, nor does it serve as disciplinary proof of authorship."
          ],
          "inferenceConditions": [
            "Questions refer to specific decisions and elements of the product and ask for them to be justified against disciplinary criteria; knowing or explaining them does not by itself establish authorship.",
            "It is applied to the whole group in the same format, not selectively."
          ],
          "whenNotToUse": "When framed as a trap or as suspicion aimed at particular people.",
          "copyablePrompt": "Answer these 3 questions about the work you submitted in 5 minutes.",
          "coverageNote": "",
          "windowConditions": [
            "It contrasts understanding of the submitted product; it certifies neither authorship nor any specific AI use.",
            "Optional adaptation: it only opens the AI-use window if the task explicitly asks for relevant AI-use decisions to be explained with their evidence (a record of the interaction or of the output used)."
          ],
          "windowRationale": "v0.13 review: default AI-use window removed. It informs about the relation between person and product, not about the tool's history."
        }
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "blind-swap",
      "slug": "intercambio-ciego",
      "url": "https://evidencias-ia-evaluacion.com/evidencia/intercambio-ciego",
      "name_es": "Intercambio ciego con pares",
      "name_en": "Blind peer swap",
      "short_description_es": "Los trabajos se intercambian sin identificar autoría y se comentan con criterios.",
      "short_description_en": "Works are swapped without identifying authorship and are commented against criteria.",
      "family": "cooperativa",
      "family_secondary": "metacognitiva",
      "primary_claim": "decide-criterio",
      "secondary_claims": "comprende",
      "evidence_kind": "producto",
      "evidence_modes": "metacognicion",
      "stages": "secundaria|bachillerato|fp|universidad|adultos",
      "areas": "",
      "moments": "despues",
      "purposes": "formativo",
      "modalities": "escrita",
      "seia_levels": "0|1|2|3",
      "time_min": 10,
      "time_max": 15,
      "teacher_load": "media",
      "participation": "pareja",
      "scalability": "hasta-30",
      "collections": "",
      "ai_relation": "",
      "review_status": "borrador-editorial",
      "version": "v0.13",
      "last_reviewed": "2026-09-06",
      "time_scope": "",
      "learning_windows": "evolucion-borradores",
      "complementary_layers": "",
      "evidence_origins": "natural",
      "window_selection": "docente",
      "evidence_produced_es": "Comentarios sobre un trabajo anónimo, escritos con criterios comunes, y la revisión que el autor hace después.",
      "evidence_produced_en": "Comments on an anonymised piece of work, written against shared criteria, and the author's later revision.",
      "bounded_inference_es": "Que quien comenta aplica criterios compartidos a un trabajo anonimizado y señala en él aspectos concretos.",
      "bounded_inference_en": "That the commenter applies shared criteria to an anonymised piece of work and points to concrete aspects of it.",
      "inference_conditions_es": "El anonimato se mantiene de verdad (formato, letra, nombres de archivo). | Existe una fase posterior de revisión del propio trabajo.",
      "inference_conditions_en": "Anonymity actually holds (format, handwriting, file names). | There is a later phase of revising one's own work.",
      "cannot_infer_es": "No informa del aprendizaje del autor comentado. | No permite concluir que se haya eliminado el sesgo: la anonimización limita una de sus fuentes, no todas.",
      "cannot_infer_en": "It says nothing about the learning of the author being commented on. | It does not support concluding that bias has been eliminated: anonymisation limits one of its sources, not all.",
      "when_not_to_use_es": "En grupos muy pequeños donde la autoría es reconocible de inmediato.",
      "when_not_to_use_en": "In very small groups where authorship is immediately recognisable.",
      "content": {
        "es": {
          "name": "Intercambio ciego con pares",
          "shortDescription": "Los trabajos se intercambian sin identificar autoría y se comentan con criterios.",
          "whenToUse": "Cuando quieres comprobar comprensión del trabajo propio sin tenerlo delante.",
          "minimalVersion": "Cada estudiante comenta un trabajo anónimo con la rúbrica.",
          "instructions": [
            "Anonimiza los trabajos antes.",
            "Prohíbe reconocer autoría."
          ],
          "observe": [
            "Comentarios centrados en criterios.",
            "No hay identificación cruzada."
          ],
          "limits": [
            "Requiere gestión cuidadosa del anonimato."
          ],
          "aiAdaptation": "",
          "example": "Intercambio ciego de ensayos con doble revisor.",
          "evidenceProduced": "Comentarios sobre un trabajo anónimo, escritos con criterios comunes, y la revisión que el autor hace después.",
          "boundedInference": "Que quien comenta aplica criterios compartidos a un trabajo anonimizado y señala en él aspectos concretos.",
          "cannotInfer": [
            "No informa del aprendizaje del autor comentado.",
            "No permite concluir que se haya eliminado el sesgo: la anonimización limita una de sus fuentes, no todas."
          ],
          "inferenceConditions": [
            "El anonimato se mantiene de verdad (formato, letra, nombres de archivo).",
            "Existe una fase posterior de revisión del propio trabajo."
          ],
          "whenNotToUse": "En grupos muy pequeños donde la autoría es reconocible de inmediato.",
          "copyablePrompt": "Comenta este trabajo aplicando la rúbrica. No intentes identificar quién lo ha escrito.",
          "coverageNote": "",
          "windowConditions": [
            "Solo si se conservan la versión anterior y la posterior del trabajo del autor tras leer el comentario ciego.",
            "Para hablar de cambio cognitivo haría falta además la respuesta propia inicial y una explicación de qué se cambió y por qué; sin ella solo hay revisión de borrador."
          ],
          "windowRationale": "La anonimización limita la información identificativa; por sí sola no garantiza comentarios mejores."
        },
        "en": {
          "name": "Blind peer swap",
          "shortDescription": "Works are swapped without identifying authorship and are commented against criteria.",
          "whenToUse": "When you want to check understanding of one's own work without having it to hand.",
          "minimalVersion": "Each student comments on an anonymous work with the rubric.",
          "instructions": [
            "Anonymise works beforehand.",
            "Forbid guessing authorship."
          ],
          "observe": [
            "Comments focused on criteria.",
            "No cross-identification."
          ],
          "limits": [
            "Careful anonymity management required."
          ],
          "aiAdaptation": "",
          "example": "Blind essay swap with two reviewers.",
          "evidenceProduced": "Comments on an anonymised piece of work, written against shared criteria, and the author's later revision.",
          "boundedInference": "That the commenter applies shared criteria to an anonymised piece of work and points to concrete aspects of it.",
          "cannotInfer": [
            "It says nothing about the learning of the author being commented on.",
            "It does not support concluding that bias has been eliminated: anonymisation limits one of its sources, not all."
          ],
          "inferenceConditions": [
            "Anonymity actually holds (format, handwriting, file names).",
            "There is a later phase of revising one's own work."
          ],
          "whenNotToUse": "In very small groups where authorship is immediately recognisable.",
          "copyablePrompt": "Comment on this work using the rubric. Do not try to identify the author.",
          "coverageNote": "",
          "windowConditions": [
            "Only if the author's before and after versions are kept once the blind comment has been read.",
            "To speak of cognitive change you would also need the student's own initial answer and an explanation of what changed and why; without it there is only draft revision."
          ],
          "windowRationale": "Anonymisation limits identifying information; on its own it does not guarantee better comments."
        }
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "teacher-followup",
      "slug": "microtutoria-de-contraste",
      "url": "https://evidencias-ia-evaluacion.com/evidencia/microtutoria-de-contraste",
      "name_es": "Micro-tutoría de contraste",
      "name_en": "Micro-tutorial contrast",
      "short_description_es": "Entrevista breve del docente con el estudiante para contrastar el trabajo entregado.",
      "short_description_en": "A brief teacher-student interview to contrast the submitted work.",
      "family": "oral-dialogica",
      "family_secondary": "",
      "primary_claim": "comprende",
      "secondary_claims": "decide-criterio|usa-ia-critica",
      "evidence_kind": "desempeno",
      "evidence_modes": "oral|desempeno-controlado",
      "stages": "primaria|secundaria|bachillerato|fp|universidad|adultos",
      "areas": "",
      "moments": "despues",
      "purposes": "calificable|certificacion|alta-relevancia",
      "modalities": "oral",
      "seia_levels": "1|2|3",
      "time_min": 3,
      "time_max": 8,
      "teacher_load": "alta",
      "participation": "individual",
      "scalability": "grupo-reducido",
      "collections": "rapidas",
      "ai_relation": "",
      "review_status": "borrador-editorial",
      "version": "v0.13",
      "last_reviewed": "2026-09-06",
      "time_scope": "",
      "learning_windows": "investigacion-decisiones",
      "complementary_layers": "desempeno-observado",
      "evidence_origins": "actuacion-provocada",
      "window_selection": "docente",
      "evidence_produced_es": "Notas de una conversación breve, guiada por dos o tres preguntas sobre el proceso seguido en el trabajo entregado.",
      "evidence_produced_en": "Notes from a short conversation guided by two or three questions about the process behind the submitted work.",
      "bounded_inference_es": "Que la persona puede reconstruir oralmente cómo llegó a su producto, con detalles que el producto no muestra.",
      "bounded_inference_en": "That the person can orally reconstruct how they reached their product, with details the product does not show.",
      "inference_conditions_es": "Las preguntas se preparan a partir del propio trabajo, no de una plantilla genérica. | Se avisa de que la conversación forma parte del diseño, no de una sospecha.",
      "inference_conditions_en": "Questions are prepared from the work itself, not from a generic template. | Students are told the conversation is part of the design, not a suspicion.",
      "cannot_infer_es": "No determina la autoría ni el uso de herramientas. | Los nervios pueden confundirse con desconocimiento.",
      "cannot_infer_en": "It does not determine authorship or tool use. | Nerves can be mistaken for lack of knowledge.",
      "when_not_to_use_es": "Cuando no hay condiciones de privacidad o cuando se aplica solo a quienes se sospecha.",
      "when_not_to_use_en": "When there are no conditions of privacy, or when applied only to those under suspicion.",
      "content": {
        "es": {
          "name": "Micro-tutoría de contraste",
          "shortDescription": "Entrevista breve del docente con el estudiante para contrastar el trabajo entregado.",
          "whenToUse": "Cuando basta una pregunta breve de seguimiento sobre un punto concreto de la entrega.",
          "minimalVersion": "Tres preguntas ligadas al producto entregado.",
          "instructions": [
            "Cita elementos concretos del trabajo.",
            "Registra respuestas con notas cortas."
          ],
          "observe": [
            "Sostiene el trabajo con criterios.",
            "Reconoce las partes que dominó menos."
          ],
          "limits": [
            "No es escalable sin planificación."
          ],
          "aiAdaptation": "",
          "example": "Micro-tutoría al recoger un trabajo de alta relevancia.",
          "evidenceProduced": "Notas de una conversación breve, guiada por dos o tres preguntas sobre el proceso seguido en el trabajo entregado.",
          "boundedInference": "Que la persona puede reconstruir oralmente cómo llegó a su producto, con detalles que el producto no muestra.",
          "cannotInfer": [
            "No determina la autoría ni el uso de herramientas.",
            "Los nervios pueden confundirse con desconocimiento."
          ],
          "inferenceConditions": [
            "Las preguntas se preparan a partir del propio trabajo, no de una plantilla genérica.",
            "Se avisa de que la conversación forma parte del diseño, no de una sospecha."
          ],
          "whenNotToUse": "Cuando no hay condiciones de privacidad o cuando se aplica solo a quienes se sospecha.",
          "copyablePrompt": "Vamos a hablar tres minutos sobre tu entrega. Empieza por explicar por qué elegiste este enfoque.",
          "coverageNote": "",
          "windowConditions": [
            "Solo si la pregunta se refiere a un punto concreto de la entrega y se anota la respuesta."
          ],
          "windowRationale": "La entrevista breve pregunta directamente por el proceso seguido."
        },
        "en": {
          "name": "Micro-tutorial contrast",
          "shortDescription": "A brief teacher-student interview to contrast the submitted work.",
          "whenToUse": "When a brief follow-up question on one specific point of the submission is enough.",
          "minimalVersion": "Three questions tied to the submitted product.",
          "instructions": [
            "Cite concrete elements of the work.",
            "Log responses with short notes."
          ],
          "observe": [
            "Upholds the work with criteria.",
            "Recognises weaker parts."
          ],
          "limits": [
            "Not scalable without planning."
          ],
          "aiAdaptation": "",
          "example": "Micro-tutorial when collecting a high-stakes work.",
          "evidenceProduced": "Notes from a short conversation guided by two or three questions about the process behind the submitted work.",
          "boundedInference": "That the person can orally reconstruct how they reached their product, with details the product does not show.",
          "cannotInfer": [
            "It does not determine authorship or tool use.",
            "Nerves can be mistaken for lack of knowledge."
          ],
          "inferenceConditions": [
            "Questions are prepared from the work itself, not from a generic template.",
            "Students are told the conversation is part of the design, not a suspicion."
          ],
          "whenNotToUse": "When there are no conditions of privacy, or when applied only to those under suspicion.",
          "copyablePrompt": "Let's talk for three minutes about your submission. Start by explaining why you chose this approach.",
          "coverageNote": "",
          "windowConditions": [
            "Only if the question refers to a specific point of the submission and the answer is noted."
          ],
          "windowRationale": "The short interview asks directly about the process followed."
        }
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "ai-critique",
      "slug": "critica-de-una-salida-de-ia",
      "url": "https://evidencias-ia-evaluacion.com/evidencia/critica-de-una-salida-de-ia",
      "name_es": "Crítica de una salida de IA",
      "name_en": "Critique of an AI output",
      "short_description_es": "El estudiante señala errores, sesgos y decisiones cuestionables de una respuesta generada por IA.",
      "short_description_en": "The student flags errors, biases and questionable decisions in an AI-generated response.",
      "family": "escrita-grafica",
      "family_secondary": "metacognitiva",
      "primary_claim": "usa-ia-critica",
      "secondary_claims": "comprende|decide-criterio",
      "evidence_kind": "producto",
      "evidence_modes": "verificacion-ia",
      "stages": "secundaria|bachillerato|fp|universidad|adultos",
      "areas": "",
      "moments": "durante|despues",
      "purposes": "formativo|calificable",
      "modalities": "escrita",
      "seia_levels": "1|2|3",
      "time_min": 5,
      "time_max": 15,
      "teacher_load": "baja",
      "participation": "individual",
      "scalability": "cualquiera",
      "collections": "ia-critica|baja-revision|grupos-numerosos",
      "ai_relation": "con-ia",
      "review_status": "borrador-editorial",
      "version": "v0.13",
      "last_reviewed": "2026-09-06",
      "time_scope": "",
      "learning_windows": "uso-ia-herramientas",
      "complementary_layers": "",
      "evidence_origins": "reflexiva|actuacion-provocada",
      "window_selection": "docente",
      "evidence_produced_es": "Un análisis escrito que señala errores, sesgos o decisiones cuestionables concretas de una salida generada, con la corrección propuesta.",
      "evidence_produced_en": "A written analysis pointing out specific errors, biases or questionable decisions in a generated output, with the proposed correction.",
      "bounded_inference_es": "Que la persona detecta fallos concretos en un texto generado y sabe explicar por qué lo son, en ese contenido.",
      "bounded_inference_en": "That the person spots specific faults in a generated text and can explain why they are faults, in that content.",
      "inference_conditions_es": "La salida analizada contiene errores comprobables en el contenido trabajado. | Se exige señalar el fragmento exacto y la corrección, no una valoración global.",
      "inference_conditions_en": "The analysed output contains checkable errors within the content taught. | They must point to the exact fragment and the correction, not give a global judgement.",
      "cannot_infer_es": "No evidencia que use la IA con criterio en su propio trabajo. | No informa de su dominio productivo del contenido.",
      "cannot_infer_en": "It evidences no critical AI use in their own work. | It says nothing about their productive command of the content.",
      "when_not_to_use_es": "Cuando el alumnado aún no domina el contenido suficiente para distinguir un error de una variante.",
      "when_not_to_use_en": "When students do not yet know the content well enough to tell an error from a variant.",
      "content": {
        "es": {
          "name": "Crítica de una salida de IA",
          "shortDescription": "El estudiante señala errores, sesgos y decisiones cuestionables de una respuesta generada por IA.",
          "whenToUse": "Cuando la tarea admite IA y quieres ver criterio para juzgar su salida.",
          "minimalVersion": "Señala 3 problemas concretos en una salida de IA dada.",
          "instructions": [
            "Da tú la salida de IA para partir de una misma base.",
            "Exige señalar la línea o el fragmento problemático."
          ],
          "observe": [
            "Los problemas señalados son reales y localizados.",
            "La corrección se apoya en criterios o fuentes."
          ],
          "limits": [
            "Sensible al nivel de dominio del contenido."
          ],
          "aiAdaptation": "",
          "example": "Se entrega una respuesta plausible pero con dos errores factuales y se pide localizarlos.",
          "evidenceProduced": "Un análisis escrito que señala errores, sesgos o decisiones cuestionables concretas de una salida generada, con la corrección propuesta.",
          "boundedInference": "Que la persona detecta fallos concretos en un texto generado y sabe explicar por qué lo son, en ese contenido.",
          "cannotInfer": [
            "No evidencia que use la IA con criterio en su propio trabajo.",
            "No informa de su dominio productivo del contenido."
          ],
          "inferenceConditions": [
            "La salida analizada contiene errores comprobables en el contenido trabajado.",
            "Se exige señalar el fragmento exacto y la corrección, no una valoración global."
          ],
          "whenNotToUse": "Cuando el alumnado aún no domina el contenido suficiente para distinguir un error de una variante.",
          "copyablePrompt": "Marca 3 problemas concretos en esta respuesta de IA. Para cada uno, explica qué falla y qué evidencia lo demuestra.",
          "coverageNote": "",
          "windowConditions": [
            "Solo si queda registrada la salida original de la IA junto a la crítica, para poder contrastarlas."
          ],
          "windowRationale": "La crítica documenta qué aportó la herramienta y qué se consideró insuficiente."
        },
        "en": {
          "name": "Critique of an AI output",
          "shortDescription": "The student flags errors, biases and questionable decisions in an AI-generated response.",
          "whenToUse": "When the task allows AI and you want to see criteria for judging its output.",
          "minimalVersion": "Flag 3 concrete problems in a given AI output.",
          "instructions": [
            "Provide the AI output so everyone starts from the same base.",
            "Require pointing to the exact line or fragment."
          ],
          "observe": [
            "Flagged problems are real and localised.",
            "The correction rests on criteria or sources."
          ],
          "limits": [
            "Sensitive to content mastery level."
          ],
          "aiAdaptation": "",
          "example": "A plausible but flawed AI answer is provided with two factual errors to locate.",
          "evidenceProduced": "A written analysis pointing out specific errors, biases or questionable decisions in a generated output, with the proposed correction.",
          "boundedInference": "That the person spots specific faults in a generated text and can explain why they are faults, in that content.",
          "cannotInfer": [
            "It evidences no critical AI use in their own work.",
            "It says nothing about their productive command of the content."
          ],
          "inferenceConditions": [
            "The analysed output contains checkable errors within the content taught.",
            "They must point to the exact fragment and the correction, not give a global judgement."
          ],
          "whenNotToUse": "When students do not yet know the content well enough to tell an error from a variant.",
          "copyablePrompt": "Mark 3 concrete problems in this AI response. For each, explain what fails and what evidence proves it.",
          "coverageNote": "",
          "windowConditions": [
            "Only if the original AI output is recorded alongside the critique, so both can be contrasted."
          ],
          "windowRationale": "The critique documents what the tool contributed and what was judged insufficient."
        }
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "ai-fact-check",
      "slug": "verificacion-de-hechos-ia",
      "url": "https://evidencias-ia-evaluacion.com/evidencia/verificacion-de-hechos-ia",
      "name_es": "Verificación de hechos generados por IA",
      "name_en": "AI fact-check",
      "short_description_es": "Comprobar afirmaciones concretas de una salida de IA contra fuentes fiables.",
      "short_description_en": "Verify specific claims in an AI output against reliable sources.",
      "family": "escrita-grafica",
      "family_secondary": "proceso-evolucion",
      "primary_claim": "usa-ia-critica",
      "secondary_claims": "comprende",
      "evidence_kind": "producto",
      "evidence_modes": "verificacion-ia",
      "stages": "secundaria|bachillerato|fp|universidad|adultos",
      "areas": "",
      "moments": "durante|despues",
      "purposes": "formativo|calificable",
      "modalities": "digital|escrita",
      "seia_levels": "1|2|3",
      "time_min": 10,
      "time_max": 20,
      "teacher_load": "media",
      "participation": "individual",
      "scalability": "cualquiera",
      "collections": "ia-critica|grupos-numerosos",
      "ai_relation": "",
      "review_status": "borrador-editorial",
      "version": "v0.13",
      "last_reviewed": "2026-09-06",
      "time_scope": "",
      "learning_windows": "uso-ia-herramientas|investigacion-decisiones",
      "complementary_layers": "",
      "evidence_origins": "actuacion-provocada",
      "window_selection": "docente",
      "evidence_produced_es": "Una tabla o listado de afirmaciones concretas extraídas de una salida de IA, cada una con la fuente consultada y el veredicto.",
      "evidence_produced_en": "A table or list of specific claims taken from an AI output, each with the source consulted and the verdict.",
      "bounded_inference_es": "Que la persona localiza fuentes pertinentes y las contrasta con afirmaciones concretas, no con el texto en bloque.",
      "bounded_inference_en": "That the person finds relevant sources and checks them against specific claims, not against the text as a whole.",
      "inference_conditions_es": "Las fuentes deben ser accesibles y citarse de forma verificable. | Se distingue entre afirmación falsa, imprecisa y no verificable.",
      "inference_conditions_en": "Sources must be accessible and cited verifiably. | A distinction is made between false, imprecise and unverifiable claims.",
      "cannot_infer_es": "No evidencia comprensión del contenido más allá de la comprobación. | No garantiza que aplique esa comprobación cuando nadie lo pide.",
      "cannot_infer_en": "It evidences no understanding of the content beyond the check. | It does not guarantee they run that check when nobody asks.",
      "when_not_to_use_es": "Cuando no hay acceso razonable a fuentes fiables sobre el tema.",
      "when_not_to_use_en": "When there is no reasonable access to reliable sources on the topic.",
      "content": {
        "es": {
          "name": "Verificación de hechos generados por IA",
          "shortDescription": "Comprobar afirmaciones concretas de una salida de IA contra fuentes fiables.",
          "whenToUse": "Cuando el contenido generado incluye datos comprobables.",
          "minimalVersion": "Verifica 3 afirmaciones con fuente y veredicto.",
          "instructions": [
            "Define qué fuentes son admisibles.",
            "Pide veredicto: sostenida, matizada, refutada."
          ],
          "observe": [
            "Las fuentes son citables.",
            "El veredicto se sostiene con lo verificado."
          ],
          "limits": [
            "Puede colapsar si el acceso a fuentes es desigual."
          ],
          "aiAdaptation": "",
          "example": "Verificar tres afirmaciones históricas de un texto generado por IA.",
          "evidenceProduced": "Una tabla o listado de afirmaciones concretas extraídas de una salida de IA, cada una con la fuente consultada y el veredicto.",
          "boundedInference": "Que la persona localiza fuentes pertinentes y las contrasta con afirmaciones concretas, no con el texto en bloque.",
          "cannotInfer": [
            "No evidencia comprensión del contenido más allá de la comprobación.",
            "No garantiza que aplique esa comprobación cuando nadie lo pide."
          ],
          "inferenceConditions": [
            "Las fuentes deben ser accesibles y citarse de forma verificable.",
            "Se distingue entre afirmación falsa, imprecisa y no verificable."
          ],
          "whenNotToUse": "Cuando no hay acceso razonable a fuentes fiables sobre el tema.",
          "copyablePrompt": "Elige 3 afirmaciones concretas de este texto de IA. Verifícalas con fuente y da un veredicto en una línea.",
          "coverageNote": "",
          "windowConditions": [
            "Solo si se identifican las afirmaciones concretas comprobadas y la fuente usada para comprobarlas."
          ],
          "windowRationale": "Comprobar afirmaciones deja rastro de fuentes consultadas y de qué se descartó."
        },
        "en": {
          "name": "AI fact-check",
          "shortDescription": "Verify specific claims in an AI output against reliable sources.",
          "whenToUse": "When the generated content includes checkable facts.",
          "minimalVersion": "Verify 3 claims with source and verdict.",
          "instructions": [
            "Define acceptable sources.",
            "Ask for a verdict: supported, qualified, refuted."
          ],
          "observe": [
            "Sources are citable.",
            "The verdict follows from what was verified."
          ],
          "limits": [
            "Can collapse if source access is unequal."
          ],
          "aiAdaptation": "",
          "example": "Verify three historical claims in an AI-generated text.",
          "evidenceProduced": "A table or list of specific claims taken from an AI output, each with the source consulted and the verdict.",
          "boundedInference": "That the person finds relevant sources and checks them against specific claims, not against the text as a whole.",
          "cannotInfer": [
            "It evidences no understanding of the content beyond the check.",
            "It does not guarantee they run that check when nobody asks."
          ],
          "inferenceConditions": [
            "Sources must be accessible and cited verifiably.",
            "A distinction is made between false, imprecise and unverifiable claims."
          ],
          "whenNotToUse": "When there is no reasonable access to reliable sources on the topic.",
          "copyablePrompt": "Pick 3 concrete claims from this AI text. Verify each with a source and give a one-line verdict.",
          "coverageNote": "",
          "windowConditions": [
            "Only if the specific claims checked and the source used to check them are identified."
          ],
          "windowRationale": "Checking claims leaves a trace of sources consulted and of what was discarded."
        }
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "ai-audit",
      "slug": "auditoria-de-uso-de-ia",
      "url": "https://evidencias-ia-evaluacion.com/evidencia/auditoria-de-uso-de-ia",
      "name_es": "Auditoría del uso de IA",
      "name_en": "AI use audit",
      "short_description_es": "Documentar de forma proporcional qué se ha usado de IA, cómo se ha verificado y qué se ha decidido.",
      "short_description_en": "Document proportionally what was used from AI, how it was verified and what was decided.",
      "family": "proceso-evolucion",
      "family_secondary": "metacognitiva",
      "primary_claim": "usa-ia-critica",
      "secondary_claims": "decide-criterio",
      "evidence_kind": "proceso",
      "evidence_modes": "verificacion-ia|proceso",
      "stages": "secundaria|bachillerato|fp|universidad|adultos",
      "areas": "",
      "moments": "despues",
      "purposes": "calificable|certificacion",
      "modalities": "escrita",
      "seia_levels": "2|3",
      "time_min": 5,
      "time_max": 10,
      "teacher_load": "baja",
      "participation": "individual",
      "scalability": "cualquiera",
      "collections": "ia-critica|rapidas|baja-revision|grupos-numerosos",
      "ai_relation": "",
      "review_status": "borrador-editorial",
      "version": "v0.13",
      "last_reviewed": "2026-09-06",
      "time_scope": "",
      "learning_windows": "uso-ia-herramientas|investigacion-decisiones",
      "complementary_layers": "",
      "evidence_origins": "reflexiva",
      "window_selection": "estudiante|cocreada",
      "evidence_produced_es": "Una declaración breve y proporcionada de qué se usó, para qué, qué se comprobó y qué se decidió a partir de ahí.",
      "evidence_produced_en": "A short, proportionate declaration of what was used, for what, what was checked and what was decided from it.",
      "bounded_inference_es": "Que la persona sabe describir su propio uso de la herramienta y las comprobaciones que hizo sobre él.",
      "bounded_inference_en": "That the person can describe their own use of the tool and the checks they ran on it.",
      "inference_conditions_es": "El nivel SEIA de la tarea está declarado antes de pedir la auditoría. | Basta con lo relevante: no se exigen historiales completos ni capturas por defecto.",
      "inference_conditions_en": "The task's SEIA level is declared before asking for the audit. | Only what is relevant is required: no full histories or screenshots by default.",
      "cannot_infer_es": "No es un registro veraz garantizado: es una declaración. | No mide la calidad del trabajo resultante.",
      "cannot_infer_en": "It is not a guaranteed truthful record: it is a declaration. | It does not measure the quality of the resulting work.",
      "when_not_to_use_es": "Cuando se convierte en vigilancia del proceso o en recogida de datos personales innecesarios.",
      "when_not_to_use_en": "When it becomes process surveillance or the collection of unnecessary personal data.",
      "content": {
        "es": {
          "name": "Auditoría del uso de IA",
          "shortDescription": "Documentar de forma proporcional qué se ha usado de IA, cómo se ha verificado y qué se ha decidido.",
          "whenToUse": "Cuando conviene documentar de forma proporcionada cómo se ha usado la IA.",
          "minimalVersion": "Formulario breve: qué usé, qué verifiqué, qué rechacé.",
          "instructions": [
            "Evita pedir historiales completos por defecto.",
            "Foco en decisiones, no en volumen."
          ],
          "observe": [
            "Coherencia entre lo declarado y el producto final.",
            "Verificación con fuentes o criterios."
          ],
          "limits": [
            "Puede volverse burocrático si se sobredimensiona."
          ],
          "aiAdaptation": "",
          "example": "Ficha adjunta a un informe universitario con SEIA 2.",
          "evidenceProduced": "Una declaración breve y proporcionada de qué se usó, para qué, qué se comprobó y qué se decidió a partir de ahí.",
          "boundedInference": "Que la persona sabe describir su propio uso de la herramienta y las comprobaciones que hizo sobre él.",
          "cannotInfer": [
            "No es un registro veraz garantizado: es una declaración.",
            "No mide la calidad del trabajo resultante."
          ],
          "inferenceConditions": [
            "El nivel SEIA de la tarea está declarado antes de pedir la auditoría.",
            "Basta con lo relevante: no se exigen historiales completos ni capturas por defecto."
          ],
          "whenNotToUse": "Cuando se convierte en vigilancia del proceso o en recogida de datos personales innecesarios.",
          "copyablePrompt": "Rellena esta ficha: (1) qué usaste de IA, (2) cómo lo verificaste, (3) qué modificaste o rechazaste.",
          "coverageNote": "",
          "windowConditions": [
            "Proporcional: basta con declarar usos y comprobaciones relevantes; no exige historiales completos ni capturas por defecto."
          ],
          "windowRationale": "Es la técnica pensada explícitamente para esta ventana."
        },
        "en": {
          "name": "AI use audit",
          "shortDescription": "Document proportionally what was used from AI, how it was verified and what was decided.",
          "whenToUse": "When it is worth documenting, proportionately, how AI was used.",
          "minimalVersion": "Brief form: what I used, what I verified, what I rejected.",
          "instructions": [
            "Do not request full histories by default.",
            "Focus on decisions, not volume."
          ],
          "observe": [
            "Coherence between the declaration and the final product.",
            "Verification via sources or criteria."
          ],
          "limits": [
            "Can become bureaucratic if overdone."
          ],
          "aiAdaptation": "",
          "example": "Form attached to a SEIA-2 university report.",
          "evidenceProduced": "A short, proportionate declaration of what was used, for what, what was checked and what was decided from it.",
          "boundedInference": "That the person can describe their own use of the tool and the checks they ran on it.",
          "cannotInfer": [
            "It is not a guaranteed truthful record: it is a declaration.",
            "It does not measure the quality of the resulting work."
          ],
          "inferenceConditions": [
            "The task's SEIA level is declared before asking for the audit.",
            "Only what is relevant is required: no full histories or screenshots by default."
          ],
          "whenNotToUse": "When it becomes process surveillance or the collection of unnecessary personal data.",
          "copyablePrompt": "Fill this form: (1) what you used from AI, (2) how you verified it, (3) what you modified or rejected.",
          "coverageNote": "",
          "windowConditions": [
            "Proportionate: declaring relevant uses and checks is enough; it does not require full histories or screenshots by default."
          ],
          "windowRationale": "It is the technique explicitly designed for this window."
        }
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "reject-and-improve",
      "slug": "rechaza-y-mejora",
      "url": "https://evidencias-ia-evaluacion.com/evidencia/rechaza-y-mejora",
      "name_es": "Rechaza y mejora",
      "name_en": "Reject and improve",
      "short_description_es": "El estudiante debe rechazar total o parcialmente una salida de IA y ofrecer una mejora sostenida.",
      "short_description_en": "The student must reject in whole or in part an AI output and provide a sustained improvement.",
      "family": "escrita-grafica",
      "family_secondary": "proceso-evolucion",
      "primary_claim": "usa-ia-critica",
      "secondary_claims": "decide-criterio|comprende",
      "evidence_kind": "producto",
      "evidence_modes": "verificacion-ia",
      "stages": "secundaria|bachillerato|fp|universidad|adultos",
      "areas": "",
      "moments": "durante|despues",
      "purposes": "formativo|calificable",
      "modalities": "escrita",
      "seia_levels": "1|2|3",
      "time_min": 10,
      "time_max": 20,
      "teacher_load": "media",
      "participation": "individual",
      "scalability": "cualquiera",
      "collections": "ia-critica|grupos-numerosos",
      "ai_relation": "",
      "review_status": "borrador-editorial",
      "version": "v0.13",
      "last_reviewed": "2026-09-06",
      "time_scope": "",
      "learning_windows": "uso-ia-herramientas",
      "complementary_layers": "",
      "evidence_origins": "reflexiva",
      "window_selection": "docente|estudiante",
      "evidence_produced_es": "La salida original, la parte rechazada con su motivo y una versión mejorada sostenida por el estudiante.",
      "evidence_produced_en": "The original output, the rejected part with its reason, and an improved version defended by the student.",
      "bounded_inference_es": "Que la persona identifica una insuficiencia concreta de la salida y puede producir algo mejor en ese punto.",
      "bounded_inference_en": "That the person identifies a concrete shortcoming in the output and can produce something better at that point.",
      "inference_conditions_es": "La mejora debe ser sustantiva y afectar al contenido, no al estilo. | Se conserva la salida original para poder comparar.",
      "inference_conditions_en": "The improvement must be substantive and affect content, not style. | The original output is kept so a comparison is possible.",
      "cannot_infer_es": "No evidencia que sepa resolver la tarea completa sin la salida de partida. | No acredita criterio estable ante otras herramientas o temas.",
      "cannot_infer_en": "It evidences no ability to solve the whole task without the starting output. | It does not certify stable judgement with other tools or topics.",
      "when_not_to_use_es": "Cuando la salida de partida es tan pobre que rechazarla no requiere criterio.",
      "when_not_to_use_en": "When the starting output is so poor that rejecting it requires no judgement.",
      "content": {
        "es": {
          "name": "Rechaza y mejora",
          "shortDescription": "El estudiante debe rechazar total o parcialmente una salida de IA y ofrecer una mejora sostenida.",
          "whenToUse": "Cuando quieres comprobar que la IA no se acepta sin revisión.",
          "minimalVersion": "Rechaza una parte y sustitúyela con justificación breve.",
          "instructions": [
            "Prohíbe la mejora meramente estilística.",
            "Pide criterio explícito para rechazar."
          ],
          "observe": [
            "El rechazo se justifica con criterio.",
            "La mejora es sostenida y verificable."
          ],
          "limits": [
            "Requiere dominio previo del tema."
          ],
          "aiAdaptation": "",
          "example": "Un párrafo con dato erróneo se rechaza y se reescribe con la cifra correcta y su fuente.",
          "evidenceProduced": "La salida original, la parte rechazada con su motivo y una versión mejorada sostenida por el estudiante.",
          "boundedInference": "Que la persona identifica una insuficiencia concreta de la salida y puede producir algo mejor en ese punto.",
          "cannotInfer": [
            "No evidencia que sepa resolver la tarea completa sin la salida de partida.",
            "No acredita criterio estable ante otras herramientas o temas."
          ],
          "inferenceConditions": [
            "La mejora debe ser sustantiva y afectar al contenido, no al estilo.",
            "Se conserva la salida original para poder comparar."
          ],
          "whenNotToUse": "Cuando la salida de partida es tan pobre que rechazarla no requiere criterio.",
          "copyablePrompt": "Rechaza una parte de esta salida de IA. Explica por qué la rechazas y sustitúyela por una versión mejor.",
          "coverageNote": "",
          "windowConditions": [
            "Exige explicar qué fallaba en la salida rechazada, no solo reescribirla.",
            "Revisión v0.13: muestra diagnóstico de un fallo ajeno. Solo sería cambio cognitivo propio con respuesta inicial propia, revisión y explicación del cambio."
          ],
          "windowRationale": "El rechazo argumentado muestra criterio sobre la herramienta y sobre el contenido."
        },
        "en": {
          "name": "Reject and improve",
          "shortDescription": "The student must reject in whole or in part an AI output and provide a sustained improvement.",
          "whenToUse": "When you want to check that AI output is not accepted without review.",
          "minimalVersion": "Reject a part and replace it with a brief justification.",
          "instructions": [
            "Forbid purely stylistic improvement.",
            "Ask for an explicit criterion to reject."
          ],
          "observe": [
            "Rejection is justified by criteria.",
            "The improvement is sustained and verifiable."
          ],
          "limits": [
            "Requires prior mastery of the topic."
          ],
          "aiAdaptation": "",
          "example": "A paragraph with a wrong figure is rejected and rewritten with the correct number and source.",
          "evidenceProduced": "The original output, the rejected part with its reason, and an improved version defended by the student.",
          "boundedInference": "That the person identifies a concrete shortcoming in the output and can produce something better at that point.",
          "cannotInfer": [
            "It evidences no ability to solve the whole task without the starting output.",
            "It does not certify stable judgement with other tools or topics."
          ],
          "inferenceConditions": [
            "The improvement must be substantive and affect content, not style.",
            "The original output is kept so a comparison is possible."
          ],
          "whenNotToUse": "When the starting output is so poor that rejecting it requires no judgement.",
          "copyablePrompt": "Reject a part of this AI output. Explain why and replace it with a better version.",
          "coverageNote": "",
          "windowConditions": [
            "It requires explaining what was wrong in the rejected output, not just rewriting it.",
            "v0.13 review: it shows diagnosis of an external fault. It would only be one's own cognitive change with an initial own answer, a revision and an explanation of the change."
          ],
          "windowRationale": "A reasoned rejection shows judgement about both the tool and the content."
        }
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "sequenced-evidence",
      "slug": "secuencia-de-evidencias",
      "url": "https://evidencias-ia-evaluacion.com/evidencia/secuencia-de-evidencias",
      "name_es": "Secuencia de evidencias",
      "name_en": "Evidence sequence",
      "short_description_es": "Encadenar tres evidencias breves de naturaleza distinta para sostener una decisión más relevante.",
      "short_description_en": "Chain three brief pieces of evidence of different kinds to support a more relevant decision.",
      "family": "proceso-evolucion",
      "family_secondary": "oral-dialogica",
      "primary_claim": "puede-hacerlo",
      "secondary_claims": "comprende|decide-criterio|muestra-avance",
      "evidence_kind": "proceso",
      "evidence_modes": "proceso|desempeno-controlado|oral",
      "stages": "secundaria|bachillerato|fp|universidad|adultos",
      "areas": "",
      "moments": "antes|durante|despues",
      "purposes": "calificable|certificacion|alta-relevancia",
      "modalities": "escrita|oral",
      "seia_levels": "1|2|3",
      "time_min": 15,
      "time_max": 30,
      "teacher_load": "media",
      "participation": "individual",
      "scalability": "hasta-30",
      "collections": "",
      "ai_relation": "",
      "review_status": "borrador-editorial",
      "version": "v0.13",
      "last_reviewed": "2026-09-06",
      "time_scope": "",
      "learning_windows": "evolucion-borradores",
      "complementary_layers": "desempeno-observado",
      "evidence_origins": "natural|actuacion-provocada",
      "window_selection": "docente",
      "evidence_produced_es": "Tres piezas breves de naturaleza distinta sobre el mismo aprendizaje, recogidas en momentos separados.",
      "evidence_produced_en": "Three short pieces of different kinds about the same learning, collected at separate moments.",
      "bounded_inference_es": "Que lo observado se sostiene en más de un formato y momento, lo que reduce la incertidumbre de una sola prueba.",
      "bounded_inference_en": "That what is observed holds across more than one format and moment, reducing the uncertainty of a single test.",
      "inference_conditions_es": "Las tres piezas deben referirse a la misma afirmación de aprendizaje. | Deben ser de naturaleza distinta; repetir el mismo formato no triangula.",
      "inference_conditions_en": "The three pieces must refer to the same learning claim. | They must be of different kinds; repeating one format does not triangulate.",
      "cannot_infer_es": "Acumular evidencias no convierte la inferencia en certeza. | Tres piezas no son un número obligatorio ni validado.",
      "cannot_infer_en": "Accumulating evidence does not turn the inference into certainty. | Three pieces is not a mandatory or validated number.",
      "when_not_to_use_es": "Cuando la decisión es de baja relevancia y no justifica la carga añadida.",
      "when_not_to_use_en": "When the decision is low-stakes and does not justify the extra load.",
      "content": {
        "es": {
          "name": "Secuencia de evidencias",
          "shortDescription": "Encadenar tres evidencias breves de naturaleza distinta para sostener una decisión más relevante.",
          "whenToUse": "Cuando una sola evidencia no basta para una decisión de peso.",
          "minimalVersion": "Producto + rastro de proceso + micro-defensa oral.",
          "instructions": [
            "Selecciona tres evidencias suficientemente independientes.",
            "Alinea todas con el mismo criterio de aprendizaje."
          ],
          "observe": [
            "Las tres evidencias apuntan a la misma afirmación.",
            "Ninguna repite el mismo tipo."
          ],
          "limits": [
            "Requiere planificación previa; no improvisable."
          ],
          "aiAdaptation": "",
          "example": "Trabajo final + bitácora + micro-defensa en FP.",
          "evidenceProduced": "Tres piezas breves de naturaleza distinta sobre el mismo aprendizaje, recogidas en momentos separados.",
          "boundedInference": "Que lo observado se sostiene en más de un formato y momento, lo que reduce la incertidumbre de una sola prueba.",
          "cannotInfer": [
            "Acumular evidencias no convierte la inferencia en certeza.",
            "Tres piezas no son un número obligatorio ni validado."
          ],
          "inferenceConditions": [
            "Las tres piezas deben referirse a la misma afirmación de aprendizaje.",
            "Deben ser de naturaleza distinta; repetir el mismo formato no triangula."
          ],
          "whenNotToUse": "Cuando la decisión es de baja relevancia y no justifica la carga añadida.",
          "copyablePrompt": "Entrega tu producto, adjunta el proceso y prepárate para una defensa oral de 2 minutos.",
          "coverageNote": "",
          "windowConditions": [
            "Solo si las evidencias encadenadas son de naturaleza distinta y están fechadas por separado."
          ],
          "windowRationale": "Encadena evidencias de distinta naturaleza; la evolución se ve en la secuencia, no en cada pieza."
        },
        "en": {
          "name": "Evidence sequence",
          "shortDescription": "Chain three brief pieces of evidence of different kinds to support a more relevant decision.",
          "whenToUse": "When a single piece of evidence is not enough for a weighty decision.",
          "minimalVersion": "Product + process trace + brief oral defence.",
          "instructions": [
            "Pick three sufficiently independent pieces of evidence.",
            "Align them all with the same learning criterion."
          ],
          "observe": [
            "The three pieces of evidence point to the same claim.",
            "No two repeat the same type."
          ],
          "limits": [
            "Requires prior planning; not improvised."
          ],
          "aiAdaptation": "",
          "example": "Final work + logbook + micro-defence in vocational education.",
          "evidenceProduced": "Three short pieces of different kinds about the same learning, collected at separate moments.",
          "boundedInference": "That what is observed holds across more than one format and moment, reducing the uncertainty of a single test.",
          "cannotInfer": [
            "Accumulating evidence does not turn the inference into certainty.",
            "Three pieces is not a mandatory or validated number."
          ],
          "inferenceConditions": [
            "The three pieces must refer to the same learning claim.",
            "They must be of different kinds; repeating one format does not triangulate."
          ],
          "whenNotToUse": "When the decision is low-stakes and does not justify the extra load.",
          "copyablePrompt": "Submit your product, attach the process and prepare for a 2-minute oral defence.",
          "coverageNote": "",
          "windowConditions": [
            "Only if the chained pieces of evidence are of different kinds and separately dated."
          ],
          "windowRationale": "It chains evidence of different kinds; evolution shows in the sequence, not in each piece."
        }
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "process-photos",
      "slug": "fotos-de-proceso",
      "url": "https://evidencias-ia-evaluacion.com/evidencia/fotos-de-proceso",
      "name_es": "Fotos de proceso",
      "name_en": "Process photos",
      "short_description_es": "Hitos fotográficos que documentan cómo se ha desarrollado un trabajo manual, plástico o técnico.",
      "short_description_en": "Photo milestones documenting how a manual, artistic or technical piece unfolded.",
      "family": "proceso-evolucion",
      "family_secondary": "",
      "primary_claim": "muestra-avance",
      "secondary_claims": "puede-hacerlo",
      "evidence_kind": "proceso",
      "evidence_modes": "proceso",
      "stages": "infantil|primaria|secundaria|fp",
      "areas": "artes|tecnologia|fp|efisica",
      "moments": "durante",
      "purposes": "formativo|calificable",
      "modalities": "visual",
      "seia_levels": "0|1|2|3",
      "time_min": 1,
      "time_max": 3,
      "teacher_load": "baja",
      "participation": "individual",
      "scalability": "cualquiera",
      "collections": "rapidas|baja-revision|grupos-numerosos",
      "ai_relation": "",
      "review_status": "borrador-editorial",
      "version": "v0.13",
      "last_reviewed": "2026-09-06",
      "time_scope": "",
      "learning_windows": "evolucion-borradores",
      "complementary_layers": "",
      "evidence_origins": "natural",
      "window_selection": "estudiante|cocreada",
      "evidence_produced_es": "Dos o tres fotografías fechadas de estados intermedios de un trabajo manual, plástico o técnico.",
      "evidence_produced_en": "Two or three dated photographs of intermediate states of a hands-on, artistic or technical piece of work.",
      "bounded_inference_es": "Que el trabajo pasó por esos estados y que el resultado final es coherente con ellos.",
      "bounded_inference_en": "That the work went through those states and that the final result is consistent with them.",
      "inference_conditions_es": "Los hitos se fijan antes y están separados en el tiempo. | No aparecen personas identificables si no es necesario.",
      "inference_conditions_en": "Milestones are set in advance and separated in time. | No identifiable people appear unless necessary.",
      "cannot_infer_es": "No documenta quién hizo cada parte en trabajos de grupo. | No informa de la comprensión de lo que se está haciendo.",
      "cannot_infer_en": "It does not document who did what in group work. | It says nothing about understanding of what is being done.",
      "when_not_to_use_es": "Cuando implica capturar imágenes del alumnado o de espacios privados sin necesidad.",
      "when_not_to_use_en": "When it involves capturing images of students or private spaces unnecessarily.",
      "content": {
        "es": {
          "name": "Fotos de proceso",
          "shortDescription": "Hitos fotográficos que documentan cómo se ha desarrollado un trabajo manual, plástico o técnico.",
          "whenToUse": "Cuando el proceso es físico o manipulativo y no deja rastro escrito.",
          "minimalVersion": "Tres fotos con leyenda breve.",
          "instructions": [
            "Define los hitos que se fotografiarán.",
            "Evita almacenar imágenes reconocibles innecesarias."
          ],
          "observe": [
            "Se aprecia progreso entre fotos.",
            "Las leyendas explican cambios reales."
          ],
          "limits": [
            "No prueba ejecución sin combinar con otro registro."
          ],
          "aiAdaptation": "",
          "example": "Un proyecto de tecnología documenta 3 hitos de montaje.",
          "evidenceProduced": "Dos o tres fotografías fechadas de estados intermedios de un trabajo manual, plástico o técnico.",
          "boundedInference": "Que el trabajo pasó por esos estados y que el resultado final es coherente con ellos.",
          "cannotInfer": [
            "No documenta quién hizo cada parte en trabajos de grupo.",
            "No informa de la comprensión de lo que se está haciendo."
          ],
          "inferenceConditions": [
            "Los hitos se fijan antes y están separados en el tiempo.",
            "No aparecen personas identificables si no es necesario."
          ],
          "whenNotToUse": "Cuando implica capturar imágenes del alumnado o de espacios privados sin necesidad.",
          "copyablePrompt": "Haz tres fotos en los momentos clave y añade una leyenda con la decisión que tomaste.",
          "coverageNote": "",
          "windowConditions": [
            "Requiere hitos separados en el tiempo; una sola foto no muestra evolución."
          ],
          "windowRationale": "En trabajo manual o plástico la fotografía es el rastro natural de estados intermedios."
        },
        "en": {
          "name": "Process photos",
          "shortDescription": "Photo milestones documenting how a manual, artistic or technical piece unfolded.",
          "whenToUse": "When the process is physical or hands-on and leaves no written trace.",
          "minimalVersion": "Three photos with brief captions.",
          "instructions": [
            "Define the milestones to be photographed.",
            "Avoid storing unnecessary identifiable images."
          ],
          "observe": [
            "Progress is visible across photos.",
            "Captions explain real changes."
          ],
          "limits": [
            "Does not prove execution without another record."
          ],
          "aiAdaptation": "",
          "example": "A technology project documents 3 assembly milestones.",
          "evidenceProduced": "Two or three dated photographs of intermediate states of a hands-on, artistic or technical piece of work.",
          "boundedInference": "That the work went through those states and that the final result is consistent with them.",
          "cannotInfer": [
            "It does not document who did what in group work.",
            "It says nothing about understanding of what is being done."
          ],
          "inferenceConditions": [
            "Milestones are set in advance and separated in time.",
            "No identifiable people appear unless necessary."
          ],
          "whenNotToUse": "When it involves capturing images of students or private spaces unnecessarily.",
          "copyablePrompt": "Take three photos at key moments and add a caption with the decision you made.",
          "coverageNote": "",
          "windowConditions": [
            "Requires milestones separated in time; a single photo shows no evolution."
          ],
          "windowRationale": "In hands-on or art work, photographs are the natural trace of intermediate states."
        }
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "decision-trace",
      "slug": "rastro-de-decisiones",
      "url": "https://evidencias-ia-evaluacion.com/evidencia/rastro-de-decisiones",
      "name_es": "Rastro de decisiones",
      "name_en": "Decision trace",
      "short_description_es": "Registro puntual de los momentos en los que el estudiante ha tomado decisiones clave.",
      "short_description_en": "A punctual record of the moments when the student took key decisions.",
      "family": "proceso-evolucion",
      "family_secondary": "escrita-grafica",
      "primary_claim": "decide-criterio",
      "secondary_claims": "muestra-avance",
      "evidence_kind": "proceso",
      "evidence_modes": "proceso",
      "stages": "secundaria|bachillerato|fp|universidad|adultos",
      "areas": "",
      "moments": "durante",
      "purposes": "formativo|calificable",
      "modalities": "escrita",
      "seia_levels": "1|2|3",
      "time_min": 3,
      "time_max": 8,
      "teacher_load": "baja",
      "participation": "individual",
      "scalability": "cualquiera",
      "collections": "rapidas|baja-revision|grupos-numerosos",
      "ai_relation": "",
      "review_status": "borrador-editorial",
      "version": "v0.13",
      "last_reviewed": "2026-09-06",
      "time_scope": "",
      "learning_windows": "investigacion-decisiones",
      "complementary_layers": "",
      "evidence_origins": "natural|reflexiva",
      "window_selection": "docente|cocreada",
      "evidence_produced_es": "Anotaciones puntuales en los momentos en que se tomó una decisión clave, con la alternativa descartada.",
      "evidence_produced_en": "Spot annotations at the moments a key decision was taken, with the discarded alternative.",
      "bounded_inference_es": "Que existieron puntos de decisión reales y que la persona sabe situarlos en su propio trabajo.",
      "bounded_inference_en": "That real decision points existed and the person can place them in their own work.",
      "inference_conditions_es": "Se anota en el momento, no al final de la tarea. | Se limita a dos o tres decisiones para no convertirlo en burocracia.",
      "inference_conditions_en": "Annotation happens in the moment, not at the end of the task. | It is limited to two or three decisions so it does not become paperwork.",
      "cannot_infer_es": "No evidencia que la decisión fuera acertada. | No sustituye la valoración del producto final.",
      "cannot_infer_en": "It does not evidence that the decision was sound. | It does not replace the assessment of the final product.",
      "when_not_to_use_es": "En tareas guiadas paso a paso, donde no hay decisiones que rastrear.",
      "when_not_to_use_en": "In step-by-step guided tasks, where there are no decisions to trace.",
      "content": {
        "es": {
          "name": "Rastro de decisiones",
          "shortDescription": "Registro puntual de los momentos en los que el estudiante ha tomado decisiones clave.",
          "whenToUse": "Cuando quieres reconstruir el itinerario de decisiones de un trabajo largo.",
          "minimalVersion": "Tres marcas de decisión con hora y razón.",
          "instructions": [
            "Define qué cuenta como decisión.",
            "Limita a 3-5 marcas para evitar burocracia."
          ],
          "observe": [
            "Las decisiones coinciden con cambios visibles."
          ],
          "limits": [
            "Puede volverse formal si no se contrasta."
          ],
          "aiAdaptation": "",
          "example": "En un ensayo, marcar tres puntos donde se decidió reorganizar el argumento.",
          "evidenceProduced": "Anotaciones puntuales en los momentos en que se tomó una decisión clave, con la alternativa descartada.",
          "boundedInference": "Que existieron puntos de decisión reales y que la persona sabe situarlos en su propio trabajo.",
          "cannotInfer": [
            "No evidencia que la decisión fuera acertada.",
            "No sustituye la valoración del producto final."
          ],
          "inferenceConditions": [
            "Se anota en el momento, no al final de la tarea.",
            "Se limita a dos o tres decisiones para no convertirlo en burocracia."
          ],
          "whenNotToUse": "En tareas guiadas paso a paso, donde no hay decisiones que rastrear.",
          "copyablePrompt": "Marca en tu documento los tres momentos en los que tomaste una decisión clave y añade una línea.",
          "coverageNote": "",
          "windowConditions": [
            "Solo si cada decisión registrada se puede vincular a un punto concreto del trabajo."
          ],
          "windowRationale": "Registra los momentos de decisión mientras ocurren, no reconstruidos al final."
        },
        "en": {
          "name": "Decision trace",
          "shortDescription": "A punctual record of the moments when the student took key decisions.",
          "whenToUse": "When you want to reconstruct the decision path of a long piece of work.",
          "minimalVersion": "Three decision marks with time and reason.",
          "instructions": [
            "Define what counts as a decision.",
            "Cap at 3-5 marks to avoid bureaucracy."
          ],
          "observe": [
            "Decisions match visible changes."
          ],
          "limits": [
            "Can become formal if not contrasted."
          ],
          "aiAdaptation": "",
          "example": "In an essay, mark three points where the argument was reorganised.",
          "evidenceProduced": "Spot annotations at the moments a key decision was taken, with the discarded alternative.",
          "boundedInference": "That real decision points existed and the person can place them in their own work.",
          "cannotInfer": [
            "It does not evidence that the decision was sound.",
            "It does not replace the assessment of the final product."
          ],
          "inferenceConditions": [
            "Annotation happens in the moment, not at the end of the task.",
            "It is limited to two or three decisions so it does not become paperwork."
          ],
          "whenNotToUse": "In step-by-step guided tasks, where there are no decisions to trace.",
          "copyablePrompt": "Mark in your document the three moments when you took a key decision and add one line.",
          "coverageNote": "",
          "windowConditions": [
            "Only if each recorded decision can be linked to a specific point in the work."
          ],
          "windowRationale": "It records decision moments as they happen, not reconstructed at the end."
        }
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "role-play-check",
      "slug": "simulacion-de-rol",
      "url": "https://evidencias-ia-evaluacion.com/evidencia/simulacion-de-rol",
      "name_es": "Simulación de rol",
      "name_en": "Role simulation",
      "short_description_es": "Ejecutar un rol profesional o comunicativo específico ante un caso realista.",
      "short_description_en": "Perform a specific professional or communicative role in a realistic case.",
      "family": "practica-desempeno",
      "family_secondary": "oral-dialogica",
      "primary_claim": "puede-hacerlo",
      "secondary_claims": "transfiere|decide-criterio",
      "evidence_kind": "desempeno",
      "evidence_modes": "desempeno-controlado|oral",
      "stages": "secundaria|bachillerato|fp|universidad|adultos",
      "areas": "",
      "moments": "durante",
      "purposes": "formativo|calificable|certificacion",
      "modalities": "oral|practica",
      "seia_levels": "0|1|2|3",
      "time_min": 10,
      "time_max": 20,
      "teacher_load": "alta",
      "participation": "equipo",
      "scalability": "grupo-reducido",
      "collections": "",
      "ai_relation": "",
      "review_status": "borrador-editorial",
      "version": "v0.13",
      "last_reviewed": "2026-09-06",
      "time_scope": "",
      "learning_windows": "",
      "complementary_layers": "desempeno-observado",
      "evidence_origins": "actuacion-provocada",
      "window_selection": "docente",
      "evidence_produced_es": "La actuación observada en un rol definido ante un caso, con las respuestas dadas dentro de la situación.",
      "evidence_produced_en": "The observed performance in a defined role facing a case, with the responses given inside the situation.",
      "bounded_inference_es": "Que la persona sostiene el rol y responde con criterios propios de ese contexto durante la simulación.",
      "bounded_inference_en": "That the person sustains the role and responds with criteria proper to that context during the simulation.",
      "inference_conditions_es": "El caso y los criterios del rol se conocen de antemano. | La simulación es lo bastante realista para exigir decisiones, no solo guion.",
      "inference_conditions_en": "The case and the role's criteria are known in advance. | The simulation is realistic enough to demand decisions, not just a script.",
      "cannot_infer_es": "Actuar bien un rol no equivale a desempeñarlo en la práctica real. | No informa del proceso de preparación previo.",
      "cannot_infer_en": "Playing a role well is not the same as performing it in real practice. | It says nothing about the preparation process beforehand.",
      "when_not_to_use_es": "Cuando la exposición ante el grupo genera un coste emocional desproporcionado.",
      "when_not_to_use_en": "When performing in front of the group carries a disproportionate emotional cost.",
      "content": {
        "es": {
          "name": "Simulación de rol",
          "shortDescription": "Ejecutar un rol profesional o comunicativo específico ante un caso realista.",
          "whenToUse": "Cuando el objetivo es actuar con criterio en una situación simulada.",
          "minimalVersion": "Un caso, un rol, una interacción con criterios.",
          "instructions": [
            "Describe el escenario con precisión.",
            "Prepara indicadores conductuales."
          ],
          "observe": [
            "Mantiene el rol.",
            "Toma decisiones coherentes con el rol."
          ],
          "limits": [
            "Alta demanda docente."
          ],
          "aiAdaptation": "",
          "example": "En FP sanitaria, un rol de atención a un paciente simulado.",
          "evidenceProduced": "La actuación observada en un rol definido ante un caso, con las respuestas dadas dentro de la situación.",
          "boundedInference": "Que la persona sostiene el rol y responde con criterios propios de ese contexto durante la simulación.",
          "cannotInfer": [
            "Actuar bien un rol no equivale a desempeñarlo en la práctica real.",
            "No informa del proceso de preparación previo."
          ],
          "inferenceConditions": [
            "El caso y los criterios del rol se conocen de antemano.",
            "La simulación es lo bastante realista para exigir decisiones, no solo guion."
          ],
          "whenNotToUse": "Cuando la exposición ante el grupo genera un coste emocional desproporcionado.",
          "copyablePrompt": "Asume este rol y responde a esta situación como si fuera real. Observaré los indicadores acordados.",
          "coverageNote": "",
          "windowConditions": [],
          "windowRationale": "Actuación en un rol ante un caso: desempeño observado; será transferencia solo si el caso es nuevo y pertinente."
        },
        "en": {
          "name": "Role simulation",
          "shortDescription": "Perform a specific professional or communicative role in a realistic case.",
          "whenToUse": "When the aim is to act with judgement in a simulated situation.",
          "minimalVersion": "One case, one role, one interaction against criteria.",
          "instructions": [
            "Describe the scenario precisely.",
            "Prepare behavioural indicators."
          ],
          "observe": [
            "Stays in role.",
            "Makes decisions consistent with the role."
          ],
          "limits": [
            "High teacher demand."
          ],
          "aiAdaptation": "",
          "example": "In healthcare vocational training, a simulated patient care role.",
          "evidenceProduced": "The observed performance in a defined role facing a case, with the responses given inside the situation.",
          "boundedInference": "That the person sustains the role and responds with criteria proper to that context during the simulation.",
          "cannotInfer": [
            "Playing a role well is not the same as performing it in real practice.",
            "It says nothing about the preparation process beforehand."
          ],
          "inferenceConditions": [
            "The case and the role's criteria are known in advance.",
            "The simulation is realistic enough to demand decisions, not just a script."
          ],
          "whenNotToUse": "When performing in front of the group carries a disproportionate emotional cost.",
          "copyablePrompt": "Take this role and respond as if the situation were real. I'll observe the agreed indicators.",
          "coverageNote": "",
          "windowConditions": [],
          "windowRationale": "Performing a role in a case: observed performance; it is transfer only if the case is new and relevant."
        }
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "concept-map",
      "slug": "mapa-conceptual",
      "url": "https://evidencias-ia-evaluacion.com/evidencia/mapa-conceptual",
      "name_es": "Mapa conceptual anotado",
      "name_en": "Annotated concept map",
      "short_description_es": "Representación visual con relaciones etiquetadas entre conceptos, acompañada de una explicación.",
      "short_description_en": "Visual representation with labelled relations between concepts, plus a written explanation.",
      "family": "escrita-grafica",
      "family_secondary": "",
      "primary_claim": "comprende",
      "secondary_claims": "decide-criterio",
      "evidence_kind": "producto",
      "evidence_modes": "producto|metacognicion",
      "stages": "primaria|secundaria|bachillerato|universidad|adultos",
      "areas": "",
      "moments": "durante|despues",
      "purposes": "formativo|calificable",
      "modalities": "visual|escrita",
      "seia_levels": "0|1|2|3",
      "time_min": 10,
      "time_max": 20,
      "teacher_load": "media",
      "participation": "individual",
      "scalability": "cualquiera",
      "collections": "grupos-numerosos",
      "ai_relation": "",
      "review_status": "borrador-editorial",
      "version": "v0.13",
      "last_reviewed": "2026-09-06",
      "time_scope": "",
      "learning_windows": "",
      "complementary_layers": "",
      "evidence_origins": "",
      "window_selection": "",
      "evidence_produced_es": "Un mapa con conceptos, relaciones etiquetadas entre ellos y una explicación oral o escrita de dos o tres enlaces.",
      "evidence_produced_en": "A map with concepts, labelled relations between them and an oral or written explanation of two or three links.",
      "bounded_inference_es": "Que la persona relaciona conceptos y sabe nombrar el tipo de relación, no solo enumerar términos.",
      "bounded_inference_en": "That the person relates concepts and can name the type of relation, not just list terms.",
      "inference_conditions_es": "Las flechas deben llevar etiqueta; un mapa sin etiquetas es una lista. | Se pide explicar los enlaces menos evidentes.",
      "inference_conditions_en": "Arrows must be labelled; an unlabelled map is a list. | They are asked to explain the least obvious links.",
      "cannot_infer_es": "Un mapa complejo no implica comprensión profunda. | No evidencia capacidad de aplicar los conceptos.",
      "cannot_infer_en": "A complex map does not imply deep understanding. | It evidences no ability to apply the concepts.",
      "when_not_to_use_es": "Cuando el contenido es procedimental y la representación visual no aporta información sobre la ejecución.",
      "when_not_to_use_en": "When the content is procedural and the visual representation says nothing about execution.",
      "content": {
        "es": {
          "name": "Mapa conceptual anotado",
          "shortDescription": "Representación visual con relaciones etiquetadas entre conceptos, acompañada de una explicación.",
          "whenToUse": "Cuando importa la relación entre conceptos y no su enumeración.",
          "minimalVersion": "6-10 conceptos con relaciones etiquetadas.",
          "instructions": [
            "Exige verbos en las flechas, no líneas neutras.",
            "Pide justificación breve de dos relaciones clave."
          ],
          "observe": [
            "Las relaciones son sustantivas, no ornamentales.",
            "Los conceptos principales están conectados."
          ],
          "limits": [
            "Puede parecer completo sin comprensión profunda."
          ],
          "aiAdaptation": "",
          "example": "Mapa de un tema con 3 relaciones justificadas.",
          "evidenceProduced": "Un mapa con conceptos, relaciones etiquetadas entre ellos y una explicación oral o escrita de dos o tres enlaces.",
          "boundedInference": "Que la persona relaciona conceptos y sabe nombrar el tipo de relación, no solo enumerar términos.",
          "cannotInfer": [
            "Un mapa complejo no implica comprensión profunda.",
            "No evidencia capacidad de aplicar los conceptos."
          ],
          "inferenceConditions": [
            "Las flechas deben llevar etiqueta; un mapa sin etiquetas es una lista.",
            "Se pide explicar los enlaces menos evidentes."
          ],
          "whenNotToUse": "Cuando el contenido es procedimental y la representación visual no aporta información sobre la ejecución.",
          "copyablePrompt": "Construye un mapa con 8 conceptos. Etiqueta las flechas y justifica dos relaciones en 4 líneas.",
          "coverageNote": "",
          "windowConditions": [],
          "windowRationale": ""
        },
        "en": {
          "name": "Annotated concept map",
          "shortDescription": "Visual representation with labelled relations between concepts, plus a written explanation.",
          "whenToUse": "When what matters is the relation between concepts, not listing them.",
          "minimalVersion": "6-10 concepts with labelled relations.",
          "instructions": [
            "Require verbs on arrows, not neutral lines.",
            "Ask for brief justification of two key links."
          ],
          "observe": [
            "Relations are substantive, not ornamental.",
            "Main concepts are connected."
          ],
          "limits": [
            "Can look complete without deep understanding."
          ],
          "aiAdaptation": "",
          "example": "A topic map with 3 justified relations.",
          "evidenceProduced": "A map with concepts, labelled relations between them and an oral or written explanation of two or three links.",
          "boundedInference": "That the person relates concepts and can name the type of relation, not just list terms.",
          "cannotInfer": [
            "A complex map does not imply deep understanding.",
            "It evidences no ability to apply the concepts."
          ],
          "inferenceConditions": [
            "Arrows must be labelled; an unlabelled map is a list.",
            "They are asked to explain the least obvious links."
          ],
          "whenNotToUse": "When the content is procedural and the visual representation says nothing about execution.",
          "copyablePrompt": "Build a map with 8 concepts. Label the arrows and justify two relations in 4 lines.",
          "coverageNote": "",
          "windowConditions": [],
          "windowRationale": ""
        }
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "explica-30s",
      "slug": "explica-lo-aprendido-en-30-segundos",
      "url": "https://evidencias-ia-evaluacion.com/evidencia/explica-lo-aprendido-en-30-segundos",
      "name_es": "Explica lo aprendido en 30 segundos",
      "name_en": "Explain what you've learnt in 30 seconds",
      "short_description_es": "El estudiante explica brevemente la idea central, con un ejemplo o una razón pertinente.",
      "short_description_en": "The student briefly explains the central idea, with a relevant example or reason.",
      "family": "oral-dialogica",
      "family_secondary": "metacognitiva",
      "primary_claim": "comprende",
      "secondary_claims": "decide-criterio",
      "evidence_kind": "desempeno",
      "evidence_modes": "oral|metacognicion",
      "stages": "primaria|secundaria|bachillerato|fp|universidad|adultos",
      "areas": "",
      "moments": "durante|despues",
      "purposes": "formativo|calificable",
      "modalities": "oral",
      "seia_levels": "0|1|2|3",
      "time_min": 1,
      "time_max": 3,
      "teacher_load": "baja",
      "participation": "individual",
      "scalability": "cualquiera",
      "collections": "rapidas|baja-revision|grupos-numerosos",
      "ai_relation": "compatible",
      "review_status": "borrador-editorial",
      "version": "v0.13",
      "last_reviewed": "2026-09-06",
      "time_scope": "por-participante",
      "learning_windows": "",
      "complementary_layers": "desempeno-observado",
      "evidence_origins": "actuacion-provocada",
      "window_selection": "docente|estudiante",
      "evidence_produced_es": "Una explicación oral breve, de unos 30 segundos por participante, con la idea central y un ejemplo o razón pertinente. Opcionalmente, una anotación del docente con dos o tres marcas de criterio.",
      "evidence_produced_en": "A brief oral explanation, around 30 seconds per participant, with the central idea and a relevant example or reason. Optionally, a teacher note with two or three criterion marks.",
      "bounded_inference_es": "Que, en ese momento y sobre ese contenido, quien ha hablado selecciona la idea central y la ilustra con un ejemplo pertinente de la disciplina. Si solo responde una muestra de 3 a 5 personas, la evidencia se refiere a quienes han respondido y sirve para decidir cómo seguir la clase, no para afirmar nada sobre cada estudiante del grupo.",
      "bounded_inference_en": "That, at that moment and on that content, the speaker selects the central idea and illustrates it with a relevant disciplinary example. If only a sample of 3 to 5 people answers, the evidence refers to those respondents and informs the next teaching decision, not a claim about every student in the group.",
      "inference_conditions_es": "La consigna debe exigir una razón disciplinar y un ejemplo, no un resumen memorizado. | Se admiten ajustes de tiempo, apoyo visual, escritura previa o respuesta grabada para quien lo necesite. | Declara si el alcance es muestral o de grupo completo: son cosas distintas y se estiman distinto.",
      "inference_conditions_en": "The prompt must require a disciplinary reason and an example, not a memorised summary. | Timing adjustments, visual support, prior writing or a recorded answer are allowed for those who need them. | State whether the scope is sampled or whole-group: they are different things and are estimated differently.",
      "cannot_infer_es": "La fluidez al hablar no es comprensión: alguien puede reformular con soltura una respuesta de IA sin haberla entendido. | Una explicación por sí sola no acredita transferencia: para eso haría falta una aplicación nueva y pertinente del aprendizaje. | Con muestreo, no informa del alumnado que no ha intervenido.",
      "cannot_infer_en": "Fluency is not understanding: someone can smoothly rephrase an AI answer without having understood it. | An explanation alone does not establish transfer: that would require a new, relevant application of the learning. | With sampling, it says nothing about the students who did not speak.",
      "when_not_to_use_es": "Cuando se necesita una decisión individual sobre cada estudiante y solo hay tiempo para una muestra, o cuando la respuesta oral inmediata supone una barrera no ajustada.",
      "when_not_to_use_en": "When an individual decision about every student is needed and there is only time for a sample, or when immediate oral response is an unadjusted barrier.",
      "content": {
        "es": {
          "name": "Explica lo aprendido en 30 segundos",
          "shortDescription": "El estudiante explica brevemente la idea central, con un ejemplo o una razón pertinente.",
          "whenToUse": "Al cerrar una sesión o subtema, para comprobar rápidamente qué han comprendido quienes responden; con muestra, no cubre a todo el grupo.",
          "minimalVersion": "El estudiante explica brevemente la idea central, con un ejemplo o una razón pertinente.",
          "instructions": [
            "Anuncia el formato: una explicación breve, de unos 30 segundos por participante, ajustable según necesidades.",
            "Usa una consigna como: «Explica brevemente la idea principal, el concepto de la materia que la sostiene y un ejemplo tuyo, no el del libro».",
            "Decide y anuncia el alcance: todo el grupo, o una muestra de 3 a 5 personas elegidas al azar.",
            "Anota dos o tres marcas de criterio por respuesta (concepto nombrado, ejemplo propio, precisión).",
            "Permite ajustes: escribir antes, apoyo visual, más tiempo o respuesta grabada para quien lo necesite."
          ],
          "observe": [
            "Prioriza lo esencial frente a lo anecdótico.",
            "Nombra el concepto de la materia, no solo el tema.",
            "El ejemplo es propio y pertinente, no el del material.",
            "Usa lenguaje propio, no fórmulas memorizadas."
          ],
          "limits": [],
          "aiAdaptation": "Si han trabajado con IA, pide una justificación disciplinar y un ejemplo propio, y repregunta cuando haga falta: reformular con otras palabras no basta para mostrar comprensión.",
          "example": "Tras una clase sobre fotosíntesis, quienes responden explican brevemente por qué las plantas necesitan luz y ponen un ejemplo propio.",
          "evidenceProduced": "Una explicación oral breve, de unos 30 segundos por participante, con la idea central y un ejemplo o razón pertinente. Opcionalmente, una anotación del docente con dos o tres marcas de criterio.",
          "boundedInference": "Que, en ese momento y sobre ese contenido, quien ha hablado selecciona la idea central y la ilustra con un ejemplo pertinente de la disciplina. Si solo responde una muestra de 3 a 5 personas, la evidencia se refiere a quienes han respondido y sirve para decidir cómo seguir la clase, no para afirmar nada sobre cada estudiante del grupo.",
          "cannotInfer": [
            "La fluidez al hablar no es comprensión: alguien puede reformular con soltura una respuesta de IA sin haberla entendido.",
            "Una explicación por sí sola no acredita transferencia: para eso haría falta una aplicación nueva y pertinente del aprendizaje.",
            "Con muestreo, no informa del alumnado que no ha intervenido."
          ],
          "inferenceConditions": [
            "La consigna debe exigir una razón disciplinar y un ejemplo, no un resumen memorizado.",
            "Se admiten ajustes de tiempo, apoyo visual, escritura previa o respuesta grabada para quien lo necesite.",
            "Declara si el alcance es muestral o de grupo completo: son cosas distintas y se estiman distinto."
          ],
          "whenNotToUse": "Cuando se necesita una decisión individual sobre cada estudiante y solo hay tiempo para una muestra, o cuando la respuesta oral inmediata supone una barrera no ajustada.",
          "copyablePrompt": "Explica brevemente, en torno a medio minuto (ajustable si lo necesitas), la idea central de lo que hemos trabajado: nombra el concepto de la materia que la sostiene y añade un ejemplo o una razón propia, no la del material. El tiempo es orientativo: lo que valoro es la precisión del concepto y la pertinencia del ejemplo.",
          "coverageNote": "La duración orientativa es de unos 30 segundos por participante y no es en sí un criterio de calidad. Con todo el grupo de 30, calcula al menos 15 minutos más transiciones y anotación; con una muestra de 3 a 5 personas, entre 3 y 5 minutos. Son estimaciones de diseño, no tiempos medidos.",
          "windowConditions": [],
          "windowRationale": "Revisión v0.13: retirada la etiqueta de transferencia. Media explicación oral no evidencia aplicación en una situación nueva; es desempeño observado breve."
        },
        "en": {
          "name": "Explain what you've learnt in 30 seconds",
          "shortDescription": "The student briefly explains the central idea, with a relevant example or reason.",
          "whenToUse": "At the end of a session or subtopic, to quickly check what the respondents have understood; with a sample, it does not cover the whole group.",
          "minimalVersion": "The student briefly explains the central idea, with a relevant example or reason.",
          "instructions": [
            "Announce the format: a brief explanation, around 30 seconds per participant, adjustable to needs.",
            "Use a prompt such as: 'Briefly explain the main idea, the disciplinary concept behind it, and an example of your own, not the textbook's.'",
            "Decide and announce the scope: the whole group, or a random sample of 3 to 5 people.",
            "Note two or three criterion marks per answer (concept named, own example, accuracy).",
            "Allow adjustments: writing first, visual support, extra time or a recorded answer for those who need it."
          ],
          "observe": [
            "Prioritises the essential over the anecdotal.",
            "Names the disciplinary concept, not just the topic.",
            "The example is their own and relevant, not the one from the materials.",
            "Uses their own words, not memorised formulas."
          ],
          "limits": [],
          "aiAdaptation": "If they worked with AI, ask for a disciplinary justification and an example of their own, and follow up as needed: rephrasing alone is not enough to show understanding.",
          "example": "After a class on photosynthesis, the respondents briefly explain why plants need light and give an example of their own.",
          "evidenceProduced": "A brief oral explanation, around 30 seconds per participant, with the central idea and a relevant example or reason. Optionally, a teacher note with two or three criterion marks.",
          "boundedInference": "That, at that moment and on that content, the speaker selects the central idea and illustrates it with a relevant disciplinary example. If only a sample of 3 to 5 people answers, the evidence refers to those respondents and informs the next teaching decision, not a claim about every student in the group.",
          "cannotInfer": [
            "Fluency is not understanding: someone can smoothly rephrase an AI answer without having understood it.",
            "An explanation alone does not establish transfer: that would require a new, relevant application of the learning.",
            "With sampling, it says nothing about the students who did not speak."
          ],
          "inferenceConditions": [
            "The prompt must require a disciplinary reason and an example, not a memorised summary.",
            "Timing adjustments, visual support, prior writing or a recorded answer are allowed for those who need them.",
            "State whether the scope is sampled or whole-group: they are different things and are estimated differently."
          ],
          "whenNotToUse": "When an individual decision about every student is needed and there is only time for a sample, or when immediate oral response is an unadjusted barrier.",
          "copyablePrompt": "Briefly explain, in around half a minute (adjustable if you need it), the central idea of what we have worked on: name the disciplinary concept behind it and add an example or reason of your own, not the one from the materials. The timing is indicative: what I look at is the accuracy of the concept and the relevance of the example.",
          "coverageNote": "The indicative duration is around 30 seconds per participant and is not in itself a quality criterion. For a whole group of 30, allow at least 15 minutes plus transitions and note-taking; for a sample of 3 to 5 people, 3 to 5 minutes. These are design estimates, not measured times.",
          "windowConditions": [],
          "windowRationale": "v0.13 review: transfer tag removed. Half a minute of oral explanation evidences no application in a new situation; it is brief observed performance."
        }
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "debate-evidencias",
      "slug": "debate-con-evidencias",
      "url": "https://evidencias-ia-evaluacion.com/evidencia/debate-con-evidencias",
      "name_es": "Debate con evidencias",
      "name_en": "Evidence-based debate",
      "short_description_es": "Los participantes defienden una posición utilizando datos, conceptos y fuentes verificables.",
      "short_description_en": "Participants defend a position using data, concepts and verifiable sources.",
      "family": "oral-dialogica",
      "family_secondary": "cooperativa",
      "primary_claim": "decide-criterio",
      "secondary_claims": "comprende|usa-ia-critica",
      "evidence_kind": "desempeno",
      "evidence_modes": "oral|desempeno-controlado",
      "stages": "primaria|secundaria|bachillerato|fp|universidad|adultos",
      "areas": "",
      "moments": "durante|despues",
      "purposes": "formativo|calificable",
      "modalities": "oral",
      "seia_levels": "1|2|3",
      "time_min": 20,
      "time_max": 45,
      "teacher_load": "media",
      "participation": "grupo-clase",
      "scalability": "hasta-30",
      "collections": "",
      "ai_relation": "compatible",
      "review_status": "borrador-editorial",
      "version": "v0.13",
      "last_reviewed": "2026-09-06",
      "time_scope": "",
      "learning_windows": "investigacion-decisiones",
      "complementary_layers": "desempeno-observado",
      "evidence_origins": "actuacion-provocada",
      "window_selection": "docente",
      "evidence_produced_es": "Las intervenciones de cada participante con la fuente o dato invocado en cada una, y la réplica recibida.",
      "evidence_produced_en": "Each participant's contributions with the source or datum invoked in each, and the reply received.",
      "bounded_inference_es": "Que la persona apoya su posición en datos identificables y responde a una objeción concreta.",
      "bounded_inference_en": "That the person supports their position with identifiable data and answers a specific objection.",
      "inference_conditions_es": "Las fuentes deben poder comprobarse después del debate. | Se registra quién dice qué; de lo contrario la evidencia es del grupo.",
      "inference_conditions_en": "Sources must be checkable after the debate. | Who says what is recorded; otherwise the evidence is the group's.",
      "cannot_infer_es": "Ganar el debate no indica mayor comprensión, sino mejor desempeño retórico. | No informa del trabajo previo de documentación individual.",
      "cannot_infer_en": "Winning the debate indicates rhetorical performance, not greater understanding. | It says nothing about the individual research done beforehand.",
      "when_not_to_use_es": "Cuando el tema afecta personalmente a parte del alumnado y el formato competitivo puede dañar.",
      "when_not_to_use_en": "When the topic personally affects part of the class and a competitive format may harm.",
      "content": {
        "es": {
          "name": "Debate con evidencias",
          "shortDescription": "Los participantes defienden una posición utilizando datos, conceptos y fuentes verificables.",
          "whenToUse": "Cuando el tema admita más de una posición razonable y quieras evaluar criterio, no opinión.",
          "minimalVersion": "Los participantes defienden una posición utilizando datos, conceptos y fuentes verificables.",
          "instructions": [
            "Reparte posiciones no elegidas: asigna, no dejes elegir.",
            "Exige al menos dos evidencias por argumento (datos, cita, ejemplo).",
            "Deja un turno final donde cada equipo reconoce algo válido del contrario."
          ],
          "observe": [
            "Distingue evidencia de opinión.",
            "Cita fuentes reconocibles, no genéricas.",
            "Responde a la refutación sin repetirse."
          ],
          "limits": [],
          "aiAdaptation": "Permite usar IA para preparar argumentos, pero prohíbe llevar guion escrito por IA al debate. Exige citar fuentes primarias, no sólo la IA.",
          "example": "Debate sobre uso de móviles en secundaria con datos de estudios recientes asignados.",
          "evidenceProduced": "Las intervenciones de cada participante con la fuente o dato invocado en cada una, y la réplica recibida.",
          "boundedInference": "Que la persona apoya su posición en datos identificables y responde a una objeción concreta.",
          "cannotInfer": [
            "Ganar el debate no indica mayor comprensión, sino mejor desempeño retórico.",
            "No informa del trabajo previo de documentación individual."
          ],
          "inferenceConditions": [
            "Las fuentes deben poder comprobarse después del debate.",
            "Se registra quién dice qué; de lo contrario la evidencia es del grupo."
          ],
          "whenNotToUse": "Cuando el tema afecta personalmente a parte del alumnado y el formato competitivo puede dañar.",
          "copyablePrompt": "",
          "coverageNote": "",
          "windowConditions": [
            "Requiere que las fuentes utilizadas sean identificables y contrastables."
          ],
          "windowRationale": "El debate obliga a mostrar en qué se apoya cada posición."
        },
        "en": {
          "name": "Evidence-based debate",
          "shortDescription": "Participants defend a position using data, concepts and verifiable sources.",
          "whenToUse": "When the topic allows more than one reasonable position and you want to assess criteria, not opinion.",
          "minimalVersion": "Participants defend a position using data, concepts and verifiable sources.",
          "instructions": [
            "Assign positions rather than let students choose.",
            "Require at least two pieces of evidence per argument (data, citation, example).",
            "Leave a final turn where each team acknowledges something valid from the opponent."
          ],
          "observe": [
            "Distinguishes evidence from opinion.",
            "Cites recognisable, not generic, sources.",
            "Responds to rebuttal without repeating themselves."
          ],
          "limits": [],
          "aiAdaptation": "Allow AI to prepare arguments, but ban AI-written scripts during the debate. Require primary sources, not the AI itself.",
          "example": "Debate on mobile-phone use in secondary school with data from assigned recent studies.",
          "evidenceProduced": "Each participant's contributions with the source or datum invoked in each, and the reply received.",
          "boundedInference": "That the person supports their position with identifiable data and answers a specific objection.",
          "cannotInfer": [
            "Winning the debate indicates rhetorical performance, not greater understanding.",
            "It says nothing about the individual research done beforehand."
          ],
          "inferenceConditions": [
            "Sources must be checkable after the debate.",
            "Who says what is recorded; otherwise the evidence is the group's."
          ],
          "whenNotToUse": "When the topic personally affects part of the class and a competitive format may harm.",
          "copyablePrompt": "",
          "coverageNote": "",
          "windowConditions": [
            "Requires the sources used to be identifiable and checkable."
          ],
          "windowRationale": "The debate forces each position to show what it rests on."
        }
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "piensa-conversa-comparte",
      "slug": "piensa-conversa-comparte",
      "url": "https://evidencias-ia-evaluacion.com/evidencia/piensa-conversa-comparte",
      "name_es": "Piensa, conversa y comparte",
      "name_en": "Think, pair, share",
      "short_description_es": "Respuesta individual, contraste en pareja y versión revisada compartida con la clase.",
      "short_description_en": "Individual answer, pair contrast and a revised version shared with the class.",
      "family": "cooperativa",
      "family_secondary": "oral-dialogica",
      "primary_claim": "comprende",
      "secondary_claims": "decide-criterio",
      "evidence_kind": "proceso",
      "evidence_modes": "oral|proceso",
      "stages": "primaria|secundaria|bachillerato|fp|universidad|adultos",
      "areas": "",
      "moments": "durante",
      "purposes": "formativo|calificable",
      "modalities": "oral|escrita",
      "seia_levels": "0|1|2",
      "time_min": 5,
      "time_max": 12,
      "teacher_load": "baja",
      "participation": "pareja",
      "scalability": "cualquiera",
      "collections": "baja-revision|grupos-numerosos",
      "ai_relation": "compatible",
      "review_status": "borrador-editorial",
      "version": "v0.13",
      "last_reviewed": "2026-09-06",
      "time_scope": "",
      "learning_windows": "",
      "complementary_layers": "",
      "evidence_origins": "",
      "window_selection": "",
      "evidence_produced_es": "La respuesta individual inicial escrita, y la versión revisada tras hablar con la pareja, con lo que ha cambiado.",
      "evidence_produced_en": "The initial individual written answer, and the revised version after talking with a partner, with what changed.",
      "bounded_inference_es": "Que la persona tenía una posición propia y la ha ajustado, o la ha mantenido, con un motivo explicable.",
      "bounded_inference_en": "That the person had their own position and adjusted it, or kept it, with an explainable reason.",
      "inference_conditions_es": "La respuesta individual se recoge antes de la conversación.",
      "inference_conditions_en": "The individual answer is collected before the conversation.",
      "cannot_infer_es": "La versión final no distingue quién aportó cada idea de la pareja. | No acredita dominio del contenido, solo movimiento en la respuesta.",
      "cannot_infer_en": "The final version does not distinguish who contributed which idea in the pair. | It does not certify content mastery, only movement in the answer.",
      "when_not_to_use_es": "Cuando el emparejamiento reproduce dependencias ya conocidas y anula la respuesta individual.",
      "when_not_to_use_en": "When pairing reproduces known dependencies and cancels out the individual answer.",
      "content": {
        "es": {
          "name": "Piensa, conversa y comparte",
          "shortDescription": "Respuesta individual, contraste en pareja y versión revisada compartida con la clase.",
          "whenToUse": "Para desbloquear participación y comprobar comprensión rápida.",
          "minimalVersion": "Respuesta individual, contraste en pareja y versión revisada compartida con la clase.",
          "instructions": [
            "1 min individual escribiendo respuesta.",
            "3 min por parejas: contrastan y revisan.",
            "2-3 parejas comparten la versión revisada, no la inicial."
          ],
          "observe": [
            "Si la versión revisada mejora sobre la individual.",
            "Quién habla y quién no en las parejas."
          ],
          "limits": [],
          "aiAdaptation": "Puedes pedir que comparen su respuesta individual con una salida de IA antes del contraste en pareja.",
          "example": "Antes de resolver un problema, cada pareja plantea la estrategia y la comparte.",
          "evidenceProduced": "La respuesta individual inicial escrita, y la versión revisada tras hablar con la pareja, con lo que ha cambiado.",
          "boundedInference": "Que la persona tenía una posición propia y la ha ajustado, o la ha mantenido, con un motivo explicable.",
          "cannotInfer": [
            "La versión final no distingue quién aportó cada idea de la pareja.",
            "No acredita dominio del contenido, solo movimiento en la respuesta."
          ],
          "inferenceConditions": [
            "La respuesta individual se recoge antes de la conversación."
          ],
          "whenNotToUse": "Cuando el emparejamiento reproduce dependencias ya conocidas y anula la respuesta individual.",
          "copyablePrompt": "",
          "coverageNote": "",
          "windowConditions": [],
          "windowRationale": ""
        },
        "en": {
          "name": "Think, pair, share",
          "shortDescription": "Individual answer, pair contrast and a revised version shared with the class.",
          "whenToUse": "To unlock participation and quickly check understanding.",
          "minimalVersion": "Individual answer, pair contrast and a revised version shared with the class.",
          "instructions": [
            "1 min individual writing.",
            "3 min in pairs: contrast and revise.",
            "2-3 pairs share the revised, not the initial, version."
          ],
          "observe": [
            "Whether the revised version improves on the individual one.",
            "Who speaks and who doesn't in each pair."
          ],
          "limits": [],
          "aiAdaptation": "You can ask them to compare their individual answer with an AI output before pairing up.",
          "example": "Before solving a problem, each pair proposes a strategy and shares it.",
          "evidenceProduced": "The initial individual written answer, and the revised version after talking with a partner, with what changed.",
          "boundedInference": "That the person had their own position and adjusted it, or kept it, with an explainable reason.",
          "cannotInfer": [
            "The final version does not distinguish who contributed which idea in the pair.",
            "It does not certify content mastery, only movement in the answer."
          ],
          "inferenceConditions": [
            "The individual answer is collected before the conversation."
          ],
          "whenNotToUse": "When pairing reproduces known dependencies and cancels out the individual answer.",
          "copyablePrompt": "",
          "coverageNote": "",
          "windowConditions": [],
          "windowRationale": ""
        }
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "ensenanza-pares",
      "slug": "ensenanza-entre-pares",
      "url": "https://evidencias-ia-evaluacion.com/evidencia/ensenanza-entre-pares",
      "name_es": "Enseñanza entre pares",
      "name_en": "Peer teaching",
      "short_description_es": "Un estudiante explica un procedimiento o concepto a otro y responde a sus preguntas.",
      "short_description_en": "A student explains a procedure or concept to another and answers their questions.",
      "family": "cooperativa",
      "family_secondary": "oral-dialogica",
      "primary_claim": "comprende",
      "secondary_claims": "puede-hacerlo",
      "evidence_kind": "desempeno",
      "evidence_modes": "oral|desempeno-controlado",
      "stages": "primaria|secundaria|bachillerato|fp|universidad|adultos",
      "areas": "",
      "moments": "durante",
      "purposes": "formativo|calificable",
      "modalities": "oral",
      "seia_levels": "0|1|2",
      "time_min": 8,
      "time_max": 15,
      "teacher_load": "baja",
      "participation": "pareja",
      "scalability": "hasta-30",
      "collections": "baja-revision",
      "ai_relation": "compatible",
      "review_status": "borrador-editorial",
      "version": "v0.13",
      "last_reviewed": "2026-09-06",
      "time_scope": "",
      "learning_windows": "",
      "complementary_layers": "",
      "evidence_origins": "",
      "window_selection": "",
      "evidence_produced_es": "La explicación dada a otro estudiante y las respuestas a las preguntas que este formula.",
      "evidence_produced_en": "The explanation given to another student and the answers to the questions they raise.",
      "bounded_inference_es": "Que quien explica organiza el contenido para otro y resuelve dudas no anticipadas sobre él.",
      "bounded_inference_en": "That the explainer organises the content for someone else and resolves unanticipated doubts about it.",
      "inference_conditions_es": "Quien escucha debe preguntar de verdad, con dos preguntas mínimas preparadas.",
      "inference_conditions_en": "The listener must genuinely question, with at least two prepared questions.",
      "cannot_infer_es": "No evidencia el aprendizaje de quien escucha. | Explicar bien un procedimiento no acredita ejecutarlo bien.",
      "cannot_infer_en": "It evidences nothing about the listener's learning. | Explaining a procedure well does not certify performing it well.",
      "when_not_to_use_es": "Cuando la diferencia de nivel convierte la explicación en dictado.",
      "when_not_to_use_en": "When the gap in level turns the explanation into dictation.",
      "content": {
        "es": {
          "name": "Enseñanza entre pares",
          "shortDescription": "Un estudiante explica un procedimiento o concepto a otro y responde a sus preguntas.",
          "whenToUse": "Cuando quieras comprobar comprensión profunda: explicar exige más que reconocer.",
          "minimalVersion": "Un estudiante explica un procedimiento o concepto a otro y responde a sus preguntas.",
          "instructions": [
            "Empareja niveles heterogéneos.",
            "Da al que enseña 2 minutos para preparar la explicación.",
            "Al final, quien escuchó formula 1 pregunta que quien enseñó debe responder."
          ],
          "observe": [
            "Usa ejemplos propios.",
            "Detecta y corrige la duda del compañero."
          ],
          "limits": [],
          "aiAdaptation": "Prohíbe leer la explicación desde una salida de IA: exige explicación en vivo con hoja en blanco.",
          "example": "En matemáticas, quien resolvió correctamente explica el procedimiento paso a paso a un compañero.",
          "evidenceProduced": "La explicación dada a otro estudiante y las respuestas a las preguntas que este formula.",
          "boundedInference": "Que quien explica organiza el contenido para otro y resuelve dudas no anticipadas sobre él.",
          "cannotInfer": [
            "No evidencia el aprendizaje de quien escucha.",
            "Explicar bien un procedimiento no acredita ejecutarlo bien."
          ],
          "inferenceConditions": [
            "Quien escucha debe preguntar de verdad, con dos preguntas mínimas preparadas."
          ],
          "whenNotToUse": "Cuando la diferencia de nivel convierte la explicación en dictado.",
          "copyablePrompt": "",
          "coverageNote": "",
          "windowConditions": [],
          "windowRationale": ""
        },
        "en": {
          "name": "Peer teaching",
          "shortDescription": "A student explains a procedure or concept to another and answers their questions.",
          "whenToUse": "When you want to check deep understanding: explaining requires more than recognising.",
          "minimalVersion": "A student explains a procedure or concept to another and answers their questions.",
          "instructions": [
            "Pair heterogeneous levels.",
            "Give the teacher 2 min to prepare.",
            "At the end, the listener asks 1 question that the teacher must answer."
          ],
          "observe": [
            "Uses their own examples.",
            "Detects and addresses the peer's doubt."
          ],
          "limits": [],
          "aiAdaptation": "Ban reading the explanation from AI output: require live explanation with a blank sheet.",
          "example": "In maths, the student who solved correctly explains the procedure step by step to a peer.",
          "evidenceProduced": "The explanation given to another student and the answers to the questions they raise.",
          "boundedInference": "That the explainer organises the content for someone else and resolves unanticipated doubts about it.",
          "cannotInfer": [
            "It evidences nothing about the listener's learning.",
            "Explaining a procedure well does not certify performing it well."
          ],
          "inferenceConditions": [
            "The listener must genuinely question, with at least two prepared questions."
          ],
          "whenNotToUse": "When the gap in level turns the explanation into dictation.",
          "copyablePrompt": "",
          "coverageNote": "",
          "windowConditions": [],
          "windowRationale": ""
        }
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "entrevista-companeros",
      "slug": "entrevista-entre-companeros",
      "url": "https://evidencias-ia-evaluacion.com/evidencia/entrevista-entre-companeros",
      "name_es": "Entrevista entre compañeros",
      "name_en": "Peer interview",
      "short_description_es": "Las parejas se formulan preguntas preparadas para comprobar comprensión y decisiones.",
      "short_description_en": "Pairs ask each other prepared questions to check understanding and decisions.",
      "family": "cooperativa",
      "family_secondary": "oral-dialogica",
      "primary_claim": "comprende",
      "secondary_claims": "decide-criterio",
      "evidence_kind": "desempeno",
      "evidence_modes": "oral",
      "stages": "primaria|secundaria|bachillerato|fp|universidad|adultos",
      "areas": "",
      "moments": "durante",
      "purposes": "formativo|calificable",
      "modalities": "oral",
      "seia_levels": "0|1|2|3",
      "time_min": 10,
      "time_max": 20,
      "teacher_load": "baja",
      "participation": "pareja",
      "scalability": "hasta-30",
      "collections": "baja-revision",
      "ai_relation": "compatible",
      "review_status": "borrador-editorial",
      "version": "v0.13",
      "last_reviewed": "2026-09-06",
      "time_scope": "",
      "learning_windows": "",
      "complementary_layers": "",
      "evidence_origins": "",
      "window_selection": "",
      "evidence_produced_es": "Las preguntas preparadas por cada miembro de la pareja y las respuestas dadas, anotadas por quien pregunta.",
      "evidence_produced_en": "The questions prepared by each member of the pair and the answers given, noted by the questioner.",
      "bounded_inference_es": "Que la persona formula preguntas que comprueban comprensión y responde a las que recibe sobre su trabajo.",
      "bounded_inference_en": "That the person asks questions that actually check understanding and answers those they receive about their work.",
      "inference_conditions_es": "Las preguntas se preparan antes con un criterio compartido de qué es una buena pregunta.",
      "inference_conditions_en": "Questions are prepared beforehand with a shared criterion of what makes a good question.",
      "cannot_infer_es": "No garantiza que las respuestas sean propias si el trabajo previo fue conjunto. | La calidad de la entrevista depende tanto de quien pregunta como de quien responde.",
      "cannot_infer_en": "It does not guarantee the answers are their own if the earlier work was joint. | The interview's quality depends as much on the questioner as on the respondent.",
      "when_not_to_use_es": "Cuando la relación entre iguales impide preguntar con exigencia.",
      "when_not_to_use_en": "When the peer relationship makes demanding questioning impossible.",
      "content": {
        "es": {
          "name": "Entrevista entre compañeros",
          "shortDescription": "Las parejas se formulan preguntas preparadas para comprobar comprensión y decisiones.",
          "whenToUse": "Tras una tarea con decisiones no triviales, para hacerlas explícitas.",
          "minimalVersion": "Las parejas se formulan preguntas preparadas para comprobar comprensión y decisiones.",
          "instructions": [
            "Facilita un guion con 4 preguntas obligatorias y 2 libres.",
            "Cada pareja se entrevista mutuamente 5 minutos por turno.",
            "Anotan 1 idea que hayan aprendido del compañero."
          ],
          "observe": [
            "Respuestas concretas, no genéricas."
          ],
          "limits": [],
          "aiAdaptation": "Incluye una pregunta obligatoria: '¿Qué te aportó la IA y qué descartaste?'",
          "example": "Tras un trabajo de investigación, se entrevistan sobre las fuentes descartadas y por qué.",
          "evidenceProduced": "Las preguntas preparadas por cada miembro de la pareja y las respuestas dadas, anotadas por quien pregunta.",
          "boundedInference": "Que la persona formula preguntas que comprueban comprensión y responde a las que recibe sobre su trabajo.",
          "cannotInfer": [
            "No garantiza que las respuestas sean propias si el trabajo previo fue conjunto.",
            "La calidad de la entrevista depende tanto de quien pregunta como de quien responde."
          ],
          "inferenceConditions": [
            "Las preguntas se preparan antes con un criterio compartido de qué es una buena pregunta."
          ],
          "whenNotToUse": "Cuando la relación entre iguales impide preguntar con exigencia.",
          "copyablePrompt": "",
          "coverageNote": "",
          "windowConditions": [],
          "windowRationale": ""
        },
        "en": {
          "name": "Peer interview",
          "shortDescription": "Pairs ask each other prepared questions to check understanding and decisions.",
          "whenToUse": "After a task with non-trivial decisions, to make them explicit.",
          "minimalVersion": "Pairs ask each other prepared questions to check understanding and decisions.",
          "instructions": [
            "Provide a script with 4 mandatory and 2 free questions.",
            "Each pair interviews each other for 5 minutes per turn.",
            "They note 1 idea learnt from the peer."
          ],
          "observe": [
            "Concrete, not generic, answers."
          ],
          "limits": [],
          "aiAdaptation": "Include one mandatory question: 'What did AI give you and what did you discard?'",
          "example": "After research, they interview each other about discarded sources and why.",
          "evidenceProduced": "The questions prepared by each member of the pair and the answers given, noted by the questioner.",
          "boundedInference": "That the person asks questions that actually check understanding and answers those they receive about their work.",
          "cannotInfer": [
            "It does not guarantee the answers are their own if the earlier work was joint.",
            "The interview's quality depends as much on the questioner as on the respondent."
          ],
          "inferenceConditions": [
            "Questions are prepared beforehand with a shared criterion of what makes a good question."
          ],
          "whenNotToUse": "When the peer relationship makes demanding questioning impossible.",
          "copyablePrompt": "",
          "coverageNote": "",
          "windowConditions": [],
          "windowRationale": ""
        }
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "rueda-preguntas",
      "slug": "rueda-de-preguntas",
      "url": "https://evidencias-ia-evaluacion.com/evidencia/rueda-de-preguntas",
      "name_es": "Rueda de preguntas",
      "name_en": "Question round",
      "short_description_es": "Cada estudiante responde una pregunta y formula la siguiente a otro compañero.",
      "short_description_en": "Each student answers a question and passes a new one to a peer.",
      "family": "oral-dialogica",
      "family_secondary": "cooperativa",
      "primary_claim": "comprende",
      "secondary_claims": "",
      "evidence_kind": "desempeno",
      "evidence_modes": "oral",
      "stages": "primaria|secundaria|bachillerato|fp|universidad|adultos",
      "areas": "",
      "moments": "durante",
      "purposes": "formativo|calificable",
      "modalities": "oral",
      "seia_levels": "0|1|2",
      "time_min": 8,
      "time_max": 15,
      "teacher_load": "baja",
      "participation": "grupo-clase",
      "scalability": "hasta-30",
      "collections": "baja-revision",
      "ai_relation": "compatible",
      "review_status": "borrador-editorial",
      "version": "v0.13",
      "last_reviewed": "2026-09-06",
      "time_scope": "",
      "learning_windows": "",
      "complementary_layers": "",
      "evidence_origins": "",
      "window_selection": "",
      "evidence_produced_es": "Una cadena de respuestas y preguntas, cada una atribuida a una persona concreta.",
      "evidence_produced_en": "A chain of answers and questions, each attributed to a specific person.",
      "bounded_inference_es": "Que quien participa entiende la respuesta anterior lo bastante como para construir una pregunta pertinente encima.",
      "bounded_inference_en": "That participants understand the previous answer well enough to build a relevant question on top of it.",
      "inference_conditions_es": "La pregunta formulada debe conectar con la respuesta anterior, no ser una pregunta nueva cualquiera.",
      "inference_conditions_en": "The question asked must connect to the previous answer, not be any new question.",
      "cannot_infer_es": "No informa de quien no participa en la rueda. | Una buena pregunta no acredita saber su respuesta.",
      "cannot_infer_en": "It says nothing about those who do not take part in the round. | A good question does not certify knowing its answer.",
      "when_not_to_use_es": "En grupos donde el turno público genera ansiedad y no se ofrecen alternativas.",
      "when_not_to_use_en": "In groups where taking a public turn creates anxiety and no alternative is offered.",
      "content": {
        "es": {
          "name": "Rueda de preguntas",
          "shortDescription": "Cada estudiante responde una pregunta y formula la siguiente a otro compañero.",
          "whenToUse": "En clases pequeñas o en pequeño grupo, para cerrar una unidad.",
          "minimalVersion": "Cada estudiante responde una pregunta y formula la siguiente a otro compañero.",
          "instructions": [
            "Da el arranque: una pregunta docente.",
            "Cada estudiante responde y formula otra dirigida a un compañero.",
            "Nadie puede repetir pregunta."
          ],
          "observe": [
            "Calidad de las preguntas formuladas por los estudiantes."
          ],
          "limits": [],
          "aiAdaptation": "Pide una pregunta que no se pueda responder con IA sin pensar.",
          "example": "Cierre de tema histórico donde cada pregunta enlaza con la anterior.",
          "evidenceProduced": "Una cadena de respuestas y preguntas, cada una atribuida a una persona concreta.",
          "boundedInference": "Que quien participa entiende la respuesta anterior lo bastante como para construir una pregunta pertinente encima.",
          "cannotInfer": [
            "No informa de quien no participa en la rueda.",
            "Una buena pregunta no acredita saber su respuesta."
          ],
          "inferenceConditions": [
            "La pregunta formulada debe conectar con la respuesta anterior, no ser una pregunta nueva cualquiera."
          ],
          "whenNotToUse": "En grupos donde el turno público genera ansiedad y no se ofrecen alternativas.",
          "copyablePrompt": "",
          "coverageNote": "",
          "windowConditions": [],
          "windowRationale": ""
        },
        "en": {
          "name": "Question round",
          "shortDescription": "Each student answers a question and passes a new one to a peer.",
          "whenToUse": "In small classes or small groups, to close a unit.",
          "minimalVersion": "Each student answers a question and passes a new one to a peer.",
          "instructions": [
            "Start with a teacher question.",
            "Each student answers and asks another peer.",
            "No repeated questions."
          ],
          "observe": [
            "Quality of student-generated questions."
          ],
          "limits": [],
          "aiAdaptation": "Request a question that cannot be answered with AI without thinking.",
          "example": "Closing a history unit where each question links to the previous one.",
          "evidenceProduced": "A chain of answers and questions, each attributed to a specific person.",
          "boundedInference": "That participants understand the previous answer well enough to build a relevant question on top of it.",
          "cannotInfer": [
            "It says nothing about those who do not take part in the round.",
            "A good question does not certify knowing its answer."
          ],
          "inferenceConditions": [
            "The question asked must connect to the previous answer, not be any new question."
          ],
          "whenNotToUse": "In groups where taking a public turn creates anxiety and no alternative is offered.",
          "copyablePrompt": "",
          "coverageNote": "",
          "windowConditions": [],
          "windowRationale": ""
        }
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "debate-pecera",
      "slug": "debate-en-pecera",
      "url": "https://evidencias-ia-evaluacion.com/evidencia/debate-en-pecera",
      "name_es": "Debate en pecera",
      "name_en": "Fishbowl debate",
      "short_description_es": "Un pequeño grupo debate y el resto observa con criterios, después aporta.",
      "short_description_en": "A small group debates while the rest observes with criteria and then contributes.",
      "family": "oral-dialogica",
      "family_secondary": "cooperativa",
      "primary_claim": "decide-criterio",
      "secondary_claims": "comprende",
      "evidence_kind": "desempeno",
      "evidence_modes": "oral",
      "stages": "primaria|secundaria|bachillerato|fp|universidad|adultos",
      "areas": "",
      "moments": "durante",
      "purposes": "formativo|calificable",
      "modalities": "oral",
      "seia_levels": "1|2|3",
      "time_min": 20,
      "time_max": 40,
      "teacher_load": "media",
      "participation": "grupo-clase",
      "scalability": "mas-30-equipos",
      "collections": "grupos-numerosos",
      "ai_relation": "compatible",
      "review_status": "borrador-editorial",
      "version": "v0.13",
      "last_reviewed": "2026-09-06",
      "time_scope": "",
      "learning_windows": "",
      "complementary_layers": "",
      "evidence_origins": "",
      "window_selection": "",
      "evidence_produced_es": "Las intervenciones del grupo interior y las observaciones con criterios de quienes miran desde fuera.",
      "evidence_produced_en": "The inner group's contributions and the criterion-based observations of those watching from outside.",
      "bounded_inference_es": "Que el grupo observador aplica criterios de calidad argumentativa a un debate real, y que el interior los cumple o no.",
      "bounded_inference_en": "That the observing group applies argument-quality criteria to a real debate, and that the inner group meets them or not.",
      "inference_conditions_es": "La hoja de observación se entrega antes con criterios concretos.",
      "inference_conditions_en": "The observation sheet is handed out beforehand with concrete criteria.",
      "cannot_infer_es": "No aporta evidencia individual del grupo observador salvo por su hoja. | No mide comprensión del contenido, sino su uso en discusión.",
      "cannot_infer_en": "It gives no individual evidence about observers beyond their sheet. | It does not measure content understanding, but its use in discussion.",
      "when_not_to_use_es": "Cuando el tiempo obliga a que la mayoría solo observe sin llegar a intervenir.",
      "when_not_to_use_en": "When time forces most of the class to observe without ever contributing.",
      "content": {
        "es": {
          "name": "Debate en pecera",
          "shortDescription": "Un pequeño grupo debate y el resto observa con criterios, después aporta.",
          "whenToUse": "Grupos grandes donde no todos pueden debatir a la vez.",
          "minimalVersion": "Un pequeño grupo debate y el resto observa con criterios, después aporta.",
          "instructions": [
            "Selecciona 4-6 debatientes; el resto observa con rúbrica.",
            "Rota entradas: observadores pueden tocar el hombro y sustituir.",
            "Cierra con contribución conjunta."
          ],
          "observe": [
            "Escuchan antes de responder.",
            "Usan evidencias, no impresiones."
          ],
          "limits": [],
          "aiAdaptation": "Permite un turno donde los observadores comprueben datos citados con una fuente distinta a la IA.",
          "example": "Debate en pecera sobre dilemas éticos del uso de IA en el aula.",
          "evidenceProduced": "Las intervenciones del grupo interior y las observaciones con criterios de quienes miran desde fuera.",
          "boundedInference": "Que el grupo observador aplica criterios de calidad argumentativa a un debate real, y que el interior los cumple o no.",
          "cannotInfer": [
            "No aporta evidencia individual del grupo observador salvo por su hoja.",
            "No mide comprensión del contenido, sino su uso en discusión."
          ],
          "inferenceConditions": [
            "La hoja de observación se entrega antes con criterios concretos."
          ],
          "whenNotToUse": "Cuando el tiempo obliga a que la mayoría solo observe sin llegar a intervenir.",
          "copyablePrompt": "",
          "coverageNote": "",
          "windowConditions": [],
          "windowRationale": ""
        },
        "en": {
          "name": "Fishbowl debate",
          "shortDescription": "A small group debates while the rest observes with criteria and then contributes.",
          "whenToUse": "Large groups where not everyone can debate at once.",
          "minimalVersion": "A small group debates while the rest observes with criteria and then contributes.",
          "instructions": [
            "Pick 4-6 debaters; the rest observes with a rubric.",
            "Rotate: observers can tap in and swap.",
            "Close with joint contribution."
          ],
          "observe": [
            "Listen before responding.",
            "Use evidence, not impressions."
          ],
          "limits": [],
          "aiAdaptation": "Allow a turn where observers verify quoted data with a source other than AI.",
          "example": "Fishbowl on ethical dilemmas of AI in the classroom.",
          "evidenceProduced": "The inner group's contributions and the criterion-based observations of those watching from outside.",
          "boundedInference": "That the observing group applies argument-quality criteria to a real debate, and that the inner group meets them or not.",
          "cannotInfer": [
            "It gives no individual evidence about observers beyond their sheet.",
            "It does not measure content understanding, but its use in discussion."
          ],
          "inferenceConditions": [
            "The observation sheet is handed out beforehand with concrete criteria."
          ],
          "whenNotToUse": "When time forces most of the class to observe without ever contributing.",
          "copyablePrompt": "",
          "coverageNote": "",
          "windowConditions": [],
          "windowRationale": ""
        }
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "rueda-prensa",
      "slug": "rueda-de-prensa",
      "url": "https://evidencias-ia-evaluacion.com/evidencia/rueda-de-prensa",
      "name_es": "Rueda de prensa",
      "name_en": "Press conference",
      "short_description_es": "Un estudiante o equipo presenta una propuesta y responde preguntas de la clase.",
      "short_description_en": "A student or team presents a proposal and answers questions from the class.",
      "family": "oral-dialogica",
      "family_secondary": "practica-desempeno",
      "primary_claim": "decide-criterio",
      "secondary_claims": "puede-hacerlo|comprende",
      "evidence_kind": "desempeno",
      "evidence_modes": "oral|desempeno-controlado",
      "stages": "primaria|secundaria|bachillerato|fp|universidad|adultos",
      "areas": "",
      "moments": "durante",
      "purposes": "formativo|calificable",
      "modalities": "oral",
      "seia_levels": "1|2|3",
      "time_min": 12,
      "time_max": 25,
      "teacher_load": "media",
      "participation": "equipo",
      "scalability": "hasta-30",
      "collections": "",
      "ai_relation": "compatible",
      "review_status": "borrador-editorial",
      "version": "v0.13",
      "last_reviewed": "2026-09-06",
      "time_scope": "",
      "learning_windows": "",
      "complementary_layers": "",
      "evidence_origins": "",
      "window_selection": "",
      "evidence_produced_es": "La presentación de la propuesta y las respuestas a preguntas no ensayadas de la clase.",
      "evidence_produced_en": "The presentation of the proposal and the answers to unrehearsed questions from the class.",
      "bounded_inference_es": "Que quien presenta sostiene su propuesta ante objeciones que no ha preparado.",
      "bounded_inference_en": "That the presenter sustains their proposal against objections they did not prepare for.",
      "inference_conditions_es": "Las preguntas no se pactan de antemano.",
      "inference_conditions_en": "Questions are not agreed in advance.",
      "cannot_infer_es": "El aplomo ante el público no equivale a solidez del contenido. | En equipos, no distingue la aportación individual salvo que se asignen turnos.",
      "cannot_infer_en": "Poise in front of an audience is not content soundness. | In teams it does not distinguish individual contribution unless turns are assigned.",
      "when_not_to_use_es": "Cuando el formato público sustituye a una comprobación individual necesaria.",
      "when_not_to_use_en": "When the public format replaces a needed individual check.",
      "content": {
        "es": {
          "name": "Rueda de prensa",
          "shortDescription": "Un estudiante o equipo presenta una propuesta y responde preguntas de la clase.",
          "whenToUse": "Cierre de proyecto o defensa de una decisión de diseño.",
          "minimalVersion": "Un estudiante o equipo presenta una propuesta y responde preguntas de la clase.",
          "instructions": [
            "Prepara la presentación en 5 minutos máx.",
            "Prepara al público con 3 tipos de pregunta obligatorios: 'por qué', 'y si', 'cómo'.",
            "Documenta 2 preguntas y sus respuestas."
          ],
          "observe": [
            "Mantiene la coherencia bajo presión de preguntas."
          ],
          "limits": [],
          "aiAdaptation": "El público puede pedir cómo llegaron a una cifra o cita: exige trazabilidad.",
          "example": "Un equipo defiende su solución a un problema de ingeniería.",
          "evidenceProduced": "La presentación de la propuesta y las respuestas a preguntas no ensayadas de la clase.",
          "boundedInference": "Que quien presenta sostiene su propuesta ante objeciones que no ha preparado.",
          "cannotInfer": [
            "El aplomo ante el público no equivale a solidez del contenido.",
            "En equipos, no distingue la aportación individual salvo que se asignen turnos."
          ],
          "inferenceConditions": [
            "Las preguntas no se pactan de antemano."
          ],
          "whenNotToUse": "Cuando el formato público sustituye a una comprobación individual necesaria.",
          "copyablePrompt": "",
          "coverageNote": "",
          "windowConditions": [],
          "windowRationale": ""
        },
        "en": {
          "name": "Press conference",
          "shortDescription": "A student or team presents a proposal and answers questions from the class.",
          "whenToUse": "Project close or defence of a design decision.",
          "minimalVersion": "A student or team presents a proposal and answers questions from the class.",
          "instructions": [
            "Cap presentation at 5 minutes.",
            "Prime the audience with 3 mandatory question types: 'why', 'what if', 'how'.",
            "Log 2 questions and their answers."
          ],
          "observe": [
            "Keeps coherence under questioning."
          ],
          "limits": [],
          "aiAdaptation": "The audience can request how a figure or quote was reached: enforce traceability.",
          "example": "A team defends their solution to an engineering problem.",
          "evidenceProduced": "The presentation of the proposal and the answers to unrehearsed questions from the class.",
          "boundedInference": "That the presenter sustains their proposal against objections they did not prepare for.",
          "cannotInfer": [
            "Poise in front of an audience is not content soundness.",
            "In teams it does not distinguish individual contribution unless turns are assigned."
          ],
          "inferenceConditions": [
            "Questions are not agreed in advance."
          ],
          "whenNotToUse": "When the public format replaces a needed individual check.",
          "copyablePrompt": "",
          "coverageNote": "",
          "windowConditions": [],
          "windowRationale": ""
        }
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "galeria-comentada",
      "slug": "galeria-comentada",
      "url": "https://evidencias-ia-evaluacion.com/evidencia/galeria-comentada",
      "name_es": "Galería comentada",
      "name_en": "Curated gallery walk",
      "short_description_es": "Los trabajos se exponen y sus autores explican decisiones a grupos que rotan.",
      "short_description_en": "Works are exhibited and authors explain decisions to rotating groups.",
      "family": "oral-dialogica",
      "family_secondary": "cooperativa",
      "primary_claim": "decide-criterio",
      "secondary_claims": "muestra-avance|comprende",
      "evidence_kind": "desempeno",
      "evidence_modes": "oral|producto",
      "stages": "primaria|secundaria|bachillerato|fp|universidad|adultos",
      "areas": "",
      "moments": "durante",
      "purposes": "formativo|calificable",
      "modalities": "oral|visual",
      "seia_levels": "1|2|3",
      "time_min": 20,
      "time_max": 40,
      "teacher_load": "media",
      "participation": "equipo",
      "scalability": "mas-30-equipos",
      "collections": "grupos-numerosos",
      "ai_relation": "compatible",
      "review_status": "borrador-editorial",
      "version": "v0.13",
      "last_reviewed": "2026-09-06",
      "time_scope": "",
      "learning_windows": "",
      "complementary_layers": "",
      "evidence_origins": "",
      "window_selection": "",
      "evidence_produced_es": "Las explicaciones que cada autor da a los grupos que rotan y las preguntas que recibe.",
      "evidence_produced_en": "The explanations each author gives to rotating groups and the questions they receive.",
      "bounded_inference_es": "Que el autor puede justificar decisiones de su trabajo varias veces ante interlocutores distintos.",
      "bounded_inference_en": "That the author can justify decisions in their work repeatedly to different interlocutors.",
      "inference_conditions_es": "Los grupos visitantes llegan con una pregunta obligatoria por parada.",
      "inference_conditions_en": "Visiting groups arrive with one compulsory question per stop.",
      "cannot_infer_es": "No permite comparar el nivel entre trabajos con equidad, porque el público cambia. | No evidencia el proceso de elaboración previo.",
      "cannot_infer_en": "It does not allow fair level comparison between works, because the audience changes. | It evidences nothing about the prior making process.",
      "when_not_to_use_es": "Cuando el espacio o el ruido impiden que las explicaciones se oigan y se registren.",
      "when_not_to_use_en": "When space or noise prevent explanations from being heard and recorded.",
      "content": {
        "es": {
          "name": "Galería comentada",
          "shortDescription": "Los trabajos se exponen y sus autores explican decisiones a grupos que rotan.",
          "whenToUse": "Cuando el producto merece defensa y quieres oír a todos, no solo a los 'buenos'.",
          "minimalVersion": "Los trabajos se exponen y sus autores explican decisiones a grupos que rotan.",
          "instructions": [
            "Cuelga los trabajos en la pared o en mesas.",
            "El autor está junto a su trabajo 3-4 min por rotación.",
            "Los visitantes dejan una pregunta o mejora."
          ],
          "observe": [
            "El autor explica decisiones, no solo el resultado."
          ],
          "limits": [],
          "aiAdaptation": "El cartel debe indicar qué aportó la IA y qué se descartó.",
          "example": "Feria de proyectos con carteles y explicación oral por rotaciones.",
          "evidenceProduced": "Las explicaciones que cada autor da a los grupos que rotan y las preguntas que recibe.",
          "boundedInference": "Que el autor puede justificar decisiones de su trabajo varias veces ante interlocutores distintos.",
          "cannotInfer": [
            "No permite comparar el nivel entre trabajos con equidad, porque el público cambia.",
            "No evidencia el proceso de elaboración previo."
          ],
          "inferenceConditions": [
            "Los grupos visitantes llegan con una pregunta obligatoria por parada."
          ],
          "whenNotToUse": "Cuando el espacio o el ruido impiden que las explicaciones se oigan y se registren.",
          "copyablePrompt": "",
          "coverageNote": "",
          "windowConditions": [],
          "windowRationale": ""
        },
        "en": {
          "name": "Curated gallery walk",
          "shortDescription": "Works are exhibited and authors explain decisions to rotating groups.",
          "whenToUse": "When the product deserves defence and you want to hear everyone.",
          "minimalVersion": "Works are exhibited and authors explain decisions to rotating groups.",
          "instructions": [
            "Post works on walls or tables.",
            "The author stands by their work 3-4 min per rotation.",
            "Visitors leave a question or improvement."
          ],
          "observe": [
            "Author explains decisions, not just the result."
          ],
          "limits": [],
          "aiAdaptation": "The poster must indicate what AI contributed and what was discarded.",
          "example": "Project fair with posters and oral rotation.",
          "evidenceProduced": "The explanations each author gives to rotating groups and the questions they receive.",
          "boundedInference": "That the author can justify decisions in their work repeatedly to different interlocutors.",
          "cannotInfer": [
            "It does not allow fair level comparison between works, because the audience changes.",
            "It evidences nothing about the prior making process."
          ],
          "inferenceConditions": [
            "Visiting groups arrive with one compulsory question per stop."
          ],
          "whenNotToUse": "When space or noise prevent explanations from being heard and recorded.",
          "copyablePrompt": "",
          "coverageNote": "",
          "windowConditions": [],
          "windowRationale": ""
        }
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "predice-observa-explica",
      "slug": "predice-observa-explica",
      "url": "https://evidencias-ia-evaluacion.com/evidencia/predice-observa-explica",
      "name_es": "Predice, observa y explica",
      "name_en": "Predict, observe, explain",
      "short_description_es": "El estudiante anticipa un resultado, observa lo sucedido y explica las diferencias.",
      "short_description_en": "The student predicts a result, observes what happens and explains the differences.",
      "family": "practica-desempeno",
      "family_secondary": "oral-dialogica",
      "primary_claim": "comprende",
      "secondary_claims": "decide-criterio",
      "evidence_kind": "proceso",
      "evidence_modes": "oral|proceso",
      "stages": "infantil|primaria|secundaria|bachillerato",
      "areas": "",
      "moments": "durante",
      "purposes": "formativo|calificable",
      "modalities": "oral|escrita|practica",
      "seia_levels": "0|1|2",
      "time_min": 10,
      "time_max": 20,
      "teacher_load": "media",
      "participation": "equipo",
      "scalability": "hasta-30",
      "collections": "",
      "ai_relation": "compatible",
      "review_status": "borrador-editorial",
      "version": "v0.13",
      "last_reviewed": "2026-09-06",
      "time_scope": "",
      "learning_windows": "error-cambio-cognitivo",
      "complementary_layers": "desempeno-observado",
      "evidence_origins": "natural|reflexiva",
      "window_selection": "docente",
      "evidence_produced_es": "La predicción escrita antes de la observación, el registro de lo observado y la explicación de la diferencia.",
      "evidence_produced_en": "The prediction written before observing, the record of what was observed and the explanation of the gap.",
      "bounded_inference_es": "Que la persona tenía un modelo previo explícito y lo ha contrastado con un resultado observable.",
      "bounded_inference_en": "That the person had an explicit prior model and contrasted it with an observable result.",
      "inference_conditions_es": "La predicción se registra antes de observar, sin posibilidad de corregirla después. | Se recoge una explicación revisada después de observar: la discrepancia sola no evidencia cambio de comprensión.",
      "inference_conditions_en": "The prediction is recorded before observing, with no chance to amend it afterwards. | A revised explanation is collected after observing: the discrepancy alone evidences no change of understanding.",
      "cannot_infer_es": "Acertar la predicción no implica comprender el mecanismo. | No evidencia que el modelo corregido se mantenga en el tiempo.",
      "cannot_infer_en": "Getting the prediction right does not imply understanding the mechanism. | It evidences nothing about whether the corrected model persists.",
      "when_not_to_use_es": "Cuando el fenómeno observado es demasiado ambiguo para señalar una diferencia clara.",
      "when_not_to_use_en": "When the observed phenomenon is too ambiguous to point to a clear gap.",
      "content": {
        "es": {
          "name": "Predice, observa y explica",
          "shortDescription": "El estudiante anticipa un resultado, observa lo sucedido y explica las diferencias.",
          "whenToUse": "Cuando hay una demostración observable: experimento, simulación, cálculo con resultado inesperado.",
          "minimalVersion": "El estudiante anticipa un resultado, observa lo sucedido y explica las diferencias.",
          "instructions": [
            "Antes: cada estudiante anota su predicción con motivo.",
            "Durante: observa y anota.",
            "Después: explica la diferencia con la predicción."
          ],
          "observe": [
            "Reconoce el error de la predicción sin justificarlo con vaguedades."
          ],
          "limits": [],
          "aiAdaptation": "La IA no debe intervenir entre predicción y observación.",
          "example": "Experimento de flotación: predice qué objetos flotarán y por qué.",
          "evidenceProduced": "La predicción escrita antes de la observación, el registro de lo observado y la explicación de la diferencia.",
          "boundedInference": "Que la persona tenía un modelo previo explícito y lo ha contrastado con un resultado observable.",
          "cannotInfer": [
            "Acertar la predicción no implica comprender el mecanismo.",
            "No evidencia que el modelo corregido se mantenga en el tiempo."
          ],
          "inferenceConditions": [
            "La predicción se registra antes de observar, sin posibilidad de corregirla después.",
            "Se recoge una explicación revisada después de observar: la discrepancia sola no evidencia cambio de comprensión."
          ],
          "whenNotToUse": "Cuando el fenómeno observado es demasiado ambiguo para señalar una diferencia clara.",
          "copyablePrompt": "",
          "coverageNote": "",
          "windowConditions": [
            "La predicción debe registrarse antes de observar; si no, no hay contraste.",
            "La discrepancia sola no evidencia cambio: hace falta la explicación revisada posterior que diga qué modelo sustituye al inicial."
          ],
          "windowRationale": "El contraste entre predicción y observación abre la ventana solo cuando se explica el modelo revisado."
        },
        "en": {
          "name": "Predict, observe, explain",
          "shortDescription": "The student predicts a result, observes what happens and explains the differences.",
          "whenToUse": "When there is an observable demo: experiment, simulation, calculation with a surprising result.",
          "minimalVersion": "The student predicts a result, observes what happens and explains the differences.",
          "instructions": [
            "Before: each student writes their prediction with a reason.",
            "During: observe and note.",
            "After: explain the gap with the prediction."
          ],
          "observe": [
            "Acknowledges the wrong prediction without vague justification."
          ],
          "limits": [],
          "aiAdaptation": "AI must not intervene between prediction and observation.",
          "example": "Buoyancy experiment: predict which objects float and why.",
          "evidenceProduced": "The prediction written before observing, the record of what was observed and the explanation of the gap.",
          "boundedInference": "That the person had an explicit prior model and contrasted it with an observable result.",
          "cannotInfer": [
            "Getting the prediction right does not imply understanding the mechanism.",
            "It evidences nothing about whether the corrected model persists."
          ],
          "inferenceConditions": [
            "The prediction is recorded before observing, with no chance to amend it afterwards.",
            "A revised explanation is collected after observing: the discrepancy alone evidences no change of understanding."
          ],
          "whenNotToUse": "When the observed phenomenon is too ambiguous to point to a clear gap.",
          "copyablePrompt": "",
          "coverageNote": "",
          "windowConditions": [
            "The prediction must be recorded before observing; otherwise there is no contrast.",
            "The discrepancy alone evidences no change: a later revised explanation stating which model replaces the initial one is required."
          ],
          "windowRationale": "The prediction-observation contrast opens the window only when the revised model is explained."
        }
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "rompecabezas-expertos",
      "slug": "rompecabezas-de-expertos",
      "url": "https://evidencias-ia-evaluacion.com/evidencia/rompecabezas-de-expertos",
      "name_es": "Rompecabezas de expertos",
      "name_en": "Jigsaw",
      "short_description_es": "Cada miembro aprende una parte, la enseña al equipo y contribuye a una respuesta común.",
      "short_description_en": "Each member learns a part, teaches it to the team and contributes to a shared answer.",
      "family": "cooperativa",
      "family_secondary": "oral-dialogica",
      "primary_claim": "comprende",
      "secondary_claims": "puede-hacerlo",
      "evidence_kind": "desempeno",
      "evidence_modes": "oral|proceso",
      "stages": "primaria|secundaria|bachillerato|fp|universidad|adultos",
      "areas": "",
      "moments": "durante",
      "purposes": "formativo|calificable",
      "modalities": "oral|escrita",
      "seia_levels": "0|1|2",
      "time_min": 30,
      "time_max": 60,
      "teacher_load": "media",
      "participation": "equipo",
      "scalability": "mas-30-equipos",
      "collections": "individual-tras-grupo|grupos-numerosos",
      "ai_relation": "compatible",
      "review_status": "borrador-editorial",
      "version": "v0.13",
      "last_reviewed": "2026-09-06",
      "time_scope": "",
      "learning_windows": "",
      "complementary_layers": "",
      "evidence_origins": "",
      "window_selection": "",
      "evidence_produced_es": "La explicación que cada experto da a su equipo y la respuesta común construida a partir de las cuatro partes.",
      "evidence_produced_en": "The explanation each expert gives their team and the joint answer built from the four parts.",
      "bounded_inference_es": "Que cada persona domina su parte lo suficiente para enseñarla y que el equipo integra las partes.",
      "bounded_inference_en": "That each person knows their part well enough to teach it and that the team integrates the parts.",
      "inference_conditions_es": "Se comprueba individualmente al menos la parte propia de cada experto.",
      "inference_conditions_en": "Each expert's own part is checked individually at minimum.",
      "cannot_infer_es": "El resultado común no evidencia el aprendizaje individual de las partes ajenas. | Un fallo del equipo no localiza en qué experto está la laguna.",
      "cannot_infer_en": "The joint result evidences no individual learning of the other parts. | A team failure does not locate which expert holds the gap.",
      "when_not_to_use_es": "Cuando el contenido no es divisible en partes de dificultad comparable.",
      "when_not_to_use_en": "When the content cannot be split into parts of comparable difficulty.",
      "content": {
        "es": {
          "name": "Rompecabezas de expertos",
          "shortDescription": "Cada miembro aprende una parte, la enseña al equipo y contribuye a una respuesta común.",
          "whenToUse": "Contenido que se puede fraccionar en 4-5 piezas complementarias.",
          "minimalVersion": "Cada miembro aprende una parte, la enseña al equipo y contribuye a una respuesta común.",
          "instructions": [
            "Grupos base de 4-5. Cada miembro va al grupo de expertos de su pieza.",
            "Los expertos preparan la explicación 15-20 min.",
            "Regresan al grupo base y enseñan; el grupo produce la respuesta común."
          ],
          "observe": [
            "Cada miembro puede responder por cualquier pieza al final."
          ],
          "limits": [],
          "aiAdaptation": "Los expertos pueden usar IA para preparar, pero deben enseñar sin leer.",
          "example": "Cuatro artículos de una ley, un experto por artículo.",
          "evidenceProduced": "La explicación que cada experto da a su equipo y la respuesta común construida a partir de las cuatro partes.",
          "boundedInference": "Que cada persona domina su parte lo suficiente para enseñarla y que el equipo integra las partes.",
          "cannotInfer": [
            "El resultado común no evidencia el aprendizaje individual de las partes ajenas.",
            "Un fallo del equipo no localiza en qué experto está la laguna."
          ],
          "inferenceConditions": [
            "Se comprueba individualmente al menos la parte propia de cada experto."
          ],
          "whenNotToUse": "Cuando el contenido no es divisible en partes de dificultad comparable.",
          "copyablePrompt": "",
          "coverageNote": "",
          "windowConditions": [],
          "windowRationale": ""
        },
        "en": {
          "name": "Jigsaw",
          "shortDescription": "Each member learns a part, teaches it to the team and contributes to a shared answer.",
          "whenToUse": "Content that can be split into 4-5 complementary pieces.",
          "minimalVersion": "Each member learns a part, teaches it to the team and contributes to a shared answer.",
          "instructions": [
            "Base groups of 4-5. Each member joins the experts' group for their piece.",
            "Experts prepare their explanation for 15-20 min.",
            "They return to the base group and teach; the group produces the common answer."
          ],
          "observe": [
            "Each member can answer for any piece by the end."
          ],
          "limits": [],
          "aiAdaptation": "Experts may use AI to prepare but must teach without reading.",
          "example": "Four articles of a law, one expert per article.",
          "evidenceProduced": "The explanation each expert gives their team and the joint answer built from the four parts.",
          "boundedInference": "That each person knows their part well enough to teach it and that the team integrates the parts.",
          "cannotInfer": [
            "The joint result evidences no individual learning of the other parts.",
            "A team failure does not locate which expert holds the gap."
          ],
          "inferenceConditions": [
            "Each expert's own part is checked individually at minimum."
          ],
          "whenNotToUse": "When the content cannot be split into parts of comparable difficulty.",
          "copyablePrompt": "",
          "coverageNote": "",
          "windowConditions": [],
          "windowRationale": ""
        }
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "resolucion-roles",
      "slug": "resolucion-cooperativa-con-roles",
      "url": "https://evidencias-ia-evaluacion.com/evidencia/resolucion-cooperativa-con-roles",
      "name_es": "Resolución cooperativa con roles",
      "name_en": "Cooperative solving with roles",
      "short_description_es": "El grupo resuelve una tarea con responsabilidades observables y rotatorias.",
      "short_description_en": "The group solves a task with observable, rotating responsibilities.",
      "family": "cooperativa",
      "family_secondary": "practica-desempeno",
      "primary_claim": "puede-hacerlo",
      "secondary_claims": "decide-criterio",
      "evidence_kind": "desempeno",
      "evidence_modes": "proceso|desempeno-controlado",
      "stages": "primaria|secundaria|bachillerato|fp|universidad|adultos",
      "areas": "",
      "moments": "durante",
      "purposes": "formativo|calificable",
      "modalities": "cualquiera",
      "seia_levels": "0|1|2|3",
      "time_min": 20,
      "time_max": 45,
      "teacher_load": "media",
      "participation": "equipo",
      "scalability": "mas-30-equipos",
      "collections": "grupos-numerosos",
      "ai_relation": "compatible",
      "review_status": "borrador-editorial",
      "version": "v0.13",
      "last_reviewed": "2026-09-06",
      "time_scope": "",
      "learning_windows": "",
      "complementary_layers": "",
      "evidence_origins": "",
      "window_selection": "",
      "evidence_produced_es": "El producto del equipo y el registro de conductas observables asociadas a cada rol durante la resolución.",
      "evidence_produced_en": "The team's product and the record of observable behaviours tied to each role during the solving.",
      "bounded_inference_es": "Que el equipo resolvió la tarea y que cada persona ejerció funciones observables dentro de ella.",
      "bounded_inference_en": "That the team solved the task and each person carried out observable functions within it.",
      "inference_conditions_es": "Los roles se definen con conductas concretas y rotan entre tareas.",
      "inference_conditions_en": "Roles are defined with concrete behaviours and rotate across tasks.",
      "cannot_infer_es": "El éxito del equipo no acredita comprensión individual del contenido. | Ejercer un rol no implica saber ejercer los demás.",
      "cannot_infer_en": "Team success does not certify individual understanding of the content. | Carrying out one role does not imply being able to carry out the others.",
      "when_not_to_use_es": "Cuando el reparto de roles permite que alguien quede al margen del contenido.",
      "when_not_to_use_en": "When the role split lets someone stay outside the content altogether.",
      "content": {
        "es": {
          "name": "Resolución cooperativa con roles",
          "shortDescription": "El grupo resuelve una tarea con responsabilidades observables y rotatorias.",
          "whenToUse": "Tareas complejas donde el trabajo en grupo suele opacar la contribución individual.",
          "minimalVersion": "El grupo resuelve una tarea con responsabilidades observables y rotatorias.",
          "instructions": [
            "Define 4 roles observables: portavoz, revisor, coordinador, secretario.",
            "Cada rol tiene indicadores claros.",
            "Rota roles a media tarea."
          ],
          "observe": [
            "El rol se ejerce, no se declara."
          ],
          "limits": [],
          "aiAdaptation": "Añade el rol de 'verificador de IA': contrasta lo que aporte la IA con otra fuente.",
          "example": "Resolución cooperativa de un caso jurídico con 4 roles.",
          "evidenceProduced": "El producto del equipo y el registro de conductas observables asociadas a cada rol durante la resolución.",
          "boundedInference": "Que el equipo resolvió la tarea y que cada persona ejerció funciones observables dentro de ella.",
          "cannotInfer": [
            "El éxito del equipo no acredita comprensión individual del contenido.",
            "Ejercer un rol no implica saber ejercer los demás."
          ],
          "inferenceConditions": [
            "Los roles se definen con conductas concretas y rotan entre tareas."
          ],
          "whenNotToUse": "Cuando el reparto de roles permite que alguien quede al margen del contenido.",
          "copyablePrompt": "",
          "coverageNote": "",
          "windowConditions": [],
          "windowRationale": ""
        },
        "en": {
          "name": "Cooperative solving with roles",
          "shortDescription": "The group solves a task with observable, rotating responsibilities.",
          "whenToUse": "Complex tasks where group work often hides individual contribution.",
          "minimalVersion": "The group solves a task with observable, rotating responsibilities.",
          "instructions": [
            "Define 4 observable roles: spokesperson, checker, coordinator, secretary.",
            "Each role has clear indicators.",
            "Rotate roles halfway through."
          ],
          "observe": [
            "The role is exercised, not merely declared."
          ],
          "limits": [],
          "aiAdaptation": "Add an 'AI verifier' role: cross-checks AI outputs with another source.",
          "example": "Cooperative resolution of a legal case with 4 roles.",
          "evidenceProduced": "The team's product and the record of observable behaviours tied to each role during the solving.",
          "boundedInference": "That the team solved the task and each person carried out observable functions within it.",
          "cannotInfer": [
            "Team success does not certify individual understanding of the content.",
            "Carrying out one role does not imply being able to carry out the others."
          ],
          "inferenceConditions": [
            "Roles are defined with concrete behaviours and rotate across tasks."
          ],
          "whenNotToUse": "When the role split lets someone stay outside the content altogether.",
          "copyablePrompt": "",
          "coverageNote": "",
          "windowConditions": [],
          "windowRationale": ""
        }
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "consenso-razonado",
      "slug": "consenso-razonado",
      "url": "https://evidencias-ia-evaluacion.com/evidencia/consenso-razonado",
      "name_es": "Consenso razonado",
      "name_en": "Reasoned consensus",
      "short_description_es": "El equipo llega a una decisión común dejando constancia de argumentos descartados y aceptados.",
      "short_description_en": "The team reaches a shared decision, logging accepted and rejected arguments.",
      "family": "cooperativa",
      "family_secondary": "oral-dialogica",
      "primary_claim": "decide-criterio",
      "secondary_claims": "",
      "evidence_kind": "proceso",
      "evidence_modes": "proceso",
      "stages": "primaria|secundaria|bachillerato|fp|universidad|adultos",
      "areas": "",
      "moments": "durante",
      "purposes": "formativo|calificable",
      "modalities": "oral|escrita",
      "seia_levels": "0|1|2|3",
      "time_min": 15,
      "time_max": 30,
      "teacher_load": "media",
      "participation": "equipo",
      "scalability": "hasta-30",
      "collections": "",
      "ai_relation": "compatible",
      "review_status": "borrador-editorial",
      "version": "v0.13",
      "last_reviewed": "2026-09-06",
      "time_scope": "",
      "learning_windows": "investigacion-decisiones",
      "complementary_layers": "",
      "evidence_origins": "natural",
      "window_selection": "cocreada",
      "evidence_produced_es": "La decisión común del equipo con la lista de argumentos aceptados y descartados, y quién sostenía cada uno.",
      "evidence_produced_en": "The team's joint decision with the list of accepted and discarded arguments, and who held each.",
      "bounded_inference_es": "Que el equipo ha ponderado alternativas explícitas antes de decidir, y que cada persona puede situar su posición.",
      "bounded_inference_en": "That the team weighed explicit alternatives before deciding, and each person can locate their position.",
      "inference_conditions_es": "El acta debe recoger lo descartado, no solo la conclusión.",
      "inference_conditions_en": "The record must capture what was discarded, not just the conclusion.",
      "cannot_infer_es": "El consenso puede reflejar jerarquía del grupo, no calidad del argumento. | No evidencia comprensión individual sin una comprobación posterior.",
      "cannot_infer_en": "Consensus can reflect group hierarchy rather than argument quality. | It evidences no individual understanding without a later check.",
      "when_not_to_use_es": "Cuando el desacuerdo es legítimo y forzar consenso empobrece el aprendizaje.",
      "when_not_to_use_en": "When disagreement is legitimate and forcing consensus impoverishes learning.",
      "content": {
        "es": {
          "name": "Consenso razonado",
          "shortDescription": "El equipo llega a una decisión común dejando constancia de argumentos descartados y aceptados.",
          "whenToUse": "Cuando la decisión importa más que el resultado técnico correcto.",
          "minimalVersion": "El equipo llega a una decisión común dejando constancia de argumentos descartados y aceptados.",
          "instructions": [
            "Fase individual: cada miembro propone y justifica.",
            "Fase grupal: se listan pros y contras.",
            "Se firma la decisión con los argumentos aceptados y descartados."
          ],
          "observe": [
            "Los descartes se justifican, no se ignoran."
          ],
          "limits": [],
          "aiAdaptation": "Incluye una fila donde se registre qué aportó la IA y cómo se validó.",
          "example": "Consenso sobre el criterio para seleccionar fuentes en un trabajo.",
          "evidenceProduced": "La decisión común del equipo con la lista de argumentos aceptados y descartados, y quién sostenía cada uno.",
          "boundedInference": "Que el equipo ha ponderado alternativas explícitas antes de decidir, y que cada persona puede situar su posición.",
          "cannotInfer": [
            "El consenso puede reflejar jerarquía del grupo, no calidad del argumento.",
            "No evidencia comprensión individual sin una comprobación posterior."
          ],
          "inferenceConditions": [
            "El acta debe recoger lo descartado, no solo la conclusión."
          ],
          "whenNotToUse": "Cuando el desacuerdo es legítimo y forzar consenso empobrece el aprendizaje.",
          "copyablePrompt": "",
          "coverageNote": "",
          "windowConditions": [
            "Solo si queda constancia de los argumentos descartados y de quién sostenía cada posición."
          ],
          "windowRationale": "Deja constancia de los argumentos descartados por el equipo."
        },
        "en": {
          "name": "Reasoned consensus",
          "shortDescription": "The team reaches a shared decision, logging accepted and rejected arguments.",
          "whenToUse": "When the decision matters more than a technically correct answer.",
          "minimalVersion": "The team reaches a shared decision, logging accepted and rejected arguments.",
          "instructions": [
            "Individual phase: each member proposes and justifies.",
            "Group phase: list pros and cons.",
            "Sign the decision with accepted and rejected arguments."
          ],
          "observe": [
            "Rejections are justified, not ignored."
          ],
          "limits": [],
          "aiAdaptation": "Add a row logging what AI contributed and how it was validated.",
          "example": "Consensus on criteria to pick sources for a paper.",
          "evidenceProduced": "The team's joint decision with the list of accepted and discarded arguments, and who held each.",
          "boundedInference": "That the team weighed explicit alternatives before deciding, and each person can locate their position.",
          "cannotInfer": [
            "Consensus can reflect group hierarchy rather than argument quality.",
            "It evidences no individual understanding without a later check."
          ],
          "inferenceConditions": [
            "The record must capture what was discarded, not just the conclusion."
          ],
          "whenNotToUse": "When disagreement is legitimate and forcing consensus impoverishes learning.",
          "copyablePrompt": "",
          "coverageNote": "",
          "windowConditions": [
            "Only if the discarded arguments and who held each position are on record."
          ],
          "windowRationale": "It records the arguments the team discarded."
        }
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "portavoz-aleatorio",
      "slug": "portavoz-aleatorio",
      "url": "https://evidencias-ia-evaluacion.com/evidencia/portavoz-aleatorio",
      "name_es": "Portavoz aleatorio",
      "name_en": "Random spokesperson",
      "short_description_es": "Después del trabajo, el docente elige quién explicará la respuesta del equipo.",
      "short_description_en": "After the work, the teacher picks who will explain the team's answer.",
      "family": "cooperativa",
      "family_secondary": "oral-dialogica",
      "primary_claim": "comprende",
      "secondary_claims": "decide-criterio",
      "evidence_kind": "desempeno",
      "evidence_modes": "oral",
      "stages": "primaria|secundaria|bachillerato|fp|universidad|adultos",
      "areas": "",
      "moments": "durante",
      "purposes": "formativo|calificable",
      "modalities": "oral",
      "seia_levels": "0|1|2|3",
      "time_min": 3,
      "time_max": 8,
      "teacher_load": "baja",
      "participation": "equipo",
      "scalability": "mas-30-equipos",
      "collections": "individual-tras-grupo|rapidas|baja-revision|grupos-numerosos",
      "ai_relation": "compatible",
      "review_status": "borrador-editorial",
      "version": "v0.13",
      "last_reviewed": "2026-09-06",
      "time_scope": "",
      "learning_windows": "",
      "complementary_layers": "",
      "evidence_origins": "",
      "window_selection": "",
      "evidence_produced_es": "La explicación de la respuesta del equipo dada por una persona elegida al azar tras el trabajo.",
      "evidence_produced_en": "The explanation of the team's answer given by a randomly chosen member after the work.",
      "bounded_inference_es": "Que esa persona concreta puede reconstruir y defender la respuesta común del equipo.",
      "bounded_inference_en": "That this particular person can reconstruct and defend the team's joint answer.",
      "inference_conditions_es": "El azar debe anunciarse antes de empezar el trabajo en equipo.",
      "inference_conditions_en": "The random selection must be announced before team work begins.",
      "cannot_infer_es": "Una respuesta pobre puede deberse al reparto interno, no al desconocimiento personal. | No informa del resto del equipo.",
      "cannot_infer_en": "A poor answer may be due to the internal division of labour, not personal ignorance. | It says nothing about the rest of the team.",
      "when_not_to_use_es": "Cuando se usa como sanción del grupo por la respuesta de una persona.",
      "when_not_to_use_en": "When used to penalise the group for one person's answer.",
      "content": {
        "es": {
          "name": "Portavoz aleatorio",
          "shortDescription": "Después del trabajo, el docente elige quién explicará la respuesta del equipo.",
          "whenToUse": "Para asegurar que todos se preparen igual, no solo el líder habitual.",
          "minimalVersion": "Después del trabajo, el docente elige quién explicará la respuesta del equipo.",
          "instructions": [
            "Anuncia al inicio que el portavoz se elegirá al azar.",
            "Al terminar, elige mediante palitos o app.",
            "Si falla, permite al equipo un turno adicional breve."
          ],
          "observe": [
            "Explica la respuesta del equipo, no la suya propia."
          ],
          "limits": [],
          "aiAdaptation": "El portavoz debe explicar sin apoyarse en la salida de IA.",
          "example": "Tras resolver un problema, elegimos quién sale a la pizarra.",
          "evidenceProduced": "La explicación de la respuesta del equipo dada por una persona elegida al azar tras el trabajo.",
          "boundedInference": "Que esa persona concreta puede reconstruir y defender la respuesta común del equipo.",
          "cannotInfer": [
            "Una respuesta pobre puede deberse al reparto interno, no al desconocimiento personal.",
            "No informa del resto del equipo."
          ],
          "inferenceConditions": [
            "El azar debe anunciarse antes de empezar el trabajo en equipo."
          ],
          "whenNotToUse": "Cuando se usa como sanción del grupo por la respuesta de una persona.",
          "copyablePrompt": "",
          "coverageNote": "",
          "windowConditions": [],
          "windowRationale": ""
        },
        "en": {
          "name": "Random spokesperson",
          "shortDescription": "After the work, the teacher picks who will explain the team's answer.",
          "whenToUse": "To ensure everyone prepares, not just the usual leader.",
          "minimalVersion": "After the work, the teacher picks who will explain the team's answer.",
          "instructions": [
            "Announce at the start that the spokesperson will be random.",
            "At the end, pick with sticks or an app.",
            "If they fail, allow the team a short extra turn."
          ],
          "observe": [
            "Explains the team's answer, not their own."
          ],
          "limits": [],
          "aiAdaptation": "The spokesperson must explain without leaning on AI output.",
          "example": "After solving a problem, we pick who goes to the board.",
          "evidenceProduced": "The explanation of the team's answer given by a randomly chosen member after the work.",
          "boundedInference": "That this particular person can reconstruct and defend the team's joint answer.",
          "cannotInfer": [
            "A poor answer may be due to the internal division of labour, not personal ignorance.",
            "It says nothing about the rest of the team."
          ],
          "inferenceConditions": [
            "The random selection must be announced before team work begins."
          ],
          "whenNotToUse": "When used to penalise the group for one person's answer.",
          "copyablePrompt": "",
          "coverageNote": "",
          "windowConditions": [],
          "windowRationale": ""
        }
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "respuesta-individual-post-grupo",
      "slug": "respuesta-individual-post-grupo",
      "url": "https://evidencias-ia-evaluacion.com/evidencia/respuesta-individual-post-grupo",
      "name_es": "Respuesta individual después del grupo",
      "name_en": "Individual answer after the group",
      "short_description_es": "Tras una tarea cooperativa, cada estudiante responde individualmente una pregunta de contraste.",
      "short_description_en": "After a cooperative task, each student individually answers a contrast question.",
      "family": "cooperativa",
      "family_secondary": "escrita-grafica",
      "primary_claim": "comprende",
      "secondary_claims": "",
      "evidence_kind": "producto",
      "evidence_modes": "proceso|producto",
      "stages": "primaria|secundaria|bachillerato|fp|universidad|adultos",
      "areas": "",
      "moments": "durante",
      "purposes": "formativo|calificable",
      "modalities": "escrita|oral",
      "seia_levels": "0|1|2|3",
      "time_min": 5,
      "time_max": 10,
      "teacher_load": "media",
      "participation": "individual",
      "scalability": "cualquiera",
      "collections": "individual-tras-grupo|rapidas|grupos-numerosos",
      "ai_relation": "compatible",
      "review_status": "borrador-editorial",
      "version": "v0.13",
      "last_reviewed": "2026-09-06",
      "time_scope": "",
      "learning_windows": "",
      "complementary_layers": "desempeno-observado",
      "evidence_origins": "actuacion-provocada",
      "window_selection": "docente",
      "evidence_produced_es": "Una respuesta individual escrita a una pregunta de contraste, resuelta sin el equipo delante.",
      "evidence_produced_en": "An individual written answer to a contrast question, completed without the team present.",
      "bounded_inference_es": "Que la persona sostiene por sí sola una parte del contenido trabajado en grupo.",
      "bounded_inference_en": "That the person can sustain, alone, part of the content worked on in the group.",
      "inference_conditions_es": "La pregunta debe ser distinta de la del grupo, no su copia.",
      "inference_conditions_en": "The question must differ from the group's, not copy it.",
      "cannot_infer_es": "No mide la contribución de cada persona al trabajo cooperativo previo. | Una respuesta floja puede indicar cansancio o falta de tiempo, no ausencia de aprendizaje.",
      "cannot_infer_en": "It does not measure each person's contribution to the earlier cooperative work. | A weak answer may indicate fatigue or lack of time, not absence of learning.",
      "when_not_to_use_es": "Cuando se aplica inmediatamente después de una sesión larga sin margen.",
      "when_not_to_use_en": "When applied immediately after a long session with no slack.",
      "content": {
        "es": {
          "name": "Respuesta individual después del grupo",
          "shortDescription": "Tras una tarea cooperativa, cada estudiante responde individualmente una pregunta de contraste.",
          "whenToUse": "Para asegurar aprendizaje individual tras el trabajo cooperativo.",
          "minimalVersion": "Tras una tarea cooperativa, cada estudiante responde individualmente una pregunta de contraste.",
          "instructions": [
            "Diseña una pregunta que no se resuelva copiando la respuesta del grupo.",
            "Aplícala inmediatamente al terminar.",
            "Compara respuestas dentro del grupo."
          ],
          "observe": [
            "Coherencia entre respuesta individual y aportación al grupo."
          ],
          "limits": [],
          "aiAdaptation": "Sin acceso a IA en esta fase individual.",
          "example": "Tras resolver un caso, se pide cambiar una variable y decidir de nuevo.",
          "evidenceProduced": "Una respuesta individual escrita a una pregunta de contraste, resuelta sin el equipo delante.",
          "boundedInference": "Que la persona sostiene por sí sola una parte del contenido trabajado en grupo.",
          "cannotInfer": [
            "No mide la contribución de cada persona al trabajo cooperativo previo.",
            "Una respuesta floja puede indicar cansancio o falta de tiempo, no ausencia de aprendizaje."
          ],
          "inferenceConditions": [
            "La pregunta debe ser distinta de la del grupo, no su copia."
          ],
          "whenNotToUse": "Cuando se aplica inmediatamente después de una sesión larga sin margen.",
          "copyablePrompt": "",
          "coverageNote": "",
          "windowConditions": [],
          "windowRationale": "Contrasta lo que sostiene cada persona tras el trabajo en grupo: desempeño individual observado."
        },
        "en": {
          "name": "Individual answer after the group",
          "shortDescription": "After a cooperative task, each student individually answers a contrast question.",
          "whenToUse": "To ensure individual learning after group work.",
          "minimalVersion": "After a cooperative task, each student individually answers a contrast question.",
          "instructions": [
            "Design a question that cannot be answered by copying the group's answer.",
            "Apply immediately at the end.",
            "Compare within the group."
          ],
          "observe": [
            "Consistency between individual answer and group contribution."
          ],
          "limits": [],
          "aiAdaptation": "No AI access during this individual phase.",
          "example": "After a case, change a variable and decide again.",
          "evidenceProduced": "An individual written answer to a contrast question, completed without the team present.",
          "boundedInference": "That the person can sustain, alone, part of the content worked on in the group.",
          "cannotInfer": [
            "It does not measure each person's contribution to the earlier cooperative work.",
            "A weak answer may indicate fatigue or lack of time, not absence of learning."
          ],
          "inferenceConditions": [
            "The question must differ from the group's, not copy it."
          ],
          "whenNotToUse": "When applied immediately after a long session with no slack.",
          "copyablePrompt": "",
          "coverageNote": "",
          "windowConditions": [],
          "windowRationale": "It contrasts what each person can sustain after group work: individual observed performance."
        }
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "controversia-academica",
      "slug": "controversia-academica",
      "url": "https://evidencias-ia-evaluacion.com/evidencia/controversia-academica",
      "name_es": "Controversia académica estructurada",
      "name_en": "Structured academic controversy",
      "short_description_es": "Los equipos estudian posiciones opuestas, intercambian argumentos y redactan una conclusión revisada.",
      "short_description_en": "Teams study opposing positions, swap arguments and draft a revised conclusion.",
      "family": "cooperativa",
      "family_secondary": "oral-dialogica",
      "primary_claim": "decide-criterio",
      "secondary_claims": "comprende|usa-ia-critica",
      "evidence_kind": "desempeno",
      "evidence_modes": "proceso|oral",
      "stages": "secundaria|bachillerato|fp|universidad|adultos",
      "areas": "",
      "moments": "durante",
      "purposes": "formativo|calificable",
      "modalities": "oral|escrita",
      "seia_levels": "1|2|3",
      "time_min": 40,
      "time_max": 90,
      "teacher_load": "alta",
      "participation": "equipo",
      "scalability": "hasta-30",
      "collections": "",
      "ai_relation": "compatible",
      "review_status": "borrador-editorial",
      "version": "v0.13",
      "last_reviewed": "2026-09-06",
      "time_scope": "",
      "learning_windows": "",
      "complementary_layers": "",
      "evidence_origins": "",
      "window_selection": "",
      "evidence_produced_es": "Los argumentos preparados por cada posición, el intercambio y la conclusión revisada firmada por el equipo.",
      "evidence_produced_en": "The arguments prepared for each position, the exchange and the revised conclusion signed by the team.",
      "bounded_inference_es": "Que el equipo maneja argumentos de ambas posiciones y modifica su conclusión a la vista de los ajenos.",
      "bounded_inference_en": "That the team handles arguments from both positions and modifies its conclusion in light of the other side's.",
      "inference_conditions_es": "Cada equipo debe defender la posición contraria en algún momento del proceso.",
      "inference_conditions_en": "Each team must defend the opposing position at some point in the process.",
      "cannot_infer_es": "No evidencia la posición personal ni el aprendizaje individual sin comprobación aparte. | El cambio de conclusión puede ser retórico, no conceptual.",
      "cannot_infer_en": "It evidences no personal position or individual learning without a separate check. | The change of conclusion may be rhetorical, not conceptual.",
      "when_not_to_use_es": "Cuando no hay tiempo para las dos fases y se queda en debate a medias.",
      "when_not_to_use_en": "When there is no time for both phases and it stays a half-finished debate.",
      "content": {
        "es": {
          "name": "Controversia académica estructurada",
          "shortDescription": "Los equipos estudian posiciones opuestas, intercambian argumentos y redactan una conclusión revisada.",
          "whenToUse": "Temas polémicos que exigen mirar más allá de la propia opinión.",
          "minimalVersion": "Los equipos estudian posiciones opuestas, intercambian argumentos y redactan una conclusión revisada.",
          "instructions": [
            "Cada equipo prepara su posición.",
            "Intercambia argumentos con el equipo contrario.",
            "Cambia de posición y defiende la contraria.",
            "Redacta una conclusión conjunta razonada."
          ],
          "observe": [
            "Capacidad de defender la posición contraria con solidez."
          ],
          "limits": [],
          "aiAdaptation": "Permite IA en preparación, pero exige citar fuentes primarias en la conclusión.",
          "example": "Controversia sobre política energética con posiciones asignadas.",
          "evidenceProduced": "Los argumentos preparados por cada posición, el intercambio y la conclusión revisada firmada por el equipo.",
          "boundedInference": "Que el equipo maneja argumentos de ambas posiciones y modifica su conclusión a la vista de los ajenos.",
          "cannotInfer": [
            "No evidencia la posición personal ni el aprendizaje individual sin comprobación aparte.",
            "El cambio de conclusión puede ser retórico, no conceptual."
          ],
          "inferenceConditions": [
            "Cada equipo debe defender la posición contraria en algún momento del proceso."
          ],
          "whenNotToUse": "Cuando no hay tiempo para las dos fases y se queda en debate a medias.",
          "copyablePrompt": "",
          "coverageNote": "",
          "windowConditions": [],
          "windowRationale": ""
        },
        "en": {
          "name": "Structured academic controversy",
          "shortDescription": "Teams study opposing positions, swap arguments and draft a revised conclusion.",
          "whenToUse": "Contested topics that demand looking beyond one's opinion.",
          "minimalVersion": "Teams study opposing positions, swap arguments and draft a revised conclusion.",
          "instructions": [
            "Each team prepares its position.",
            "Swap arguments with the opposite team.",
            "Switch positions and defend the other side.",
            "Draft a joint reasoned conclusion."
          ],
          "observe": [
            "Ability to defend the opposite side robustly."
          ],
          "limits": [],
          "aiAdaptation": "Allow AI in preparation but require primary sources in the conclusion.",
          "example": "Controversy on energy policy with assigned positions.",
          "evidenceProduced": "The arguments prepared for each position, the exchange and the revised conclusion signed by the team.",
          "boundedInference": "That the team handles arguments from both positions and modifies its conclusion in light of the other side's.",
          "cannotInfer": [
            "It evidences no personal position or individual learning without a separate check.",
            "The change of conclusion may be rhetorical, not conceptual."
          ],
          "inferenceConditions": [
            "Each team must defend the opposing position at some point in the process."
          ],
          "whenNotToUse": "When there is no time for both phases and it stays a half-finished debate.",
          "copyablePrompt": "",
          "coverageNote": "",
          "windowConditions": [],
          "windowRationale": ""
        }
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "revision-cruzada-equipos",
      "slug": "revision-cruzada-entre-equipos",
      "url": "https://evidencias-ia-evaluacion.com/evidencia/revision-cruzada-entre-equipos",
      "name_es": "Revisión cruzada entre equipos",
      "name_en": "Cross-team review",
      "short_description_es": "Cada equipo analiza el trabajo de otro con criterios y propone una mejora concreta.",
      "short_description_en": "Each team analyses another's work with criteria and proposes a concrete improvement.",
      "family": "cooperativa",
      "family_secondary": "proceso-evolucion",
      "primary_claim": "decide-criterio",
      "secondary_claims": "comprende",
      "evidence_kind": "proceso",
      "evidence_modes": "proceso|producto",
      "stages": "primaria|secundaria|bachillerato|fp|universidad|adultos",
      "areas": "",
      "moments": "durante",
      "purposes": "formativo|calificable",
      "modalities": "escrita",
      "seia_levels": "0|1|2|3",
      "time_min": 15,
      "time_max": 30,
      "teacher_load": "media",
      "participation": "equipo",
      "scalability": "mas-30-equipos",
      "collections": "grupos-numerosos",
      "ai_relation": "compatible",
      "review_status": "borrador-editorial",
      "version": "v0.13",
      "last_reviewed": "2026-09-06",
      "time_scope": "",
      "learning_windows": "evolucion-borradores",
      "complementary_layers": "",
      "evidence_origins": "natural",
      "window_selection": "docente",
      "evidence_produced_es": "El análisis de un equipo sobre el trabajo de otro con criterios comunes y una propuesta de mejora concreta.",
      "evidence_produced_en": "One team's analysis of another's work against shared criteria, with one concrete improvement proposal.",
      "bounded_inference_es": "Que el equipo revisor aplica criterios a un trabajo ajeno y propone una mejora accionable.",
      "bounded_inference_en": "That the reviewing team applies criteria to someone else's work and proposes an actionable improvement.",
      "inference_conditions_es": "La mejora propuesta debe ser una sola, concreta y justificada.",
      "inference_conditions_en": "The proposed improvement must be single, concrete and justified.",
      "cannot_infer_es": "No evidencia el aprendizaje del equipo revisado. | Sin revisión posterior, no hay evidencia de evolución.",
      "cannot_infer_en": "It evidences nothing about the reviewed team's learning. | Without a later revision, there is no evidence of evolution.",
      "when_not_to_use_es": "Cuando la revisión se convierte en competición entre equipos.",
      "when_not_to_use_en": "When the review turns into competition between teams.",
      "content": {
        "es": {
          "name": "Revisión cruzada entre equipos",
          "shortDescription": "Cada equipo analiza el trabajo de otro con criterios y propone una mejora concreta.",
          "whenToUse": "Antes de la entrega final, para mejorar y evaluar criterio.",
          "minimalVersion": "Cada equipo analiza el trabajo de otro con criterios y propone una mejora concreta.",
          "instructions": [
            "Define rúbrica compartida con 3-5 criterios.",
            "Intercambia trabajos anonimizados.",
            "Cada equipo entrega 1 mejora concreta."
          ],
          "observe": [
            "La mejora es accionable, no cosmética."
          ],
          "limits": [],
          "aiAdaptation": "La rúbrica humana prevalece sobre cualquier análisis automatizado.",
          "example": "Revisión cruzada de borradores de informe con rúbrica.",
          "evidenceProduced": "El análisis de un equipo sobre el trabajo de otro con criterios comunes y una propuesta de mejora concreta.",
          "boundedInference": "Que el equipo revisor aplica criterios a un trabajo ajeno y propone una mejora accionable.",
          "cannotInfer": [
            "No evidencia el aprendizaje del equipo revisado.",
            "Sin revisión posterior, no hay evidencia de evolución."
          ],
          "inferenceConditions": [
            "La mejora propuesta debe ser una sola, concreta y justificada."
          ],
          "whenNotToUse": "Cuando la revisión se convierte en competición entre equipos.",
          "copyablePrompt": "",
          "coverageNote": "",
          "windowConditions": [
            "Solo si la mejora propuesta se incorpora y queda registrada en una versión posterior."
          ],
          "windowRationale": "Sin versión posterior, la revisión cruzada evidencia criterio, no evolución."
        },
        "en": {
          "name": "Cross-team review",
          "shortDescription": "Each team analyses another's work with criteria and proposes a concrete improvement.",
          "whenToUse": "Before final delivery, to improve and assess criteria.",
          "minimalVersion": "Each team analyses another's work with criteria and proposes a concrete improvement.",
          "instructions": [
            "Define a shared rubric with 3-5 criteria.",
            "Swap anonymised works.",
            "Each team delivers 1 concrete improvement."
          ],
          "observe": [
            "The improvement is actionable, not cosmetic."
          ],
          "limits": [],
          "aiAdaptation": "The human rubric outweighs any automated analysis.",
          "example": "Cross review of report drafts with a rubric.",
          "evidenceProduced": "One team's analysis of another's work against shared criteria, with one concrete improvement proposal.",
          "boundedInference": "That the reviewing team applies criteria to someone else's work and proposes an actionable improvement.",
          "cannotInfer": [
            "It evidences nothing about the reviewed team's learning.",
            "Without a later revision, there is no evidence of evolution."
          ],
          "inferenceConditions": [
            "The proposed improvement must be single, concrete and justified."
          ],
          "whenNotToUse": "When the review turns into competition between teams.",
          "copyablePrompt": "",
          "coverageNote": "",
          "windowConditions": [
            "Only if the proposed improvement is incorporated and recorded in a later version."
          ],
          "windowRationale": "Without a later version, cross-review evidences criteria, not evolution."
        }
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "mural-conexiones",
      "slug": "mural-de-conexiones",
      "url": "https://evidencias-ia-evaluacion.com/evidencia/mural-de-conexiones",
      "name_es": "Mural de conexiones",
      "name_en": "Connections mural",
      "short_description_es": "El grupo construye una representación común donde cada integrante justifica una relación.",
      "short_description_en": "The group builds a shared representation and each member justifies one link.",
      "family": "cooperativa",
      "family_secondary": "escrita-grafica",
      "primary_claim": "comprende",
      "secondary_claims": "",
      "evidence_kind": "producto",
      "evidence_modes": "proceso|producto",
      "stages": "primaria|secundaria|bachillerato|fp|universidad|adultos",
      "areas": "",
      "moments": "durante",
      "purposes": "formativo|calificable",
      "modalities": "visual|oral",
      "seia_levels": "0|1|2|3",
      "time_min": 20,
      "time_max": 40,
      "teacher_load": "media",
      "participation": "equipo",
      "scalability": "hasta-30",
      "collections": "",
      "ai_relation": "compatible",
      "review_status": "borrador-editorial",
      "version": "v0.13",
      "last_reviewed": "2026-09-06",
      "time_scope": "",
      "learning_windows": "",
      "complementary_layers": "",
      "evidence_origins": "",
      "window_selection": "",
      "evidence_produced_es": "Un mural común donde cada persona firma y justifica al menos una relación entre elementos.",
      "evidence_produced_en": "A shared mural where each person signs and justifies at least one link between elements.",
      "bounded_inference_es": "Que cada persona puede establecer y defender una relación concreta dentro del contenido.",
      "bounded_inference_en": "That each person can establish and defend one concrete relation within the content.",
      "inference_conditions_es": "Cada conexión debe ir firmada y explicada, no solo dibujada.",
      "inference_conditions_en": "Each connection must be signed and explained, not just drawn.",
      "cannot_infer_es": "El mural completo no representa el conocimiento de nadie en particular. | Una relación acertada no acredita comprender el conjunto.",
      "cannot_infer_en": "The finished mural represents nobody's knowledge in particular. | One sound relation does not certify understanding of the whole.",
      "when_not_to_use_es": "Cuando el formato visual esconde que solo dos o tres personas han trabajado.",
      "when_not_to_use_en": "When the visual format hides that only two or three people did the work.",
      "content": {
        "es": {
          "name": "Mural de conexiones",
          "shortDescription": "El grupo construye una representación común donde cada integrante justifica una relación.",
          "whenToUse": "Al cerrar un tema con muchas piezas relacionadas.",
          "minimalVersion": "El grupo construye una representación común donde cada integrante justifica una relación.",
          "instructions": [
            "Pared grande, post-its o tarjetas.",
            "Cada miembro añade 2 nodos y 1 relación.",
            "Justifica su relación en voz alta ante el grupo."
          ],
          "observe": [
            "Las relaciones son sustantivas, no ornamentales."
          ],
          "limits": [],
          "aiAdaptation": "Prohíbe mural generado por IA: se construye colectivamente.",
          "example": "Mural sobre revolución industrial con causas, consecuencias y actores.",
          "evidenceProduced": "Un mural común donde cada persona firma y justifica al menos una relación entre elementos.",
          "boundedInference": "Que cada persona puede establecer y defender una relación concreta dentro del contenido.",
          "cannotInfer": [
            "El mural completo no representa el conocimiento de nadie en particular.",
            "Una relación acertada no acredita comprender el conjunto."
          ],
          "inferenceConditions": [
            "Cada conexión debe ir firmada y explicada, no solo dibujada."
          ],
          "whenNotToUse": "Cuando el formato visual esconde que solo dos o tres personas han trabajado.",
          "copyablePrompt": "",
          "coverageNote": "",
          "windowConditions": [],
          "windowRationale": ""
        },
        "en": {
          "name": "Connections mural",
          "shortDescription": "The group builds a shared representation and each member justifies one link.",
          "whenToUse": "When closing a topic with many related pieces.",
          "minimalVersion": "The group builds a shared representation and each member justifies one link.",
          "instructions": [
            "Big wall, sticky notes or cards.",
            "Each member adds 2 nodes and 1 link.",
            "Justifies their link aloud to the group."
          ],
          "observe": [
            "Links are substantive, not decorative."
          ],
          "limits": [],
          "aiAdaptation": "Ban AI-generated murals: build it collectively.",
          "example": "Mural on the industrial revolution with causes, consequences and actors.",
          "evidenceProduced": "A shared mural where each person signs and justifies at least one link between elements.",
          "boundedInference": "That each person can establish and defend one concrete relation within the content.",
          "cannotInfer": [
            "The finished mural represents nobody's knowledge in particular.",
            "One sound relation does not certify understanding of the whole."
          ],
          "inferenceConditions": [
            "Each connection must be signed and explained, not just drawn."
          ],
          "whenNotToUse": "When the visual format hides that only two or three people did the work.",
          "copyablePrompt": "",
          "coverageNote": "",
          "windowConditions": [],
          "windowRationale": ""
        }
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "acta-decisiones",
      "slug": "acta-de-decisiones-del-equipo",
      "url": "https://evidencias-ia-evaluacion.com/evidencia/acta-de-decisiones-del-equipo",
      "name_es": "Acta de decisiones del equipo",
      "name_en": "Team decision log",
      "short_description_es": "Registro breve de decisiones, desacuerdos, cambios y responsables durante el trabajo.",
      "short_description_en": "Brief log of decisions, disagreements, changes and owners during the work.",
      "family": "proceso-evolucion",
      "family_secondary": "cooperativa",
      "primary_claim": "muestra-avance",
      "secondary_claims": "decide-criterio",
      "evidence_kind": "proceso",
      "evidence_modes": "proceso",
      "stages": "primaria|secundaria|bachillerato|fp|universidad|adultos",
      "areas": "",
      "moments": "durante",
      "purposes": "formativo|calificable",
      "modalities": "escrita",
      "seia_levels": "0|1|2|3",
      "time_min": 5,
      "time_max": 10,
      "teacher_load": "baja",
      "participation": "equipo",
      "scalability": "cualquiera",
      "collections": "rapidas|baja-revision|grupos-numerosos",
      "ai_relation": "compatible",
      "review_status": "borrador-editorial",
      "version": "v0.13",
      "last_reviewed": "2026-09-06",
      "time_scope": "",
      "learning_windows": "investigacion-decisiones",
      "complementary_layers": "",
      "evidence_origins": "natural",
      "window_selection": "cocreada",
      "evidence_produced_es": "Un registro fechado de decisiones del equipo, desacuerdos, cambios de rumbo y persona responsable.",
      "evidence_produced_en": "A dated record of the team's decisions, disagreements, changes of course and responsible person.",
      "bounded_inference_es": "Que el equipo tomó decisiones identificables en momentos concretos y que hubo alternativas en juego.",
      "bounded_inference_en": "That the team took identifiable decisions at specific moments and that alternatives were in play.",
      "inference_conditions_es": "El acta se cumplimenta durante el trabajo, no al final.",
      "inference_conditions_en": "The log is completed during the work, not at the end.",
      "cannot_infer_es": "No acredita que el reparto declarado corresponda al trabajo real. | No evidencia comprensión del contenido por parte de nadie.",
      "cannot_infer_en": "It does not certify that the declared division matches the real work. | It evidences no one's understanding of the content.",
      "when_not_to_use_es": "Cuando el acta se usa para señalar responsables de un mal resultado.",
      "when_not_to_use_en": "When the log is used to single out who is to blame for a poor result.",
      "content": {
        "es": {
          "name": "Acta de decisiones del equipo",
          "shortDescription": "Registro breve de decisiones, desacuerdos, cambios y responsables durante el trabajo.",
          "whenToUse": "Proyectos largos donde la trazabilidad de decisiones importa.",
          "minimalVersion": "Registro breve de decisiones, desacuerdos, cambios y responsables durante el trabajo.",
          "instructions": [
            "Plantilla fija: fecha · decisión · argumentos · descartes · responsable.",
            "Se rellena en cada sesión, no al final.",
            "La entrega final incluye las actas."
          ],
          "observe": [
            "Coherencia entre actas y producto final."
          ],
          "limits": [],
          "aiAdaptation": "El acta debe indicar dónde intervino la IA y qué decisiones humanas se tomaron sobre ello.",
          "example": "Proyecto de investigación con acta semanal.",
          "evidenceProduced": "Un registro fechado de decisiones del equipo, desacuerdos, cambios de rumbo y persona responsable.",
          "boundedInference": "Que el equipo tomó decisiones identificables en momentos concretos y que hubo alternativas en juego.",
          "cannotInfer": [
            "No acredita que el reparto declarado corresponda al trabajo real.",
            "No evidencia comprensión del contenido por parte de nadie."
          ],
          "inferenceConditions": [
            "El acta se cumplimenta durante el trabajo, no al final."
          ],
          "whenNotToUse": "Cuando el acta se usa para señalar responsables de un mal resultado.",
          "copyablePrompt": "",
          "coverageNote": "",
          "windowConditions": [
            "Solo si el acta se cumplimenta durante el proceso y recoge las alternativas descartadas."
          ],
          "windowRationale": "El acta recoge desacuerdos y cambios de rumbo del equipo mientras suceden."
        },
        "en": {
          "name": "Team decision log",
          "shortDescription": "Brief log of decisions, disagreements, changes and owners during the work.",
          "whenToUse": "Long projects where decision traceability matters.",
          "minimalVersion": "Brief log of decisions, disagreements, changes and owners during the work.",
          "instructions": [
            "Fixed template: date · decision · arguments · discards · owner.",
            "Filled each session, not at the end.",
            "Final delivery includes the log."
          ],
          "observe": [
            "Consistency between the log and the final product."
          ],
          "limits": [],
          "aiAdaptation": "The log must record where AI intervened and what human decisions followed.",
          "example": "Research project with a weekly log.",
          "evidenceProduced": "A dated record of the team's decisions, disagreements, changes of course and responsible person.",
          "boundedInference": "That the team took identifiable decisions at specific moments and that alternatives were in play.",
          "cannotInfer": [
            "It does not certify that the declared division matches the real work.",
            "It evidences no one's understanding of the content."
          ],
          "inferenceConditions": [
            "The log is completed during the work, not at the end."
          ],
          "whenNotToUse": "When the log is used to single out who is to blame for a poor result.",
          "copyablePrompt": "",
          "coverageNote": "",
          "windowConditions": [
            "Only if the log is filled in during the process and records the discarded alternatives."
          ],
          "windowRationale": "The log captures the team's disagreements and changes of course as they happen."
        }
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "autoeval-contribucion",
      "slug": "autoevaluacion-contribucion-grupo",
      "url": "https://evidencias-ia-evaluacion.com/evidencia/autoevaluacion-contribucion-grupo",
      "name_es": "Autoevaluación de la contribución al grupo",
      "name_en": "Self-evaluation of group contribution",
      "short_description_es": "Cada integrante valora su aportación con indicadores observables y aporta un ejemplo.",
      "short_description_en": "Each member rates their contribution with observable indicators and gives an example.",
      "family": "metacognitiva",
      "family_secondary": "cooperativa",
      "primary_claim": "muestra-avance",
      "secondary_claims": "decide-criterio",
      "evidence_kind": "proceso",
      "evidence_modes": "metacognicion",
      "stages": "primaria|secundaria|bachillerato|fp|universidad|adultos",
      "areas": "",
      "moments": "durante",
      "purposes": "formativo|calificable",
      "modalities": "escrita",
      "seia_levels": "0|1|2|3",
      "time_min": 5,
      "time_max": 10,
      "teacher_load": "baja",
      "participation": "individual",
      "scalability": "cualquiera",
      "collections": "individual-tras-grupo|rapidas|baja-revision|grupos-numerosos",
      "ai_relation": "compatible",
      "review_status": "borrador-editorial",
      "version": "v0.13",
      "last_reviewed": "2026-09-06",
      "time_scope": "",
      "learning_windows": "investigacion-decisiones",
      "complementary_layers": "",
      "evidence_origins": "reflexiva",
      "window_selection": "estudiante",
      "evidence_produced_es": "Una valoración por indicadores observables de la propia aportación, acompañada de un ejemplo concreto por indicador.",
      "evidence_produced_en": "A rating against observable indicators of one's own contribution, with a concrete example per indicator.",
      "bounded_inference_es": "Que la persona sabe identificar aportaciones concretas suyas dentro del trabajo del equipo.",
      "bounded_inference_en": "That the person can identify concrete contributions of their own within the team's work.",
      "inference_conditions_es": "Cada valoración exige un ejemplo verificable dentro del producto.",
      "inference_conditions_en": "Each rating requires a checkable example within the product.",
      "cannot_infer_es": "No es una medida fiable del reparto real de trabajo. | No informa de la calidad de esas aportaciones.",
      "cannot_infer_en": "It is not a reliable measure of the real division of labour. | It says nothing about the quality of those contributions.",
      "when_not_to_use_es": "Cuando la autovaloración se traduce directamente en nota individual.",
      "when_not_to_use_en": "When self-rating translates directly into an individual grade.",
      "content": {
        "es": {
          "name": "Autoevaluación de la contribución al grupo",
          "shortDescription": "Cada integrante valora su aportación con indicadores observables y aporta un ejemplo.",
          "whenToUse": "Al final de un trabajo cooperativo con calificación grupal.",
          "minimalVersion": "Cada integrante valora su aportación con indicadores observables y aporta un ejemplo.",
          "instructions": [
            "Facilita rúbrica con 4-6 indicadores observables.",
            "Exige un ejemplo concreto por indicador.",
            "Contrasta con la coevaluación del equipo."
          ],
          "observe": [
            "Los ejemplos son verificables por el grupo."
          ],
          "limits": [],
          "aiAdaptation": "Incluye indicador 'uso responsable de IA' con ejemplo obligatorio.",
          "example": "Al terminar un proyecto, cada miembro rellena una hoja de autoevaluación con ejemplos.",
          "evidenceProduced": "Una valoración por indicadores observables de la propia aportación, acompañada de un ejemplo concreto por indicador.",
          "boundedInference": "Que la persona sabe identificar aportaciones concretas suyas dentro del trabajo del equipo.",
          "cannotInfer": [
            "No es una medida fiable del reparto real de trabajo.",
            "No informa de la calidad de esas aportaciones."
          ],
          "inferenceConditions": [
            "Cada valoración exige un ejemplo verificable dentro del producto."
          ],
          "whenNotToUse": "Cuando la autovaloración se traduce directamente en nota individual.",
          "copyablePrompt": "",
          "coverageNote": "",
          "windowConditions": [
            "Solo si cada valoración se acompaña de un ejemplo concreto y verificable dentro del trabajo."
          ],
          "windowRationale": "Sin ejemplo, la autovaloración de contribución no aporta rastro del proceso."
        },
        "en": {
          "name": "Self-evaluation of group contribution",
          "shortDescription": "Each member rates their contribution with observable indicators and gives an example.",
          "whenToUse": "At the end of cooperative work with a group mark.",
          "minimalVersion": "Each member rates their contribution with observable indicators and gives an example.",
          "instructions": [
            "Provide a rubric with 4-6 observable indicators.",
            "Require a concrete example per indicator.",
            "Contrast with peer evaluation."
          ],
          "observe": [
            "Examples are verifiable by the group."
          ],
          "limits": [],
          "aiAdaptation": "Include a 'responsible AI use' indicator with a mandatory example.",
          "example": "At project end, each member fills a self-evaluation sheet with examples.",
          "evidenceProduced": "A rating against observable indicators of one's own contribution, with a concrete example per indicator.",
          "boundedInference": "That the person can identify concrete contributions of their own within the team's work.",
          "cannotInfer": [
            "It is not a reliable measure of the real division of labour.",
            "It says nothing about the quality of those contributions."
          ],
          "inferenceConditions": [
            "Each rating requires a checkable example within the product."
          ],
          "whenNotToUse": "When self-rating translates directly into an individual grade.",
          "copyablePrompt": "",
          "coverageNote": "",
          "windowConditions": [
            "Only if each rating comes with a concrete, checkable example within the work."
          ],
          "windowRationale": "Without an example, self-rated contribution leaves no trace of the process."
        }
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "papel-un-minuto",
      "slug": "papel-de-un-minuto",
      "url": "https://evidencias-ia-evaluacion.com/evidencia/papel-de-un-minuto",
      "name_es": "Papel de un minuto",
      "name_en": "One-minute paper",
      "short_description_es": "Respuesta breve sobre la idea principal aprendida y la duda que permanece.",
      "short_description_en": "Short response on the main idea learnt and the remaining question.",
      "family": "metacognitiva",
      "family_secondary": "escrita-grafica",
      "primary_claim": "comprende",
      "secondary_claims": "",
      "evidence_kind": "producto",
      "evidence_modes": "metacognicion|producto",
      "stages": "primaria|secundaria|bachillerato|fp|universidad|adultos",
      "areas": "",
      "moments": "despues",
      "purposes": "formativo|calificable",
      "modalities": "escrita",
      "seia_levels": "0|1|2|3",
      "time_min": 2,
      "time_max": 5,
      "teacher_load": "baja",
      "participation": "individual",
      "scalability": "cualquiera",
      "collections": "rapidas|baja-revision|grupos-numerosos",
      "ai_relation": "compatible",
      "review_status": "borrador-editorial",
      "version": "v0.13",
      "last_reviewed": "2026-09-06",
      "time_scope": "",
      "learning_windows": "error-cambio-cognitivo",
      "complementary_layers": "",
      "evidence_origins": "reflexiva",
      "window_selection": "docente",
      "evidence_produced_es": "Una respuesta escrita de un minuto sobre la idea principal aprendida y la duda que permanece.",
      "evidence_produced_en": "A one-minute written response on the main idea learnt and the doubt that remains.",
      "bounded_inference_es": "Que en ese momento la persona puede nombrar una idea de la sesión y localizar una duda; sirve para ajustar la clase siguiente.",
      "bounded_inference_en": "That at that moment the person can name one idea from the session and locate a doubt; useful for adjusting the next class.",
      "inference_conditions_es": "Se responde sin materiales y con la misma consigna para todo el grupo.",
      "inference_conditions_en": "It is answered without materials and with the same prompt for everyone.",
      "cannot_infer_es": "No evidencia cambio de comprensión sin una respuesta previa comparable. | No permite calificar el aprendizaje del tema.",
      "cannot_infer_en": "It evidences no change in understanding without a comparable earlier response. | It does not support grading learning of the topic.",
      "when_not_to_use_es": "Cuando se acumula sin usarse para decidir nada en la sesión siguiente.",
      "when_not_to_use_en": "When it piles up without being used to decide anything in the next session.",
      "content": {
        "es": {
          "name": "Papel de un minuto",
          "shortDescription": "Respuesta breve sobre la idea principal aprendida y la duda que permanece.",
          "whenToUse": "Cierre de clase para captar comprensión y dudas.",
          "minimalVersion": "Respuesta breve sobre la idea principal aprendida y la duda que permanece.",
          "instructions": [
            "Dos preguntas fijas: qué he aprendido y qué sigo sin entender.",
            "Anónimo o firmado según el clima.",
            "Lee 5-10 al inicio de la siguiente sesión."
          ],
          "observe": [
            "Las dudas repetidas señalan lo que hay que retomar."
          ],
          "limits": [],
          "aiAdaptation": "Prohíbe usar IA: interesa lo que cree el estudiante, no la IA.",
          "example": "Últimos 2 minutos: papel de un minuto en una tarjeta.",
          "evidenceProduced": "Una respuesta escrita de un minuto sobre la idea principal aprendida y la duda que permanece.",
          "boundedInference": "Que en ese momento la persona puede nombrar una idea de la sesión y localizar una duda; sirve para ajustar la clase siguiente.",
          "cannotInfer": [
            "No evidencia cambio de comprensión sin una respuesta previa comparable.",
            "No permite calificar el aprendizaje del tema."
          ],
          "inferenceConditions": [
            "Se responde sin materiales y con la misma consigna para todo el grupo."
          ],
          "whenNotToUse": "Cuando se acumula sin usarse para decidir nada en la sesión siguiente.",
          "copyablePrompt": "",
          "coverageNote": "",
          "windowConditions": [
            "Revisión v0.13: condicionada a línea de base previa, respuesta posterior modificada y explicación del cambio."
          ],
          "windowRationale": "Igual que el ticket de salida: sin línea de base solo registra el estado actual."
        },
        "en": {
          "name": "One-minute paper",
          "shortDescription": "Short response on the main idea learnt and the remaining question.",
          "whenToUse": "End of class to capture understanding and doubts.",
          "minimalVersion": "Short response on the main idea learnt and the remaining question.",
          "instructions": [
            "Two fixed questions: what I learnt and what I don't yet get.",
            "Anonymous or signed depending on the climate.",
            "Read 5-10 at the start of the next session."
          ],
          "observe": [
            "Recurring doubts signal what to revisit."
          ],
          "limits": [],
          "aiAdaptation": "Ban AI: what matters is the student's view.",
          "example": "Last 2 minutes: one-minute paper on a card.",
          "evidenceProduced": "A one-minute written response on the main idea learnt and the doubt that remains.",
          "boundedInference": "That at that moment the person can name one idea from the session and locate a doubt; useful for adjusting the next class.",
          "cannotInfer": [
            "It evidences no change in understanding without a comparable earlier response.",
            "It does not support grading learning of the topic."
          ],
          "inferenceConditions": [
            "It is answered without materials and with the same prompt for everyone."
          ],
          "whenNotToUse": "When it piles up without being used to decide anything in the next session.",
          "copyablePrompt": "",
          "coverageNote": "",
          "windowConditions": [
            "v0.13 review: conditional on a prior baseline, a later changed answer and an explanation of the change."
          ],
          "windowRationale": "Like the exit ticket: without a baseline it only records the current state."
        }
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "punto-mas-confuso",
      "slug": "el-punto-mas-confuso",
      "url": "https://evidencias-ia-evaluacion.com/evidencia/el-punto-mas-confuso",
      "name_es": "El punto más confuso",
      "name_en": "The muddiest point",
      "short_description_es": "El estudiante identifica qué parte no comprende y dónde aparece la dificultad.",
      "short_description_en": "The student identifies which part they don't yet understand and where.",
      "family": "metacognitiva",
      "family_secondary": "",
      "primary_claim": "comprende",
      "secondary_claims": "",
      "evidence_kind": "proceso",
      "evidence_modes": "metacognicion",
      "stages": "primaria|secundaria|bachillerato|fp|universidad|adultos",
      "areas": "",
      "moments": "despues",
      "purposes": "formativo|calificable",
      "modalities": "escrita",
      "seia_levels": "0|1|2|3",
      "time_min": 2,
      "time_max": 5,
      "teacher_load": "baja",
      "participation": "individual",
      "scalability": "cualquiera",
      "collections": "rapidas|baja-revision|grupos-numerosos",
      "ai_relation": "compatible",
      "review_status": "borrador-editorial",
      "version": "v0.13",
      "last_reviewed": "2026-09-06",
      "time_scope": "",
      "learning_windows": "error-cambio-cognitivo",
      "complementary_layers": "",
      "evidence_origins": "reflexiva",
      "window_selection": "estudiante",
      "evidence_produced_es": "La parte del contenido que el estudiante señala como no comprendida y el punto exacto donde aparece la dificultad.",
      "evidence_produced_en": "The part of the content the student flags as not understood and the exact point where the difficulty appears.",
      "bounded_inference_es": "Que la persona localiza dónde se le rompe la comprensión, con el grado de precisión que muestre su respuesta.",
      "bounded_inference_en": "That the person locates where their understanding breaks down, to the level of precision their answer shows.",
      "inference_conditions_es": "Se pide señalar el punto concreto, no un tema entero.",
      "inference_conditions_en": "They are asked to point to the specific spot, not a whole topic.",
      "cannot_infer_es": "No evidencia cambio de comprensión: nombrar la duda no es haberla superado. | El silencio o el «nada» no significan que no haya dificultad.",
      "cannot_infer_en": "It evidences no change in understanding: naming a doubt is not overcoming it. | Silence or 'nothing' does not mean there is no difficulty.",
      "when_not_to_use_es": "Cuando las respuestas se leen como falta de atención en lugar de como información didáctica.",
      "when_not_to_use_en": "When responses are read as inattention rather than as teaching information.",
      "content": {
        "es": {
          "name": "El punto más confuso",
          "shortDescription": "El estudiante identifica qué parte no comprende y dónde aparece la dificultad.",
          "whenToUse": "Cuando la clase toca conceptos que suelen dar problemas.",
          "minimalVersion": "El estudiante identifica qué parte no comprende y dónde aparece la dificultad.",
          "instructions": [
            "Pide localización exacta: 'el paso 3', 'la fórmula X'.",
            "Exige una frase describiendo la dificultad, no una etiqueta."
          ],
          "observe": [
            "Especificidad de la localización."
          ],
          "limits": [],
          "aiAdaptation": "La IA puede ayudar a formularla, pero interesa la duda propia.",
          "example": "Al final del tema, cada estudiante entrega su punto más confuso.",
          "evidenceProduced": "La parte del contenido que el estudiante señala como no comprendida y el punto exacto donde aparece la dificultad.",
          "boundedInference": "Que la persona localiza dónde se le rompe la comprensión, con el grado de precisión que muestre su respuesta.",
          "cannotInfer": [
            "No evidencia cambio de comprensión: nombrar la duda no es haberla superado.",
            "El silencio o el «nada» no significan que no haya dificultad."
          ],
          "inferenceConditions": [
            "Se pide señalar el punto concreto, no un tema entero."
          ],
          "whenNotToUse": "Cuando las respuestas se leen como falta de atención en lugar de como información didáctica.",
          "copyablePrompt": "",
          "coverageNote": "",
          "windowConditions": [
            "Revisión v0.13: solo abre ventana si se recoge una respuesta de partida, una respuesta posterior modificada y la explicación del cambio. Aplicada una sola vez, señala la dificultad pero no evidencia cambio."
          ],
          "windowRationale": "Reasignada de forma condicional: identificar la duda no equivale a cambiar de comprensión."
        },
        "en": {
          "name": "The muddiest point",
          "shortDescription": "The student identifies which part they don't yet understand and where.",
          "whenToUse": "When the class covers concepts that often cause trouble.",
          "minimalVersion": "The student identifies which part they don't yet understand and where.",
          "instructions": [
            "Ask for exact location: 'step 3', 'formula X'.",
            "Require a sentence describing the difficulty, not a label."
          ],
          "observe": [
            "Specificity of the location."
          ],
          "limits": [],
          "aiAdaptation": "AI can help phrasing, but the student's own doubt is what matters.",
          "example": "At the end of a unit, each student submits their muddiest point.",
          "evidenceProduced": "The part of the content the student flags as not understood and the exact point where the difficulty appears.",
          "boundedInference": "That the person locates where their understanding breaks down, to the level of precision their answer shows.",
          "cannotInfer": [
            "It evidences no change in understanding: naming a doubt is not overcoming it.",
            "Silence or 'nothing' does not mean there is no difficulty."
          ],
          "inferenceConditions": [
            "They are asked to point to the specific spot, not a whole topic."
          ],
          "whenNotToUse": "When responses are read as inattention rather than as teaching information.",
          "copyablePrompt": "",
          "coverageNote": "",
          "windowConditions": [
            "v0.13 review: it only opens the window if a baseline answer, a later changed answer and an explanation of the change are collected. Used once, it flags difficulty but evidences no change."
          ],
          "windowRationale": "Conditionally reassigned: naming the doubt is not the same as changing one's understanding."
        }
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "titular-subtitulo",
      "slug": "titular-y-subtitulo",
      "url": "https://evidencias-ia-evaluacion.com/evidencia/titular-y-subtitulo",
      "name_es": "Titular y subtítulo",
      "name_en": "Headline and standfirst",
      "short_description_es": "Síntesis de un aprendizaje mediante un titular preciso y una frase que lo explique.",
      "short_description_en": "Synthesis of learning through a precise headline and one explanatory sentence.",
      "family": "escrita-grafica",
      "family_secondary": "",
      "primary_claim": "comprende",
      "secondary_claims": "",
      "evidence_kind": "producto",
      "evidence_modes": "producto",
      "stages": "primaria|secundaria|bachillerato|fp|universidad|adultos",
      "areas": "",
      "moments": "durante",
      "purposes": "formativo|calificable",
      "modalities": "escrita",
      "seia_levels": "0|1|2|3",
      "time_min": 3,
      "time_max": 8,
      "teacher_load": "baja",
      "participation": "individual",
      "scalability": "cualquiera",
      "collections": "rapidas|baja-revision|grupos-numerosos",
      "ai_relation": "compatible",
      "review_status": "borrador-editorial",
      "version": "v0.13",
      "last_reviewed": "2026-09-06",
      "time_scope": "",
      "learning_windows": "",
      "complementary_layers": "",
      "evidence_origins": "",
      "window_selection": "",
      "evidence_produced_es": "Un titular breve y una frase que lo explique, sobre el contenido trabajado.",
      "evidence_produced_en": "A short headline and one sentence explaining it, about the content covered.",
      "bounded_inference_es": "Que la persona jerarquiza: distingue lo principal de lo accesorio y lo formula con precisión.",
      "bounded_inference_en": "That the person prioritises: distinguishes the main point from the peripheral and states it precisely.",
      "inference_conditions_es": "El titular debe ser informativo, no una etiqueta temática.",
      "inference_conditions_en": "The headline must be informative, not a topic label.",
      "cannot_infer_es": "Una síntesis correcta puede memorizarse o generarse sin comprensión. | No informa de la capacidad de desarrollar la idea.",
      "cannot_infer_en": "A correct synthesis can be memorised or generated without understanding. | It says nothing about the ability to develop the idea.",
      "when_not_to_use_es": "Cuando el contenido no admite una jerarquía clara y el formato fuerza simplificaciones falsas.",
      "when_not_to_use_en": "When the content admits no clear hierarchy and the format forces false simplifications.",
      "content": {
        "es": {
          "name": "Titular y subtítulo",
          "shortDescription": "Síntesis de un aprendizaje mediante un titular preciso y una frase que lo explique.",
          "whenToUse": "Cierre de tema o lectura para comprobar síntesis.",
          "minimalVersion": "Síntesis de un aprendizaje mediante un titular preciso y una frase que lo explique.",
          "instructions": [
            "Titular de máximo 10 palabras.",
            "Subtítulo de 1 frase que aporte lo esencial que el titular no dice."
          ],
          "observe": [
            "Precisión del titular.",
            "Complementariedad entre titular y subtítulo."
          ],
          "limits": [],
          "aiAdaptation": "Prohíbe titular generado por IA: interesa la síntesis del estudiante.",
          "example": "Titular del artículo leído: '10 palabras que capten la idea nuclear'.",
          "evidenceProduced": "Un titular breve y una frase que lo explique, sobre el contenido trabajado.",
          "boundedInference": "Que la persona jerarquiza: distingue lo principal de lo accesorio y lo formula con precisión.",
          "cannotInfer": [
            "Una síntesis correcta puede memorizarse o generarse sin comprensión.",
            "No informa de la capacidad de desarrollar la idea."
          ],
          "inferenceConditions": [
            "El titular debe ser informativo, no una etiqueta temática."
          ],
          "whenNotToUse": "Cuando el contenido no admite una jerarquía clara y el formato fuerza simplificaciones falsas.",
          "copyablePrompt": "",
          "coverageNote": "",
          "windowConditions": [],
          "windowRationale": ""
        },
        "en": {
          "name": "Headline and standfirst",
          "shortDescription": "Synthesis of learning through a precise headline and one explanatory sentence.",
          "whenToUse": "End of unit or reading to check synthesis.",
          "minimalVersion": "Synthesis of learning through a precise headline and one explanatory sentence.",
          "instructions": [
            "Headline of up to 10 words.",
            "Standfirst of 1 sentence adding what the headline omits."
          ],
          "observe": [
            "Headline precision.",
            "Complementarity between headline and standfirst."
          ],
          "limits": [],
          "aiAdaptation": "Ban AI-generated headlines: the student's synthesis is what matters.",
          "example": "Headline for the article read: '10 words capturing the core idea'.",
          "evidenceProduced": "A short headline and one sentence explaining it, about the content covered.",
          "boundedInference": "That the person prioritises: distinguishes the main point from the peripheral and states it precisely.",
          "cannotInfer": [
            "A correct synthesis can be memorised or generated without understanding.",
            "It says nothing about the ability to develop the idea."
          ],
          "inferenceConditions": [
            "The headline must be informative, not a topic label."
          ],
          "whenNotToUse": "When the content admits no clear hierarchy and the format forces false simplifications.",
          "copyablePrompt": "",
          "coverageNote": "",
          "windowConditions": [],
          "windowRationale": ""
        }
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "ejemplo-no-ejemplo",
      "slug": "ejemplo-y-no-ejemplo",
      "url": "https://evidencias-ia-evaluacion.com/evidencia/ejemplo-y-no-ejemplo",
      "name_es": "Ejemplo y no ejemplo",
      "name_en": "Example and non-example",
      "short_description_es": "El estudiante crea o clasifica casos que cumplen y no cumplen un concepto y justifica la diferencia.",
      "short_description_en": "The student creates or classifies cases that meet and do not meet a concept and justifies the difference.",
      "family": "escrita-grafica",
      "family_secondary": "",
      "primary_claim": "comprende",
      "secondary_claims": "",
      "evidence_kind": "producto",
      "evidence_modes": "producto",
      "stages": "primaria|secundaria|bachillerato|fp|universidad|adultos",
      "areas": "",
      "moments": "durante",
      "purposes": "formativo|calificable",
      "modalities": "escrita",
      "seia_levels": "0|1|2|3",
      "time_min": 5,
      "time_max": 12,
      "teacher_load": "baja",
      "participation": "individual",
      "scalability": "cualquiera",
      "collections": "baja-revision|grupos-numerosos",
      "ai_relation": "compatible",
      "review_status": "borrador-editorial",
      "version": "v0.13",
      "last_reviewed": "2026-09-06",
      "time_scope": "",
      "learning_windows": "",
      "complementary_layers": "",
      "evidence_origins": "",
      "window_selection": "",
      "evidence_produced_es": "Un caso que cumple el concepto, otro que no lo cumple y la justificación de la diferencia.",
      "evidence_produced_en": "One case that meets the concept, one that does not, and the justification of the difference.",
      "bounded_inference_es": "Que la persona maneja los atributos definitorios del concepto y no solo su ejemplo canónico.",
      "bounded_inference_en": "That the person handles the concept's defining attributes, not just its canonical example.",
      "inference_conditions_es": "El no ejemplo debe ser cercano, no obviamente ajeno al concepto.",
      "inference_conditions_en": "The non-example must be near-miss, not obviously unrelated.",
      "cannot_infer_es": "No evidencia uso del concepto en la resolución de problemas. | No informa de la comprensión de conceptos relacionados.",
      "cannot_infer_en": "It evidences no use of the concept in problem-solving. | It says nothing about understanding of related concepts.",
      "when_not_to_use_es": "Cuando el concepto es difuso y la frontera entre ejemplo y no ejemplo es discutible.",
      "when_not_to_use_en": "When the concept is fuzzy and the example/non-example boundary is debatable.",
      "content": {
        "es": {
          "name": "Ejemplo y no ejemplo",
          "shortDescription": "El estudiante crea o clasifica casos que cumplen y no cumplen un concepto y justifica la diferencia.",
          "whenToUse": "Conceptos que se confunden con otros cercanos.",
          "minimalVersion": "El estudiante crea o clasifica casos que cumplen y no cumplen un concepto y justifica la diferencia.",
          "instructions": [
            "Pide 1 ejemplo y 1 no ejemplo.",
            "Exige una razón por la que el no ejemplo se queda fuera."
          ],
          "observe": [
            "El no ejemplo es realmente cercano, no absurdo."
          ],
          "limits": [],
          "aiAdaptation": "Pide un no ejemplo que la IA no detecte fácilmente.",
          "example": "Ejemplo y no ejemplo de metáfora frente a comparación.",
          "evidenceProduced": "Un caso que cumple el concepto, otro que no lo cumple y la justificación de la diferencia.",
          "boundedInference": "Que la persona maneja los atributos definitorios del concepto y no solo su ejemplo canónico.",
          "cannotInfer": [
            "No evidencia uso del concepto en la resolución de problemas.",
            "No informa de la comprensión de conceptos relacionados."
          ],
          "inferenceConditions": [
            "El no ejemplo debe ser cercano, no obviamente ajeno al concepto."
          ],
          "whenNotToUse": "Cuando el concepto es difuso y la frontera entre ejemplo y no ejemplo es discutible.",
          "copyablePrompt": "",
          "coverageNote": "",
          "windowConditions": [],
          "windowRationale": ""
        },
        "en": {
          "name": "Example and non-example",
          "shortDescription": "The student creates or classifies cases that meet and do not meet a concept and justifies the difference.",
          "whenToUse": "Concepts often confused with similar ones.",
          "minimalVersion": "The student creates or classifies cases that meet and do not meet a concept and justifies the difference.",
          "instructions": [
            "Ask for 1 example and 1 non-example.",
            "Require a reason why the non-example is excluded."
          ],
          "observe": [
            "The non-example is genuinely close, not absurd."
          ],
          "limits": [],
          "aiAdaptation": "Ask for a non-example the AI wouldn't easily catch.",
          "example": "Example and non-example of metaphor vs simile.",
          "evidenceProduced": "One case that meets the concept, one that does not, and the justification of the difference.",
          "boundedInference": "That the person handles the concept's defining attributes, not just its canonical example.",
          "cannotInfer": [
            "It evidences no use of the concept in problem-solving.",
            "It says nothing about understanding of related concepts."
          ],
          "inferenceConditions": [
            "The non-example must be near-miss, not obviously unrelated."
          ],
          "whenNotToUse": "When the concept is fuzzy and the example/non-example boundary is debatable.",
          "copyablePrompt": "",
          "coverageNote": "",
          "windowConditions": [],
          "windowRationale": ""
        }
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "analisis-error",
      "slug": "analisis-de-un-error",
      "url": "https://evidencias-ia-evaluacion.com/evidencia/analisis-de-un-error",
      "name_es": "Análisis de un error",
      "name_en": "Error analysis",
      "short_description_es": "Se presenta una respuesta equivocada y se pide localizar el error, explicarlo y corregirlo.",
      "short_description_en": "A wrong answer is presented; students must locate the error, explain it and correct it.",
      "family": "escrita-grafica",
      "family_secondary": "metacognitiva",
      "primary_claim": "comprende",
      "secondary_claims": "decide-criterio",
      "evidence_kind": "producto",
      "evidence_modes": "producto",
      "stages": "primaria|secundaria|bachillerato|fp|universidad|adultos",
      "areas": "",
      "moments": "durante",
      "purposes": "formativo|calificable",
      "modalities": "escrita",
      "seia_levels": "0|1|2|3",
      "time_min": 8,
      "time_max": 15,
      "teacher_load": "media",
      "participation": "individual",
      "scalability": "cualquiera",
      "collections": "grupos-numerosos",
      "ai_relation": "compatible",
      "review_status": "borrador-editorial",
      "version": "v0.13",
      "last_reviewed": "2026-09-06",
      "time_scope": "",
      "learning_windows": "",
      "complementary_layers": "desempeno-observado",
      "evidence_origins": "reflexiva",
      "window_selection": "docente",
      "evidence_produced_es": "La localización del error en una respuesta dada, su explicación y la corrección propuesta.",
      "evidence_produced_en": "The location of the error in a given answer, its explanation and the proposed correction.",
      "bounded_inference_es": "Que la persona reconoce un fallo concreto en un procedimiento ajeno y sabe explicar por qué es un fallo.",
      "bounded_inference_en": "That the person recognises a specific fault in someone else's procedure and can explain why it is one.",
      "inference_conditions_es": "El error debe ser característico del contenido, no una errata.",
      "inference_conditions_en": "The error must be characteristic of the content, not a typo.",
      "cannot_infer_es": "Detectar un error ajeno no implica no cometerlo uno mismo. | No evidencia cambio en la propia comprensión.",
      "cannot_infer_en": "Spotting someone else's error does not imply not making it oneself. | It evidences no change in one's own understanding.",
      "when_not_to_use_es": "Cuando el error presentado se parece al de un estudiante identificable del grupo.",
      "when_not_to_use_en": "When the presented error resembles that of an identifiable student in the group.",
      "content": {
        "es": {
          "name": "Análisis de un error",
          "shortDescription": "Se presenta una respuesta equivocada y se pide localizar el error, explicarlo y corregirlo.",
          "whenToUse": "Contenidos con errores típicos frecuentes.",
          "minimalVersion": "Se presenta una respuesta equivocada y se pide localizar el error, explicarlo y corregirlo.",
          "instructions": [
            "Prepara la respuesta con un error genuino, no ficticio.",
            "Pide localización, explicación y corrección."
          ],
          "observe": [
            "Explica por qué es error, no solo lo señala."
          ],
          "limits": [],
          "aiAdaptation": "Usa salidas de IA con errores reales como caso de análisis.",
          "example": "Análisis de un texto argumentativo con una falacia introducida.",
          "evidenceProduced": "La localización del error en una respuesta dada, su explicación y la corrección propuesta.",
          "boundedInference": "Que la persona reconoce un fallo concreto en un procedimiento ajeno y sabe explicar por qué es un fallo.",
          "cannotInfer": [
            "Detectar un error ajeno no implica no cometerlo uno mismo.",
            "No evidencia cambio en la propia comprensión."
          ],
          "inferenceConditions": [
            "El error debe ser característico del contenido, no una errata."
          ],
          "whenNotToUse": "Cuando el error presentado se parece al de un estudiante identificable del grupo.",
          "copyablePrompt": "",
          "coverageNote": "",
          "windowConditions": [
            "El error analizado debe explicarse y corregirse, no solo señalarse.",
            "Solo abriría la ventana de error y cambio si se añaden la respuesta propia inicial, una revisión posterior y la explicación del cambio."
          ],
          "windowRationale": "Revisión v0.13: retirada la ventana por defecto. Diagnosticar un error ajeno es diagnóstico, no cambio cognitivo propio."
        },
        "en": {
          "name": "Error analysis",
          "shortDescription": "A wrong answer is presented; students must locate the error, explain it and correct it.",
          "whenToUse": "Content with common typical errors.",
          "minimalVersion": "A wrong answer is presented; students must locate the error, explain it and correct it.",
          "instructions": [
            "Prepare an answer with a real, not fictitious, error.",
            "Ask for location, explanation and correction."
          ],
          "observe": [
            "Explains why it's an error, not just points at it."
          ],
          "limits": [],
          "aiAdaptation": "Use real AI outputs with errors as analysis cases.",
          "example": "Analysis of an argumentative text with an introduced fallacy.",
          "evidenceProduced": "The location of the error in a given answer, its explanation and the proposed correction.",
          "boundedInference": "That the person recognises a specific fault in someone else's procedure and can explain why it is one.",
          "cannotInfer": [
            "Spotting someone else's error does not imply not making it oneself.",
            "It evidences no change in one's own understanding."
          ],
          "inferenceConditions": [
            "The error must be characteristic of the content, not a typo."
          ],
          "whenNotToUse": "When the presented error resembles that of an identifiable student in the group.",
          "copyablePrompt": "",
          "coverageNote": "",
          "windowConditions": [
            "The analysed error must be explained and corrected, not merely spotted.",
            "It would only open the error-and-change window if the student's own initial answer, a later revision and an explanation of the change were added."
          ],
          "windowRationale": "v0.13 review: default window removed. Diagnosing someone else's error is diagnosis, not one's own cognitive change."
        }
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "completa-ejemplo-resuelto",
      "slug": "completa-el-ejemplo-resuelto",
      "url": "https://evidencias-ia-evaluacion.com/evidencia/completa-el-ejemplo-resuelto",
      "name_es": "Completa el ejemplo resuelto",
      "name_en": "Complete the worked example",
      "short_description_es": "El estudiante recibe un procedimiento incompleto y debe terminarlo justificando los pasos.",
      "short_description_en": "The student receives an incomplete procedure and must finish it, justifying each step.",
      "family": "escrita-grafica",
      "family_secondary": "practica-desempeno",
      "primary_claim": "puede-hacerlo",
      "secondary_claims": "comprende",
      "evidence_kind": "desempeno",
      "evidence_modes": "producto",
      "stages": "primaria|secundaria|bachillerato|fp|universidad|adultos",
      "areas": "",
      "moments": "durante",
      "purposes": "formativo|calificable",
      "modalities": "escrita",
      "seia_levels": "0|1|2",
      "time_min": 10,
      "time_max": 20,
      "teacher_load": "media",
      "participation": "individual",
      "scalability": "cualquiera",
      "collections": "grupos-numerosos",
      "ai_relation": "compatible",
      "review_status": "borrador-editorial",
      "version": "v0.13",
      "last_reviewed": "2026-09-06",
      "time_scope": "",
      "learning_windows": "",
      "complementary_layers": "",
      "evidence_origins": "",
      "window_selection": "",
      "evidence_produced_es": "Los pasos que faltaban, completados por el estudiante, con la justificación de cada uno.",
      "evidence_produced_en": "The missing steps, completed by the student, with a justification for each.",
      "bounded_inference_es": "Que la persona puede continuar un procedimiento a partir de un estado intermedio y explicar por qué cada paso va donde va.",
      "bounded_inference_en": "That the person can continue a procedure from an intermediate state and explain why each step goes where it goes.",
      "inference_conditions_es": "Los pasos omitidos deben ser los que exigen decisión, no los mecánicos.",
      "inference_conditions_en": "The omitted steps must be the ones requiring a decision, not the mechanical ones.",
      "cannot_infer_es": "No acredita que sepa iniciar el procedimiento desde cero. | No informa de la elección del procedimiento adecuado ante un problema abierto.",
      "cannot_infer_en": "It does not certify they can start the procedure from scratch. | It says nothing about choosing the right procedure for an open problem.",
      "when_not_to_use_es": "Cuando el andamiaje ya no es necesario y sustituye a una resolución completa.",
      "when_not_to_use_en": "When the scaffolding is no longer needed and replaces a full solution.",
      "content": {
        "es": {
          "name": "Completa el ejemplo resuelto",
          "shortDescription": "El estudiante recibe un procedimiento incompleto y debe terminarlo justificando los pasos.",
          "whenToUse": "Procedimientos que requieren pasos con lógica.",
          "minimalVersion": "El estudiante recibe un procedimiento incompleto y debe terminarlo justificando los pasos.",
          "instructions": [
            "Prepara procedimiento con últimos 2-3 pasos ausentes.",
            "Pide justificación breve por paso completado."
          ],
          "observe": [
            "Coherencia entre pasos y justificación."
          ],
          "limits": [],
          "aiAdaptation": "Prohíbe copiar el resto desde IA: exige justificación manuscrita en clase.",
          "example": "Problema de matemáticas con desarrollo hasta la mitad.",
          "evidenceProduced": "Los pasos que faltaban, completados por el estudiante, con la justificación de cada uno.",
          "boundedInference": "Que la persona puede continuar un procedimiento a partir de un estado intermedio y explicar por qué cada paso va donde va.",
          "cannotInfer": [
            "No acredita que sepa iniciar el procedimiento desde cero.",
            "No informa de la elección del procedimiento adecuado ante un problema abierto."
          ],
          "inferenceConditions": [
            "Los pasos omitidos deben ser los que exigen decisión, no los mecánicos."
          ],
          "whenNotToUse": "Cuando el andamiaje ya no es necesario y sustituye a una resolución completa.",
          "copyablePrompt": "",
          "coverageNote": "",
          "windowConditions": [],
          "windowRationale": ""
        },
        "en": {
          "name": "Complete the worked example",
          "shortDescription": "The student receives an incomplete procedure and must finish it, justifying each step.",
          "whenToUse": "Procedures with logical steps.",
          "minimalVersion": "The student receives an incomplete procedure and must finish it, justifying each step.",
          "instructions": [
            "Prepare a procedure missing its last 2-3 steps.",
            "Ask for a brief justification per completed step."
          ],
          "observe": [
            "Coherence between steps and justification."
          ],
          "limits": [],
          "aiAdaptation": "Ban copying the rest from AI: require in-class hand-written justification.",
          "example": "Maths problem worked out halfway.",
          "evidenceProduced": "The missing steps, completed by the student, with a justification for each.",
          "boundedInference": "That the person can continue a procedure from an intermediate state and explain why each step goes where it goes.",
          "cannotInfer": [
            "It does not certify they can start the procedure from scratch.",
            "It says nothing about choosing the right procedure for an open problem."
          ],
          "inferenceConditions": [
            "The omitted steps must be the ones requiring a decision, not the mechanical ones."
          ],
          "whenNotToUse": "When the scaffolding is no longer needed and replaces a full solution.",
          "copyablePrompt": "",
          "coverageNote": "",
          "windowConditions": [],
          "windowRationale": ""
        }
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "cuadricula-recuperacion",
      "slug": "cuadricula-de-recuperacion",
      "url": "https://evidencias-ia-evaluacion.com/evidencia/cuadricula-de-recuperacion",
      "name_es": "Cuadrícula de recuperación",
      "name_en": "Retrieval grid",
      "short_description_es": "Tabla de preguntas breves para recuperar conocimientos sin consultar los materiales.",
      "short_description_en": "Grid of short questions to retrieve knowledge without checking materials.",
      "family": "escrita-grafica",
      "family_secondary": "metacognitiva",
      "primary_claim": "comprende",
      "secondary_claims": "",
      "evidence_kind": "producto",
      "evidence_modes": "producto",
      "stages": "primaria|secundaria|bachillerato|fp|universidad|adultos",
      "areas": "",
      "moments": "durante",
      "purposes": "formativo|calificable",
      "modalities": "escrita",
      "seia_levels": "0|1",
      "time_min": 8,
      "time_max": 15,
      "teacher_load": "baja",
      "participation": "individual",
      "scalability": "cualquiera",
      "collections": "baja-revision|grupos-numerosos",
      "ai_relation": "compatible",
      "review_status": "borrador-editorial",
      "version": "v0.13",
      "last_reviewed": "2026-09-06",
      "time_scope": "",
      "learning_windows": "error-cambio-cognitivo",
      "complementary_layers": "",
      "evidence_origins": "actuacion-provocada",
      "window_selection": "docente",
      "evidence_produced_es": "Lo recordado sin materiales sobre varios contenidos, en una misma cuadrícula y con fecha.",
      "evidence_produced_en": "What is recalled without materials across several contents, in one grid, dated.",
      "bounded_inference_es": "Que en esa fecha la persona recupera determinados contenidos sin apoyo externo.",
      "bounded_inference_en": "That on that date the person retrieves certain contents without external support.",
      "inference_conditions_es": "Se hace sin apuntes ni dispositivos y en condiciones equivalentes para todos.",
      "inference_conditions_en": "It is done without notes or devices and under equivalent conditions for everyone.",
      "cannot_infer_es": "Recuperar un dato no implica comprenderlo ni saber aplicarlo. | Sin repeticiones espaciadas no evidencia retención duradera. | Más aciertos entre pases no evidencian por sí solos un cambio de comprensión, solo mejor recuperación.",
      "cannot_infer_en": "Retrieving a fact does not imply understanding or being able to apply it. | Without spaced repetitions it evidences no durable retention. | More hits across rounds do not by themselves evidence a change of understanding, only better retrieval.",
      "when_not_to_use_es": "Cuando el objetivo es comprensión profunda y la cuadrícula la sustituye.",
      "when_not_to_use_en": "When the goal is deep understanding and the grid replaces it.",
      "content": {
        "es": {
          "name": "Cuadrícula de recuperación",
          "shortDescription": "Tabla de preguntas breves para recuperar conocimientos sin consultar los materiales.",
          "whenToUse": "Retención a medio plazo, contenido acumulativo.",
          "minimalVersion": "Tabla de preguntas breves para recuperar conocimientos sin consultar los materiales.",
          "instructions": [
            "Grid con 9-12 casillas de preguntas variadas.",
            "Sin apuntes durante la primera pasada.",
            "Corrige en pareja con apuntes."
          ],
          "observe": [
            "Retención sin apoyo."
          ],
          "limits": [],
          "aiAdaptation": "Modo sin IA. La IA puede generar la propia cuadrícula.",
          "example": "Grid semanal de recuperación con contenidos de las 3 últimas semanas.",
          "evidenceProduced": "Lo recordado sin materiales sobre varios contenidos, en una misma cuadrícula y con fecha.",
          "boundedInference": "Que en esa fecha la persona recupera determinados contenidos sin apoyo externo.",
          "cannotInfer": [
            "Recuperar un dato no implica comprenderlo ni saber aplicarlo.",
            "Sin repeticiones espaciadas no evidencia retención duradera.",
            "Más aciertos entre pases no evidencian por sí solos un cambio de comprensión, solo mejor recuperación."
          ],
          "inferenceConditions": [
            "Se hace sin apuntes ni dispositivos y en condiciones equivalentes para todos."
          ],
          "whenNotToUse": "Cuando el objetivo es comprensión profunda y la cuadrícula la sustituye.",
          "copyablePrompt": "",
          "coverageNote": "",
          "windowConditions": [
            "Solo si se repite sobre los mismos contenidos y se comparan aciertos y fallos entre pases.",
            "Que suban los aciertos no evidencia por sí solo cambio cognitivo: hace falta que el estudiante explique qué entiende ahora distinto respecto al pase anterior."
          ],
          "windowRationale": "Un único pase mide recuerdo en ese momento; la comparación entre pases solo evidencia cambio si se explica."
        },
        "en": {
          "name": "Retrieval grid",
          "shortDescription": "Grid of short questions to retrieve knowledge without checking materials.",
          "whenToUse": "Mid-term retention, cumulative content.",
          "minimalVersion": "Grid of short questions to retrieve knowledge without checking materials.",
          "instructions": [
            "Grid with 9-12 varied questions.",
            "No notes on the first pass.",
            "Correct in pairs with notes."
          ],
          "observe": [
            "Retention without support."
          ],
          "limits": [],
          "aiAdaptation": "No-AI mode. AI can generate the grid itself.",
          "example": "Weekly retrieval grid with the last 3 weeks' content.",
          "evidenceProduced": "What is recalled without materials across several contents, in one grid, dated.",
          "boundedInference": "That on that date the person retrieves certain contents without external support.",
          "cannotInfer": [
            "Retrieving a fact does not imply understanding or being able to apply it.",
            "Without spaced repetitions it evidences no durable retention.",
            "More hits across rounds do not by themselves evidence a change of understanding, only better retrieval."
          ],
          "inferenceConditions": [
            "It is done without notes or devices and under equivalent conditions for everyone."
          ],
          "whenNotToUse": "When the goal is deep understanding and the grid replaces it.",
          "copyablePrompt": "",
          "coverageNote": "",
          "windowConditions": [
            "Only if repeated on the same content and hits and misses are compared across rounds.",
            "More hits alone evidences no cognitive change: the student must explain what they now understand differently from the previous round."
          ],
          "windowRationale": "A single round measures recall at that moment; comparing rounds evidences change only if it is explained."
        }
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "dibuja-de-memoria",
      "slug": "dibuja-de-memoria",
      "url": "https://evidencias-ia-evaluacion.com/evidencia/dibuja-de-memoria",
      "name_es": "Dibuja de memoria",
      "name_en": "Draw from memory",
      "short_description_es": "Representación visual de un sistema, proceso o concepto antes de consultar fuentes.",
      "short_description_en": "Visual representation of a system, process or concept before consulting sources.",
      "family": "escrita-grafica",
      "family_secondary": "",
      "primary_claim": "comprende",
      "secondary_claims": "",
      "evidence_kind": "producto",
      "evidence_modes": "producto",
      "stages": "primaria|secundaria|bachillerato|fp|universidad|adultos",
      "areas": "",
      "moments": "durante",
      "purposes": "formativo|calificable",
      "modalities": "visual",
      "seia_levels": "0|1",
      "time_min": 5,
      "time_max": 10,
      "teacher_load": "baja",
      "participation": "individual",
      "scalability": "cualquiera",
      "collections": "rapidas|baja-revision|grupos-numerosos",
      "ai_relation": "compatible",
      "review_status": "borrador-editorial",
      "version": "v0.13",
      "last_reviewed": "2026-09-06",
      "time_scope": "",
      "learning_windows": "",
      "complementary_layers": "",
      "evidence_origins": "",
      "window_selection": "",
      "evidence_produced_es": "Un esquema o diagrama hecho sin fuentes, con las partes y relaciones que la persona recuerda, y su explicación.",
      "evidence_produced_en": "A sketch or diagram made without sources, with the parts and relations the person recalls, plus their explanation.",
      "bounded_inference_es": "Que la persona tiene una representación interna del sistema con determinadas partes y relaciones.",
      "bounded_inference_en": "That the person holds an internal representation of the system with certain parts and relations.",
      "inference_conditions_es": "El dibujo va acompañado de explicación oral o escrita de las relaciones.",
      "inference_conditions_en": "The drawing is accompanied by an oral or written explanation of the relations.",
      "cannot_infer_es": "La calidad gráfica no es comprensión; un mal dibujo puede ocultar un buen modelo. | No evidencia uso funcional del modelo en una tarea.",
      "cannot_infer_en": "Graphic quality is not understanding; a poor drawing may hide a good model. | It evidences no functional use of the model in a task.",
      "when_not_to_use_es": "Cuando la dificultad gráfica del alumnado se confunde con dificultad conceptual.",
      "when_not_to_use_en": "When students' graphic difficulty is mistaken for conceptual difficulty.",
      "content": {
        "es": {
          "name": "Dibuja de memoria",
          "shortDescription": "Representación visual de un sistema, proceso o concepto antes de consultar fuentes.",
          "whenToUse": "Contenido con estructura espacial o sistémica.",
          "minimalVersion": "Representación visual de un sistema, proceso o concepto antes de consultar fuentes.",
          "instructions": [
            "Dibuja sin consultar durante 5 min.",
            "Compara con la fuente y marca lo que faltó."
          ],
          "observe": [
            "Estructura global, no detalle."
          ],
          "limits": [],
          "aiAdaptation": "La IA no interviene en la primera pasada.",
          "example": "Dibuja el sistema circulatorio de memoria.",
          "evidenceProduced": "Un esquema o diagrama hecho sin fuentes, con las partes y relaciones que la persona recuerda, y su explicación.",
          "boundedInference": "Que la persona tiene una representación interna del sistema con determinadas partes y relaciones.",
          "cannotInfer": [
            "La calidad gráfica no es comprensión; un mal dibujo puede ocultar un buen modelo.",
            "No evidencia uso funcional del modelo en una tarea."
          ],
          "inferenceConditions": [
            "El dibujo va acompañado de explicación oral o escrita de las relaciones."
          ],
          "whenNotToUse": "Cuando la dificultad gráfica del alumnado se confunde con dificultad conceptual.",
          "copyablePrompt": "",
          "coverageNote": "",
          "windowConditions": [],
          "windowRationale": ""
        },
        "en": {
          "name": "Draw from memory",
          "shortDescription": "Visual representation of a system, process or concept before consulting sources.",
          "whenToUse": "Content with spatial or systemic structure.",
          "minimalVersion": "Visual representation of a system, process or concept before consulting sources.",
          "instructions": [
            "Draw without checking for 5 min.",
            "Compare with the source and mark what was missing."
          ],
          "observe": [
            "Overall structure, not detail."
          ],
          "limits": [],
          "aiAdaptation": "AI does not intervene in the first pass.",
          "example": "Draw the circulatory system from memory.",
          "evidenceProduced": "A sketch or diagram made without sources, with the parts and relations the person recalls, plus their explanation.",
          "boundedInference": "That the person holds an internal representation of the system with certain parts and relations.",
          "cannotInfer": [
            "Graphic quality is not understanding; a poor drawing may hide a good model.",
            "It evidences no functional use of the model in a task."
          ],
          "inferenceConditions": [
            "The drawing is accompanied by an oral or written explanation of the relations."
          ],
          "whenNotToUse": "When students' graphic difficulty is mistaken for conceptual difficulty.",
          "copyablePrompt": "",
          "coverageNote": "",
          "windowConditions": [],
          "windowRationale": ""
        }
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "afirmacion-evidencia-razonamiento",
      "slug": "afirmacion-evidencia-razonamiento",
      "url": "https://evidencias-ia-evaluacion.com/evidencia/afirmacion-evidencia-razonamiento",
      "name_es": "Afirmación, evidencia y razonamiento",
      "name_en": "Claim, evidence, reasoning",
      "short_description_es": "El estudiante formula una afirmación, aporta evidencias y explica por qué la sostienen.",
      "short_description_en": "The student states a claim, provides evidence and explains why it supports the claim.",
      "family": "escrita-grafica",
      "family_secondary": "",
      "primary_claim": "decide-criterio",
      "secondary_claims": "comprende",
      "evidence_kind": "producto",
      "evidence_modes": "producto",
      "stages": "primaria|secundaria|bachillerato|fp|universidad|adultos",
      "areas": "",
      "moments": "durante",
      "purposes": "formativo|calificable",
      "modalities": "escrita",
      "seia_levels": "0|1|2|3",
      "time_min": 10,
      "time_max": 25,
      "teacher_load": "media",
      "participation": "individual",
      "scalability": "cualquiera",
      "collections": "grupos-numerosos",
      "ai_relation": "compatible",
      "review_status": "borrador-editorial",
      "version": "v0.13",
      "last_reviewed": "2026-09-06",
      "time_scope": "",
      "learning_windows": "",
      "complementary_layers": "",
      "evidence_origins": "",
      "window_selection": "",
      "evidence_produced_es": "Una afirmación, el dato que la respalda y el razonamiento explícito que une ambos.",
      "evidence_produced_en": "A claim, the datum backing it and the explicit reasoning linking the two.",
      "bounded_inference_es": "Que la persona distingue dato de interpretación y hace explícito el paso entre ellos.",
      "bounded_inference_en": "That the person distinguishes datum from interpretation and makes the step between them explicit.",
      "inference_conditions_es": "El dato debe proceder de una fuente concreta identificada.",
      "inference_conditions_en": "The datum must come from a specific identified source.",
      "cannot_infer_es": "Una estructura correcta puede rellenarse con contenido generado y ajeno. | No evidencia capacidad de buscar la evidencia por sí misma.",
      "cannot_infer_en": "A correct structure can be filled with generated, borrowed content. | It evidences no ability to find the evidence independently.",
      "when_not_to_use_es": "Cuando el contenido no admite evidencia empírica y la plantilla fuerza pseudodatos.",
      "when_not_to_use_en": "When the content admits no empirical evidence and the template forces pseudo-data.",
      "content": {
        "es": {
          "name": "Afirmación, evidencia y razonamiento",
          "shortDescription": "El estudiante formula una afirmación, aporta evidencias y explica por qué la sostienen.",
          "whenToUse": "Argumentación en cualquier área.",
          "minimalVersion": "El estudiante formula una afirmación, aporta evidencias y explica por qué la sostienen.",
          "instructions": [
            "Estructura fija: afirmación · evidencia · razonamiento.",
            "Cada evidencia se atribuye a una fuente."
          ],
          "observe": [
            "La evidencia sostiene realmente la afirmación."
          ],
          "limits": [],
          "aiAdaptation": "La IA no aporta razonamiento: pide que sea del estudiante.",
          "example": "En ciencias: afirmación, datos del experimento, razón teórica.",
          "evidenceProduced": "Una afirmación, el dato que la respalda y el razonamiento explícito que une ambos.",
          "boundedInference": "Que la persona distingue dato de interpretación y hace explícito el paso entre ellos.",
          "cannotInfer": [
            "Una estructura correcta puede rellenarse con contenido generado y ajeno.",
            "No evidencia capacidad de buscar la evidencia por sí misma."
          ],
          "inferenceConditions": [
            "El dato debe proceder de una fuente concreta identificada."
          ],
          "whenNotToUse": "Cuando el contenido no admite evidencia empírica y la plantilla fuerza pseudodatos.",
          "copyablePrompt": "",
          "coverageNote": "",
          "windowConditions": [],
          "windowRationale": ""
        },
        "en": {
          "name": "Claim, evidence, reasoning",
          "shortDescription": "The student states a claim, provides evidence and explains why it supports the claim.",
          "whenToUse": "Argumentation in any subject.",
          "minimalVersion": "The student states a claim, provides evidence and explains why it supports the claim.",
          "instructions": [
            "Fixed structure: claim · evidence · reasoning.",
            "Each evidence is attributed to a source."
          ],
          "observe": [
            "Evidence genuinely supports the claim."
          ],
          "limits": [],
          "aiAdaptation": "AI must not provide the reasoning: require it from the student.",
          "example": "In science: claim, experimental data, theoretical reasoning.",
          "evidenceProduced": "A claim, the datum backing it and the explicit reasoning linking the two.",
          "boundedInference": "That the person distinguishes datum from interpretation and makes the step between them explicit.",
          "cannotInfer": [
            "A correct structure can be filled with generated, borrowed content.",
            "It evidences no ability to find the evidence independently."
          ],
          "inferenceConditions": [
            "The datum must come from a specific identified source."
          ],
          "whenNotToUse": "When the content admits no empirical evidence and the template forces pseudo-data.",
          "copyablePrompt": "",
          "coverageNote": "",
          "windowConditions": [],
          "windowRationale": ""
        }
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "matriz-comparacion",
      "slug": "matriz-de-comparacion",
      "url": "https://evidencias-ia-evaluacion.com/evidencia/matriz-de-comparacion",
      "name_es": "Matriz de comparación",
      "name_en": "Comparison matrix",
      "short_description_es": "Comparación de casos, textos, métodos o soluciones mediante criterios definidos.",
      "short_description_en": "Comparison of cases, texts, methods or solutions using defined criteria.",
      "family": "escrita-grafica",
      "family_secondary": "",
      "primary_claim": "decide-criterio",
      "secondary_claims": "comprende",
      "evidence_kind": "producto",
      "evidence_modes": "producto",
      "stages": "primaria|secundaria|bachillerato|fp|universidad|adultos",
      "areas": "",
      "moments": "durante",
      "purposes": "formativo|calificable",
      "modalities": "escrita|visual",
      "seia_levels": "0|1|2|3",
      "time_min": 15,
      "time_max": 30,
      "teacher_load": "media",
      "participation": "individual",
      "scalability": "cualquiera",
      "collections": "grupos-numerosos",
      "ai_relation": "compatible",
      "review_status": "borrador-editorial",
      "version": "v0.13",
      "last_reviewed": "2026-09-06",
      "time_scope": "",
      "learning_windows": "",
      "complementary_layers": "",
      "evidence_origins": "",
      "window_selection": "",
      "evidence_produced_es": "Una matriz con los criterios elegidos por el estudiante, los casos comparados y la conclusión derivada.",
      "evidence_produced_en": "A matrix with the student's chosen criteria, the compared cases and the conclusion drawn.",
      "bounded_inference_es": "Que la persona selecciona criterios pertinentes para comparar y extrae una conclusión coherente con la matriz.",
      "bounded_inference_en": "That the person selects relevant comparison criteria and draws a conclusion consistent with the matrix.",
      "inference_conditions_es": "Los criterios los elige el estudiante y los justifica; si se dan hechos, la inferencia se reduce a rellenar.",
      "inference_conditions_en": "Criteria are chosen and justified by the student; if given ready-made, the inference shrinks to form-filling.",
      "cannot_infer_es": "Una matriz completa no evidencia comprensión de cada caso en profundidad. | No informa de transferencia a casos no incluidos.",
      "cannot_infer_en": "A complete matrix evidences no in-depth understanding of each case. | It says nothing about transfer to cases not included.",
      "when_not_to_use_es": "Cuando la comparación aplana diferencias cualitativas importantes.",
      "when_not_to_use_en": "When the comparison flattens important qualitative differences.",
      "content": {
        "es": {
          "name": "Matriz de comparación",
          "shortDescription": "Comparación de casos, textos, métodos o soluciones mediante criterios definidos.",
          "whenToUse": "Cuando hay varias opciones y hay que elegir.",
          "minimalVersion": "Comparación de casos, textos, métodos o soluciones mediante criterios definidos.",
          "instructions": [
            "Filas: criterios. Columnas: opciones.",
            "Al final, decisión razonada."
          ],
          "observe": [
            "La decisión final es consistente con la matriz."
          ],
          "limits": [],
          "aiAdaptation": "La IA puede llenar celdas, pero el estudiante decide y firma.",
          "example": "Comparar 3 métodos científicos para resolver un problema.",
          "evidenceProduced": "Una matriz con los criterios elegidos por el estudiante, los casos comparados y la conclusión derivada.",
          "boundedInference": "Que la persona selecciona criterios pertinentes para comparar y extrae una conclusión coherente con la matriz.",
          "cannotInfer": [
            "Una matriz completa no evidencia comprensión de cada caso en profundidad.",
            "No informa de transferencia a casos no incluidos."
          ],
          "inferenceConditions": [
            "Los criterios los elige el estudiante y los justifica; si se dan hechos, la inferencia se reduce a rellenar."
          ],
          "whenNotToUse": "Cuando la comparación aplana diferencias cualitativas importantes.",
          "copyablePrompt": "",
          "coverageNote": "",
          "windowConditions": [],
          "windowRationale": ""
        },
        "en": {
          "name": "Comparison matrix",
          "shortDescription": "Comparison of cases, texts, methods or solutions using defined criteria.",
          "whenToUse": "When there are several options and a choice must be made.",
          "minimalVersion": "Comparison of cases, texts, methods or solutions using defined criteria.",
          "instructions": [
            "Rows: criteria. Columns: options.",
            "At the end, reasoned decision."
          ],
          "observe": [
            "The final decision matches the matrix."
          ],
          "limits": [],
          "aiAdaptation": "AI can fill cells; the student decides and signs.",
          "example": "Compare 3 scientific methods for a problem.",
          "evidenceProduced": "A matrix with the student's chosen criteria, the compared cases and the conclusion drawn.",
          "boundedInference": "That the person selects relevant comparison criteria and draws a conclusion consistent with the matrix.",
          "cannotInfer": [
            "A complete matrix evidences no in-depth understanding of each case.",
            "It says nothing about transfer to cases not included."
          ],
          "inferenceConditions": [
            "Criteria are chosen and justified by the student; if given ready-made, the inference shrinks to form-filling."
          ],
          "whenNotToUse": "When the comparison flattens important qualitative differences.",
          "copyablePrompt": "",
          "coverageNote": "",
          "windowConditions": [],
          "windowRationale": ""
        }
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "formula-buena-pregunta",
      "slug": "formula-una-buena-pregunta",
      "url": "https://evidencias-ia-evaluacion.com/evidencia/formula-una-buena-pregunta",
      "name_es": "Formula una buena pregunta",
      "name_en": "Craft a good question",
      "short_description_es": "El estudiante crea una pregunta que permita comprobar comprensión y redacta una respuesta razonada.",
      "short_description_en": "The student creates a question that checks understanding and writes a reasoned answer.",
      "family": "escrita-grafica",
      "family_secondary": "metacognitiva",
      "primary_claim": "comprende",
      "secondary_claims": "",
      "evidence_kind": "producto",
      "evidence_modes": "producto|metacognicion",
      "stages": "primaria|secundaria|bachillerato|fp|universidad|adultos",
      "areas": "",
      "moments": "durante",
      "purposes": "formativo|calificable",
      "modalities": "escrita",
      "seia_levels": "0|1|2|3",
      "time_min": 10,
      "time_max": 20,
      "teacher_load": "media",
      "participation": "individual",
      "scalability": "cualquiera",
      "collections": "grupos-numerosos",
      "ai_relation": "compatible",
      "review_status": "borrador-editorial",
      "version": "v0.13",
      "last_reviewed": "2026-09-06",
      "time_scope": "",
      "learning_windows": "",
      "complementary_layers": "",
      "evidence_origins": "",
      "window_selection": "",
      "evidence_produced_es": "Las preguntas formuladas por el estudiante sobre el contenido y la justificación de por qué son relevantes.",
      "evidence_produced_en": "The questions the student formulates about the content and why they are relevant.",
      "bounded_inference_es": "Que la persona identifica zonas no resueltas o relevantes del contenido, señal de un mapa mental del tema.",
      "bounded_inference_en": "That the person identifies unresolved or relevant areas of the content, a sign of a mental map of the topic.",
      "inference_conditions_es": "Se pide justificar la relevancia de cada pregunta, no solo enunciarla.",
      "inference_conditions_en": "They must justify each question's relevance, not merely state it.",
      "cannot_infer_es": "Formular buenas preguntas no acredita saber responderlas. | Las preguntas pueden generarse con IA; sin justificación propia no dicen nada.",
      "cannot_infer_en": "Formulating good questions does not certify being able to answer them. | Questions can be AI-generated; without their own justification they say nothing.",
      "when_not_to_use_es": "Cuando el alumnado aún no tiene base suficiente para preguntar con sentido.",
      "when_not_to_use_en": "When students still lack enough grounding to ask meaningfully.",
      "content": {
        "es": {
          "name": "Formula una buena pregunta",
          "shortDescription": "El estudiante crea una pregunta que permita comprobar comprensión y redacta una respuesta razonada.",
          "whenToUse": "Cierre de tema; permite ver el techo cognitivo del estudiante.",
          "minimalVersion": "El estudiante crea una pregunta que permita comprobar comprensión y redacta una respuesta razonada.",
          "instructions": [
            "Prohíbe preguntas cerradas de definición.",
            "Exige que la respuesta prevista requiera al menos 2 pasos."
          ],
          "observe": [
            "La pregunta pide algo más que reconocer."
          ],
          "limits": [],
          "aiAdaptation": "Puedes contrastar la pregunta con una generada por IA y comparar profundidad.",
          "example": "Pregunta de examen que el propio estudiante propone.",
          "evidenceProduced": "Las preguntas formuladas por el estudiante sobre el contenido y la justificación de por qué son relevantes.",
          "boundedInference": "Que la persona identifica zonas no resueltas o relevantes del contenido, señal de un mapa mental del tema.",
          "cannotInfer": [
            "Formular buenas preguntas no acredita saber responderlas.",
            "Las preguntas pueden generarse con IA; sin justificación propia no dicen nada."
          ],
          "inferenceConditions": [
            "Se pide justificar la relevancia de cada pregunta, no solo enunciarla."
          ],
          "whenNotToUse": "Cuando el alumnado aún no tiene base suficiente para preguntar con sentido.",
          "copyablePrompt": "",
          "coverageNote": "",
          "windowConditions": [],
          "windowRationale": ""
        },
        "en": {
          "name": "Craft a good question",
          "shortDescription": "The student creates a question that checks understanding and writes a reasoned answer.",
          "whenToUse": "End of unit; reveals the student's cognitive ceiling.",
          "minimalVersion": "The student creates a question that checks understanding and writes a reasoned answer.",
          "instructions": [
            "Ban closed definition questions.",
            "Require the expected answer to need at least 2 steps."
          ],
          "observe": [
            "The question asks for more than recognition."
          ],
          "limits": [],
          "aiAdaptation": "Compare the question with an AI-generated one and contrast depth.",
          "example": "Exam question the student proposes themselves.",
          "evidenceProduced": "The questions the student formulates about the content and why they are relevant.",
          "boundedInference": "That the person identifies unresolved or relevant areas of the content, a sign of a mental map of the topic.",
          "cannotInfer": [
            "Formulating good questions does not certify being able to answer them.",
            "Questions can be AI-generated; without their own justification they say nothing."
          ],
          "inferenceConditions": [
            "They must justify each question's relevance, not merely state it."
          ],
          "whenNotToUse": "When students still lack enough grounding to ask meaningfully.",
          "copyablePrompt": "",
          "coverageNote": "",
          "windowConditions": [],
          "windowRationale": ""
        }
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "clasificacion-razonada",
      "slug": "clasificacion-razonada",
      "url": "https://evidencias-ia-evaluacion.com/evidencia/clasificacion-razonada",
      "name_es": "Clasificación razonada",
      "name_en": "Reasoned classification",
      "short_description_es": "Organiza elementos en categorías y explica los criterios utilizados.",
      "short_description_en": "Sorts items into categories and explains the criteria.",
      "family": "escrita-grafica",
      "family_secondary": "",
      "primary_claim": "comprende",
      "secondary_claims": "decide-criterio",
      "evidence_kind": "producto",
      "evidence_modes": "producto",
      "stages": "primaria|secundaria|bachillerato|fp|universidad|adultos",
      "areas": "",
      "moments": "durante",
      "purposes": "formativo|calificable",
      "modalities": "escrita|visual",
      "seia_levels": "0|1|2|3",
      "time_min": 10,
      "time_max": 20,
      "teacher_load": "baja",
      "participation": "individual",
      "scalability": "cualquiera",
      "collections": "baja-revision|grupos-numerosos",
      "ai_relation": "compatible",
      "review_status": "borrador-editorial",
      "version": "v0.13",
      "last_reviewed": "2026-09-06",
      "time_scope": "",
      "learning_windows": "",
      "complementary_layers": "",
      "evidence_origins": "",
      "window_selection": "",
      "evidence_produced_es": "La agrupación de elementos hecha por el estudiante y el criterio explícito que ha usado para agrupar.",
      "evidence_produced_en": "The student's grouping of items and the explicit criterion used to group them.",
      "bounded_inference_es": "Que la persona usa un criterio disciplinar consistente y no una semejanza superficial.",
      "bounded_inference_en": "That the person uses a consistent disciplinary criterion rather than surface similarity.",
      "inference_conditions_es": "El criterio se enuncia antes o junto a la clasificación, no se deduce después.",
      "inference_conditions_en": "The criterion is stated before or alongside the classification, not inferred afterwards.",
      "cannot_infer_es": "Una clasificación correcta puede reproducir una vista en clase sin comprensión. | No evidencia manejo de casos límite no incluidos.",
      "cannot_infer_en": "A correct classification may reproduce one seen in class without understanding. | It evidences no handling of borderline cases not included.",
      "when_not_to_use_es": "Cuando solo se acepta una clasificación posible y hay varias defendibles.",
      "when_not_to_use_en": "When only one classification is accepted and several are defensible.",
      "content": {
        "es": {
          "name": "Clasificación razonada",
          "shortDescription": "Organiza elementos en categorías y explica los criterios utilizados.",
          "whenToUse": "Contenido con taxonomías o categorías.",
          "minimalVersion": "Organiza elementos en categorías y explica los criterios utilizados.",
          "instructions": [
            "Da un conjunto de 8-15 elementos.",
            "Pide criterios explícitos, no solo cajas."
          ],
          "observe": [
            "El criterio es explícito y aplicado sin excepciones."
          ],
          "limits": [],
          "aiAdaptation": "Pide una clasificación diferente a la de una IA con justificación.",
          "example": "Clasificar seres vivos según nutrición y reproducción.",
          "evidenceProduced": "La agrupación de elementos hecha por el estudiante y el criterio explícito que ha usado para agrupar.",
          "boundedInference": "Que la persona usa un criterio disciplinar consistente y no una semejanza superficial.",
          "cannotInfer": [
            "Una clasificación correcta puede reproducir una vista en clase sin comprensión.",
            "No evidencia manejo de casos límite no incluidos."
          ],
          "inferenceConditions": [
            "El criterio se enuncia antes o junto a la clasificación, no se deduce después."
          ],
          "whenNotToUse": "Cuando solo se acepta una clasificación posible y hay varias defendibles.",
          "copyablePrompt": "",
          "coverageNote": "",
          "windowConditions": [],
          "windowRationale": ""
        },
        "en": {
          "name": "Reasoned classification",
          "shortDescription": "Sorts items into categories and explains the criteria.",
          "whenToUse": "Content with taxonomies or categories.",
          "minimalVersion": "Sorts items into categories and explains the criteria.",
          "instructions": [
            "Give a set of 8-15 items.",
            "Ask for explicit criteria, not just boxes."
          ],
          "observe": [
            "The criterion is explicit and applied without exceptions."
          ],
          "limits": [],
          "aiAdaptation": "Ask for a classification different from an AI's, with justification.",
          "example": "Classify organisms by nutrition and reproduction.",
          "evidenceProduced": "The student's grouping of items and the explicit criterion used to group them.",
          "boundedInference": "That the person uses a consistent disciplinary criterion rather than surface similarity.",
          "cannotInfer": [
            "A correct classification may reproduce one seen in class without understanding.",
            "It evidences no handling of borderline cases not included."
          ],
          "inferenceConditions": [
            "The criterion is stated before or alongside the classification, not inferred afterwards."
          ],
          "whenNotToUse": "When only one classification is accepted and several are defensible.",
          "copyablePrompt": "",
          "coverageNote": "",
          "windowConditions": [],
          "windowRationale": ""
        }
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "demuestra-explica",
      "slug": "demuestra-y-explica",
      "url": "https://evidencias-ia-evaluacion.com/evidencia/demuestra-y-explica",
      "name_es": "Demuestra y explica",
      "name_en": "Demonstrate and explain",
      "short_description_es": "El estudiante ejecuta un procedimiento mientras explica las decisiones relevantes.",
      "short_description_en": "The student performs a procedure while explaining relevant decisions.",
      "family": "practica-desempeno",
      "family_secondary": "oral-dialogica",
      "primary_claim": "puede-hacerlo",
      "secondary_claims": "comprende",
      "evidence_kind": "desempeno",
      "evidence_modes": "oral|desempeno-controlado",
      "stages": "primaria|secundaria|bachillerato|fp|universidad|adultos",
      "areas": "",
      "moments": "durante",
      "purposes": "formativo|calificable",
      "modalities": "oral|practica",
      "seia_levels": "0|1|2",
      "time_min": 5,
      "time_max": 15,
      "teacher_load": "media",
      "participation": "individual",
      "scalability": "grupo-reducido",
      "collections": "",
      "ai_relation": "compatible",
      "review_status": "borrador-editorial",
      "version": "v0.13",
      "last_reviewed": "2026-09-06",
      "time_scope": "",
      "learning_windows": "",
      "complementary_layers": "desempeno-observado",
      "evidence_origins": "actuacion-provocada",
      "window_selection": "docente",
      "evidence_produced_es": "La ejecución del procedimiento delante del docente junto con la explicación simultánea de cada decisión.",
      "evidence_produced_en": "The performance of the procedure in front of the teacher together with a simultaneous explanation of each decision.",
      "bounded_inference_es": "Que la persona ejecuta el procedimiento y sabe por qué hace cada paso, en ese contexto y con ese material.",
      "bounded_inference_en": "That the person performs the procedure and knows why each step is taken, in that context and with that material.",
      "inference_conditions_es": "La explicación es simultánea o inmediata, no reconstruida más tarde.",
      "inference_conditions_en": "The explanation is simultaneous or immediate, not reconstructed later.",
      "cannot_infer_es": "No garantiza el mismo desempeño con material o contexto distinto. | La ejecución observada una vez no evidencia consolidación.",
      "cannot_infer_en": "It does not guarantee the same performance with different material or context. | One observed performance evidences no consolidation.",
      "when_not_to_use_es": "Cuando la observación directa altera tanto la ejecución que la desvirtúa.",
      "when_not_to_use_en": "When direct observation disturbs the performance enough to distort it.",
      "content": {
        "es": {
          "name": "Demuestra y explica",
          "shortDescription": "El estudiante ejecuta un procedimiento mientras explica las decisiones relevantes.",
          "whenToUse": "Procedimientos donde el paso a paso importa.",
          "minimalVersion": "El estudiante ejecuta un procedimiento mientras explica las decisiones relevantes.",
          "instructions": [
            "El estudiante hace y verbaliza al mismo tiempo.",
            "Docente pregunta sobre decisiones clave."
          ],
          "observe": [
            "La ejecución y la explicación coinciden."
          ],
          "limits": [],
          "aiAdaptation": "La ejecución debe ser en vivo, no leída desde IA.",
          "example": "Un estudiante prepara una disolución y explica cada paso.",
          "evidenceProduced": "La ejecución del procedimiento delante del docente junto con la explicación simultánea de cada decisión.",
          "boundedInference": "Que la persona ejecuta el procedimiento y sabe por qué hace cada paso, en ese contexto y con ese material.",
          "cannotInfer": [
            "No garantiza el mismo desempeño con material o contexto distinto.",
            "La ejecución observada una vez no evidencia consolidación."
          ],
          "inferenceConditions": [
            "La explicación es simultánea o inmediata, no reconstruida más tarde."
          ],
          "whenNotToUse": "Cuando la observación directa altera tanto la ejecución que la desvirtúa.",
          "copyablePrompt": "",
          "coverageNote": "",
          "windowConditions": [],
          "windowRationale": "Ejecución acompañada de explicación en el mismo acto."
        },
        "en": {
          "name": "Demonstrate and explain",
          "shortDescription": "The student performs a procedure while explaining relevant decisions.",
          "whenToUse": "Procedures where step-by-step matters.",
          "minimalVersion": "The student performs a procedure while explaining relevant decisions.",
          "instructions": [
            "The student does and verbalises at once.",
            "Teacher asks about key decisions."
          ],
          "observe": [
            "Execution and explanation match."
          ],
          "limits": [],
          "aiAdaptation": "Execution must be live, not read from AI.",
          "example": "A student prepares a solution and explains each step.",
          "evidenceProduced": "The performance of the procedure in front of the teacher together with a simultaneous explanation of each decision.",
          "boundedInference": "That the person performs the procedure and knows why each step is taken, in that context and with that material.",
          "cannotInfer": [
            "It does not guarantee the same performance with different material or context.",
            "One observed performance evidences no consolidation."
          ],
          "inferenceConditions": [
            "The explanation is simultaneous or immediate, not reconstructed later."
          ],
          "whenNotToUse": "When direct observation disturbs the performance enough to distort it.",
          "copyablePrompt": "",
          "coverageNote": "",
          "windowConditions": [],
          "windowRationale": "Execution accompanied by explanation in the same act."
        }
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "piensa-en-voz-alta",
      "slug": "piensa-en-voz-alta",
      "url": "https://evidencias-ia-evaluacion.com/evidencia/piensa-en-voz-alta",
      "name_es": "Piensa en voz alta",
      "name_en": "Think aloud",
      "short_description_es": "Verbaliza qué observa, qué decide y por qué mientras resuelve una tarea.",
      "short_description_en": "Verbalises what they observe, decide and why while solving a task.",
      "family": "oral-dialogica",
      "family_secondary": "proceso-evolucion",
      "primary_claim": "decide-criterio",
      "secondary_claims": "comprende",
      "evidence_kind": "proceso",
      "evidence_modes": "oral|proceso",
      "stages": "primaria|secundaria|bachillerato|fp|universidad|adultos",
      "areas": "",
      "moments": "durante",
      "purposes": "formativo|calificable",
      "modalities": "oral",
      "seia_levels": "0|1|2",
      "time_min": 5,
      "time_max": 15,
      "teacher_load": "media",
      "participation": "individual",
      "scalability": "grupo-reducido",
      "collections": "",
      "ai_relation": "compatible",
      "review_status": "borrador-editorial",
      "version": "v0.13",
      "last_reviewed": "2026-09-06",
      "time_scope": "",
      "learning_windows": "investigacion-decisiones",
      "complementary_layers": "desempeno-observado",
      "evidence_origins": "natural|actuacion-provocada",
      "window_selection": "docente",
      "evidence_produced_es": "El relato verbal del razonamiento mientras se resuelve, con las dudas y rectificaciones en el momento.",
      "evidence_produced_en": "The verbal account of reasoning while solving, including in-the-moment doubts and corrections.",
      "bounded_inference_es": "Que la persona sigue una estrategia identificable y detecta o no sus propios bloqueos mientras trabaja.",
      "bounded_inference_en": "That the person follows an identifiable strategy and does or does not detect their own blocks while working.",
      "inference_conditions_es": "No se interrumpe ni se corrige durante la verbalización.",
      "inference_conditions_en": "No interruption or correction during the verbalisation.",
      "cannot_infer_es": "Verbalizar poco no significa razonar poco; algunas personas piensan mejor en silencio. | No evidencia el resultado final ni su corrección.",
      "cannot_infer_en": "Verbalising little does not mean reasoning little; some people think better in silence. | It evidences nothing about the final result or its correctness.",
      "when_not_to_use_es": "Cuando la carga de hablar y resolver a la vez perjudica a parte del alumnado.",
      "when_not_to_use_en": "When the load of speaking and solving at once penalises part of the class.",
      "content": {
        "es": {
          "name": "Piensa en voz alta",
          "shortDescription": "Verbaliza qué observa, qué decide y por qué mientras resuelve una tarea.",
          "whenToUse": "Tareas con decisiones invisibles en el producto final.",
          "minimalVersion": "Verbaliza qué observa, qué decide y por qué mientras resuelve una tarea.",
          "instructions": [
            "Modela una vez tú mismo.",
            "El estudiante resuelve verbalizando cada paso."
          ],
          "observe": [
            "Verbaliza dudas, no solo aciertos."
          ],
          "limits": [],
          "aiAdaptation": "Sin IA durante la verbalización.",
          "example": "Resolución de un problema matemático pensando en voz alta.",
          "evidenceProduced": "El relato verbal del razonamiento mientras se resuelve, con las dudas y rectificaciones en el momento.",
          "boundedInference": "Que la persona sigue una estrategia identificable y detecta o no sus propios bloqueos mientras trabaja.",
          "cannotInfer": [
            "Verbalizar poco no significa razonar poco; algunas personas piensan mejor en silencio.",
            "No evidencia el resultado final ni su corrección."
          ],
          "inferenceConditions": [
            "No se interrumpe ni se corrige durante la verbalización."
          ],
          "whenNotToUse": "Cuando la carga de hablar y resolver a la vez perjudica a parte del alumnado.",
          "copyablePrompt": "",
          "coverageNote": "",
          "windowConditions": [
            "Solo si se registra la verbalización, incluidos los bloqueos y rectificaciones, y no solo el resultado."
          ],
          "windowRationale": "Verbalizar mientras se resuelve expone las decisiones en el momento en que se toman."
        },
        "en": {
          "name": "Think aloud",
          "shortDescription": "Verbalises what they observe, decide and why while solving a task.",
          "whenToUse": "Tasks with decisions invisible in the final product.",
          "minimalVersion": "Verbalises what they observe, decide and why while solving a task.",
          "instructions": [
            "Model it once yourself.",
            "The student solves while verbalising each step."
          ],
          "observe": [
            "Verbalises doubts, not just correct steps."
          ],
          "limits": [],
          "aiAdaptation": "No AI during verbalisation.",
          "example": "Maths problem solved thinking aloud.",
          "evidenceProduced": "The verbal account of reasoning while solving, including in-the-moment doubts and corrections.",
          "boundedInference": "That the person follows an identifiable strategy and does or does not detect their own blocks while working.",
          "cannotInfer": [
            "Verbalising little does not mean reasoning little; some people think better in silence.",
            "It evidences nothing about the final result or its correctness."
          ],
          "inferenceConditions": [
            "No interruption or correction during the verbalisation."
          ],
          "whenNotToUse": "When the load of speaking and solving at once penalises part of the class.",
          "copyablePrompt": "",
          "coverageNote": "",
          "windowConditions": [
            "Only if the verbalisation is recorded, including blocks and corrections, not just the result."
          ],
          "windowRationale": "Verbalising while solving exposes decisions at the moment they are made."
        }
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "cuaderno-laboratorio",
      "slug": "cuaderno-de-laboratorio",
      "url": "https://evidencias-ia-evaluacion.com/evidencia/cuaderno-de-laboratorio",
      "name_es": "Cuaderno de laboratorio",
      "name_en": "Lab notebook",
      "short_description_es": "Registra hipótesis, procedimiento, incidencias, datos y cambios durante una práctica.",
      "short_description_en": "Records hypotheses, procedure, incidents, data and changes during a practical session.",
      "family": "proceso-evolucion",
      "family_secondary": "practica-desempeno",
      "primary_claim": "muestra-avance",
      "secondary_claims": "decide-criterio|puede-hacerlo",
      "evidence_kind": "proceso",
      "evidence_modes": "proceso",
      "stages": "secundaria|bachillerato|fp|universidad",
      "areas": "ciencias|tecnologia|fp",
      "moments": "durante",
      "purposes": "formativo|calificable",
      "modalities": "escrita",
      "seia_levels": "0|1|2|3",
      "time_min": 15,
      "time_max": 45,
      "teacher_load": "media",
      "participation": "individual",
      "scalability": "cualquiera",
      "collections": "grupos-numerosos",
      "ai_relation": "compatible",
      "review_status": "borrador-editorial",
      "version": "v0.13",
      "last_reviewed": "2026-09-06",
      "time_scope": "",
      "learning_windows": "investigacion-decisiones|evolucion-borradores",
      "complementary_layers": "desempeno-observado",
      "evidence_origins": "natural",
      "window_selection": "docente",
      "evidence_produced_es": "Un registro fechado de montaje, medidas, incidencias y ajustes durante la práctica.",
      "evidence_produced_en": "A dated record of setup, measurements, incidents and adjustments during the practical.",
      "bounded_inference_es": "Que la persona ha ejecutado la práctica y ha tomado decisiones ante incidencias reales.",
      "bounded_inference_en": "That the person carried out the practical and made decisions in the face of real incidents.",
      "inference_conditions_es": "Se escribe durante la sesión, con incidencias incluidas, no pasado a limpio después.",
      "inference_conditions_en": "It is written during the session, incidents included, not tidied up afterwards.",
      "cannot_infer_es": "Un cuaderno impecable puede indicar copia del guion, no buena práctica. | No evidencia comprensión del fundamento teórico.",
      "cannot_infer_en": "A flawless notebook may indicate copying the script, not good practice. | It evidences no understanding of the underlying theory.",
      "when_not_to_use_es": "Cuando se califica la pulcritud del cuaderno en lugar del proceso.",
      "when_not_to_use_en": "When the notebook's neatness is graded instead of the process.",
      "content": {
        "es": {
          "name": "Cuaderno de laboratorio",
          "shortDescription": "Registra hipótesis, procedimiento, incidencias, datos y cambios durante una práctica.",
          "whenToUse": "Prácticas experimentales o técnicas.",
          "minimalVersion": "Registra hipótesis, procedimiento, incidencias, datos y cambios durante una práctica.",
          "instructions": [
            "Estructura fija con secciones obligatorias.",
            "Registra incidencias, no solo éxitos."
          ],
          "observe": [
            "Trazabilidad entre datos y conclusiones."
          ],
          "limits": [],
          "aiAdaptation": "La IA no genera el cuaderno; sí puede revisar formato.",
          "example": "Cuaderno de una práctica química con desviaciones registradas.",
          "evidenceProduced": "Un registro fechado de montaje, medidas, incidencias y ajustes durante la práctica.",
          "boundedInference": "Que la persona ha ejecutado la práctica y ha tomado decisiones ante incidencias reales.",
          "cannotInfer": [
            "Un cuaderno impecable puede indicar copia del guion, no buena práctica.",
            "No evidencia comprensión del fundamento teórico."
          ],
          "inferenceConditions": [
            "Se escribe durante la sesión, con incidencias incluidas, no pasado a limpio después."
          ],
          "whenNotToUse": "Cuando se califica la pulcritud del cuaderno en lugar del proceso.",
          "copyablePrompt": "",
          "coverageNote": "",
          "windowConditions": [
            "Solo si el registro se escribe durante la sesión e incluye incidencias y ajustes, no un guion pasado a limpio."
          ],
          "windowRationale": "Hipótesis, incidencias y ajustes quedan fechados por el propio protocolo de práctica."
        },
        "en": {
          "name": "Lab notebook",
          "shortDescription": "Records hypotheses, procedure, incidents, data and changes during a practical session.",
          "whenToUse": "Experimental or technical practicals.",
          "minimalVersion": "Records hypotheses, procedure, incidents, data and changes during a practical session.",
          "instructions": [
            "Fixed structure with mandatory sections.",
            "Log incidents, not just successes."
          ],
          "observe": [
            "Traceability between data and conclusions."
          ],
          "limits": [],
          "aiAdaptation": "AI cannot generate the notebook; it can review the format.",
          "example": "Chemistry practical notebook with recorded deviations.",
          "evidenceProduced": "A dated record of setup, measurements, incidents and adjustments during the practical.",
          "boundedInference": "That the person carried out the practical and made decisions in the face of real incidents.",
          "cannotInfer": [
            "A flawless notebook may indicate copying the script, not good practice.",
            "It evidences no understanding of the underlying theory."
          ],
          "inferenceConditions": [
            "It is written during the session, incidents included, not tidied up afterwards."
          ],
          "whenNotToUse": "When the notebook's neatness is graded instead of the process.",
          "copyablePrompt": "",
          "coverageNote": "",
          "windowConditions": [
            "Only if the record is written during the session and includes incidents and adjustments, not a tidied-up script."
          ],
          "windowRationale": "Hypotheses, incidents and adjustments are dated by the practical protocol itself."
        }
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "prueba-revision-prototipo",
      "slug": "prueba-y-revision-de-prototipo",
      "url": "https://evidencias-ia-evaluacion.com/evidencia/prueba-y-revision-de-prototipo",
      "name_es": "Prueba y revisión de prototipo",
      "name_en": "Prototype test and revision",
      "short_description_es": "El estudiante somete su creación a una prueba, recoge fallos y justifica los cambios.",
      "short_description_en": "The student tests their creation, gathers failures and justifies changes.",
      "family": "practica-desempeno",
      "family_secondary": "proceso-evolucion",
      "primary_claim": "puede-hacerlo",
      "secondary_claims": "muestra-avance|decide-criterio",
      "evidence_kind": "desempeno",
      "evidence_modes": "proceso|desempeno-controlado",
      "stages": "primaria|secundaria|bachillerato|fp|universidad",
      "areas": "tecnologia|artes|fp|ciencias",
      "moments": "durante",
      "purposes": "formativo|calificable",
      "modalities": "practica",
      "seia_levels": "0|1|2|3",
      "time_min": 20,
      "time_max": 60,
      "teacher_load": "media",
      "participation": "equipo",
      "scalability": "hasta-30",
      "collections": "",
      "ai_relation": "compatible",
      "review_status": "borrador-editorial",
      "version": "v0.13",
      "last_reviewed": "2026-09-06",
      "time_scope": "",
      "learning_windows": "evolucion-borradores|error-cambio-cognitivo",
      "complementary_layers": "desempeno-observado",
      "evidence_origins": "natural",
      "window_selection": "docente|cocreada",
      "evidence_produced_es": "Las versiones sucesivas del prototipo, los datos de cada prueba y el cambio introducido tras cada una.",
      "evidence_produced_en": "The successive prototype versions, each test's data and the change introduced after each.",
      "bounded_inference_es": "Que la persona modifica su diseño en función de resultados obtenidos, no de intuiciones.",
      "bounded_inference_en": "That the person modifies their design based on obtained results, not hunches.",
      "inference_conditions_es": "Cada cambio se vincula explícitamente al dato que lo motiva.",
      "inference_conditions_en": "Each change is explicitly linked to the datum that motivates it.",
      "cannot_infer_es": "Un prototipo final que funciona no evidencia por sí solo el proceso iterativo. | No informa del reparto del trabajo si es en equipo.",
      "cannot_infer_en": "A final working prototype alone evidences no iterative process. | It says nothing about the division of labour if done in a team.",
      "when_not_to_use_es": "Cuando no hay tiempo material para más de una iteración.",
      "when_not_to_use_en": "When there is no real time for more than one iteration.",
      "content": {
        "es": {
          "name": "Prueba y revisión de prototipo",
          "shortDescription": "El estudiante somete su creación a una prueba, recoge fallos y justifica los cambios.",
          "whenToUse": "Proyectos con producto físico o digital.",
          "minimalVersion": "El estudiante somete su creación a una prueba, recoge fallos y justifica los cambios.",
          "instructions": [
            "Define escenario de prueba.",
            "Recoge fallos.",
            "Prioriza y aplica 2 mejoras justificadas."
          ],
          "observe": [
            "Los cambios responden a fallos, no a preferencia estética."
          ],
          "limits": [],
          "aiAdaptation": "La IA puede sugerir cambios; el estudiante decide y justifica.",
          "example": "Prototipo de aplicación con revisión tras usuarios reales.",
          "evidenceProduced": "Las versiones sucesivas del prototipo, los datos de cada prueba y el cambio introducido tras cada una.",
          "boundedInference": "Que la persona modifica su diseño en función de resultados obtenidos, no de intuiciones.",
          "cannotInfer": [
            "Un prototipo final que funciona no evidencia por sí solo el proceso iterativo.",
            "No informa del reparto del trabajo si es en equipo."
          ],
          "inferenceConditions": [
            "Cada cambio se vincula explícitamente al dato que lo motiva."
          ],
          "whenNotToUse": "Cuando no hay tiempo material para más de una iteración.",
          "copyablePrompt": "",
          "coverageNote": "",
          "windowConditions": [
            "La ventana de error exige un fallo detectado en la prueba y un cambio explicado a partir de él."
          ],
          "windowRationale": "La prueba genera un fallo observable y la revisión posterior muestra qué se reconsideró."
        },
        "en": {
          "name": "Prototype test and revision",
          "shortDescription": "The student tests their creation, gathers failures and justifies changes.",
          "whenToUse": "Projects with a physical or digital product.",
          "minimalVersion": "The student tests their creation, gathers failures and justifies changes.",
          "instructions": [
            "Define test scenario.",
            "Gather failures.",
            "Prioritise and apply 2 justified improvements."
          ],
          "observe": [
            "Changes respond to failures, not aesthetic preference."
          ],
          "limits": [],
          "aiAdaptation": "AI can suggest changes; the student decides and justifies.",
          "example": "App prototype revised after real users.",
          "evidenceProduced": "The successive prototype versions, each test's data and the change introduced after each.",
          "boundedInference": "That the person modifies their design based on obtained results, not hunches.",
          "cannotInfer": [
            "A final working prototype alone evidences no iterative process.",
            "It says nothing about the division of labour if done in a team."
          ],
          "inferenceConditions": [
            "Each change is explicitly linked to the datum that motivates it."
          ],
          "whenNotToUse": "When there is no real time for more than one iteration.",
          "copyablePrompt": "",
          "coverageNote": "",
          "windowConditions": [
            "The error window requires a failure detected in the test and a change explained from it."
          ],
          "windowRationale": "The test produces an observable failure and the revision shows what was reconsidered."
        }
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "estaciones-practicas",
      "slug": "estaciones-practicas",
      "url": "https://evidencias-ia-evaluacion.com/evidencia/estaciones-practicas",
      "name_es": "Estaciones prácticas",
      "name_en": "Practical stations",
      "short_description_es": "El alumnado pasa por varias tareas breves que permiten observar habilidades diferentes.",
      "short_description_en": "Students rotate through short tasks that surface different skills.",
      "family": "practica-desempeno",
      "family_secondary": "",
      "primary_claim": "puede-hacerlo",
      "secondary_claims": "",
      "evidence_kind": "desempeno",
      "evidence_modes": "desempeno-controlado",
      "stages": "primaria|secundaria|bachillerato|fp|universidad|adultos",
      "areas": "",
      "moments": "durante",
      "purposes": "formativo|calificable",
      "modalities": "practica",
      "seia_levels": "0|1|2",
      "time_min": 20,
      "time_max": 50,
      "teacher_load": "alta",
      "participation": "equipo",
      "scalability": "mas-30-equipos",
      "collections": "grupos-numerosos",
      "ai_relation": "compatible",
      "review_status": "borrador-editorial",
      "version": "v0.13",
      "last_reviewed": "2026-09-06",
      "time_scope": "",
      "learning_windows": "",
      "complementary_layers": "desempeno-observado",
      "evidence_origins": "actuacion-provocada",
      "window_selection": "docente",
      "evidence_produced_es": "La ejecución de cada estudiante en varias tareas breves distintas, registrada con la misma pauta.",
      "evidence_produced_en": "Each student's performance across several different short tasks, recorded with the same rubric.",
      "bounded_inference_es": "Que la persona ejecuta determinadas destrezas concretas en condiciones comparables entre estudiantes.",
      "bounded_inference_en": "That the person performs certain concrete skills under conditions comparable across students.",
      "inference_conditions_es": "Las estaciones tienen la misma exigencia y la misma pauta de registro.",
      "inference_conditions_en": "Stations have the same demand and the same recording rubric.",
      "cannot_infer_es": "Tareas breves y descontextualizadas no evidencian desempeño integrado. | No informan del razonamiento salvo que se pregunte en la estación.",
      "cannot_infer_en": "Short decontextualised tasks evidence no integrated performance. | They say nothing about reasoning unless it is asked at the station.",
      "when_not_to_use_es": "Cuando la rotación deja tiempos tan cortos que solo se observa rapidez.",
      "when_not_to_use_en": "When rotation leaves times so short that only speed is observed.",
      "content": {
        "es": {
          "name": "Estaciones prácticas",
          "shortDescription": "El alumnado pasa por varias tareas breves que permiten observar habilidades diferentes.",
          "whenToUse": "Evaluación de competencia con múltiples subhabilidades.",
          "minimalVersion": "El alumnado pasa por varias tareas breves que permiten observar habilidades diferentes.",
          "instructions": [
            "Prepara 4-6 estaciones autónomas.",
            "5-8 min por estación.",
            "Rúbrica compartida."
          ],
          "observe": [
            "Autonomía por estación."
          ],
          "limits": [],
          "aiAdaptation": "Algunas estaciones con IA, otras sin, para triangular.",
          "example": "Evaluación de competencias digitales en 5 estaciones.",
          "evidenceProduced": "La ejecución de cada estudiante en varias tareas breves distintas, registrada con la misma pauta.",
          "boundedInference": "Que la persona ejecuta determinadas destrezas concretas en condiciones comparables entre estudiantes.",
          "cannotInfer": [
            "Tareas breves y descontextualizadas no evidencian desempeño integrado.",
            "No informan del razonamiento salvo que se pregunte en la estación."
          ],
          "inferenceConditions": [
            "Las estaciones tienen la misma exigencia y la misma pauta de registro."
          ],
          "whenNotToUse": "Cuando la rotación deja tiempos tan cortos que solo se observa rapidez.",
          "copyablePrompt": "",
          "coverageNote": "",
          "windowConditions": [],
          "windowRationale": "Varias tareas breves observadas; muestra ejecución, no evolución."
        },
        "en": {
          "name": "Practical stations",
          "shortDescription": "Students rotate through short tasks that surface different skills.",
          "whenToUse": "Competency assessment with multiple subskills.",
          "minimalVersion": "Students rotate through short tasks that surface different skills.",
          "instructions": [
            "Prepare 4-6 self-contained stations.",
            "5-8 min per station.",
            "Shared rubric."
          ],
          "observe": [
            "Autonomy per station."
          ],
          "limits": [],
          "aiAdaptation": "Some stations with AI, some without, to triangulate.",
          "example": "Digital-competence assessment in 5 stations.",
          "evidenceProduced": "Each student's performance across several different short tasks, recorded with the same rubric.",
          "boundedInference": "That the person performs certain concrete skills under conditions comparable across students.",
          "cannotInfer": [
            "Short decontextualised tasks evidence no integrated performance.",
            "They say nothing about reasoning unless it is asked at the station."
          ],
          "inferenceConditions": [
            "Stations have the same demand and the same recording rubric."
          ],
          "whenNotToUse": "When rotation leaves times so short that only speed is observed.",
          "copyablePrompt": "",
          "coverageNote": "",
          "windowConditions": [],
          "windowRationale": "Several short observed tasks; it shows execution, not evolution."
        }
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "caso-profesional",
      "slug": "resolucion-de-caso-profesional",
      "url": "https://evidencias-ia-evaluacion.com/evidencia/resolucion-de-caso-profesional",
      "name_es": "Resolución de un caso profesional",
      "name_en": "Solve a professional case",
      "short_description_es": "Actuación ante una situación propia de una profesión, con decisiones y criterios realistas.",
      "short_description_en": "Response to a real professional situation with realistic decisions and criteria.",
      "family": "practica-desempeno",
      "family_secondary": "escrita-grafica",
      "primary_claim": "puede-hacerlo",
      "secondary_claims": "transfiere|decide-criterio",
      "evidence_kind": "desempeno",
      "evidence_modes": "desempeno-controlado|transferencia",
      "stages": "fp|bachillerato|universidad",
      "areas": "fp|sociales|ciencias|tecnologia",
      "moments": "durante",
      "purposes": "formativo|calificable",
      "modalities": "cualquiera",
      "seia_levels": "1|2|3",
      "time_min": 30,
      "time_max": 90,
      "teacher_load": "alta",
      "participation": "equipo",
      "scalability": "hasta-30",
      "collections": "transferencia",
      "ai_relation": "compatible",
      "review_status": "borrador-editorial",
      "version": "v0.13",
      "last_reviewed": "2026-09-06",
      "time_scope": "",
      "learning_windows": "investigacion-decisiones",
      "complementary_layers": "desempeno-observado|transferencia-real",
      "evidence_origins": "actuacion-provocada|natural",
      "window_selection": "docente",
      "evidence_produced_es": "La resolución de un caso con las condiciones y limitaciones del contexto profesional, con las decisiones justificadas.",
      "evidence_produced_en": "The resolution of a case with the conditions and constraints of the professional context, with justified decisions.",
      "bounded_inference_es": "Que la persona moviliza conocimiento en una situación con restricciones realistas y justifica su elección.",
      "bounded_inference_en": "That the person mobilises knowledge in a situation with realistic constraints and justifies their choice.",
      "inference_conditions_es": "Las restricciones del caso son reales, no decorativas. | Con un caso familiar informa de desempeño; para hablar de transferencia el caso debe ser nuevo respecto al aprendizaje que se declara aplicado.",
      "inference_conditions_en": "The case constraints are real, not decorative. | With a familiar case it informs about performance; to speak of transfer the case must be new relative to the prior learning claimed to be applied.",
      "cannot_infer_es": "No acredita competencia profesional: es una simulación en aula. | No evidencia desempeño bajo presión o tiempo reales del puesto.",
      "cannot_infer_en": "It does not certify professional competence: it is a classroom simulation. | It evidences no performance under the real time or pressure of the job.",
      "when_not_to_use_es": "Cuando falta el conocimiento disciplinar previo que el caso exige, o el escenario resulta inaccesible para parte del alumnado.",
      "when_not_to_use_en": "When the prerequisite disciplinary knowledge the case demands is missing, or the scenario is inaccessible to some students.",
      "content": {
        "es": {
          "name": "Resolución de un caso profesional",
          "shortDescription": "Actuación ante una situación propia de una profesión, con decisiones y criterios realistas.",
          "whenToUse": "Formación profesional y prácticas.",
          "minimalVersion": "Actuación ante una situación propia de una profesión, con decisiones y criterios realistas.",
          "instructions": [
            "Describe situación realista y contexto.",
            "Exige documento profesional coherente."
          ],
          "observe": [
            "Coherencia con estándares del sector."
          ],
          "limits": [],
          "aiAdaptation": "Permite IA como en la profesión: exige transparencia en el uso.",
          "example": "Elaborar un informe técnico ante una incidencia industrial.",
          "evidenceProduced": "La resolución de un caso con las condiciones y limitaciones del contexto profesional, con las decisiones justificadas.",
          "boundedInference": "Que la persona moviliza conocimiento en una situación con restricciones realistas y justifica su elección.",
          "cannotInfer": [
            "No acredita competencia profesional: es una simulación en aula.",
            "No evidencia desempeño bajo presión o tiempo reales del puesto."
          ],
          "inferenceConditions": [
            "Las restricciones del caso son reales, no decorativas.",
            "Con un caso familiar informa de desempeño; para hablar de transferencia el caso debe ser nuevo respecto al aprendizaje que se declara aplicado."
          ],
          "whenNotToUse": "Cuando falta el conocimiento disciplinar previo que el caso exige, o el escenario resulta inaccesible para parte del alumnado.",
          "copyablePrompt": "",
          "coverageNote": "",
          "windowConditions": [
            "Solo si se documentan las decisiones tomadas y el uso de herramientas durante la resolución, no únicamente el resultado.",
            "Con un caso familiar sirve para desempeño observado; la capa de transferencia solo se sostiene si el caso es nuevo respecto al aprendizaje que se declara aplicado."
          ],
          "windowRationale": "Combina decisiones documentables con actuación observable; puede explorar transferencia si el caso es nuevo y pertinente al aprendizaje declarado."
        },
        "en": {
          "name": "Solve a professional case",
          "shortDescription": "Response to a real professional situation with realistic decisions and criteria.",
          "whenToUse": "Vocational training and internships.",
          "minimalVersion": "Response to a real professional situation with realistic decisions and criteria.",
          "instructions": [
            "Describe realistic situation and context.",
            "Require a coherent professional output."
          ],
          "observe": [
            "Consistency with industry standards."
          ],
          "limits": [],
          "aiAdaptation": "Allow AI as the profession does: require transparency.",
          "example": "Produce a technical report on an industrial incident.",
          "evidenceProduced": "The resolution of a case with the conditions and constraints of the professional context, with justified decisions.",
          "boundedInference": "That the person mobilises knowledge in a situation with realistic constraints and justifies their choice.",
          "cannotInfer": [
            "It does not certify professional competence: it is a classroom simulation.",
            "It evidences no performance under the real time or pressure of the job."
          ],
          "inferenceConditions": [
            "The case constraints are real, not decorative.",
            "With a familiar case it informs about performance; to speak of transfer the case must be new relative to the prior learning claimed to be applied."
          ],
          "whenNotToUse": "When the prerequisite disciplinary knowledge the case demands is missing, or the scenario is inaccessible to some students.",
          "copyablePrompt": "",
          "coverageNote": "",
          "windowConditions": [
            "Only if the decisions taken and tool use during the solving are documented, not just the result.",
            "With a familiar case it serves observed performance; the transfer layer only holds if the case is new relative to the prior learning claimed to be applied."
          ],
          "windowRationale": "It combines documentable decisions with observable performance; it can explore transfer if the case is new and relevant to the stated prior learning."
        }
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "lectura-datos",
      "slug": "lectura-e-interpretacion-de-datos",
      "url": "https://evidencias-ia-evaluacion.com/evidencia/lectura-e-interpretacion-de-datos",
      "name_es": "Lectura e interpretación de datos",
      "name_en": "Data reading and interpretation",
      "short_description_es": "El estudiante extrae conclusiones de una tabla, gráfica o conjunto de datos y señala sus límites.",
      "short_description_en": "The student draws conclusions from a table, graph or dataset and flags its limits.",
      "family": "escrita-grafica",
      "family_secondary": "",
      "primary_claim": "decide-criterio",
      "secondary_claims": "comprende",
      "evidence_kind": "producto",
      "evidence_modes": "producto",
      "stages": "primaria|secundaria|bachillerato|fp|universidad|adultos",
      "areas": "",
      "moments": "durante",
      "purposes": "formativo|calificable",
      "modalities": "escrita|visual",
      "seia_levels": "0|1|2|3",
      "time_min": 10,
      "time_max": 25,
      "teacher_load": "media",
      "participation": "individual",
      "scalability": "cualquiera",
      "collections": "grupos-numerosos",
      "ai_relation": "compatible",
      "review_status": "borrador-editorial",
      "version": "v0.13",
      "last_reviewed": "2026-09-06",
      "time_scope": "",
      "learning_windows": "",
      "complementary_layers": "",
      "evidence_origins": "",
      "window_selection": "",
      "evidence_produced_es": "La interpretación de un gráfico o tabla no vista antes, con lo que la persona afirma y lo que descarta afirmar.",
      "evidence_produced_en": "The interpretation of a previously unseen chart or table, with what the person claims and declines to claim.",
      "bounded_inference_es": "Que la persona lee correctamente la representación y distingue lo que los datos permiten sostener.",
      "bounded_inference_en": "That the person reads the representation correctly and distinguishes what the data support.",
      "inference_conditions_es": "Se pide explícitamente qué no puede concluirse a partir de esos datos.",
      "inference_conditions_en": "They are explicitly asked what cannot be concluded from those data.",
      "cannot_infer_es": "No evidencia capacidad de producir la representación. | No informa de comprensión del fenómeno representado.",
      "cannot_infer_en": "It evidences no ability to produce the representation. | It says nothing about understanding of the phenomenon represented.",
      "when_not_to_use_es": "Cuando la barrera es la lectura del formato y no el contenido evaluado.",
      "when_not_to_use_en": "When the barrier is reading the format rather than the content assessed.",
      "content": {
        "es": {
          "name": "Lectura e interpretación de datos",
          "shortDescription": "El estudiante extrae conclusiones de una tabla, gráfica o conjunto de datos y señala sus límites.",
          "whenToUse": "Ciencias, sociales, salud, economía.",
          "minimalVersion": "El estudiante extrae conclusiones de una tabla, gráfica o conjunto de datos y señala sus límites.",
          "instructions": [
            "Entrega dato o gráfica.",
            "Pide 3 conclusiones y 2 límites."
          ],
          "observe": [
            "Distingue lo que dice el dato de lo que no dice."
          ],
          "limits": [],
          "aiAdaptation": "Comprueba con IA cuando la IA da conclusiones falsas por generalización.",
          "example": "Interpretar una gráfica de encuesta y señalar 2 sesgos posibles.",
          "evidenceProduced": "La interpretación de un gráfico o tabla no vista antes, con lo que la persona afirma y lo que descarta afirmar.",
          "boundedInference": "Que la persona lee correctamente la representación y distingue lo que los datos permiten sostener.",
          "cannotInfer": [
            "No evidencia capacidad de producir la representación.",
            "No informa de comprensión del fenómeno representado."
          ],
          "inferenceConditions": [
            "Se pide explícitamente qué no puede concluirse a partir de esos datos."
          ],
          "whenNotToUse": "Cuando la barrera es la lectura del formato y no el contenido evaluado.",
          "copyablePrompt": "",
          "coverageNote": "",
          "windowConditions": [],
          "windowRationale": ""
        },
        "en": {
          "name": "Data reading and interpretation",
          "shortDescription": "The student draws conclusions from a table, graph or dataset and flags its limits.",
          "whenToUse": "Science, humanities, health, economics.",
          "minimalVersion": "The student draws conclusions from a table, graph or dataset and flags its limits.",
          "instructions": [
            "Provide data or chart.",
            "Ask for 3 conclusions and 2 limits."
          ],
          "observe": [
            "Distinguishes what data says from what it doesn't."
          ],
          "limits": [],
          "aiAdaptation": "Verify with AI outputs that generalise wrongly.",
          "example": "Interpret a survey chart and flag 2 possible biases.",
          "evidenceProduced": "The interpretation of a previously unseen chart or table, with what the person claims and declines to claim.",
          "boundedInference": "That the person reads the representation correctly and distinguishes what the data support.",
          "cannotInfer": [
            "It evidences no ability to produce the representation.",
            "It says nothing about understanding of the phenomenon represented."
          ],
          "inferenceConditions": [
            "They are explicitly asked what cannot be concluded from those data."
          ],
          "whenNotToUse": "When the barrier is reading the format rather than the content assessed.",
          "copyablePrompt": "",
          "coverageNote": "",
          "windowConditions": [],
          "windowRationale": ""
        }
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "analisis-fuente-primaria",
      "slug": "analisis-de-fuente-primaria",
      "url": "https://evidencias-ia-evaluacion.com/evidencia/analisis-de-fuente-primaria",
      "name_es": "Análisis de una fuente primaria",
      "name_en": "Primary-source analysis",
      "short_description_es": "Examina autoría, contexto, intención, contenido y fiabilidad de una fuente original.",
      "short_description_en": "Examines authorship, context, intent, content and reliability of an original source.",
      "family": "escrita-grafica",
      "family_secondary": "",
      "primary_claim": "decide-criterio",
      "secondary_claims": "usa-ia-critica|comprende",
      "evidence_kind": "producto",
      "evidence_modes": "producto",
      "stages": "primaria|secundaria|bachillerato|fp|universidad|adultos",
      "areas": "sociales|lenguas|artes",
      "moments": "durante",
      "purposes": "formativo|calificable",
      "modalities": "escrita",
      "seia_levels": "0|1|2|3",
      "time_min": 15,
      "time_max": 30,
      "teacher_load": "media",
      "participation": "individual",
      "scalability": "cualquiera",
      "collections": "grupos-numerosos",
      "ai_relation": "compatible",
      "review_status": "borrador-editorial",
      "version": "v0.13",
      "last_reviewed": "2026-09-06",
      "time_scope": "",
      "learning_windows": "",
      "complementary_layers": "",
      "evidence_origins": "",
      "window_selection": "",
      "evidence_produced_es": "El análisis de un documento con su contexto, su intención y sus límites como fuente, citando pasajes.",
      "evidence_produced_en": "The analysis of a document with its context, intent and limits as a source, quoting passages.",
      "bounded_inference_es": "Que la persona sitúa la fuente y usa pasajes concretos para sostener su lectura.",
      "bounded_inference_en": "That the person situates the source and uses specific passages to support their reading.",
      "inference_conditions_es": "La fuente no debe estar analizada en materiales accesibles ni ser un clásico muy comentado.",
      "inference_conditions_en": "The source must not be pre-analysed in accessible materials or be a heavily commented classic.",
      "cannot_infer_es": "Un análisis correcto puede reproducir una interpretación disponible en línea o generada. | No evidencia manejo del periodo o del corpus completo.",
      "cannot_infer_en": "A correct analysis may reproduce an interpretation available online or generated. | It evidences no command of the period or the full corpus.",
      "when_not_to_use_es": "Cuando el documento requiere un contexto que el alumnado aún no tiene.",
      "when_not_to_use_en": "When the document requires context students do not yet have.",
      "content": {
        "es": {
          "name": "Análisis de una fuente primaria",
          "shortDescription": "Examina autoría, contexto, intención, contenido y fiabilidad de una fuente original.",
          "whenToUse": "Historia, filosofía, literatura, comunicación.",
          "minimalVersion": "Examina autoría, contexto, intención, contenido y fiabilidad de una fuente original.",
          "instructions": [
            "Rúbrica: autoría · contexto · intención · contenido · fiabilidad.",
            "Comparación con una fuente secundaria."
          ],
          "observe": [
            "Distingue evidencia primaria de interpretación."
          ],
          "limits": [],
          "aiAdaptation": "Contrasta la interpretación de la IA con la del estudiante.",
          "example": "Análisis de un cartel histórico contrastado con un libro de texto.",
          "evidenceProduced": "El análisis de un documento con su contexto, su intención y sus límites como fuente, citando pasajes.",
          "boundedInference": "Que la persona sitúa la fuente y usa pasajes concretos para sostener su lectura.",
          "cannotInfer": [
            "Un análisis correcto puede reproducir una interpretación disponible en línea o generada.",
            "No evidencia manejo del periodo o del corpus completo."
          ],
          "inferenceConditions": [
            "La fuente no debe estar analizada en materiales accesibles ni ser un clásico muy comentado."
          ],
          "whenNotToUse": "Cuando el documento requiere un contexto que el alumnado aún no tiene.",
          "copyablePrompt": "",
          "coverageNote": "",
          "windowConditions": [],
          "windowRationale": ""
        },
        "en": {
          "name": "Primary-source analysis",
          "shortDescription": "Examines authorship, context, intent, content and reliability of an original source.",
          "whenToUse": "History, philosophy, literature, media.",
          "minimalVersion": "Examines authorship, context, intent, content and reliability of an original source.",
          "instructions": [
            "Rubric: authorship · context · intent · content · reliability.",
            "Contrast with a secondary source."
          ],
          "observe": [
            "Distinguishes primary evidence from interpretation."
          ],
          "limits": [],
          "aiAdaptation": "Contrast AI's interpretation with the student's.",
          "example": "Analysis of a historical poster contrasted with a textbook.",
          "evidenceProduced": "The analysis of a document with its context, intent and limits as a source, quoting passages.",
          "boundedInference": "That the person situates the source and uses specific passages to support their reading.",
          "cannotInfer": [
            "A correct analysis may reproduce an interpretation available online or generated.",
            "It evidences no command of the period or the full corpus."
          ],
          "inferenceConditions": [
            "The source must not be pre-analysed in accessible materials or be a heavily commented classic."
          ],
          "whenNotToUse": "When the document requires context students do not yet have.",
          "copyablePrompt": "",
          "coverageNote": "",
          "windowConditions": [],
          "windowRationale": ""
        }
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "muestra-artistica",
      "slug": "muestra-artistica-comentada",
      "url": "https://evidencias-ia-evaluacion.com/evidencia/muestra-artistica-comentada",
      "name_es": "Muestra artística comentada",
      "name_en": "Commented artistic showing",
      "short_description_es": "Presenta una creación y explica elecciones de composición, técnica, referentes y revisión.",
      "short_description_en": "Presents a creation and explains choices of composition, technique, references and revision.",
      "family": "oral-dialogica",
      "family_secondary": "practica-desempeno",
      "primary_claim": "decide-criterio",
      "secondary_claims": "puede-hacerlo|muestra-avance",
      "evidence_kind": "desempeno",
      "evidence_modes": "oral|producto",
      "stages": "primaria|secundaria|bachillerato|fp|universidad|adultos",
      "areas": "artes",
      "moments": "durante",
      "purposes": "formativo|calificable",
      "modalities": "oral|visual",
      "seia_levels": "0|1|2|3",
      "time_min": 8,
      "time_max": 20,
      "teacher_load": "media",
      "participation": "individual",
      "scalability": "hasta-30",
      "collections": "",
      "ai_relation": "compatible",
      "review_status": "borrador-editorial",
      "version": "v0.13",
      "last_reviewed": "2026-09-06",
      "time_scope": "",
      "learning_windows": "",
      "complementary_layers": "",
      "evidence_origins": "",
      "window_selection": "",
      "evidence_produced_es": "La obra o interpretación junto con la justificación de las decisiones estéticas y técnicas tomadas.",
      "evidence_produced_en": "The work or performance together with the justification of the aesthetic and technical decisions taken.",
      "bounded_inference_es": "Que la persona toma decisiones deliberadas y puede explicar los criterios en los que se apoyan.",
      "bounded_inference_en": "That the person makes deliberate decisions and can explain the criteria behind them.",
      "inference_conditions_es": "La justificación se recoge junto a la obra, no como texto separado y opcional.",
      "inference_conditions_en": "The justification is collected alongside the work, not as a separate optional text.",
      "cannot_infer_es": "La calidad estética no es indicador directo de aprendizaje. | No informa del proceso salvo que se acompañe de registro de proceso.",
      "cannot_infer_en": "Aesthetic quality is not a direct indicator of learning. | It says nothing about process unless accompanied by a process record.",
      "when_not_to_use_es": "Cuando la valoración estética del docente sustituye a los criterios acordados.",
      "when_not_to_use_en": "When the teacher's aesthetic judgement replaces the agreed criteria.",
      "content": {
        "es": {
          "name": "Muestra artística comentada",
          "shortDescription": "Presenta una creación y explica elecciones de composición, técnica, referentes y revisión.",
          "whenToUse": "Educación artística y proyectos de diseño.",
          "minimalVersion": "Presenta una creación y explica elecciones de composición, técnica, referentes y revisión.",
          "instructions": [
            "Cada estudiante presenta 5-8 min.",
            "Rúbrica con 4 focos: composición, técnica, referente, revisión."
          ],
          "observe": [
            "Explica elecciones, no solo describe la obra."
          ],
          "limits": [],
          "aiAdaptation": "Si usó IA generativa, exige comparar con esbozo humano previo.",
          "example": "Presentación de una serie fotográfica.",
          "evidenceProduced": "La obra o interpretación junto con la justificación de las decisiones estéticas y técnicas tomadas.",
          "boundedInference": "Que la persona toma decisiones deliberadas y puede explicar los criterios en los que se apoyan.",
          "cannotInfer": [
            "La calidad estética no es indicador directo de aprendizaje.",
            "No informa del proceso salvo que se acompañe de registro de proceso."
          ],
          "inferenceConditions": [
            "La justificación se recoge junto a la obra, no como texto separado y opcional."
          ],
          "whenNotToUse": "Cuando la valoración estética del docente sustituye a los criterios acordados.",
          "copyablePrompt": "",
          "coverageNote": "",
          "windowConditions": [],
          "windowRationale": ""
        },
        "en": {
          "name": "Commented artistic showing",
          "shortDescription": "Presents a creation and explains choices of composition, technique, references and revision.",
          "whenToUse": "Arts education and design projects.",
          "minimalVersion": "Presents a creation and explains choices of composition, technique, references and revision.",
          "instructions": [
            "Each student presents 5-8 min.",
            "Rubric with 4 foci: composition, technique, reference, revision."
          ],
          "observe": [
            "Explains choices, not just describes the work."
          ],
          "limits": [],
          "aiAdaptation": "If generative AI was used, require comparison with a prior human sketch.",
          "example": "Photo series presentation.",
          "evidenceProduced": "The work or performance together with the justification of the aesthetic and technical decisions taken.",
          "boundedInference": "That the person makes deliberate decisions and can explain the criteria behind them.",
          "cannotInfer": [
            "Aesthetic quality is not a direct indicator of learning.",
            "It says nothing about process unless accompanied by a process record."
          ],
          "inferenceConditions": [
            "The justification is collected alongside the work, not as a separate optional text."
          ],
          "whenNotToUse": "When the teacher's aesthetic judgement replaces the agreed criteria.",
          "copyablePrompt": "",
          "coverageNote": "",
          "windowConditions": [],
          "windowRationale": ""
        }
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "ejecucion-motriz",
      "slug": "ejecucion-motriz-explicada",
      "url": "https://evidencias-ia-evaluacion.com/evidencia/ejecucion-motriz-explicada",
      "name_es": "Ejecución motriz explicada",
      "name_en": "Explained motor performance",
      "short_description_es": "Realiza una acción corporal o deportiva y reconoce elementos técnicos, tácticos o de seguridad.",
      "short_description_en": "Performs a bodily or sporting action and recognises technical, tactical or safety elements.",
      "family": "practica-desempeno",
      "family_secondary": "oral-dialogica",
      "primary_claim": "puede-hacerlo",
      "secondary_claims": "comprende",
      "evidence_kind": "desempeno",
      "evidence_modes": "oral|desempeno-controlado",
      "stages": "primaria|secundaria|bachillerato|fp|universidad|adultos",
      "areas": "efisica",
      "moments": "durante",
      "purposes": "formativo|calificable",
      "modalities": "oral|practica",
      "seia_levels": "0|1|2",
      "time_min": 8,
      "time_max": 20,
      "teacher_load": "media",
      "participation": "individual",
      "scalability": "mas-30-equipos",
      "collections": "grupos-numerosos",
      "ai_relation": "compatible",
      "review_status": "borrador-editorial",
      "version": "v0.13",
      "last_reviewed": "2026-09-06",
      "time_scope": "",
      "learning_windows": "",
      "complementary_layers": "desempeno-observado",
      "evidence_origins": "natural|actuacion-provocada",
      "window_selection": "docente",
      "evidence_produced_es": "La ejecución observada con una pauta de indicadores técnicos y las condiciones concretas de la observación.",
      "evidence_produced_en": "The observed performance against a rubric of technical indicators and the specific observation conditions.",
      "bounded_inference_es": "Que en esa ejecución concreta se cumplen o no determinados indicadores técnicos.",
      "bounded_inference_en": "That in that particular performance certain technical indicators are or are not met.",
      "inference_conditions_es": "Los indicadores son observables y se conocen previamente.",
      "inference_conditions_en": "Indicators are observable and known in advance.",
      "cannot_infer_es": "Una ejecución puntual no evidencia consolidación de la destreza. | No informa de la comprensión táctica o del porqué del gesto.",
      "cannot_infer_en": "A one-off performance evidences no consolidation of the skill. | It says nothing about tactical understanding or the reason for the movement.",
      "when_not_to_use_es": "Cuando las condiciones físicas del alumnado no se han considerado en la pauta.",
      "when_not_to_use_en": "When students' physical conditions have not been considered in the rubric.",
      "content": {
        "es": {
          "name": "Ejecución motriz explicada",
          "shortDescription": "Realiza una acción corporal o deportiva y reconoce elementos técnicos, tácticos o de seguridad.",
          "whenToUse": "Educación física, danza, artes escénicas.",
          "minimalVersion": "Realiza una acción corporal o deportiva y reconoce elementos técnicos, tácticos o de seguridad.",
          "instructions": [
            "Ejecuta y verbaliza los focos técnicos.",
            "Detecta un error propio y propone corrección."
          ],
          "observe": [
            "Distingue error técnico de error táctico."
          ],
          "limits": [],
          "aiAdaptation": "Análisis por vídeo con IA no reemplaza el ojo docente.",
          "example": "Ejecución de un pase con verbalización de puntos técnicos.",
          "evidenceProduced": "La ejecución observada con una pauta de indicadores técnicos y las condiciones concretas de la observación.",
          "boundedInference": "Que en esa ejecución concreta se cumplen o no determinados indicadores técnicos.",
          "cannotInfer": [
            "Una ejecución puntual no evidencia consolidación de la destreza.",
            "No informa de la comprensión táctica o del porqué del gesto."
          ],
          "inferenceConditions": [
            "Los indicadores son observables y se conocen previamente."
          ],
          "whenNotToUse": "Cuando las condiciones físicas del alumnado no se han considerado en la pauta.",
          "copyablePrompt": "",
          "coverageNote": "",
          "windowConditions": [],
          "windowRationale": "Acción corporal observable y comentada por quien la ejecuta."
        },
        "en": {
          "name": "Explained motor performance",
          "shortDescription": "Performs a bodily or sporting action and recognises technical, tactical or safety elements.",
          "whenToUse": "PE, dance, performing arts.",
          "minimalVersion": "Performs a bodily or sporting action and recognises technical, tactical or safety elements.",
          "instructions": [
            "Perform and verbalise technical foci.",
            "Detect one own error and propose a fix."
          ],
          "observe": [
            "Distinguishes technical from tactical errors."
          ],
          "limits": [],
          "aiAdaptation": "AI video analysis does not replace the teacher's eye.",
          "example": "Passing performance with verbalised technical points.",
          "evidenceProduced": "The observed performance against a rubric of technical indicators and the specific observation conditions.",
          "boundedInference": "That in that particular performance certain technical indicators are or are not met.",
          "cannotInfer": [
            "A one-off performance evidences no consolidation of the skill.",
            "It says nothing about tactical understanding or the reason for the movement."
          ],
          "inferenceConditions": [
            "Indicators are observable and known in advance."
          ],
          "whenNotToUse": "When students' physical conditions have not been considered in the rubric.",
          "copyablePrompt": "",
          "coverageNote": "",
          "windowConditions": [],
          "windowRationale": "Observable bodily action, commented on by the person performing it."
        }
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "secuencia-manipulativos",
      "slug": "secuencia-con-materiales-manipulativos",
      "url": "https://evidencias-ia-evaluacion.com/evidencia/secuencia-con-materiales-manipulativos",
      "name_es": "Secuencia con materiales manipulativos",
      "name_en": "Sequence with hands-on materials",
      "short_description_es": "El niño construye, ordena o representa una idea con objetos y explica lo que ha hecho.",
      "short_description_en": "The child builds, orders or represents an idea with objects and explains what they did.",
      "family": "practica-desempeno",
      "family_secondary": "oral-dialogica",
      "primary_claim": "comprende",
      "secondary_claims": "puede-hacerlo",
      "evidence_kind": "desempeno",
      "evidence_modes": "oral|desempeno-controlado",
      "stages": "infantil|primaria",
      "areas": "",
      "moments": "durante",
      "purposes": "formativo|calificable",
      "modalities": "practica|oral",
      "seia_levels": "0|1",
      "time_min": 5,
      "time_max": 15,
      "teacher_load": "baja",
      "participation": "individual",
      "scalability": "grupo-reducido",
      "collections": "baja-revision",
      "ai_relation": "sin-ia",
      "review_status": "borrador-editorial",
      "version": "v0.13",
      "last_reviewed": "2026-09-06",
      "time_scope": "",
      "learning_windows": "",
      "complementary_layers": "desempeno-observado",
      "evidence_origins": "natural",
      "window_selection": "docente",
      "evidence_produced_es": "La disposición del material hecha por el estudiante y su explicación de por qué va en ese orden.",
      "evidence_produced_en": "The student's arrangement of the material and their explanation of why it goes in that order.",
      "bounded_inference_es": "Que la persona representa la relación o el orden con objetos y puede dar razón de ello.",
      "bounded_inference_en": "That the person represents the relation or order with objects and can give a reason for it.",
      "inference_conditions_es": "Se pide la explicación oral; sin ella solo hay una disposición correcta o incorrecta.",
      "inference_conditions_en": "The oral explanation is required; without it there is only a right or wrong arrangement.",
      "cannot_infer_es": "El acierto puede deberse a imitación de la disposición del compañero. | No evidencia transferencia al plano simbólico.",
      "cannot_infer_en": "Success may be due to copying a classmate's arrangement. | It evidences no transfer to the symbolic level.",
      "when_not_to_use_es": "Cuando el material introduce una dificultad manipulativa ajena al objetivo.",
      "when_not_to_use_en": "When the material introduces a handling difficulty unrelated to the objective.",
      "content": {
        "es": {
          "name": "Secuencia con materiales manipulativos",
          "shortDescription": "El niño construye, ordena o representa una idea con objetos y explica lo que ha hecho.",
          "whenToUse": "Cuando los niños aún no leen o escriben con soltura.",
          "minimalVersion": "El niño construye, ordena o representa una idea con objetos y explica lo que ha hecho.",
          "instructions": [
            "Ofrece objetos manipulables.",
            "Pide construir y contar lo hecho."
          ],
          "observe": [
            "Coherencia entre lo que hace y lo que dice."
          ],
          "limits": [],
          "aiAdaptation": "No procede en esta etapa; centrarse en el niño.",
          "example": "Ordenar palitos por tamaño y explicar el criterio.",
          "evidenceProduced": "La disposición del material hecha por el estudiante y su explicación de por qué va en ese orden.",
          "boundedInference": "Que la persona representa la relación o el orden con objetos y puede dar razón de ello.",
          "cannotInfer": [
            "El acierto puede deberse a imitación de la disposición del compañero.",
            "No evidencia transferencia al plano simbólico."
          ],
          "inferenceConditions": [
            "Se pide la explicación oral; sin ella solo hay una disposición correcta o incorrecta."
          ],
          "whenNotToUse": "Cuando el material introduce una dificultad manipulativa ajena al objetivo.",
          "copyablePrompt": "",
          "coverageNote": "",
          "windowConditions": [],
          "windowRationale": "En edades tempranas la manipulación explicada es desempeño observado."
        },
        "en": {
          "name": "Sequence with hands-on materials",
          "shortDescription": "The child builds, orders or represents an idea with objects and explains what they did.",
          "whenToUse": "When children do not yet read or write fluently.",
          "minimalVersion": "The child builds, orders or represents an idea with objects and explains what they did.",
          "instructions": [
            "Offer manipulable objects.",
            "Ask to build and tell."
          ],
          "observe": [
            "Consistency between doing and saying."
          ],
          "limits": [],
          "aiAdaptation": "Not applicable at this stage; focus on the child.",
          "example": "Order sticks by size and explain the criterion.",
          "evidenceProduced": "The student's arrangement of the material and their explanation of why it goes in that order.",
          "boundedInference": "That the person represents the relation or order with objects and can give a reason for it.",
          "cannotInfer": [
            "Success may be due to copying a classmate's arrangement.",
            "It evidences no transfer to the symbolic level."
          ],
          "inferenceConditions": [
            "The oral explanation is required; without it there is only a right or wrong arrangement."
          ],
          "whenNotToUse": "When the material introduces a handling difficulty unrelated to the objective.",
          "copyablePrompt": "",
          "coverageNote": "",
          "windowConditions": [],
          "windowRationale": "In early years, explained hands-on work is observed performance."
        }
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "dibujo-explicacion-oral",
      "slug": "dibujo-con-explicacion-oral",
      "url": "https://evidencias-ia-evaluacion.com/evidencia/dibujo-con-explicacion-oral",
      "name_es": "Dibujo con explicación oral",
      "name_en": "Drawing with oral explanation",
      "short_description_es": "El dibujo se acompaña de una conversación breve para interpretar lo que el niño comprende.",
      "short_description_en": "The drawing goes with a brief conversation to interpret what the child understands.",
      "family": "oral-dialogica",
      "family_secondary": "escrita-grafica",
      "primary_claim": "comprende",
      "secondary_claims": "",
      "evidence_kind": "producto",
      "evidence_modes": "oral|producto",
      "stages": "infantil|primaria",
      "areas": "",
      "moments": "durante",
      "purposes": "formativo|calificable",
      "modalities": "visual|oral",
      "seia_levels": "0|1",
      "time_min": 5,
      "time_max": 15,
      "teacher_load": "baja",
      "participation": "individual",
      "scalability": "grupo-reducido",
      "collections": "baja-revision",
      "ai_relation": "sin-ia",
      "review_status": "borrador-editorial",
      "version": "v0.13",
      "last_reviewed": "2026-09-06",
      "time_scope": "",
      "learning_windows": "",
      "complementary_layers": "",
      "evidence_origins": "",
      "window_selection": "",
      "evidence_produced_es": "El dibujo del alumno y su explicación oral de lo representado, anotada literalmente por el docente.",
      "evidence_produced_en": "The child's drawing and their oral explanation of what it shows, noted verbatim by the teacher.",
      "bounded_inference_es": "Que el alumno atribuye significado a lo que ha representado y lo comunica.",
      "bounded_inference_en": "That the child attributes meaning to what they represented and communicates it.",
      "inference_conditions_es": "La explicación se recoge en el momento y con las palabras del alumno.",
      "inference_conditions_en": "The explanation is recorded at the time and in the child's own words.",
      "cannot_infer_es": "El nivel gráfico no indica el nivel conceptual. | No permite comparar entre alumnos con desarrollo motriz distinto.",
      "cannot_infer_en": "Graphic level does not indicate conceptual level. | It does not allow comparison between children with different motor development.",
      "when_not_to_use_es": "Cuando el dibujo se interpreta sin la voz del alumno.",
      "when_not_to_use_en": "When the drawing is interpreted without the child's voice.",
      "content": {
        "es": {
          "name": "Dibujo con explicación oral",
          "shortDescription": "El dibujo se acompaña de una conversación breve para interpretar lo que el niño comprende.",
          "whenToUse": "Etapa infantil y primeros cursos.",
          "minimalVersion": "El dibujo se acompaña de una conversación breve para interpretar lo que el niño comprende.",
          "instructions": [
            "Pide dibujar una idea.",
            "Conversa con preguntas abiertas: 'cuéntame'."
          ],
          "observe": [
            "Se interpreta lo que dice el niño, no solo el dibujo."
          ],
          "limits": [],
          "aiAdaptation": "No procede.",
          "example": "Dibuja una planta y explica cómo crece.",
          "evidenceProduced": "El dibujo del alumno y su explicación oral de lo representado, anotada literalmente por el docente.",
          "boundedInference": "Que el alumno atribuye significado a lo que ha representado y lo comunica.",
          "cannotInfer": [
            "El nivel gráfico no indica el nivel conceptual.",
            "No permite comparar entre alumnos con desarrollo motriz distinto."
          ],
          "inferenceConditions": [
            "La explicación se recoge en el momento y con las palabras del alumno."
          ],
          "whenNotToUse": "Cuando el dibujo se interpreta sin la voz del alumno.",
          "copyablePrompt": "",
          "coverageNote": "",
          "windowConditions": [],
          "windowRationale": ""
        },
        "en": {
          "name": "Drawing with oral explanation",
          "shortDescription": "The drawing goes with a brief conversation to interpret what the child understands.",
          "whenToUse": "Early years and first primary grades.",
          "minimalVersion": "The drawing goes with a brief conversation to interpret what the child understands.",
          "instructions": [
            "Ask to draw an idea.",
            "Chat with open prompts: 'tell me'."
          ],
          "observe": [
            "Interpret what the child says, not just the drawing."
          ],
          "limits": [],
          "aiAdaptation": "Not applicable.",
          "example": "Draw a plant and explain how it grows.",
          "evidenceProduced": "The child's drawing and their oral explanation of what it shows, noted verbatim by the teacher.",
          "boundedInference": "That the child attributes meaning to what they represented and communicates it.",
          "cannotInfer": [
            "Graphic level does not indicate conceptual level.",
            "It does not allow comparison between children with different motor development."
          ],
          "inferenceConditions": [
            "The explanation is recorded at the time and in the child's own words."
          ],
          "whenNotToUse": "When the drawing is interpreted without the child's voice.",
          "copyablePrompt": "",
          "coverageNote": "",
          "windowConditions": [],
          "windowRationale": ""
        }
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "observacion-juego-simbolico",
      "slug": "observacion-del-juego-simbolico",
      "url": "https://evidencias-ia-evaluacion.com/evidencia/observacion-del-juego-simbolico",
      "name_es": "Observación del juego simbólico",
      "name_en": "Symbolic-play observation",
      "short_description_es": "El docente registra cómo el alumnado utiliza lenguaje, roles, reglas y conocimientos durante el juego.",
      "short_description_en": "The teacher records how children use language, roles, rules and knowledge during play.",
      "family": "practica-desempeno",
      "family_secondary": "proceso-evolucion",
      "primary_claim": "muestra-avance",
      "secondary_claims": "comprende|puede-hacerlo",
      "evidence_kind": "proceso",
      "evidence_modes": "proceso",
      "stages": "infantil",
      "areas": "",
      "moments": "durante",
      "purposes": "formativo|calificable",
      "modalities": "oral|practica",
      "seia_levels": "0",
      "time_min": 10,
      "time_max": 30,
      "teacher_load": "media",
      "participation": "individual",
      "scalability": "grupo-reducido",
      "collections": "",
      "ai_relation": "sin-ia",
      "review_status": "borrador-editorial",
      "version": "v0.13",
      "last_reviewed": "2026-09-06",
      "time_scope": "",
      "learning_windows": "",
      "complementary_layers": "desempeno-observado",
      "evidence_origins": "natural",
      "window_selection": "docente",
      "evidence_produced_es": "Un registro de conductas y verbalizaciones durante el juego, con fecha y situación.",
      "evidence_produced_en": "A record of behaviours and utterances during play, with date and situation.",
      "bounded_inference_es": "Que en esa situación aparecen determinados usos del lenguaje, roles o resoluciones.",
      "bounded_inference_en": "That in that situation certain language uses, roles or resolutions appear.",
      "inference_conditions_es": "Se registra lo observable, sin interpretación mezclada en la misma nota.",
      "inference_conditions_en": "What is observable is recorded, without interpretation mixed into the same note.",
      "cannot_infer_es": "La ausencia de una conducta no significa que no exista la capacidad. | Una observación aislada no describe al alumno.",
      "cannot_infer_en": "The absence of a behaviour does not mean the capacity is absent. | An isolated observation does not describe the child.",
      "when_not_to_use_es": "Cuando el registro se usa para etiquetar en lugar de para acompañar.",
      "when_not_to_use_en": "When the record is used to label rather than to support.",
      "content": {
        "es": {
          "name": "Observación del juego simbólico",
          "shortDescription": "El docente registra cómo el alumnado utiliza lenguaje, roles, reglas y conocimientos durante el juego.",
          "whenToUse": "Rincones y momentos de juego libre estructurado.",
          "minimalVersion": "El docente registra cómo el alumnado utiliza lenguaje, roles, reglas y conocimientos durante el juego.",
          "instructions": [
            "Ficha de observación con 4-6 indicadores.",
            "Registra ejemplos concretos."
          ],
          "observe": [
            "Uso funcional del lenguaje aprendido."
          ],
          "limits": [],
          "aiAdaptation": "No procede.",
          "example": "Observación de un rincón de tienda: uso de números y roles.",
          "evidenceProduced": "Un registro de conductas y verbalizaciones durante el juego, con fecha y situación.",
          "boundedInference": "Que en esa situación aparecen determinados usos del lenguaje, roles o resoluciones.",
          "cannotInfer": [
            "La ausencia de una conducta no significa que no exista la capacidad.",
            "Una observación aislada no describe al alumno."
          ],
          "inferenceConditions": [
            "Se registra lo observable, sin interpretación mezclada en la misma nota."
          ],
          "whenNotToUse": "Cuando el registro se usa para etiquetar en lugar de para acompañar.",
          "copyablePrompt": "",
          "coverageNote": "",
          "windowConditions": [],
          "windowRationale": "Registro docente de conductas observadas durante el juego."
        },
        "en": {
          "name": "Symbolic-play observation",
          "shortDescription": "The teacher records how children use language, roles, rules and knowledge during play.",
          "whenToUse": "Free structured-play corners.",
          "minimalVersion": "The teacher records how children use language, roles, rules and knowledge during play.",
          "instructions": [
            "Observation sheet with 4-6 indicators.",
            "Log concrete examples."
          ],
          "observe": [
            "Functional use of learnt language."
          ],
          "limits": [],
          "aiAdaptation": "Not applicable.",
          "example": "Observation of a shop corner: use of numbers and roles.",
          "evidenceProduced": "A record of behaviours and utterances during play, with date and situation.",
          "boundedInference": "That in that situation certain language uses, roles or resolutions appear.",
          "cannotInfer": [
            "The absence of a behaviour does not mean the capacity is absent.",
            "An isolated observation does not describe the child."
          ],
          "inferenceConditions": [
            "What is observable is recorded, without interpretation mixed into the same note."
          ],
          "whenNotToUse": "When the record is used to label rather than to support.",
          "copyablePrompt": "",
          "coverageNote": "",
          "windowConditions": [],
          "windowRationale": "Teacher record of behaviours observed during play."
        }
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "caso-variable-cambiada",
      "slug": "caso-con-una-variable-cambiada",
      "url": "https://evidencias-ia-evaluacion.com/evidencia/caso-con-una-variable-cambiada",
      "name_es": "Caso con una variable cambiada",
      "name_en": "Case with one variable changed",
      "short_description_es": "Se modifica una condición del problema original para comprobar si el estudiante adapta lo aprendido.",
      "short_description_en": "One condition of the original problem is changed to check if the student adapts what they learnt.",
      "family": "escrita-grafica",
      "family_secondary": "practica-desempeno",
      "primary_claim": "transfiere",
      "secondary_claims": "comprende|decide-criterio",
      "evidence_kind": "producto",
      "evidence_modes": "transferencia",
      "stages": "primaria|secundaria|bachillerato|fp|universidad|adultos",
      "areas": "",
      "moments": "durante",
      "purposes": "formativo|calificable",
      "modalities": "escrita|oral",
      "seia_levels": "0|1|2|3",
      "time_min": 10,
      "time_max": 25,
      "teacher_load": "media",
      "participation": "individual",
      "scalability": "cualquiera",
      "collections": "transferencia|grupos-numerosos",
      "ai_relation": "compatible",
      "review_status": "borrador-editorial",
      "version": "v0.13",
      "last_reviewed": "2026-09-06",
      "time_scope": "",
      "learning_windows": "",
      "complementary_layers": "transferencia-real",
      "evidence_origins": "actuacion-provocada",
      "window_selection": "docente",
      "evidence_produced_es": "La resolución de un problema conocido con una variable modificada, y el ajuste que la persona introduce.",
      "evidence_produced_en": "The solution of a familiar problem with one variable changed, and the adjustment the person introduces.",
      "bounded_inference_es": "Que la persona reconoce el efecto del cambio y adapta su procedimiento en consecuencia.",
      "bounded_inference_en": "That the person recognises the effect of the change and adapts their procedure accordingly.",
      "inference_conditions_es": "El cambio debe alterar realmente el procedimiento, no solo los números.",
      "inference_conditions_en": "The change must genuinely alter the procedure, not just the numbers.",
      "cannot_infer_es": "Es transferencia cercana: no evidencia aplicación a contextos alejados. | No basta por sí sola para establecer dominio completo del contenido ni transferencia general.",
      "cannot_infer_en": "It is near transfer: it evidences no application to distant contexts. | On its own it is not enough to establish full mastery of the content or general transfer.",
      "when_not_to_use_es": "Cuando la variable cambiada convierte el problema en otro sin conexión.",
      "when_not_to_use_en": "When the changed variable turns it into an unconnected problem.",
      "content": {
        "es": {
          "name": "Caso con una variable cambiada",
          "shortDescription": "Se modifica una condición del problema original para comprobar si el estudiante adapta lo aprendido.",
          "whenToUse": "Tras resolver un caso o problema conocido.",
          "minimalVersion": "Se modifica una condición del problema original para comprobar si el estudiante adapta lo aprendido.",
          "instructions": [
            "Cambia una sola variable de un caso previo.",
            "Pide nueva decisión con justificación."
          ],
          "observe": [
            "Reconoce qué cambia y qué se mantiene."
          ],
          "limits": [],
          "aiAdaptation": "Sin IA en la fase individual, para no volver a delegar.",
          "example": "Mismo problema con presupuesto reducido a la mitad.",
          "evidenceProduced": "La resolución de un problema conocido con una variable modificada, y el ajuste que la persona introduce.",
          "boundedInference": "Que la persona reconoce el efecto del cambio y adapta su procedimiento en consecuencia.",
          "cannotInfer": [
            "Es transferencia cercana: no evidencia aplicación a contextos alejados.",
            "No basta por sí sola para establecer dominio completo del contenido ni transferencia general."
          ],
          "inferenceConditions": [
            "El cambio debe alterar realmente el procedimiento, no solo los números."
          ],
          "whenNotToUse": "Cuando la variable cambiada convierte el problema en otro sin conexión.",
          "copyablePrompt": "",
          "coverageNote": "",
          "windowConditions": [
            "Solo puede leerse como transferencia si el cambio obliga a una aplicación nueva y pertinente del aprendizaje especificado; cambiar la variable por sí solo no es transferencia."
          ],
          "windowRationale": "Puede explorar transferencia cercana si el ajuste exigido es real y se compara con el procedimiento aprendido."
        },
        "en": {
          "name": "Case with one variable changed",
          "shortDescription": "One condition of the original problem is changed to check if the student adapts what they learnt.",
          "whenToUse": "After solving a known case or problem.",
          "minimalVersion": "One condition of the original problem is changed to check if the student adapts what they learnt.",
          "instructions": [
            "Change a single variable in a prior case.",
            "Ask for a new decision with justification."
          ],
          "observe": [
            "Recognises what changes and what remains."
          ],
          "limits": [],
          "aiAdaptation": "No AI during the individual phase, to avoid re-delegation.",
          "example": "Same problem with budget halved.",
          "evidenceProduced": "The solution of a familiar problem with one variable changed, and the adjustment the person introduces.",
          "boundedInference": "That the person recognises the effect of the change and adapts their procedure accordingly.",
          "cannotInfer": [
            "It is near transfer: it evidences no application to distant contexts.",
            "On its own it is not enough to establish full mastery of the content or general transfer."
          ],
          "inferenceConditions": [
            "The change must genuinely alter the procedure, not just the numbers."
          ],
          "whenNotToUse": "When the changed variable turns it into an unconnected problem.",
          "copyablePrompt": "",
          "coverageNote": "",
          "windowConditions": [
            "It can only be read as transfer if the change forces a new, relevant application of the specified prior learning; changing the variable alone is not transfer."
          ],
          "windowRationale": "It can explore near transfer if the required adjustment is genuine and is compared with the procedure taught."
        }
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "explicaselo-a-alguien-que-empieza",
      "slug": "explicaselo-a-alguien-que-empieza",
      "url": "https://evidencias-ia-evaluacion.com/evidencia/explicaselo-a-alguien-que-empieza",
      "name_es": "Explícaselo a alguien que empieza",
      "name_en": "Explain it to a beginner",
      "short_description_es": "Preparar una explicación para una persona sin conocimientos previos y responder sus dudas.",
      "short_description_en": "Prepare an explanation for a beginner and respond to their doubts.",
      "family": "oral-dialogica",
      "family_secondary": "escrita-grafica",
      "primary_claim": "comprende",
      "secondary_claims": "transfiere|decide-criterio",
      "evidence_kind": "desempeno",
      "evidence_modes": "oral|producto",
      "stages": "primaria|secundaria|bachillerato|fp|universidad|adultos",
      "areas": "",
      "moments": "durante",
      "purposes": "formativo|calificable",
      "modalities": "oral|escrita",
      "seia_levels": "0|1|2|3",
      "time_min": 10,
      "time_max": 20,
      "teacher_load": "media",
      "participation": "individual",
      "scalability": "cualquiera",
      "collections": "grupos-numerosos",
      "ai_relation": "compatible",
      "review_status": "borrador-editorial",
      "version": "v0.13",
      "last_reviewed": "2026-09-06",
      "time_scope": "",
      "learning_windows": "",
      "complementary_layers": "",
      "evidence_origins": "",
      "window_selection": "",
      "evidence_produced_es": "Una explicación dirigida a un destinatario sin conocimientos previos, con las decisiones de simplificación tomadas.",
      "evidence_produced_en": "An explanation aimed at an audience with no prior knowledge, with the simplification choices made.",
      "bounded_inference_es": "Que la persona distingue lo esencial de lo accesorio y controla el vocabulario técnico que usa.",
      "bounded_inference_en": "That the person separates the essential from the peripheral and controls the technical vocabulary used.",
      "inference_conditions_es": "Se fija el destinatario y se pide señalar qué se ha dejado fuera y por qué.",
      "inference_conditions_en": "The audience is fixed and they must state what was left out and why.",
      "cannot_infer_es": "Una explicación clara puede reproducir una divulgación ajena o generada. | No evidencia manejo del contenido en su nivel técnico completo.",
      "cannot_infer_en": "A clear explanation may reproduce someone else's or AI-generated popularisation. | It evidences no command of the content at its full technical level.",
      "when_not_to_use_es": "Cuando la simplificación exigida induce errores conceptuales.",
      "when_not_to_use_en": "When the required simplification induces conceptual errors.",
      "content": {
        "es": {
          "name": "Explícaselo a alguien que empieza",
          "shortDescription": "Preparar una explicación para una persona sin conocimientos previos y responder sus dudas.",
          "whenToUse": "Consolidar comprensión de un contenido nuevo.",
          "minimalVersion": "Preparar una explicación para una persona sin conocimientos previos y responder sus dudas.",
          "instructions": [
            "Elige audiencia real o simulada.",
            "Prepara explicación de 3 min sin jerga."
          ],
          "observe": [
            "Usa analogías útiles, no forzadas."
          ],
          "limits": [],
          "aiAdaptation": "Contrasta la explicación humana con la de una IA y analiza claridad.",
          "example": "Explica qué es una hipoteca a un adolescente.",
          "evidenceProduced": "Una explicación dirigida a un destinatario sin conocimientos previos, con las decisiones de simplificación tomadas.",
          "boundedInference": "Que la persona distingue lo esencial de lo accesorio y controla el vocabulario técnico que usa.",
          "cannotInfer": [
            "Una explicación clara puede reproducir una divulgación ajena o generada.",
            "No evidencia manejo del contenido en su nivel técnico completo."
          ],
          "inferenceConditions": [
            "Se fija el destinatario y se pide señalar qué se ha dejado fuera y por qué."
          ],
          "whenNotToUse": "Cuando la simplificación exigida induce errores conceptuales.",
          "copyablePrompt": "",
          "coverageNote": "",
          "windowConditions": [],
          "windowRationale": ""
        },
        "en": {
          "name": "Explain it to a beginner",
          "shortDescription": "Prepare an explanation for a beginner and respond to their doubts.",
          "whenToUse": "Consolidate understanding of new content.",
          "minimalVersion": "Prepare an explanation for a beginner and respond to their doubts.",
          "instructions": [
            "Choose real or simulated audience.",
            "Prepare a 3-min jargon-free explanation."
          ],
          "observe": [
            "Uses useful, not forced, analogies."
          ],
          "limits": [],
          "aiAdaptation": "Contrast the human explanation with an AI's and analyse clarity.",
          "example": "Explain a mortgage to a teenager.",
          "evidenceProduced": "An explanation aimed at an audience with no prior knowledge, with the simplification choices made.",
          "boundedInference": "That the person separates the essential from the peripheral and controls the technical vocabulary used.",
          "cannotInfer": [
            "A clear explanation may reproduce someone else's or AI-generated popularisation.",
            "It evidences no command of the content at its full technical level."
          ],
          "inferenceConditions": [
            "The audience is fixed and they must state what was left out and why."
          ],
          "whenNotToUse": "When the required simplification induces conceptual errors.",
          "copyablePrompt": "",
          "coverageNote": "",
          "windowConditions": [],
          "windowRationale": ""
        }
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "encargo-realista",
      "slug": "encargo-realista",
      "url": "https://evidencias-ia-evaluacion.com/evidencia/encargo-realista",
      "name_es": "Encargo realista",
      "name_en": "Realistic commission",
      "short_description_es": "Responder a una petición con destinatario, condiciones y propósito definidos.",
      "short_description_en": "Respond to a request with a defined audience, constraints and purpose.",
      "family": "practica-desempeno",
      "family_secondary": "proceso-evolucion",
      "primary_claim": "transfiere",
      "secondary_claims": "puede-hacerlo|decide-criterio",
      "evidence_kind": "producto",
      "evidence_modes": "producto|transferencia",
      "stages": "primaria|secundaria|bachillerato|fp|universidad|adultos",
      "areas": "",
      "moments": "durante",
      "purposes": "formativo|calificable",
      "modalities": "escrita|digital|visual",
      "seia_levels": "1|2|3",
      "time_min": 30,
      "time_max": 120,
      "teacher_load": "alta",
      "participation": "equipo",
      "scalability": "hasta-30",
      "collections": "transferencia",
      "ai_relation": "compatible",
      "review_status": "borrador-editorial",
      "version": "v0.13",
      "last_reviewed": "2026-09-06",
      "time_scope": "",
      "learning_windows": "investigacion-decisiones",
      "complementary_layers": "desempeno-observado|transferencia-real",
      "evidence_origins": "natural|actuacion-provocada",
      "window_selection": "docente|cocreada",
      "evidence_produced_es": "El producto entregado ante un encargo con destinatario, formato y restricciones definidos, y las decisiones tomadas para cumplirlo.",
      "evidence_produced_en": "The product delivered for a brief with defined audience, format and constraints, and the decisions taken to meet it.",
      "bounded_inference_es": "Que la persona adapta su trabajo a condiciones externas concretas y no solo a la consigna escolar.",
      "bounded_inference_en": "That the person adapts their work to concrete external conditions, not just to a school prompt.",
      "inference_conditions_es": "Las restricciones se comprueban en el producto entregado, una a una. | El encargo puede ser realista sin destinatario externo ni salida del aula; solo hay transferencia si aplica el aprendizaje declarado a condiciones nuevas.",
      "inference_conditions_en": "Constraints are checked in the delivered product, one by one. | A brief can be realistic without an outside client or leaving the classroom; there is transfer only if the stated prior learning is applied to new conditions.",
      "cannot_infer_es": "El producto por sí solo no informa de quién lo hizo ni con qué apoyos. | Cumplir el encargo no acredita comprensión conceptual del contenido.",
      "cannot_infer_en": "The product alone says nothing about who made it or with what support. | Meeting the brief does not certify conceptual understanding of the content.",
      "when_not_to_use_es": "Cuando el encargo exige recursos que no todo el alumnado tiene.",
      "when_not_to_use_en": "When the brief requires resources not all students have.",
      "content": {
        "es": {
          "name": "Encargo realista",
          "shortDescription": "Responder a una petición con destinatario, condiciones y propósito definidos.",
          "whenToUse": "Aprendizaje aplicado a situaciones reales.",
          "minimalVersion": "Responder a una petición con destinatario, condiciones y propósito definidos.",
          "instructions": [
            "Define destinatario, propósito, restricciones.",
            "Producto con formato profesional."
          ],
          "observe": [
            "Adecuación a destinatario real."
          ],
          "limits": [],
          "aiAdaptation": "Permite IA; exige declaración de uso y firma humana del contenido.",
          "example": "Redactar un correo formal para una asociación local.",
          "evidenceProduced": "El producto entregado ante un encargo con destinatario, formato y restricciones definidos, y las decisiones tomadas para cumplirlo.",
          "boundedInference": "Que la persona adapta su trabajo a condiciones externas concretas y no solo a la consigna escolar.",
          "cannotInfer": [
            "El producto por sí solo no informa de quién lo hizo ni con qué apoyos.",
            "Cumplir el encargo no acredita comprensión conceptual del contenido."
          ],
          "inferenceConditions": [
            "Las restricciones se comprueban en el producto entregado, una a una.",
            "El encargo puede ser realista sin destinatario externo ni salida del aula; solo hay transferencia si aplica el aprendizaje declarado a condiciones nuevas."
          ],
          "whenNotToUse": "Cuando el encargo exige recursos que no todo el alumnado tiene.",
          "copyablePrompt": "",
          "coverageNote": "",
          "windowConditions": [
            "Solo si se conserva rastro de las decisiones tomadas para cumplir las restricciones del encargo.",
            "El realismo del encargo no implica destinatario externo ni salida del aula: la capa de transferencia solo se sostiene si hay una aplicación nueva y pertinente del aprendizaje declarado."
          ],
          "windowRationale": "Puede explorar transferencia si el encargo exige decidir y ejecutar sobre condiciones distintas de las practicadas."
        },
        "en": {
          "name": "Realistic commission",
          "shortDescription": "Respond to a request with a defined audience, constraints and purpose.",
          "whenToUse": "Learning applied to real situations.",
          "minimalVersion": "Respond to a request with a defined audience, constraints and purpose.",
          "instructions": [
            "Define audience, purpose, constraints.",
            "Professional-format product."
          ],
          "observe": [
            "Fit to real audience."
          ],
          "limits": [],
          "aiAdaptation": "Allow AI; require use declaration and human sign-off.",
          "example": "Draft a formal email to a local association.",
          "evidenceProduced": "The product delivered for a brief with defined audience, format and constraints, and the decisions taken to meet it.",
          "boundedInference": "That the person adapts their work to concrete external conditions, not just to a school prompt.",
          "cannotInfer": [
            "The product alone says nothing about who made it or with what support.",
            "Meeting the brief does not certify conceptual understanding of the content."
          ],
          "inferenceConditions": [
            "Constraints are checked in the delivered product, one by one.",
            "A brief can be realistic without an outside client or leaving the classroom; there is transfer only if the stated prior learning is applied to new conditions."
          ],
          "whenNotToUse": "When the brief requires resources not all students have.",
          "copyablePrompt": "",
          "coverageNote": "",
          "windowConditions": [
            "Only if a trace of the decisions taken to meet the brief's constraints is kept.",
            "A realistic brief implies neither an outside client nor work beyond the classroom: the transfer layer only holds if there is a new, relevant application of the stated prior learning."
          ],
          "windowRationale": "It can explore transfer if the brief requires deciding and delivering under conditions different from those practised."
        }
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "decision-bajo-restricciones",
      "slug": "decision-bajo-restricciones",
      "url": "https://evidencias-ia-evaluacion.com/evidencia/decision-bajo-restricciones",
      "name_es": "Decisión bajo restricciones",
      "name_en": "Decision under constraints",
      "short_description_es": "Elegir una solución con límites de tiempo, coste, recursos, seguridad o impacto.",
      "short_description_en": "Choose a solution within constraints of time, cost, resources, safety or impact.",
      "family": "escrita-grafica",
      "family_secondary": "oral-dialogica",
      "primary_claim": "decide-criterio",
      "secondary_claims": "transfiere",
      "evidence_kind": "producto",
      "evidence_modes": "producto",
      "stages": "primaria|secundaria|bachillerato|fp|universidad|adultos",
      "areas": "",
      "moments": "durante",
      "purposes": "formativo|calificable",
      "modalities": "escrita|oral",
      "seia_levels": "0|1|2|3",
      "time_min": 15,
      "time_max": 40,
      "teacher_load": "media",
      "participation": "individual",
      "scalability": "cualquiera",
      "collections": "transferencia|grupos-numerosos",
      "ai_relation": "compatible",
      "review_status": "borrador-editorial",
      "version": "v0.13",
      "last_reviewed": "2026-09-06",
      "time_scope": "",
      "learning_windows": "investigacion-decisiones",
      "complementary_layers": "transferencia-real",
      "evidence_origins": "actuacion-provocada",
      "window_selection": "docente",
      "evidence_produced_es": "La decisión tomada ante un conjunto de restricciones y la justificación explícita de las renuncias y del criterio de prioridad usado.",
      "evidence_produced_en": "The decision taken under a set of constraints and the explicit justification of the trade-offs and the priority criterion used.",
      "bounded_inference_es": "Que la persona hace explícitas las renuncias que impone el contexto y jerarquiza criterios de forma explicable.",
      "bounded_inference_en": "That the person makes explicit the trade-offs the context imposes and prioritises criteria in an explainable way.",
      "inference_conditions_es": "Las restricciones y las renuncias se hacen explícitas y se justifican; no hace falta que sean mutuamente incompatibles.",
      "inference_conditions_en": "Constraints and trade-offs are made explicit and justified; they need not be mutually incompatible.",
      "cannot_infer_es": "Cuando caben varias opciones defendibles, la calidad está en el criterio justificado, no en la opción elegida. | No evidencia que la persona actuara igual en una situación real.",
      "cannot_infer_en": "When several defensible options exist, quality lies in the justified criterion, not in the option chosen. | It evidences nothing about how the person would act in a real situation.",
      "when_not_to_use_es": "Cuando el dilema toca situaciones personales sensibles del alumnado.",
      "when_not_to_use_en": "When the dilemma touches students' sensitive personal situations.",
      "content": {
        "es": {
          "name": "Decisión bajo restricciones",
          "shortDescription": "Elegir una solución con límites de tiempo, coste, recursos, seguridad o impacto.",
          "whenToUse": "Cuando hay que elegir con restricciones reales.",
          "minimalVersion": "Elegir una solución con límites de tiempo, coste, recursos, seguridad o impacto.",
          "instructions": [
            "Explicita 3 restricciones no negociables.",
            "Compara al menos 2 alternativas.",
            "Justifica la elección final."
          ],
          "observe": [
            "Las restricciones se respetan y se explicitan."
          ],
          "limits": [],
          "aiAdaptation": "La IA puede simular alternativas; el estudiante decide y firma.",
          "example": "Elegir la mejor solución técnica con presupuesto limitado.",
          "evidenceProduced": "La decisión tomada ante un conjunto de restricciones y la justificación explícita de las renuncias y del criterio de prioridad usado.",
          "boundedInference": "Que la persona hace explícitas las renuncias que impone el contexto y jerarquiza criterios de forma explicable.",
          "cannotInfer": [
            "Cuando caben varias opciones defendibles, la calidad está en el criterio justificado, no en la opción elegida.",
            "No evidencia que la persona actuara igual en una situación real."
          ],
          "inferenceConditions": [
            "Las restricciones y las renuncias se hacen explícitas y se justifican; no hace falta que sean mutuamente incompatibles."
          ],
          "whenNotToUse": "Cuando el dilema toca situaciones personales sensibles del alumnado.",
          "copyablePrompt": "",
          "coverageNote": "",
          "windowConditions": [
            "Solo si se explicita el criterio de prioridad usado y las opciones descartadas.",
            "Las restricciones por sí solas no son transferencia: la capa solo se sostiene si hay aplicación nueva y pertinente del aprendizaje declarado."
          ],
          "windowRationale": "Puede explorar transferencia si las renuncias exigidas obligan a aplicar el criterio en condiciones distintas de las practicadas."
        },
        "en": {
          "name": "Decision under constraints",
          "shortDescription": "Choose a solution within constraints of time, cost, resources, safety or impact.",
          "whenToUse": "When choosing under real constraints.",
          "minimalVersion": "Choose a solution within constraints of time, cost, resources, safety or impact.",
          "instructions": [
            "Set 3 non-negotiable constraints.",
            "Compare at least 2 alternatives.",
            "Justify the final choice."
          ],
          "observe": [
            "Constraints are respected and made explicit."
          ],
          "limits": [],
          "aiAdaptation": "AI can simulate alternatives; the student decides and signs.",
          "example": "Pick the best technical solution within budget.",
          "evidenceProduced": "The decision taken under a set of constraints and the explicit justification of the trade-offs and the priority criterion used.",
          "boundedInference": "That the person makes explicit the trade-offs the context imposes and prioritises criteria in an explainable way.",
          "cannotInfer": [
            "When several defensible options exist, quality lies in the justified criterion, not in the option chosen.",
            "It evidences nothing about how the person would act in a real situation."
          ],
          "inferenceConditions": [
            "Constraints and trade-offs are made explicit and justified; they need not be mutually incompatible."
          ],
          "whenNotToUse": "When the dilemma touches students' sensitive personal situations.",
          "copyablePrompt": "",
          "coverageNote": "",
          "windowConditions": [
            "Only if the priority criterion used and the discarded options are made explicit.",
            "Constraints alone are not transfer: the layer only holds if there is a new, relevant application of the stated prior learning."
          ],
          "windowRationale": "It can explore transfer if the trade-offs required force applying the criterion under conditions different from those practised."
        }
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "solucion-propia-vs-ia",
      "slug": "solucion-propia-frente-a-solucion-de-ia",
      "url": "https://evidencias-ia-evaluacion.com/evidencia/solucion-propia-frente-a-solucion-de-ia",
      "name_es": "Solución propia frente a solución de IA",
      "name_en": "Own solution vs AI solution",
      "short_description_es": "El estudiante compara su primera respuesta con una salida generada, identifica diferencias y construye una versión final justificada.",
      "short_description_en": "The student compares their first answer with an AI output, identifies differences and builds a justified final version.",
      "family": "escrita-grafica",
      "family_secondary": "proceso-evolucion",
      "primary_claim": "usa-ia-critica",
      "secondary_claims": "decide-criterio|comprende",
      "evidence_kind": "producto",
      "evidence_modes": "verificacion-ia|producto",
      "stages": "primaria|secundaria|bachillerato|fp|universidad|adultos",
      "areas": "",
      "moments": "durante|despues",
      "purposes": "formativo|calificable",
      "modalities": "escrita|digital",
      "seia_levels": "2|3",
      "time_min": 15,
      "time_max": 30,
      "teacher_load": "media",
      "participation": "individual",
      "scalability": "cualquiera",
      "collections": "ia-critica|grupos-numerosos",
      "ai_relation": "con-ia",
      "review_status": "borrador-editorial",
      "version": "v0.13",
      "last_reviewed": "2026-09-06",
      "time_scope": "",
      "learning_windows": "uso-ia-herramientas|error-cambio-cognitivo",
      "complementary_layers": "",
      "evidence_origins": "actuacion-provocada|reflexiva",
      "window_selection": "docente",
      "evidence_produced_es": "La solución propia previa, la solución generada por IA y el análisis razonado de las diferencias entre ambas.",
      "evidence_produced_en": "The prior own solution, the AI-generated solution and a reasoned analysis of the differences between them.",
      "bounded_inference_es": "Que la persona tiene criterio para valorar una salida de IA frente a un trabajo propio, con argumentos disciplinares.",
      "bounded_inference_en": "That the person has criteria to judge an AI output against their own work, with disciplinary arguments.",
      "inference_conditions_es": "La solución propia se entrega y se sella antes de consultar la IA. | El análisis debe señalar diferencias concretas, no valoraciones generales.",
      "inference_conditions_en": "The own solution is submitted and time-stamped before consulting the AI. | The analysis must point to concrete differences, not general appraisals.",
      "cannot_infer_es": "Preferir la salida de IA no indica falta de criterio si lo justifica. | No evidencia competencia general en uso de IA fuera de esta tarea.",
      "cannot_infer_en": "Preferring the AI output does not indicate lack of criteria if it is justified. | It evidences no general AI-use competence beyond this task.",
      "when_not_to_use_es": "Cuando el acceso a la herramienta no es equitativo o el nivel SEIA de la tarea no lo permite.",
      "when_not_to_use_en": "When access to the tool is not equitable or the task's SEIA level does not allow it.",
      "content": {
        "es": {
          "name": "Solución propia frente a solución de IA",
          "shortDescription": "El estudiante compara su primera respuesta con una salida generada, identifica diferencias y construye una versión final justificada.",
          "whenToUse": "Tras generar una primera respuesta propia sin IA.",
          "minimalVersion": "El estudiante compara su primera respuesta con una salida generada, identifica diferencias y construye una versión final justificada.",
          "instructions": [
            "Fase 1: respuesta individual sin IA.",
            "Fase 2: obtener una salida de IA con prompt fijo.",
            "Fase 3: identificar 3 diferencias.",
            "Fase 4: versión final justificada indicando qué se aceptó y qué se rechazó."
          ],
          "observe": [
            "Reconoce sesgos, imprecisiones o simplificaciones de la IA."
          ],
          "limits": [],
          "aiAdaptation": "El objetivo mismo requiere IA. Fija el prompt para que sea comparable entre estudiantes.",
          "example": "Ensayo breve corregido tras comparar con salida de IA.",
          "evidenceProduced": "La solución propia previa, la solución generada por IA y el análisis razonado de las diferencias entre ambas.",
          "boundedInference": "Que la persona tiene criterio para valorar una salida de IA frente a un trabajo propio, con argumentos disciplinares.",
          "cannotInfer": [
            "Preferir la salida de IA no indica falta de criterio si lo justifica.",
            "No evidencia competencia general en uso de IA fuera de esta tarea."
          ],
          "inferenceConditions": [
            "La solución propia se entrega y se sella antes de consultar la IA.",
            "El análisis debe señalar diferencias concretas, no valoraciones generales."
          ],
          "whenNotToUse": "Cuando el acceso a la herramienta no es equitativo o el nivel SEIA de la tarea no lo permite.",
          "copyablePrompt": "",
          "coverageNote": "",
          "windowConditions": [
            "Requiere respuesta propia registrada antes de ver la salida de la herramienta."
          ],
          "windowRationale": "El orden (primero propio, después herramienta) es lo que crea el contraste."
        },
        "en": {
          "name": "Own solution vs AI solution",
          "shortDescription": "The student compares their first answer with an AI output, identifies differences and builds a justified final version.",
          "whenToUse": "After producing a first AI-free answer.",
          "minimalVersion": "The student compares their first answer with an AI output, identifies differences and builds a justified final version.",
          "instructions": [
            "Phase 1: individual AI-free answer.",
            "Phase 2: obtain an AI output with a fixed prompt.",
            "Phase 3: identify 3 differences.",
            "Phase 4: justified final version, noting what was kept and rejected."
          ],
          "observe": [
            "Recognises AI biases, inaccuracies or oversimplifications."
          ],
          "limits": [],
          "aiAdaptation": "The task requires AI. Fix the prompt so it is comparable across students.",
          "example": "Short essay revised after comparing with AI output.",
          "evidenceProduced": "The prior own solution, the AI-generated solution and a reasoned analysis of the differences between them.",
          "boundedInference": "That the person has criteria to judge an AI output against their own work, with disciplinary arguments.",
          "cannotInfer": [
            "Preferring the AI output does not indicate lack of criteria if it is justified.",
            "It evidences no general AI-use competence beyond this task."
          ],
          "inferenceConditions": [
            "The own solution is submitted and time-stamped before consulting the AI.",
            "The analysis must point to concrete differences, not general appraisals."
          ],
          "whenNotToUse": "When access to the tool is not equitable or the task's SEIA level does not allow it.",
          "copyablePrompt": "",
          "coverageNote": "",
          "windowConditions": [
            "Requires the student's own answer recorded before seeing the tool's output."
          ],
          "windowRationale": "The order (own answer first, tool second) is what creates the contrast."
        }
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "error-al-cambio",
      "slug": "del-error-al-cambio",
      "url": "https://evidencias-ia-evaluacion.com/evidencia/del-error-al-cambio",
      "name_es": "Del error al cambio",
      "name_en": "From error to change",
      "short_description_es": "El estudiante reconstruye en cinco pasos breves qué pensaba antes, qué resultó insuficiente, qué provocó el cambio, qué comprende ahora y dónde lo aplicaría.",
      "short_description_en": "In five short steps the student reconstructs what they thought before, what proved insufficient, what triggered the change, what they understand now and where they would apply it.",
      "family": "metacognitiva",
      "family_secondary": "proceso-evolucion",
      "primary_claim": "muestra-avance",
      "secondary_claims": "comprende|decide-criterio",
      "evidence_kind": "proceso",
      "evidence_modes": "metacognicion|proceso|transferencia",
      "stages": "primaria|secundaria|bachillerato|fp|universidad|adultos",
      "areas": "",
      "moments": "durante|despues",
      "purposes": "formativo|calificable",
      "modalities": "escrita|oral|digital",
      "seia_levels": "0|1|2|3",
      "time_min": 5,
      "time_max": 15,
      "teacher_load": "media",
      "participation": "individual",
      "scalability": "cualquiera",
      "collections": "grupos-numerosos",
      "ai_relation": "compatible",
      "review_status": "borrador-editorial",
      "version": "v0.13",
      "last_reviewed": "2026-09-06",
      "time_scope": "",
      "learning_windows": "error-cambio-cognitivo|evolucion-borradores",
      "complementary_layers": "",
      "evidence_origins": "reflexiva|natural",
      "window_selection": "docente|estudiante|cocreada",
      "evidence_produced_es": "Una respuesta inicial errónea con fecha, la respuesta posterior a la misma cuestión y la explicación de qué ha cambiado en el razonamiento y por qué.",
      "evidence_produced_en": "A dated initial incorrect answer, the later answer to the same question, and an explanation of what changed in the reasoning and why.",
      "bounded_inference_es": "Que entre ambos momentos ha habido un cambio en el razonamiento sobre esa cuestión concreta, y que la persona puede describirlo.",
      "bounded_inference_en": "That between the two moments there was a change in reasoning about that specific question, and the person can describe it.",
      "inference_conditions_es": "Debe existir línea base registrada, respuesta posterior comparable y explicación del cambio: sin las tres, no se abre la ventana de error y cambio cognitivo. | La aplicación nueva a otra situación es un requisito opcional, y solo cuando se pide explícitamente.",
      "inference_conditions_en": "There must be a recorded baseline, a comparable later answer and an explanation of the change: without all three, the error-and-change window does not open. | A new application to another situation is an optional requirement, and only when explicitly asked for.",
      "cannot_infer_es": "Anticipar dónde podría repetirse el error no es transferencia observada: es una previsión. | El cambio en una cuestión no evidencia cambio en el conjunto del contenido. | La técnica se apoya conceptualmente en Winstone, Gravett y Elkington (2026); no existe evidencia de eficacia propia.",
      "cannot_infer_en": "Anticipating where the error might recur is not observed transfer: it is a forecast. | Change on one question evidences no change across the content as a whole. | The technique draws conceptually on Winstone, Gravett and Elkington (2026); there is no efficacy evidence of its own.",
      "when_not_to_use_es": "Cuando el error inicial no puede registrarse sin exponerlo ante el grupo, o cuando no habrá una segunda oportunidad de responder.",
      "when_not_to_use_en": "When the initial error cannot be recorded without exposing it to the group, or when there will be no second chance to answer.",
      "content": {
        "es": {
          "name": "Del error al cambio",
          "shortDescription": "El estudiante reconstruye en cinco pasos breves qué pensaba antes, qué resultó insuficiente, qué provocó el cambio, qué comprende ahora y dónde lo aplicaría.",
          "whenToUse": "Después de una corrección, un contraejemplo, una devolución entre iguales o un contraste con una salida de IA.",
          "minimalVersion": "Cinco líneas: qué pensaba, qué falló, qué me hizo cambiar, qué entiendo ahora, dónde lo aplicaría.",
          "instructions": [
            "Elige un único momento de cambio: no pidas el historial completo de la tarea.",
            "Pide la idea inicial en una frase, tal y como se pensaba entonces.",
            "Pide el error o el supuesto insuficiente, descrito sin juicio moral.",
            "Pide la fuente del cambio: un dato, un contraejemplo, una corrección entre iguales, una lectura o una respuesta de IA contrastada.",
            "Pide la comprensión actual y una aplicación a una situación nueva y breve.",
            "Léelo junto al trabajo, no de forma aislada, y devuelve una pregunta de seguimiento."
          ],
          "observe": [
            "Diferencia sustantiva, no cosmética, entre la idea inicial y la actual.",
            "Relación explícita entre el desencadenante del cambio y la nueva comprensión.",
            "Transferencia mínima: sabe dónde volvería a aparecer ese error."
          ],
          "limits": [
            "Su fundamento es conceptual (Winstone, Gravett y Elkington, 2026, sobre hacer visible el proceso): no existe evidencia empírica de eficacia de esta técnica concreta.",
            "Anticipar dónde se aplicaría el cambio es una intención declarada, no transferencia observada. Solo la versión reforzada, si añade una aplicación nueva y pertinente realmente realizada, sostiene una inferencia de transferencia observada.",
            "Corregir un error no acredita por sí solo un cambio conceptual: puede ser sustitución de respuesta sin comprensión.",
            "El relato puede reconstruirse a posteriori para agradar al docente; conviene contrastarlo con el trabajo real.",
            "No informa de la estabilidad del cambio: comprobarlo de nuevo más adelante es lo que aporta esa información."
          ],
          "aiAdaptation": "Si la tarea permite IA (SEIA 1 a 3), el desencadenante puede ser una respuesta generada. Pide entonces qué parte de esa respuesta se comprobó y por qué se aceptó o se rechazó, sin exigir el historial completo de conversación.",
          "example": "Una estudiante explica que creía que un promedio alto describía bien al grupo, comprueba con dos conjuntos de datos que la dispersión cambiaba la lectura y propone acompañar siempre la media de una medida de dispersión.",
          "evidenceProduced": "Una respuesta inicial errónea con fecha, la respuesta posterior a la misma cuestión y la explicación de qué ha cambiado en el razonamiento y por qué.",
          "boundedInference": "Que entre ambos momentos ha habido un cambio en el razonamiento sobre esa cuestión concreta, y que la persona puede describirlo.",
          "cannotInfer": [
            "Anticipar dónde podría repetirse el error no es transferencia observada: es una previsión.",
            "El cambio en una cuestión no evidencia cambio en el conjunto del contenido.",
            "La técnica se apoya conceptualmente en Winstone, Gravett y Elkington (2026); no existe evidencia de eficacia propia."
          ],
          "inferenceConditions": [
            "Debe existir línea base registrada, respuesta posterior comparable y explicación del cambio: sin las tres, no se abre la ventana de error y cambio cognitivo.",
            "La aplicación nueva a otra situación es un requisito opcional, y solo cuando se pide explícitamente."
          ],
          "whenNotToUse": "Cuando el error inicial no puede registrarse sin exponerlo ante el grupo, o cuando no habrá una segunda oportunidad de responder.",
          "copyablePrompt": "Explica en cinco frases: (1) qué pensaba al empezar, (2) qué parte resultó insuficiente o errónea, (3) qué evidencia, comentario o contraste me hizo cambiar, (4) qué entiendo ahora, (5) en qué otra situación aplicaría este cambio.",
          "coverageNote": "",
          "windowConditions": [
            "Requiere respuesta inicial conservada, respuesta cambiada y explicación de qué provocó el cambio."
          ],
          "windowRationale": "Está diseñada exactamente para hacer visible el punto de cambio de comprensión."
        },
        "en": {
          "name": "From error to change",
          "shortDescription": "In five short steps the student reconstructs what they thought before, what proved insufficient, what triggered the change, what they understand now and where they would apply it.",
          "whenToUse": "After a correction, a counterexample, peer feedback or a contrast with an AI output.",
          "minimalVersion": "Five lines: what I thought, what failed, what made me change, what I understand now, where I would apply it.",
          "instructions": [
            "Choose a single moment of change: do not ask for the full history of the task.",
            "Ask for the initial idea in one sentence, exactly as it was thought at the time.",
            "Ask for the error or insufficient assumption, described without moral judgement.",
            "Ask for the source of the change: data, a counterexample, peer feedback, a reading or a checked AI answer.",
            "Ask for the current understanding and one application to a short, new situation.",
            "Read it alongside the work, not in isolation, and return one follow-up question."
          ],
          "observe": [
            "Substantive, not cosmetic, difference between the initial and current idea.",
            "Explicit link between the trigger of the change and the new understanding.",
            "Minimal transfer: they know where that error would appear again."
          ],
          "limits": [
            "Its grounding is conceptual (Winstone, Gravett and Elkington, 2026, on making the process visible): there is no empirical evidence of this specific technique's effectiveness.",
            "Anticipating where the change would apply is a stated intention, not observed transfer. Only the reinforced version, if it adds a genuinely new and pertinent application actually carried out, supports an inference of observed transfer.",
            "Correcting an error does not by itself certify conceptual change: it may be answer substitution without understanding.",
            "The account can be reconstructed after the fact to please the teacher; it should be contrasted with the actual work.",
            "It says nothing about how stable the change is: only a later re-check provides that."
          ],
          "aiAdaptation": "If the task allows AI (SEIA 1 to 3), the trigger may be a generated answer. Ask which part of that answer was checked and why it was accepted or rejected, without requiring the full chat history.",
          "example": "A student explains she believed a high average described the group well, checks two data sets showing dispersion changed the reading, and proposes always pairing the mean with a measure of spread.",
          "evidenceProduced": "A dated initial incorrect answer, the later answer to the same question, and an explanation of what changed in the reasoning and why.",
          "boundedInference": "That between the two moments there was a change in reasoning about that specific question, and the person can describe it.",
          "cannotInfer": [
            "Anticipating where the error might recur is not observed transfer: it is a forecast.",
            "Change on one question evidences no change across the content as a whole.",
            "The technique draws conceptually on Winstone, Gravett and Elkington (2026); there is no efficacy evidence of its own."
          ],
          "inferenceConditions": [
            "There must be a recorded baseline, a comparable later answer and an explanation of the change: without all three, the error-and-change window does not open.",
            "A new application to another situation is an optional requirement, and only when explicitly asked for."
          ],
          "whenNotToUse": "When the initial error cannot be recorded without exposing it to the group, or when there will be no second chance to answer.",
          "copyablePrompt": "Explain in five sentences: (1) what I thought at the start, (2) which part proved insufficient or wrong, (3) what evidence, comment or contrast made me change, (4) what I understand now, (5) in which other situation I would apply this change.",
          "coverageNote": "",
          "windowConditions": [
            "Requires the initial answer kept, the changed answer, and an explanation of what caused the change."
          ],
          "windowRationale": "It is designed precisely to make the point of conceptual change visible."
        }
      }
    }
  ]
}